Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,281 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#254576 Apr 3, 2013
behold the lonely shills wrote:
in the past 10 hours 13 out of 14 posts from the govie shills...you guys seem awfully lonely now that most of the truthers are gone and don't even want to bother arguing with you anymore. I guess in your puny delusional minds that means you have won this debate, eh shills?
Go back to sleep junkie boy-sheep 20 pilots STREET CORNER JEEBUS.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#254577 Apr 3, 2013
Don wrote:
<quoted text>There was a period of free-fall for the entire visible perimeter of WTC-7. This can be easily verified by anyone who understands how to determine free-fall acceleration in a video (and physics teacher David Chandler provides lessons to anyone who needs schooling -- including the NIST "investigators"!) Yes, even NIST has conceded a period of free fall for WTC-7.

You are an unrepentant and shameless liar. You accuse others of speculating, and yet your links are at best speculative (as is evident from the prominent role of words like "may have" and "probable" and "hypothesized." On the other hand, you deny FACTS (like the period of symmetric free-fall of the WTC-7 roof line) that undermine these speculations.

Here are actual experiments done with conventional thermite as a way of cutting through steel beams. You will see first hand that it is possible.

The fact that sophisticated thermitic pyrotechnic material has been found in the World Trade Center dust confirms demolition beyond all doubt.
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/e...

Demolition means that 9/11 was an inside job.
NIST never "conceded" anything. Free fall was evident in the draft report and although moronic twoofers attempt to claim it proves demolition, they've never qualified such a claim.

There's hundreds of real cd videos available yet not once has a twoofer shown that known cd's include any portion of free fall much proven that free fall is an inherent characteristic of cd.

And they found paint.
BibleVideo

AOL

#254578 Apr 3, 2013
.

NEARING RAPTURE ---- Who goes?.....Who stays?

http://youtu.be/LVvXgkOK-84

.
Sierra

Amsterdam, Netherlands

#254579 Apr 3, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
NIST never "conceded" anything. Free fall was evident in the draft report and although moronic twoofers attempt to claim it proves demolition, they've never qualified such a claim.
There's hundreds of real cd videos available yet not once has a twoofer shown that known cd's include any portion of free fall much proven that free fall is an inherent characteristic of cd.
And they found paint.
Can you quote the passage(s) from the draft report that acknowledge a period of free fall for the roof line of WTC 7?

Here is a link to the draft document:

http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm...

The significance of free fall (as you well know) is that it requires the complete absence of structural support or resistance or deflection. If the falling upper floors are causing structural supports below to bend or crumple or deflect, then the falling floors will not be in free fall. The structure below will cause the upper block to slow (or even stop). But if the upper floors are falling at gravitational acceleration (free fall), then they contributed ZERO energy to the destruction of the lower floors. The destruction of the lower floors was caused by something else.

What you insist is "paint" was found in abundant quantities in the dust after the destruction of the Towers and WTC7. This "paint," when ignited, gives off a great deal of energy in a very small amount of time. A byproduct of combustion of this "paint" is a spray of molten iron (indicating extremely high temperatures and vigorous reaction)-- which soon cools and solidifies into tiny iron-rich spheres. Tiny iron rich spheres are also found in abundant quantities in the World Trade Center dust

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254580 Apr 3, 2013
why donít you follow your link and read the report Stupid, read how the internal support structure collapsed before the outer facade began to fall, read how 12 floors of support collapsed and thatís what lead to the very brief period of near free fall ... read, understand, learn, overcome ignorance
Sierra wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you quote the passage(s) from the draft report that acknowledge a period of free fall for the roof line of WTC 7?
Here is a link to the draft document:
http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm...
The significance of free fall (as you well know) is that it requires the complete absence of structural support or resistance or deflection. If the falling upper floors are causing structural supports below to bend or crumple or deflect, then the falling floors will not be in free fall. The structure below will cause the upper block to slow (or even stop). But if the upper floors are falling at gravitational acceleration (free fall), then they contributed ZERO energy to the destruction of the lower floors. The destruction of the lower floors was caused by something else.
What you insist is "paint" was found in abundant quantities in the dust after the destruction of the Towers and WTC7. This "paint," when ignited, gives off a great deal of energy in a very small amount of time. A byproduct of combustion of this "paint" is a spray of molten iron (indicating extremely high temperatures and vigorous reaction)-- which soon cools and solidifies into tiny iron-rich spheres. Tiny iron rich spheres are also found in abundant quantities in the World Trade Center dust
Heisenberg

Absecon, NJ

#254581 Apr 3, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
why donít you follow your link and read the report Stupid, read how the internal support structure collapsed before the outer facade began to fall, read how 12 floors of support collapsed and thatís what lead to the very brief period of near free fall ... read, understand, learn, overcome ignorance
<quoted text>
The discussion was about NIST's alleged acknowledgement of the free fall drop of the roof line in the draft report. Can you help your friend out by finding the quote?

Are you fond of "Road Runner" cartoons, where the characters just hang in mid-air even as the supporting ground beneath them has disappeared? Can you describe -- or quote NIST's description-- of the sequence of events that would cause the entire visible perimeter to accelerate from a standstill to 9.8 meters/second/second, while allegedly the supports for this visible perimeter are undergoing a gradual progressive failure?

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#254582 Apr 3, 2013
No 911 was not.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#254583 Apr 3, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
You calling me a govie shill?
That makes you a liar and a fool. The government case has been closed for over ten years Twoofer shill. OTOH I can call you a Twoofer shill because you are still trying to pedal your conspiracy snake oil.
ROTFLMAO
TWOOFER SHILL
Ditto!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#254584 Apr 3, 2013
Heisenberg wrote:
<quoted text>
The discussion was about NIST's alleged acknowledgement of the free fall drop of the roof line in the draft report. Can you help your friend out by finding the quote?
Are you fond of "Road Runner" cartoons, where the characters just hang in mid-air even as the supporting ground beneath them has disappeared? Can you describe -- or quote NIST's description-- of the sequence of events that would cause the entire visible perimeter to accelerate from a standstill to 9.8 meters/second/second, while allegedly the supports for this visible perimeter are undergoing a gradual progressive failure?
Looney Tune analogies? That's appropriate considering the source
David

Anonymous Proxy

#254588 Apr 3, 2013
Chaumette wrote:
<quoted text>
Looney Tune analogies? That's appropriate considering the source
Defenders of the official 9/11 fiction seem to be fond of cartoons. Efforts have to be made often to point out that, in real life, there are laws of physics that cannot be circumvented.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254589 Apr 3, 2013
who cares if they acknowledged it, it is of no signifigance
Heisenberg wrote:
<quoted text>
The discussion was about NIST's alleged acknowledgement of the free fall drop of the roof line in the draft report. Can you help your friend out by finding the quote?
Are you fond of "Road Runner" cartoons, where the characters just hang in mid-air even as the supporting ground beneath them has disappeared? Can you describe -- or quote NIST's description-- of the sequence of events that would cause the entire visible perimeter to accelerate from a standstill to 9.8 meters/second/second, while allegedly the supports for this visible perimeter are undergoing a gradual progressive failure?

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254590 Apr 3, 2013
WTC 7's collapse, viewed from the exterior (most videos were taken from the north), did appear to fall almost uniformly as a single unit. This occurred because the interior failures that took place did not cause the exterior framing to fail until the final stages of the building collapse. The interior floor framing and columns collapsed downward and pulled away from the exterior frame. There were clues that internal damage was taking place, prior to the downward movement of the exterior frame, such as when the east penthouse fell downward into the building and windows broke out on the north face at the ends of the building core. The symmetric appearance of the downward fall of the WTC 7 was primarily due to the greater stiffness and strength of its exterior frame relative to the interior framing.
Heisenberg wrote:
<quoted text>
The discussion was about NIST's alleged acknowledgement of the free fall drop of the roof line in the draft report. Can you help your friend out by finding the quote?
Are you fond of "Road Runner" cartoons, where the characters just hang in mid-air even as the supporting ground beneath them has disappeared? Can you describe -- or quote NIST's description-- of the sequence of events that would cause the entire visible perimeter to accelerate from a standstill to 9.8 meters/second/second, while allegedly the supports for this visible perimeter are undergoing a gradual progressive failure?

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#254591 Apr 3, 2013
Mr Opinion wrote:
To take a line from the movie "Cool Hand Luke "What we have here ..is a failure to communicate"
Good One!

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254592 Apr 3, 2013
thats funny coming from the guys who want to know why when an airplane slams into a re-enforced concrete building at 500mph the wings and tail don't survive ??
David wrote:
<quoted text>
Defenders of the official 9/11 fiction seem to be fond of cartoons. Efforts have to be made often to point out that, in real life, there are laws of physics that cannot be circumvented.
Harrit

Netherlands

#254594 Apr 3, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
who cares if they acknowledged it, it is of no signifigance
<quoted text>
The free fall drop of the WTC 7 roof is of no significance?! This demonstrates beyond all doubt that your unschooled opinion is of no significance!

Also, I take this as admission on your part that NIST did not acknowledge free fall in the draft report and that they were forced to concede this after the issue was pressed during the public questioning at the August 2008 Technical Briefing.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254595 Apr 3, 2013
So why dont you explain to us what the significance is
Harrit wrote:
<quoted text>
The free fall drop of the WTC 7 roof is of no significance?! This demonstrates beyond all doubt that your unschooled opinion is of no significance!
Also, I take this as admission on your part that NIST did not acknowledge free fall in the draft report and that they were forced to concede this after the issue was pressed during the public questioning at the August 2008 Technical Briefing.
Kcalberaswejlaer eht

Oklahoma City, OK

#254596 Apr 3, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
At least I looked at facts and evidence which proved my previous position wrong. You are plainly stuck on stupid. Why post this crap? It only makes you look all the more ignorant and misguided. Oh that's right.
You don't have a life.
He isn't lying. I remembered you saying to Charlie Sheen that you "like to mess with people" even if it means taking an unpopular position. This is proof that you were just faking your original stance of 911 being an inside job.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254598 Apr 3, 2013
why is it Twoof Twits can never tell us why free fall is significant ??
Trier

HŲst, Germany

#254600 Apr 3, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
why is it Twoof Twits can never tell us why free fall is significant ??
The explanations are here but they leap over your head
McCloud

Glasgow, UK

#254601 Apr 3, 2013
Trier wrote:
<quoted text>
The explanations are here but they leap over your head
That is the truth! See for example www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04T49GGG7...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 min Liam 579,472
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 10 min Paul Porter1 818,492
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 11 min mike 609,999
Will Satan, fallen demons, and lost human be i... 15 min giddy up 4
gay bottom in gurgaon (May '14) 23 min monu top ggn 14
Most incredible Mystery of all-time: an Eternal... 41 min giddy up 13
my wife neha ki chudai (May '14) 1 hr rajevas 8
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 4 hr River Tam 2,054
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 8 hr RiccardoFire 39,987
More from around the web