I am certain that the "9.8" that appears in the Table is not a measure of acceleration. The words "free fall" or "gravitational acceleration" do not appear in the Table you indicate. There is no data showing acceleration, period. You are pretending to have accomplished something with this effort?<quoted text>1) Table 3-1 pg. 39 of the draft shows a table which includes the free fall portion of the collapse.
Here is the claim that you promised to refute:
Porkpie:There was a period of free-fall for the entire visible perimeter of WTC-7. This can be easily verified by anyone who understands how to determine free-fall acceleration in a video (and physics teacher David Chandler provides lessons to anyone who needs schooling -- including the NIST "investigators"!) Yes, even NIST has conceded a period of free fall for WTC-7.
Sierra:NIST never "conceded" anything. Free fall was evident in the draft report
Porkpie:Can you quote the passage(s) from the draft report that acknowledge a period of free fall for the roof line of WTC 7?
Here is a link to the draft document:
Porkpie:Of course I can but I'll do it from my laptop at home since opening PDF docs is too cumbersome on a phone.
The word "includes" is not properly used. There is no acknowledgement in that Table on page 39 of the period free fall acceleration.Table 3-1 pg. 39 of the draft shows a table which includes the free fall portion of the collapse.