Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254604 Apr 3, 2013
LMAO .... at what engineering school did you learn this ??
Don wrote:
When an object is in free fall, none of its gravitational potential energy is available for crushing or deformation or deflection or otherwise contributing to the destruction of or imparting of force and momentum to anything below the free-falling object. The structural integrity below was destroyed entirely by something else.
Colette

Donetsk, Ukraine

#254605 Apr 3, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
LMAO .... at what engineering school did you learn this ??
<quoted text>
This is taught in primary physics class. It is basic Newtonian physics. You should study before demonstrating your ignorance in discussions!

Since: Jan 11

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#254606 Apr 3, 2013
The Pittsfield MA Truck Driving Institute
YellowPissreality wrote:
LMAO .... at what engineering school did you learn this ??
<quoted text>

Since: Jan 11

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#254608 Apr 3, 2013
I bet you learned about it on a Twoofer website
Stephan wrote:
<quoted text>
Conservation of energy is a fundamental law of nature. I learned about it in high school... and probably middle school. And I'm sure I heard about it even before these classes.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254609 Apr 3, 2013
Can anybody explain why the 32 story land Mark Tower in Texas, the tallest building ever brought down by a CD, did not fall in free fall accleration ????

Did the CD company do something wrong ???
It took them over 4 months to wire the building???
Did the laws of physics take a day off ???
Why no free fall ???
Euler

Netherlands

#254610 Apr 3, 2013
Sierra wrote:
...
The significance of free fall (as you well know) is that it requires the complete absence of structural support or resistance or deflection. If the falling upper floors are causing structural supports below to bend or crumple or deflect, then the falling floors will not be in free fall. The structure below will cause the upper block to slow (or even stop). But if the upper floors are falling at gravitational acceleration (free fall), then they contributed ZERO energy to the destruction of the lower floors. The destruction of the lower floors was caused by something else.
...t
Well stated, thank you!

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254611 Apr 3, 2013
Why are you talking to yourself Proxy Sock Puppet
Euler wrote:
<quoted text>
Well stated, thank you!

“The Biggest Liar on Topix”

Since: Jan 11

Pittsfield, MA

#254613 Apr 3, 2013
Maybe it was magic
YellowPissreality wrote:
Can anybody explain why the 32 story land Mark Tower in Texas, the tallest building ever brought down by a CD, did not fall in free fall accleration ????
Did the CD company do something wrong ???
It took them over 4 months to wire the building???
Did the laws of physics take a day off ???
Why no free fall ???

“The Biggest Liar on Topix”

Since: Jan 11

Pittsfield, MA

#254614 Apr 3, 2013
I learned how to be a Chef there
Timestin wrote:
The Pittsfield MA Truck Driving Institute
<quoted text>

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254617 Apr 3, 2013
I asked you a question Proxy Sock, so stop being a Twoofer sheep and running away from questions. You Idiots claim free fall is a condition caused by CD so why can't you find a single CD that comes down in free fall ?? I'll tell you why, it's because you are all idiots without clue one about engineering or physics and you swallow everything you read on Twoofer websites created by bigger morons then you .... but Good Luck with that
Jacob wrote:
<quoted text>
Go back and finish high school! Ask your physics teacher!
By the way, WTC7 was 47 stories and an obvious implosion. WTC 1 and 2 were each 110 stories. They hold the record for tallest demolitions, although they were very messy indeed!

Since: Jan 11

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#254619 Apr 3, 2013
HAAAHAHAAAAHAAAAAHAAAA .... why did they cut out the part with the massive 130db explosions in the Land Mark Tower video ?

You guys are a bunch of clowns

The complete Land Mark Tower implosions ... Nothing like any building at the WTC

Stewart wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is a side by side comparison of Land Mark demolition with WTC-7 demolition:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Gerald

Absecon, NJ

#254620 Apr 3, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
I asked you a question Proxy Sock, so stop being a Twoofer sheep and running away from questions. You Idiots claim free fall is a condition caused by CD so why can't you find a single CD that comes down in free fall ?? I'll tell you why, it's because you are all idiots without clue one about engineering or physics and you swallow everything you read on Twoofer websites created by bigger morons then you .... but Good Luck with that
<quoted text>
Oooh! Yellow Piss demands answers! Problem is, Yellow Piss doesn't understand the answers.

Or isn't paid to understand the answers.
911 was an inside job

Austin, TX

#254621 Apr 3, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
I asked you a question Proxy Sock, so stop being a Twoofer sheep and running away from questions. You Idiots claim free fall is a condition caused by CD so why can't you find a single CD that comes down in free fall ?? I'll tell you why, it's because you are all idiots without clue one about engineering or physics and you swallow everything you read on Twoofer websites created by bigger morons then you .... but Good Luck with that
<quoted text>
You're funny! I see lots of folks providing answers to your questions, but I don't detect a glimmer of comprehension on your part. But that's because you are a shill, a defender of mass murderers.

I'd say people have been giving you much more credit than you're worth.

Since: Jan 11

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#254625 Apr 3, 2013
You idiots have claimed that free fall can only be a result of a CD, my question is why the Land Mark Tower did not come down in free fall if it was brought down by a CD ???
Pamgren wrote:
<quoted text>
your queston has been answered! If something is not in free falling that means it is encounter structural resistanse. Even in control demoliton offan there is resistanse. if no resistanse that means resistanse has been +++COMPLETLY+++ destroy
Hilerova

Ivanovo, Russia

#254628 Apr 3, 2013
is truth the attack was USA operation

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#254629 Apr 3, 2013
Sierra wrote:
<quoted text>Can you quote the passage(s) from the draft report that acknowledge a period of free fall for the roof line of WTC 7?

Here is a link to the draft document:

http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm...

The significance of free fall (as you well know) is that it requires the complete absence of structural support or resistance or deflection. If the falling upper floors are causing structural supports below to bend or crumple or deflect, then the falling floors will not be in free fall. The structure below will cause the upper block to slow (or even stop). But if the upper floors are falling at gravitational acceleration (free fall), then they contributed ZERO energy to the destruction of the lower floors. The destruction of the lower floors was caused by something else.

What you insist is "paint" was found in abundant quantities in the dust after the destruction of the Towers and WTC7. This "paint," when ignited, gives off a great deal of energy in a very small amount of time. A byproduct of combustion of this "paint" is a spray of molten iron (indicating extremely high temperatures and vigorous reaction)-- which soon cools and solidifies into tiny iron-rich spheres. Tiny iron rich spheres are also found in abundant quantities in the World Trade Center dust
1) Of course I can but I'll do it from my laptop at home since opening PDF docs is too cumbersome on a phone.

2) Simply repeating the same stupidity over and over with dozens of socks won't make your delusions true.

Your charlatan masters have never presented any argument that proves the only way for structural support to fail is by explosives or incendiaries.

Fire has been a known threat to steel structures for as long as steel structures have existed.

3) Any organic compound will combust in air and things like paper and peanut butter release more energy. The test was a joke that had one purpose, to feed the flock of fools gullible enough to believe it had any relevance.

And I'll post a video later of a guy melting melting steel wool with a bic lighter and creating the same iron spherules.

Steel wool is actually thicker than the grey layer, which is just metal scale, found on these chips.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#254630 Apr 3, 2013
Don wrote:
When an object is in free fall, none of its gravitational potential energy is available for crushing or deformation or deflection or otherwise contributing to the destruction of or imparting of force and momentum to anything below the free-falling object. The structural integrity below was destroyed entirely by something else.
Very good STREET CORNER JEEBUS, now prove that something else can't be structural failure due to fire.

Go!

Since: Jan 11

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#254631 Apr 3, 2013
Classic Twoofer non-answer answer, and you call other people sheep HAHAHAHAAHAA
Nigel wrote:
Attention Timestin/YellowPiss/etc.:
I, too, could give you an answer to your query regarding the relationship of freefall to demolition, but first I'd have to invent a time machine and go back in time and persuade your mother not to indulge in so much alcohol and drugs while she was pregnant with you. Otherwise my answer, like those already posted, would be meaningless to you.
Hey, good luck there, kid!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#254632 Apr 3, 2013
Jacob wrote:
<quoted text>Go back and finish high school! Ask your physics teacher!

By the way, WTC7 was 47 stories and an obvious implosion. WTC 1 and 2 were each 110 stories. They hold the record for tallest demolitions, although they were very messy indeed!
Sorry proxy sock, but the laymen's definition if implosion is falling in on itself.

It actually fell in on itself as well as on other structures so your twoof sanctioned meme stands up about as well as Harrit's "thermite" paper.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#254633 Apr 3, 2013
Stewart wrote:
<quoted text>Here is a side by side comparison of Land Mark demolition with WTC-7 demolition:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =D7Rm6ZFROmcXX&t=12
That's not what he's asking.

Can you produce an analysis of other CDs that proves free fall is inherent to controlled demolitions?

We already know the answer is no...so why are you standing there holding a bog of sh$t and claiming it's really apple blossoms?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 min Robert F 653,876
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 3 min Dr Banonator 63,644
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 16 min New Age Spiritual... 973,742
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 17 min Annaleigh 106,489
Straight c**k 26 min Horny 1
Talk to Demi Lovato (Jul '08) 45 min Jess 728
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 47 min New Age Spiritual... 618,733
More from around the web