created by: djhixx | Oct 13, 2007

Top Stories

53,487 votes

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Click on an option to vote

  • yes
  • no
  • well, im not sure
Comments
235,981 - 236,000 of 257,831 Comments Last updated 46 min ago

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254110
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

1

Werner wrote:
<quoted text>
Some chunks of the towers were moving faster because they were being propelled by late-firing explosives!
Multi-toin chunks of a building don't "fly out" in all directions hundreds of feet in a gravity driven collapse.
False claim. They flew out because of the air being forced out between the floors as they collapsed. Besides, they still descended at free fall speed while the rest of the building descended at a lower rate of speed. No evidence of explosive devices has been found by anyone.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254111
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

1

onemale wrote:
This is just a few of the many 9/11 Coincidences
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =kRFha40XfT8XX
Coincidences don't count. Facts and evidence do.
ClearWater

Anonymous Proxy

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254112
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

5

4

WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
False claim. They flew out because of the air being forced out between the floors as they collapsed. Besides, they still descended at free fall speed while the rest of the building descended at a lower rate of speed. No evidence of explosive devices has been found by anyone.


Anyone can see with their own eyes!

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254113
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

6

2

1

That you are a Sock Puppet
ClearWater wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =pre2lIlbyQoXX
Anyone can see with their own eyes!

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254114
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

5

2

1

Hey Sock Puppet, how much energy was released by each tower during the collpases ?
Werner wrote:
<quoted text>
Some chunks of the towers were moving faster because they were being propelled by late-firing explosives!
Multi-toin chunks of a building don't "fly out" in all directions hundreds of feet in a gravity driven collapse.
Truth Teller

Centerville, UT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254117
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

5

RADECKTs SOCK wrote:
how much energy was released by each tower during the collpases ?
<quoted text>
The presence of so many tons of nanothermitic pyrotechnic material in the buildings, discovered by researchers later in the dust, guarantees that the energy released was sufficient to destroy the tough steel core columns and dense perimeter structure. Gravity alone could not have brought the entire building down, and gravity certainly wasn't responsible for the horizontal forces that blew the towers apart in every direction.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254118
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

6

3

3

WRONG Sock Puppet, an independent lab tested dust samples in Feb 2012 and found no thermite ... try keeping up Dim Wit
Truth Teller wrote:
<quoted text>
The presence of so many tons of nanothermitic pyrotechnic material in the buildings, discovered by researchers later in the dust, guarantees that the energy released was sufficient to destroy the tough steel core columns and dense perimeter structure. Gravity alone could not have brought the entire building down, and gravity certainly wasn't responsible for the horizontal forces that blew the towers apart in every direction.
Van der Holleen

Amsterdam, Netherlands

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254119
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

6

4

4

mini radish wrote:
WRONG Sock Puppet, an independent lab tested dust samples in Feb 2012 and found no thermite ... try keeping up Dim Wit
<quoted text>
Well, next time you perform the test, try igniting the pyrotechnic material in the dust with sufficiently high energy source (torch) and watch them flash and produce molten iron droplets, a product of thermite reaction.

But your mother may not appreciate you using your basement room for pyrotechnic experiments.
Mark

Crofton, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254120
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

6

i own 9-11, myself,Tom,rade etc...have already proved everything there is abouyt this, clearly a Terrorist operation..No Government Involvment what so ever..so move along

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254121
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

ClearWater wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =pre2lIlbyQoXX
Anyone can see with their own eyes!
Chandler has been debunked. What an idiot.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254122
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

Truth Teller wrote:
<quoted text>
The presence of so many tons of nanothermitic pyrotechnic material in the buildings, discovered by researchers later in the dust, guarantees that the energy released was sufficient to destroy the tough steel core columns and dense perimeter structure. Gravity alone could not have brought the entire building down, and gravity certainly wasn't responsible for the horizontal forces that blew the towers apart in every direction.
Nonsense. More false claims.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254123
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

Mark wrote:
i own 9-11, myself,Tom,rade etc...have already proved everything there is abouyt this, clearly a Terrorist operation..No Government Involvment what so ever..so move along
Exactly.
Your Teacher

Nürnberg, Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254125
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

11

10

10

Researcher Jonathan Cole, summarizes the physical evidence and other forms of solid evidence, which indicates sophisticated demolition at the World Trade Center, and then he demonstrates how even the conventional variants of thermite can cut through the steel structure. The advanced nanothermitic materials that have been found by multiple researchers are much more efficient than the conventional incendiaries that Jonathan Cole uses to successfully cut steel beams. Watch

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254126
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Your Teacher wrote:
Researcher Jonathan Cole, summarizes the physical evidence and other forms of solid evidence, which indicates sophisticated demolition at the World Trade Center, and then he demonstrates how even the conventional variants of thermite can cut through the steel structure. The advanced nanothermitic materials that have been found by multiple researchers are much more efficient than the conventional incendiaries that Jonathan Cole uses to successfully cut steel beams. Watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =JLrPxFCLNkAXX
More nonsense devoid of any tangible evidence or common sense. What's wrong with the fact the buildings fell because of catastrophic damage caused by fully fueled airplanes crashed into them at full speed? Kind of obvious isn't it?
Erik

Anonymous Proxy

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254127
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

9

8

7

WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
More nonsense devoid of any tangible evidence or common sense. What's wrong with the fact the buildings fell because of catastrophic damage caused by fully fueled airplanes crashed into them at full speed? Kind of obvious isn't it?
What is wrong is, number one, it is not a "fact",
and number 2, the Towers did not "fall" - they were blown apart violently, as is obvious in the news footage
and number 3, the airplanes were not "fully fueled"
and number 4, the Towers were designed to sustain airplane impacts, as they obviously did

The fires in the impact zones were burning out. However, there were explosives detonating on other floors of the Towers, as we could hear on the fireman radios and as we learned from testimony of firefighters who survived blasts that had nothing to do with the plane impacts. It is quite obvious from the way the Towers were being blown very quickly apart that these were not structural failures from fire and impact!


https://www.youtube.com/watch...
Convar

Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254128
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

7

5

Hard disks that were recovered from the ground Zero and cleaned in a sophisticated procedure revealed evidence of financial crimes

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254129
Mar 16, 2013
 
because we all know that the ONLY thing that explodes in a fire is ..... Explosives

House Fire Triggers Massive Explosion - Firefighter Injured
FireFightingNews.com

(Oregon)- At 12:26 am on November 29th Canby Firefighters responded to a house fire located at 12777 S. Union Hall Rd. Upon arrival, firefighters found a home fully involved in fire. The home was located on an 18-acre rural home-site, which had a very long, very narrow, and very dark driveway that looked much like others driveways. Firefighters had to literally guess as to which driveway might lead them to the burning home, and fortunately, they chose the correct driveway the first time. Firefighters were forced to park their fire engine about 200 feet from the home and deployed an exterior defensive attack.

At 1:09 AM, 23 minutes after firefighters initially started fire-ground operations, a massive explosion rocked the fire scene. Within seconds, firefighters heard the ominous words over their radios, "Firefighter Down." Firefighter Raina Eshleman had suffered and injury, and her fellow firefighters, John Footman and Andrew Gordian rushed to her aid, and quickly removed her from the hazard area.
Erik wrote:
<quoted text>
What is wrong is, number one, it is not a "fact",
and number 2, the Towers did not "fall" - they were blown apart violently, as is obvious in the news footage
and number 3, the airplanes were not "fully fueled"
and number 4, the Towers were designed to sustain airplane impacts, as they obviously did
The fires in the impact zones were burning out. However, there were explosives detonating on other floors of the Towers, as we could hear on the fireman radios and as we learned from testimony of firefighters who survived blasts that had nothing to do with the plane impacts. It is quite obvious from the way the Towers were being blown very quickly apart that these were not structural failures from fire and impact!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =IO1ps1mzU8oXX
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
van Eyke

Amsterdam, Netherlands

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254130
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

YellowPissreality wrote:
because we all know that the ONLY thing that explodes in a fire is ..... Explosives
House Fire Triggers Massive Explosion - Firefighter Injured
FireFightingNews.com
(Oregon)- At 12:26 am on November 29th Canby Firefighters responded to a house fire located at 12777 S. Union Hall Rd. Upon arrival, firefighters found a home fully involved in fire. The home was located on an 18-acre rural home-site, which had a very long, very narrow, and very dark driveway that looked much like others driveways. Firefighters had to literally guess as to which driveway might lead them to the burning home, and fortunately, they chose the correct driveway the first time. Firefighters were forced to park their fire engine about 200 feet from the home and deployed an exterior defensive attack.
At 1:09 AM, 23 minutes after firefighters initially started fire-ground operations, a massive explosion rocked the fire scene. Within seconds, firefighters heard the ominous words over their radios, "Firefighter Down." Firefighter Raina Eshleman had suffered and injury, and her fellow firefighters, John Footman and Andrew Gordian rushed to her aid, and quickly removed her from the hazard area.
<quoted text>
This is a red herring, yes? What does this have to do with explosions that are many many meters from the fire, and in some cases <<BEFORE>> the airplains hit the building?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254131
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Erik wrote:
<quoted text>
What is wrong is, number one, it is not a "fact",
and number 2, the Towers did not "fall" - they were blown apart violently, as is obvious in the news footage
and number 3, the airplanes were not "fully fueled"
and number 4, the Towers were designed to sustain airplane impacts, as they obviously did
The fires in the impact zones were burning out. However, there were explosives detonating on other floors of the Towers, as we could hear on the fireman radios and as we learned from testimony of firefighters who survived blasts that had nothing to do with the plane impacts. It is quite obvious from the way the Towers were being blown very quickly apart that these were not structural failures from fire and impact!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =IO1ps1mzU8oXX
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
It is a fact unless you can prove otherwise. So far there are many far fetched opinions but no evidence to back any of those claims.

The towers stood for a little over two hours before metal fatigue and truss bolts sheared causing them to collapse.

The two airplanes had just taken off from nearby airports. They had plenty of fuel on board to reach their destinations.

The towers did sustain the immediate impact but were not designed to be flown into at full speed with fully fueled planes of that size. Besides, this is the test of the engineering. They actually held up pretty well.

There were no explosives. What was heard was structural failure. I see you have no experience with things letting go under pressure, I have.

The firefighters spoke of undetermined secondary explosions common in fires of that size.

It is obvious the towers failed. It is equally obvious there was no evidence of explosive devices.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254132
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

ZERO explosions before plane impacts
van Eyke wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a red herring, yes? What does this have to do with explosions that are many many meters from the fire, and in some cases <<BEFORE>> the airplains hit the building?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 10 min June VanDerMark 538,771
Why do BLACK People hate Mexicans so much? (Dec '13) 15 min Yourbrainisbroke 297
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 15 min atheism is destru... 732,691
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 19 min bacon hater 94,632
Appjoy invite code 19 min Im Rk9 43
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 24 min Chosen Holy Dr Sh... 599,771
Last Word + 2 27 min Hannah V 488
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 3 hr Chris Clearwater 173,271
•••
Enter and win $5000

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••