Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#254245 Mar 21, 2013
High Ranking US Major General
Exposes September 11 High
This is based on his 30+ years of expertise



Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254247 Mar 21, 2013
YAWN.... BORING thread.
Charlie Sheen

Matthews, NC

#254248 Mar 21, 2013
onemale wrote:
High Ranking US Major General
Exposes September 11 High
This is based on his 30+ years of expertise
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =W0xzsbSbVUEXX
That's the nutter that claims there are Psychic Super Soldiers who can walk through walls, turn invisible and kill with their minds from half way around the world.

I'd say 30 plus years of lunacy.
Charlie Sheen

Matthews, NC

#254249 Mar 21, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
I have seen all the evidence I need.
You won't bother checking out the links... so why should I bother posting them?
In other words you made it all up!
Charlie Sheen

Matthews, NC

#254250 Mar 21, 2013
Adam wrote:
The illuminati goverment did it. Illuminatis have a pact with the devil from the lowest to the highest degree.The illuminatis made then a pact with Al Qaida to hijack planes to kill americans to find some reasons to invade in Iraq and Afghanistan.
I accuse the former government of complicity.The method of Al Qaida is also inspired by the devil. They abuse religions for killing innocents. God clearly said in all three abrahamic religions:Thou shall not kill innocents, thou shall not abuse my name.
Did Steve tell you this nutty crap, he will say anything, he's just trying to get in your pants again.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254252 Mar 21, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
That's the nutter that claims there are Psychic Super Soldiers who can walk through walls, turn invisible and kill with their minds from half way around the world.
I'd say 30 plus years of lunacy.
You mean to tell me super soldiers can't walk right through solid walls? Whoda guessed?
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#254253 Mar 21, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
That's the nutter that claims there are Psychic Super Soldiers who can walk through walls, turn invisible and kill with their minds from half way around the world.
I'd say 30 plus years of lunacy.
What are your credentials???
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#254254 Mar 21, 2013
Governor Ventura confronted by the CIA


Alexis

Germany

#254255 Mar 23, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
I just saw a show about building demolitions. Concrete structures are blown and collapsed. Steel frame structures cannot be collapsed that way. Too bad. Twoofers lose again. Tell you armchair engineers and architects to go work in the real world and get back to us later after they get some experience in the field...
You just saw a show? And that makes you, what?

An arm chair expert? And a very obtuse one.
Andropov

Lviv, Ukraine

#254257 Mar 23, 2013
With regard to Oklahoma City bombing, this is from the conclusion of the bomb damage assessment conducted by Air Force Brigadier General Benton Partin, an expert in armaments:

"CONCLUSION: The Murrah Federal Building was not destroyed by one sole truck bomb. The major factor in its destruction appears to have been detonation of explosives carefully placed at four critical junctures on supporting columns within the building.

The only possible reinforced concrete structural failure solely attributable to the truck bomb was the stripping out of the ceilings of the first and second floors in the "pit" area behind columns B4 and By. Even this may have been caused by a demolition charge at column B3.

It is truly unfortunate that a separate and independent bomb damage assessment was not made during the cleanup__before the building was demolished on May 23 and hundreds of truck loads of debris were hauled away, smashed down, and covered with dirt behind a security fence."

#######

This is in agreement with a Blast Effects Study conducted at the Armament Directorate, Wright Laboratory at Eglin Air Force Base. Here is a quote from the conclusion:

"the EBES concludes:

Due to these conditions, it is impossible to ascribe the damage
that occurred on April 19, 1995 to a single truck bomb containing
4,800 lbs. of ANFO. In fact, the maximum predicted damage to the
floor panels of the Murrah Federal Building is equal to
approximately 1% of the total floor area of the building.
Furthermore, due to the lack of symmetrical damage pattern at the
Murrah Building, it would be inconsistent with the results of the
ETS test [number] one to state that all of the damage to the Murrah
Building is the result of the truck bomb.

The damage to the Murrah Federal Building is consistent with damage
resulting from mechanically coupled devices placed locally within
the structure....

It must be concluded that the damage at the Murrah Federal Building
is not the result of the truck bomb itself, but rather due to other
factors such as locally placed charges within the building
itself.... The procedures used to cause the damage to the Murrah
Building are therefore more involved and complex than simply
parking a truck and leaving...."

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254258 Mar 23, 2013
do you have a brother named Hans ???
Andropov wrote:
With regard to Oklahoma City bombing, this is from the conclusion of the bomb damage assessment conducted by Air Force Brigadier General Benton Partin, an expert in armaments:
"CONCLUSION: The Murrah Federal Building was not destroyed by one sole truck bomb. The major factor in its destruction appears to have been detonation of explosives carefully placed at four critical junctures on supporting columns within the building.
The only possible reinforced concrete structural failure solely attributable to the truck bomb was the stripping out of the ceilings of the first and second floors in the "pit" area behind columns B4 and By. Even this may have been caused by a demolition charge at column B3.
It is truly unfortunate that a separate and independent bomb damage assessment was not made during the cleanup__before the building was demolished on May 23 and hundreds of truck loads of debris were hauled away, smashed down, and covered with dirt behind a security fence."
#######
This is in agreement with a Blast Effects Study conducted at the Armament Directorate, Wright Laboratory at Eglin Air Force Base. Here is a quote from the conclusion:
"the EBES concludes:
Due to these conditions, it is impossible to ascribe the damage
that occurred on April 19, 1995 to a single truck bomb containing
4,800 lbs. of ANFO. In fact, the maximum predicted damage to the
floor panels of the Murrah Federal Building is equal to
approximately 1% of the total floor area of the building.
Furthermore, due to the lack of symmetrical damage pattern at the
Murrah Building, it would be inconsistent with the results of the
ETS test [number] one to state that all of the damage to the Murrah
Building is the result of the truck bomb.
The damage to the Murrah Federal Building is consistent with damage
resulting from mechanically coupled devices placed locally within
the structure....
It must be concluded that the damage at the Murrah Federal Building
is not the result of the truck bomb itself, but rather due to other
factors such as locally placed charges within the building
itself.... The procedures used to cause the damage to the Murrah
Building are therefore more involved and complex than simply
parking a truck and leaving...."

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254261 Mar 23, 2013
Talking to yourself again ??
Jessie wrote:
<quoted text>
That's correct. The Murrah Federal Building was destroyed by explosives INSIDE the building. Who has the level of access to a federal building necessary to place explosives at "critical junctures" AND ALSO derail forensic investigations by federal agencies and destroy evidence in federal custody?
Well, the feds do, for one.
Looks like Oklahoma City bombing was just another in the false flag attack pattern that also includes the September 11 attack.
Henrik

Ringe, Denmark

#254262 Mar 23, 2013
Jessie wrote:
<quoted text>
That's correct. The Murrah Federal Building was destroyed by explosives INSIDE the building. Who has the level of access to a federal building necessary to place explosives at "critical junctures" AND ALSO derail forensic investigations by federal agencies and destroy evidence in federal custody?
Well, the feds do, for one.
Looks like Oklahoma City bombing was just another in the false flag attack pattern that also includes the September 11 attack.
The American government is inventing enemies to insure profits for the military industrial complex. Among many others, the American people are also victims.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254263 Mar 23, 2013
Alexis wrote:
<quoted text>
You just saw a show? And that makes you, what?
An arm chair expert? And a very obtuse one.
I saw a show where expert demolition people demonstrated what they do and how it is done. Steel frame buildings are either toppled or dismantled. They are never collapsed the same way a reinforced concrete building is done. That makes the claims of demolition a fallacy.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254264 Mar 23, 2013
Andropov wrote:
With regard to Oklahoma City bombing, this is from the conclusion of the bomb damage assessment conducted by Air Force Brigadier General Benton Partin, an expert in armaments:
"CONCLUSION: The Murrah Federal Building was not destroyed by one sole truck bomb. The major factor in its destruction appears to have been detonation of explosives carefully placed at four critical junctures on supporting columns within the building.
The only possible reinforced concrete structural failure solely attributable to the truck bomb was the stripping out of the ceilings of the first and second floors in the "pit" area behind columns B4 and By. Even this may have been caused by a demolition charge at column B3.
It is truly unfortunate that a separate and independent bomb damage assessment was not made during the cleanup__before the building was demolished on May 23 and hundreds of truck loads of debris were hauled away, smashed down, and covered with dirt behind a security fence."
#######
This is in agreement with a Blast Effects Study conducted at the Armament Directorate, Wright Laboratory at Eglin Air Force Base. Here is a quote from the conclusion:
"the EBES concludes:
Due to these conditions, it is impossible to ascribe the damage
that occurred on April 19, 1995 to a single truck bomb containing
4,800 lbs. of ANFO. In fact, the maximum predicted damage to the
floor panels of the Murrah Federal Building is equal to
approximately 1% of the total floor area of the building.
Furthermore, due to the lack of symmetrical damage pattern at the
Murrah Building, it would be inconsistent with the results of the
ETS test [number] one to state that all of the damage to the Murrah
Building is the result of the truck bomb.
The damage to the Murrah Federal Building is consistent with damage
resulting from mechanically coupled devices placed locally within
the structure....
It must be concluded that the damage at the Murrah Federal Building
is not the result of the truck bomb itself, but rather due to other
factors such as locally placed charges within the building
itself.... The procedures used to cause the damage to the Murrah
Building are therefore more involved and complex than simply
parking a truck and leaving...."
Nonsense.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254265 Mar 23, 2013
Andropov wrote:
With regard to Oklahoma City bombing, this is from the conclusion of the bomb damage assessment conducted by Air Force Brigadier General Benton Partin, an expert in armaments:
"CONCLUSION: The Murrah Federal Building was not destroyed by one sole truck bomb. The major factor in its destruction appears to have been detonation of explosives carefully placed at four critical junctures on supporting columns within the building.
The only possible reinforced concrete structural failure solely attributable to the truck bomb was the stripping out of the ceilings of the first and second floors in the "pit" area behind columns B4 and By. Even this may have been caused by a demolition charge at column B3.
It is truly unfortunate that a separate and independent bomb damage assessment was not made during the cleanup__before the building was demolished on May 23 and hundreds of truck loads of debris were hauled away, smashed down, and covered with dirt behind a security fence."
#######
This is in agreement with a Blast Effects Study conducted at the Armament Directorate, Wright Laboratory at Eglin Air Force Base. Here is a quote from the conclusion:
"the EBES concludes:
Due to these conditions, it is impossible to ascribe the damage
that occurred on April 19, 1995 to a single truck bomb containing
4,800 lbs. of ANFO. In fact, the maximum predicted damage to the
floor panels of the Murrah Federal Building is equal to
approximately 1% of the total floor area of the building.
Furthermore, due to the lack of symmetrical damage pattern at the
Murrah Building, it would be inconsistent with the results of the
ETS test [number] one to state that all of the damage to the Murrah
Building is the result of the truck bomb.
The damage to the Murrah Federal Building is consistent with damage
resulting from mechanically coupled devices placed locally within
the structure....
It must be concluded that the damage at the Murrah Federal Building
is not the result of the truck bomb itself, but rather due to other
factors such as locally placed charges within the building
itself.... The procedures used to cause the damage to the Murrah
Building are therefore more involved and complex than simply
parking a truck and leaving...."
So the government goes around blowing up buildings. What was accomplished by the Oklahoma bombing? This makes no sense. It the general is spouting such nonsense, then it is clear he has lost his mind.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254266 Mar 23, 2013
Henrik wrote:
<quoted text>
The American government is inventing enemies to insure profits for the military industrial complex. Among many others, the American people are also victims.
How would the Oklahoma City bombing accomplish such a goal?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#254267 Mar 23, 2013
Jessie wrote:
<quoted text>
That's correct. The Murrah Federal Building was destroyed by explosives INSIDE the building. Who has the level of access to a federal building necessary to place explosives at "critical junctures" AND ALSO derail forensic investigations by federal agencies and destroy evidence in federal custody?
Well, the feds do, for one.
Looks like Oklahoma City bombing was just another in the false flag attack pattern that also includes the September 11 attack.
That's odd, after that they did a test via the "offical story" and the results were the same.

OH and .... Audio in his own words.

Hear McVeigh's confession

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/36633900/
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#254268 Mar 23, 2013
Andropov wrote:
With regard to Oklahoma City bombing, this is from the conclusion of the bomb damage assessment conducted by Air Force Brigadier General Benton Partin, an expert in armaments:
Just another loon that thinks the only bad guy in the whole wide world is the US Government (But oddly did not mind getting paid by them for 31 years)

The 'Two-Bomb' General
Benton Partin, 74

Patriot ideologues have long scoffed at the work of scholars and specialists, but like conspiracy theorists everywhere, they love a credentialed expert who is on their side. Such was the case with retired Brig. Gen. Benton Partin, a 31-year Air Force veteran who provided Patriots with their core theory about the Oklahoma bombing.

In press conferences, at Patriot gatherings and in letters to politicians, Partin expounded on his idea that the truck bomb driven by Timothy McVeigh "could not possibly" have destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building by itself. Claiming long experience in weapons design, Partin — who retired in 1979 — said photographs of the damage convinced him there were other bombs inside the building.

Although Partin didn't say so, other Patriots expanded on this theory to accuse the government of bombing its own building to create an excuse for passing draconian anti-terrorism legislation.

Ultimately, Partin became a proponent of a whole pantheon of conspiracy theories. He claimed that federal agents used explosives to breach the Davidian compound in Waco — a charge for which there is no evidence.

He produced a hyper-conspiratorial video entitled, "Globalism: The Program." And, never one to pass up a possible plot, he said TWA Flight 800 was hit by a surface-to-air missile. Partin did finally present his Oklahoma bomb theory to a grand jury, WHICH ROUNDLY REJECTED THE CONCEPT.
Gerhard

Germany

#254270 Mar 23, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
So the government goes around blowing up buildings. What was accomplished by the Oklahoma bombing? This makes no sense. It the general is spouting such nonsense, then it is clear he has lost his mind.
Here's an interesting article in Vanity Fair on the topic:

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 4 min It aint necessari... 38,082
Why do white men hate white women who want blac... (May '11) 17 min Paul is dead 4,102
Anyone Want to shag on my milf Aunt live (Jun '15) 38 min willthis23 2
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 42 min truth 641,491
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 1 hr sabazius54 104,657
Gay on Sunshine Coast BC 1 hr sabazius54 1
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr LAWEST100 44,330
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 hr The Hangman 969,956
More from around the web