Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,078 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

onemale

Pana, IL

#253968 Mar 13, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no evidence of thermite. If the buildings were rigged, there would have been thousands of such devices used. Some would have failed. Besides, there was no free-fall. If you watch the collapse videos you can see huge chunks blown out and falling faster than the rest of the building. Updrafts come up the sides of the building, the elevator shafts and the stairwells. All were open and feeding the intense flames.
Huge FAIL buddy.
A chemical engineer and a scientist found thermite residue in the dust.
NIST admitted they didn't check the dust for any type of explosive resdue. Your problem is you listen to the news.
onemale

Pana, IL

#253969 Mar 13, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Any evidence to your rough accusation that it was not a natural occurrence from the crash.
THOUGHT NOT!
I just found that interesting, and it is interesting how so many flight recorders didn't make it. The law of averages doesn't match.
Alex Jones

Buffalo, NY

#253970 Mar 13, 2013
onemale

Pana, IL

#253971 Mar 13, 2013
Amee wrote:
Osama was actually a CIA agent,did you know that?
I read a report that we armed and worked with the Taliban and Osama to defeat Russia.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#253973 Mar 13, 2013
WRONG ...... would you like to try Double Jeopardy where the prizes can really double ???
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
I read a report that we armed and worked with the Taliban and Osama to defeat Russia.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#253974 Mar 13, 2013
WRONG !!!!

Progress Report on the
Analysis of Red/Gray Chips
in WTC Dust
Prepared for:
Classical Guide
Feb, 2012
Denver, CO
James R. Millette, Ph.D.
Executive Director
MVA Scientific Consultants
3300 Breckinridge Boulevard
Suite 400 Duluth, GA 30096

Conclusions
The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments.
There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nano-thermite.
Nigel wrote:
<quoted text>
There was tens of tons of advanced nanothermitic material and residues of thermite reaction in the World Trace Center dust!
onemale

Pana, IL

#253975 Mar 13, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
We already know the planes were hijacked. The phone calls from the plane confirmed it along with what the ATC heard. The hijackers were both seen and videotaped passing through airport security and boarding the planes. They were crashing the planes rather than flying them safely. The airline pilots have a bias toward safety; they can't even imagine doing such things.
You are forgetting one thing, airline pilots are also concerned about their own safety in the air.
onemale

Pana, IL

#253976 Mar 13, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
LINK, Who said it was impossible, 20 fake pilots?
20 fake pilots??? I need proof.
Eigenvalue

Germany

#253977 Mar 13, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
I read a report that we armed and worked with the Taliban and Osama to defeat Russia.
The games still continue -- in Chetchnya and other former Soviet bloc countries -- U.S. arming and funding al kaida.
Yuri

Ukraine

#253978 Mar 13, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
A chemical engineer and a scientist found thermite residue in the dust.
NIST admitted they didn't check the dust for any type of explosive resdue. Your problem is you listen to the news.
More than these have found thermite and residue in dust in New York of the Sepetember 11 building destructions
They Took r Jobs

Hamilton, Canada

#253979 Mar 13, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
I read a report that we armed and worked with the Taliban and Osama to defeat Russia.
You read a report. It has been common knowledge for twenty years.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#253980 Mar 14, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
I just found that interesting, and it is interesting how so many flight recorders didn't make it. The law of averages doesn't match.
LMFAO, First you say none, then you say the law of averages, do explain, in detail, how two black boxes were to survive a 110 story collapse of all those concrete floors.

MAN, You got to be Moobs with logic like that.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#253981 Mar 14, 2013
Yuri wrote:
<quoted text>
More than these have found thermite and residue in dust in New York of the Sepetember 11 building destructions
False! None was ever found, it's oil based paint most likely, otherwise explain the lack one of the main components, Barium Nitrate.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#253982 Mar 14, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
20 fake pilots??? I need proof.
I'm waiting for proof too, trust me, it never comes.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#253983 Mar 14, 2013
EXPLAINING THE THEORY
Just before the Twin Towers collapsed on 9/11, loud explosions were heard inside, leading conspiracy theorists to believe they were caused by explosives.
But according to Christian Simensen of the Norwegian Research Institute SINTEF, these were actually the result of a chemical reaction which caused both buildings to come down.
His theory is that the aluminium used to make the aeroplanes flown by the terrorists melted in the 2,700f heat and dripped down through the building where it mixed with the hundreds of litres of water from the sprinklers.

The combination of the two caused a chemical reaction similar to dynamite which was strong enough to destroy chunks of the building.
Combined with the ferocious heat, this would have been enough to collapse both buildings.
The explosions heard by witnesses were the explosive hydrogen being fired off by the reaction of the liquid aluminium and water, nothing more.
http://houstonfreethinkers.com/all-news/92-91...

And that's why the towers fell.....due to exploding aluminum
Yeah right
And The core with 5" thick steel was blown out by this exploding aluminum and water,eh?
Lmao.....Yeah right.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#253984 Mar 14, 2013
2,700f heat caused by jet fuel and office materials.... That's another.....lmao
Ryan also notes that National Geographic Today and the History Channel asserted fire temperatures of 2,900 and 2,700 F.

Since jet fuel fires burn at a maximum of around 1,500 F (unless in a special combustion chamber) and the melting point of steel is around 2,800 F, the claim that jet fuel fires melted structural steel is absurd. Although the official reports do not hold that the WTC fires melted steel, the origins of this idea is important, since it has been used as a straw-man attack by official story defenders such as Popular Mechanics.

Ryan notes that steel temperatures lag behind gas temperatures in both time and magnitude, and that none of the official reports have performed thermodynamic calculations about the probable steel temperatures. Ryan's own calculations show that steel temperatures in the impact zones probably did not exceed 600 F.
Yet, as Ryan notes, there is always an official explanation for terrorist events. Ryan reviews anomalies in the official account of the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, and notes that in that case, as in the case of the World Trade Center, a small group of engineers produced reports supporting the official story.

Ryan shows that the same principals headed the various government investigations of the WTC collapses, the Pentagon crash, and Oklahoma City bombing, despite the fact that the investigations involved assessments of entirely different kinds of structures inflicted with different kinds of damage. Why do the same five or so individuals turn up in investigations relating to terrorist attack, when, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), there are 1.5 million engineers in the US? The authors of the official report on the Murrah Federal Building -- Gene Corley, Charles Thornton, Paul Mlaker, and Mete Sozen -- were all among the initial team of the ASCE WTC investigation. Several of these individuals have strong connections to industries that benefited from the attack, such as armaments makers and oil and gas producers.
.
NIST now says about 4,500 gallons of jet fuel were available to feed fires -- 590,000 MJ of energy
Office furnishings in the impact zone would have provided 490,000 MJ of energy
Using masses and specific heats for materials heated, a maximum temp in the impact zone can be calculated.
The result is less than 600 degrees F
Assuming fuel burned with perfect efficiency, that no hot gases left the impact zone, no heat escaped by conduction, steel and concrete had unlimited amount of time to absorb all the heat
http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/kevin_rya...

Since: Aug 11

Santa Cruz, CA

#253985 Mar 14, 2013
Nigel wrote:
<quoted text>
There was tens of tons of advanced nanothermitic material and residues of thermite reaction in the World Trace Center dust!
Prove it!!!

That's a false claim. No devices were found by anyone. There is nothing which qualifies as evidence of such material.

Since: Aug 11

Santa Cruz, CA

#253986 Mar 14, 2013
Timesten wrote:
2,700f heat caused by jet fuel and office materials.... That's another.....lmao
Ryan also notes that National Geographic Today and the History Channel asserted fire temperatures of 2,900 and 2,700 F.
Since jet fuel fires burn at a maximum of around 1,500 F (unless in a special combustion chamber) and the melting point of steel is around 2,800 F, the claim that jet fuel fires melted structural steel is absurd. Although the official reports do not hold that the WTC fires melted steel, the origins of this idea is important, since it has been used as a straw-man attack by official story defenders such as Popular Mechanics.
Ryan notes that steel temperatures lag behind gas temperatures in both time and magnitude, and that none of the official reports have performed thermodynamic calculations about the probable steel temperatures. Ryan's own calculations show that steel temperatures in the impact zones probably did not exceed 600 F.
Yet, as Ryan notes, there is always an official explanation for terrorist events. Ryan reviews anomalies in the official account of the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, and notes that in that case, as in the case of the World Trade Center, a small group of engineers produced reports supporting the official story.
Ryan shows that the same principals headed the various government investigations of the WTC collapses, the Pentagon crash, and Oklahoma City bombing, despite the fact that the investigations involved assessments of entirely different kinds of structures inflicted with different kinds of damage. Why do the same five or so individuals turn up in investigations relating to terrorist attack, when, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), there are 1.5 million engineers in the US? The authors of the official report on the Murrah Federal Building -- Gene Corley, Charles Thornton, Paul Mlaker, and Mete Sozen -- were all among the initial team of the ASCE WTC investigation. Several of these individuals have strong connections to industries that benefited from the attack, such as armaments makers and oil and gas producers.
.
NIST now says about 4,500 gallons of jet fuel were available to feed fires -- 590,000 MJ of energy
Office furnishings in the impact zone would have provided 490,000 MJ of energy
Using masses and specific heats for materials heated, a maximum temp in the impact zone can be calculated.
The result is less than 600 degrees F
Assuming fuel burned with perfect efficiency, that no hot gases left the impact zone, no heat escaped by conduction, steel and concrete had unlimited amount of time to absorb all the heat
http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/kevin_rya...
False conclusion. Updrafts cause high combustion temperatures!!!

Since: Aug 11

Santa Cruz, CA

#253987 Mar 14, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
A chemical engineer and a scientist found thermite residue in the dust.
NIST admitted they didn't check the dust for any type of explosive resdue. Your problem is you listen to the news.
Doesn't count. Could have been planted just to make up a story. Besides, nobody found any devices or evidence of such. Let's go with your theory of devices. What about the unexploded devices such as those which failed and those place above the point of impact? Get the drift?
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#253989 Mar 14, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
The cockpit recorder would have told what language was being used, either Arabian or Arabian accent. And how they could fly a 100 ton jetliner in a fashion that airline pilots have said was impossible.
Impossible? Well, that is moot, since it obviously was flown the way it was.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min nanoanomaly 794,299
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 7 min Al Capone 5,316
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 18 min AntiqueAnnie 607,103
Scientific proof for God's existence 35 min lightbeamrider 514
What If People Made Fun Of Your God 37 min Just Me 18
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 39 min truth 567,656
Snapchat names (Jan '14) 42 min madhavi99 7
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 53 min AN NFL FAN 120,656
More from around the web