Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

GovOps

Germany

#254105 Mar 16, 2013
Doctor REALITY wrote:
If there were two events that have shocked me the most in my lifetime, it was the rise and fall of O.J. Simpson....and the rise and fall of the twin towers of New York. And now the evil that awaits a nation that has made MONEY it's god instead of the Lord has been put in place in Lower Manhattan. The time has come,America. The 'fake king' is about to make his appearance before the REAL KING breaks through the clouds in great power and glory before a stunned world!!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =RYfww-66X_gXX
You were not shocked to find out in the 1999 trial that the US government had multiple teams in Memphis, TN to assassinate Martin Luther King Jr, in case the Memphis policeman failed?!(The jury found that James Earl Ray was framed for the assassination).

You were not shocked to find out that the Oklahoma City bombing story that was told to the public was a lie, that the truck bomb could not have done the damage, that other bombs were planted inside this federal building (and some of them did not go off and were pulled out on the day of the attack)? Who has access to a federal building to plant multiple bombs? Why would the federal government lie about the attack?

You weren't shocked by the Iran/Contra hearings, exposing US government funding and training of terrorists on multiple continents with profits from the drug trade?

You weren't shocked by pedophiles in the Catholic Church and plenty of protestant churches and high in our government?

What about the serial murder of U.S. leaders by our own government?(Kennedy 1, Kennedy 2, MLK, other popular leaders)

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254106 Mar 16, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike you, I don't claim to have all the answers.
But I do know the alleged hijackers are not on any airline flight lists on 9-11. And I do know it is impossible for fiberglass and aluminum to knife through massive steel beams like hot butter. Physicists have said you have two choices, believe the laws of physics or the NIST report.
The law of physics works fine. If you watch some of the footage of the towers collapsing, you will see big chunks flying out as the structure fails. Those chunks descend at a much faster rate than the building. What this means is the chunks are free falling; the building is descending at a slower rate of speed proving successive structural failure rather than the Twoofer free fall claim. The NIST report is correct.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254107 Mar 16, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
And how much do you waste on this forum in the past 5 years. Ranting your denials? If we're nuts then you are nuttier for staying here replying to us. Sort of like it takes one to know one.
Much less than you trying to prove your false claims. ROTFLMAO
Werner

Romania

#254108 Mar 16, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
The law of physics works fine. If you watch some of the footage of the towers collapsing, you will see big chunks flying out as the structure fails. Those chunks descend at a much faster rate than the building. What this means is the chunks are free falling; the building is descending at a slower rate of speed proving successive structural failure rather than the Twoofer free fall claim. The NIST report is correct.
Some chunks of the towers were moving faster because they were being propelled by late-firing explosives!

Multi-toin chunks of a building don't "fly out" in all directions hundreds of feet in a gravity driven collapse.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#254109 Mar 16, 2013
This is just a few of the many 9/11 Coincidences

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254110 Mar 16, 2013
Werner wrote:
<quoted text>
Some chunks of the towers were moving faster because they were being propelled by late-firing explosives!
Multi-toin chunks of a building don't "fly out" in all directions hundreds of feet in a gravity driven collapse.
False claim. They flew out because of the air being forced out between the floors as they collapsed. Besides, they still descended at free fall speed while the rest of the building descended at a lower rate of speed. No evidence of explosive devices has been found by anyone.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254111 Mar 16, 2013
onemale wrote:
This is just a few of the many 9/11 Coincidences
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =kRFha40XfT8XX
Coincidences don't count. Facts and evidence do.
ClearWater

Åkersberga, Sweden

#254112 Mar 16, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
False claim. They flew out because of the air being forced out between the floors as they collapsed. Besides, they still descended at free fall speed while the rest of the building descended at a lower rate of speed. No evidence of explosive devices has been found by anyone.


Anyone can see with their own eyes!

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254113 Mar 16, 2013
That you are a Sock Puppet
ClearWater wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =pre2lIlbyQoXX
Anyone can see with their own eyes!

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254114 Mar 16, 2013
Hey Sock Puppet, how much energy was released by each tower during the collpases ?
Werner wrote:
<quoted text>
Some chunks of the towers were moving faster because they were being propelled by late-firing explosives!
Multi-toin chunks of a building don't "fly out" in all directions hundreds of feet in a gravity driven collapse.
Truth Teller

Salt Lake City, UT

#254117 Mar 16, 2013
RADECKTs SOCK wrote:
how much energy was released by each tower during the collpases ?
<quoted text>
The presence of so many tons of nanothermitic pyrotechnic material in the buildings, discovered by researchers later in the dust, guarantees that the energy released was sufficient to destroy the tough steel core columns and dense perimeter structure. Gravity alone could not have brought the entire building down, and gravity certainly wasn't responsible for the horizontal forces that blew the towers apart in every direction.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254118 Mar 16, 2013
WRONG Sock Puppet, an independent lab tested dust samples in Feb 2012 and found no thermite ... try keeping up Dim Wit
Truth Teller wrote:
<quoted text>
The presence of so many tons of nanothermitic pyrotechnic material in the buildings, discovered by researchers later in the dust, guarantees that the energy released was sufficient to destroy the tough steel core columns and dense perimeter structure. Gravity alone could not have brought the entire building down, and gravity certainly wasn't responsible for the horizontal forces that blew the towers apart in every direction.
Van der Holleen

Netherlands

#254119 Mar 16, 2013
mini radish wrote:
WRONG Sock Puppet, an independent lab tested dust samples in Feb 2012 and found no thermite ... try keeping up Dim Wit
<quoted text>
Well, next time you perform the test, try igniting the pyrotechnic material in the dust with sufficiently high energy source (torch) and watch them flash and produce molten iron droplets, a product of thermite reaction.

But your mother may not appreciate you using your basement room for pyrotechnic experiments.
Mark

Lutherville Timonium, MD

#254120 Mar 16, 2013
i own 9-11, myself,Tom,rade etc...have already proved everything there is abouyt this, clearly a Terrorist operation..No Government Involvment what so ever..so move along

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254121 Mar 16, 2013
ClearWater wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =pre2lIlbyQoXX
Anyone can see with their own eyes!
Chandler has been debunked. What an idiot.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254122 Mar 16, 2013
Truth Teller wrote:
<quoted text>
The presence of so many tons of nanothermitic pyrotechnic material in the buildings, discovered by researchers later in the dust, guarantees that the energy released was sufficient to destroy the tough steel core columns and dense perimeter structure. Gravity alone could not have brought the entire building down, and gravity certainly wasn't responsible for the horizontal forces that blew the towers apart in every direction.
Nonsense. More false claims.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254123 Mar 16, 2013
Mark wrote:
i own 9-11, myself,Tom,rade etc...have already proved everything there is abouyt this, clearly a Terrorist operation..No Government Involvment what so ever..so move along
Exactly.
Your Teacher

Nürnberg, Germany

#254125 Mar 16, 2013
Researcher Jonathan Cole, summarizes the physical evidence and other forms of solid evidence, which indicates sophisticated demolition at the World Trade Center, and then he demonstrates how even the conventional variants of thermite can cut through the steel structure. The advanced nanothermitic materials that have been found by multiple researchers are much more efficient than the conventional incendiaries that Jonathan Cole uses to successfully cut steel beams. Watch

Judged:

11

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254126 Mar 16, 2013
Your Teacher wrote:
Researcher Jonathan Cole, summarizes the physical evidence and other forms of solid evidence, which indicates sophisticated demolition at the World Trade Center, and then he demonstrates how even the conventional variants of thermite can cut through the steel structure. The advanced nanothermitic materials that have been found by multiple researchers are much more efficient than the conventional incendiaries that Jonathan Cole uses to successfully cut steel beams. Watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =JLrPxFCLNkAXX
More nonsense devoid of any tangible evidence or common sense. What's wrong with the fact the buildings fell because of catastrophic damage caused by fully fueled airplanes crashed into them at full speed? Kind of obvious isn't it?
Erik

Anonymous Proxy

#254127 Mar 16, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
More nonsense devoid of any tangible evidence or common sense. What's wrong with the fact the buildings fell because of catastrophic damage caused by fully fueled airplanes crashed into them at full speed? Kind of obvious isn't it?
What is wrong is, number one, it is not a "fact",
and number 2, the Towers did not "fall" - they were blown apart violently, as is obvious in the news footage
and number 3, the airplanes were not "fully fueled"
and number 4, the Towers were designed to sustain airplane impacts, as they obviously did

The fires in the impact zones were burning out. However, there were explosives detonating on other floors of the Towers, as we could hear on the fireman radios and as we learned from testimony of firefighters who survived blasts that had nothing to do with the plane impacts. It is quite obvious from the way the Towers were being blown very quickly apart that these were not structural failures from fire and impact!


https://www.youtube.com/watch...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 29 min Catcher1 101,231
I love you sister Joyce Meyer 1 hr Doctor REALITY 1
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr Liamm 670,552
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 2 hr WildWeirdWillie 184,310
hurricane hyjinks by yin katz 6 hr yin katz 4
lsexting 7 hr splashshane 1
what are the physical differences between india... (Jun '09) 8 hr Pres Mr Donald J ... 91
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 15 hr Joe Fortuna 980,324
More from around the web