Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,200 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#253613 Feb 24, 2013
official govie twoof wrote:
<quoted text>
I think I know where you looked to find your tangible evidence for the official govie twoof.
http://www.google.com/imgres...
I said evidence. For example evidence of high tech explosive devices used to demolish buildings. Thousands would have been required. Evidence of where the real planes went if not into the targets. Evidence that all government agencies, WTC leaseholders and airlines all worked in a massive cover-up conspiracy. Let's see your stuff.
page one

Winchester, KY

#253614 Feb 24, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
I said evidence. For example evidence of high tech explosive devices used to demolish buildings. Thousands would have been required. Evidence of where the real planes went if not into the targets. Evidence that all government agencies, WTC leaseholders and airlines all worked in a massive cover-up conspiracy. Let's see your stuff.
I have a suggestion for you. Why don't you go back to page one of this thread and start reading. We've presented the evidence ad nauseum. There really is no point in repeating something that's been discussed numerous times on this thread. When will you finally catch on that this debate is over and you are just looking pathetically desperate for trying to keep it alive despite the fact that you guys got your asses kicked a long time ago.
onemale

Pana, IL

#253615 Feb 24, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly what evidence did he investigate and document? The burden of proof is up to you to refute the government investigation using tangible evidence. Opinions don't count.
Fetzer did have tangible evidence:
1.) The alleged terrorist names do not appear on any passenger manifest. That is not possible to arrange.
2.) Seven have turned up a live in the middle east and have been interviewed by the BBC and the Guardian of the UK.
3.) Their flying background proves they could not have flown a large commercial jet.
4.) Studies have proved the cell phone calls could not have taken place. Cell phones do not work above 2,000 feet and at speeds of over 230 mph.
The list goes on to a total of 20 points.

I am no longer wasting my time with you.
You have denied every fact shown here and you will continue to do so, for whatever reason.
We simply cannot help some people.



Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#253616 Feb 24, 2013
page one wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a suggestion for you. Why don't you go back to page one of this thread and start reading. We've presented the evidence ad nauseum. There really is no point in repeating something that's been discussed numerous times on this thread. When will you finally catch on that this debate is over and you are just looking pathetically desperate for trying to keep it alive despite the fact that you guys got your asses kicked a long time ago.
Not one post presented any tangible evidence, only unsubstantiated, unqualified opinions.

The debate was over before it started. There is no tangible evidence which conflicts with the official version of the events as they unfolded on 9/11.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#253617 Feb 24, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Fetzer did have tangible evidence:
1.) The alleged terrorist names do not appear on any passenger manifest. That is not possible to arrange.
2.) Seven have turned up a live in the middle east and have been interviewed by the BBC and the Guardian of the UK.
3.) Their flying background proves they could not have flown a large commercial jet.
4.) Studies have proved the cell phone calls could not have taken place. Cell phones do not work above 2,000 feet and at speeds of over 230 mph.
The list goes on to a total of 20 points.
I am no longer wasting my time with you.
You have denied every fact shown here and you will continue to do so, for whatever reason.
We simply cannot help some people.
1. They were not included because they had already been identified as the hijackers. Boarding passes were issued, they were videotaped passing through airport security and seen boarding the planes.

2. False. This has already been debunked as well. They perished along with everyone else who boarded the planes.

3. They could not fly a passenger jet safely but had the skills necessary to complete their missions which they obviously did.

4. Cell phone studies have been debunked as well. Sometimes cell phone work on planes. Calls were also made to airline operators from Air-phones on the planes. People left messages and talked to loved ones as well.

So far you have come up with four items which have proven to be false beyond any reasonable doubt. All the evidence proves you to be a liar.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#253618 Feb 24, 2013
None of those four items are facts. All four have proven to be false by hundreds of witnesses.

Do you have any more Twoofer Fantasies to share?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#253619 Feb 25, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Fetzer did have tangible evidence:
1.) The alleged terrorist names do not appear on any passenger manifest. That is not possible to arrange.
They were not listed on the victims list, they were on the flight manifests and were singled out as the hijackers by flight attendants while the planes were still in the air.

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/No_hijacker...

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Identifying...
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>2.) Seven have turned up a live in the middle east and have been interviewed by the BBC and the Guardian of the UK.
People with the same name...there's 7 billion plus humans on earth, some have the same name.

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Hijackers_s...
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>3.) Their flying background proves they could not have flown a large commercial jet.
Wrong, they were crappy pilots and had training.

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Flight_Scho...
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>4.) Studies have proved the cell phone calls could not have taken place. Cell phones do not work above 2,000 feet and at speeds of over 230 mph.
The list goes on to a total of 20 points.
I am no longer wasting my time with you.
You have denied every fact shown here and you will continue to do so, for whatever reason.
We simply cannot help some people.
Not studies, twoofers tried to prove something that wasn't being claimed.

The majority of calls were made from seat back airphones and a couple from cells that were dropped quickly (I'll look for the map showing the calls that were made from cells were actually made while the plane was below 8000').



It's funny you attempt using an argument from authority by way of Fetzer since all of his arguments come from places like loose change and DRG...who are definitely NOT authorities regarding the subject material...and the same goes for Fetzer.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#253620 Feb 25, 2013
And the Toofers always seem to forget that Hanjour had a commercial pilots license

Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>They were not listed on the victims list, they were on the flight manifests and were singled out as the hijackers by flight attendants while the planes were still in the air.
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/No_hijacker...
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Identifying...
<quoted text>People with the same name...there's 7 billion plus humans on earth, some have the same name.
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Hijackers_s...
<quoted text>Wrong, they were crappy pilots and had training.
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Flight_Scho...
<quoted text>Not studies, twoofers tried to prove something that wasn't being claimed.
The majority of calls were made from seat back airphones and a couple from cells that were dropped quickly (I'll look for the map showing the calls that were made from cells were actually made while the plane was below 8000').
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =q-Tr0u35TekXX
It's funny you attempt using an argument from authority by way of Fetzer since all of his arguments come from places like loose change and DRG...who are definitely NOT authorities regarding the subject material...and the same goes for Fetzer.
Say the Truht

Eatontown, NJ

#253622 Feb 25, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
According to airline pilots a jet cannot travel 500 mph at low altitudes. Due to the air density the engines are not powerful enough, even if they were the structure of the plane couldn't handle the stress.. it would fly apart.
Wrong. Wrong..who cares when you're going to crash it into a building?
Say the Truth

Eatontown, NJ

#253623 Feb 25, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
The info comes from Dr. James Fetzer is a retired Professor Emeritus, of the University of Minnesota, Duluth. Who with a team have thoroughly investigated it.
What are your credentials???
All you are capable of is to deny everything, except what the government tells you
retired Professor Emeritus formerly of the Dept. of Redundancy Dept.
Say the Truth

Eatontown, NJ

#253624 Feb 25, 2013
the twoof wrote:
<quoted text>
because whatever the government says is the twoof, the whole twoof, and nothing but the twoof.
Nonsense. If you want the twoof, the whole twoof, and nothing but the twoof, you may find it all on YouTube and in raw Google search returns.
Say the Truth

Eatontown, NJ

#253625 Feb 25, 2013
page one wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a suggestion for you. Why don't you go back to page one of this thread and start reading. We've presented the evidence ad nauseum. There really is no point in repeating something that's been discussed numerous times on this thread. When will you finally catch on that this debate is over and you are just looking pathetically desperate for trying to keep it alive despite the fact that you guys got your asses kicked a long time ago.
LMAO, Troy. For solid, irrefutable pwoof you provide a bag of dust from some chick in Brooklyn's window sill.
Say the Truth

Eatontown, NJ

#253626 Feb 25, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Fetzer did have tangible evidence:
1.) The alleged terrorist names do not appear on any passenger manifest. That is not possible to arrange.
2.) Seven have turned up a live in the middle east and have been interviewed by the BBC and the Guardian of the UK.
3.) Their flying background proves they could not have flown a large commercial jet.
4.) Studies have proved the cell phone calls could not have taken place. Cell phones do not work above 2,000 feet and at speeds of over 230 mph.
The list goes on to a total of 20 points.
I am no longer wasting my time with you.
You have denied every fact shown here and you will continue to do so, for whatever reason.
We simply cannot help some people.
So long, Chuckles!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#253628 Feb 25, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>They were not listed on the victims list, they were on the flight manifests and were singled out as the hijackers by flight attendants while the planes were still in the air.
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/No_hijacker...
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Identifying...
<quoted text>People with the same name...there's 7 billion plus humans on earth, some have the same name.
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Hijackers_s...
<quoted text>Wrong, they were crappy pilots and had training.
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Flight_Scho...
<quoted text>Not studies, twoofers tried to prove something that wasn't being claimed.
The majority of calls were made from seat back airphones and a couple from cells that were dropped quickly (I'll look for the map showing the calls that were made from cells were actually made while the plane was below 8000').
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =q-Tr0u35TekXX
It's funny you attempt using an argument from authority by way of Fetzer since all of his arguments come from places like loose change and DRG...who are definitely NOT authorities regarding the subject material...and the same goes for Fetzer.
Exactly.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#253629 Feb 25, 2013
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO, Troy. For solid, irrefutable pwoof you provide a bag of dust from some chick in Brooklyn's window sill.
You mean Twoofer Dust?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#253630 Feb 25, 2013
page one wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a suggestion for you. Why don't you go back to page one of this thread and start reading. We've presented the evidence ad nauseum. There really is no point in repeating something that's been discussed numerous times on this thread. When will you finally catch on that this debate is over and you are just looking pathetically desperate for trying to keep it alive despite the fact that you guys got your asses kicked a long time ago.
While we are giving out suggestions, may I suggest you seek the services of a qualified psychotherapist for help with your paranoid delusions.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#253631 Feb 25, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
<quoted text>And the Toofers always seem to forget that Hanjour had a commercial pilots license
Reality is something twoofers just can't deal with.

“Bright Waters House ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#253635 Feb 26, 2013
When you visit your local police station or sheriff痴 office, you can hand them our brochure, or just the printed letter, and say something like:

的 am a volunteer with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. I came in because I care about our country and I知 very concerned about the true nature of the crime that occurred on 9/11 at the World Trade Center. Did you receive the faxed letter from AE911Truth on January 16th?[Oh no! Well here is a copy!] Please forward this important letter to the Chief directly, because it summarizes the peer-reviewed scientific evidence that calls into question the official account of 9/11.

You can continue by citing evidence described in the letter and explaining how it applies to the jurisdiction covered by your local police department.

If you prefer to call your local police station, you can say something very similar:

的 am a volunteer with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. I知 calling because I care about our country and I知 very concerned about the true nature of the crime that occurred on 9/11 at the World Trade Center. Did you receive the faxed letter about this subject from AE911Truth on January 16th?[Oh no? Well what is your fax number? I will fax it to you right away (or just bring it in.)] Please forward this important letter to the Chief directly because it summarizes the peer-reviewed scientific evidence that calls into question the official account of 9/11.

LMAO !!!!!!!!

“Bright Waters House ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#253638 Feb 26, 2013
I'm hired for my brains DIM and I am a managing director DIM WIIT so YES, I have time to throw out a few posts
911 is not over wrote:

“Bright Waters House ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#253639 Feb 26, 2013
maybe the volunteers for A&E9/11 can explain why after 11 years ,A&E9/11 doesn't have a single peer reviewed paper in any engineering journal !!??!?!!?!
911 is not over wrote:
<quoted text>
It was an example of how to approach the Police dept, idiot.
Shouldn't you be at work or doesn't your boss mind paying you to troll chat rooms everyday.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
10 good tips to lose weight easily 4 min diettips 1
Weight Watchers diet: how to lose weight? 7 min diettips 1
How to Copy DVD to Computer / PC / Hard Drive? 10 min lydiawang 1
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 29 min truth 574,347
hi 32 min Mantu 1
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr Joe fortuna 810,347
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 1 hr KiMare 97,908
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 hr lil whispers 608,267
Sleeping with mother (Oct '13) 9 hr Jon 19
Straight guys: Would you ever have intercourse ... (Jul '12) Wed viky235 164
More from around the web