Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#253595 Feb 24, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course it can if it is diving. Which pilots are your speaking of? The ones who say a plane can't be crashed into a target the size of the Pentagon? They have already been proven wrong.
You must be kidding.
Airline Pilots Speak Out on September 11th

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#253597 Feb 24, 2013
Professor of Theology with a minor in basket weaving AHAAAHHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAHAHAHAHAH A !!!!!
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
The info comes from Dr. James Fetzer is a retired Professor Emeritus, of the University of Minnesota, Duluth. Who with a team have thoroughly investigated it.
What are your credentials???
All you are capable of is to deny everything, except what the government tells you

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#253598 Feb 24, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>Well duh!!!!
I know eh!

;-)

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#253599 Feb 24, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>Most of these professionals are very high level professionals.
I personally know the sister of Jim Fetzer.
This is his top ten reasons why the hijackers were fake.
He makes a very good case.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =G6gtqAr241IXX
If you actually think Fetzer makes a good case, you're hopeless.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#253600 Feb 24, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>The plane that supposedly went down in Pennsylvania was over Champaign, IL at the time.
The plane that supposedly crashed in the north tower wasn't even flying that day.
The plane that supposedly crashed in the south tower was over Pittsburgh at the time.
There are many other flaws in the government claims as explained in this interview.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =nKvFbtI9NGwXX
The day was chaotic as hell and given the shear volume of information it's not surprising, or out of the ordinary, that some was correct and some wasn't.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#253601 Feb 24, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>According to airline pilots a jet cannot travel 500 mph at low altitudes. Due to the air density the engines are not powerful enough, even if they were the structure of the plane couldn't handle the stress.. it would fly apart.
And of course if I showed you an article by aerospace engineers who proved that wrong you'd dismiss it out if hand without even reading the article...but you'll read anything and everything written by kooks who are dismissed by the vast majority of experts.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#253602 Feb 24, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
<quoted text>Professor of Theology with a minor in basket weaving AHAAAHHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAHAHAHAHAH A !!!!!
And a long time kook.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#253604 Feb 24, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
The day was chaotic as hell and given the shear volume of information it's not surprising, or out of the ordinary, that some was correct and some wasn't.
List the some wasn't and the some was.
and guaranteed 99% of your answers will come from the govt's reports.
http://commonsenseconspiracy.com/wp-content/u...
.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#253605 Feb 24, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
The info comes from Dr. James Fetzer is a retired Professor Emeritus, of the University of Minnesota, Duluth. Who with a team have thoroughly investigated it.
What are your credentials???
All you are capable of is to deny everything, except what the government tells you
Exactly what evidence did he investigate and document? The burden of proof is up to you to refute the government investigation using tangible evidence. Opinions don't count.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#253606 Feb 24, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Airline Pilots Speak Out on September 11th
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =Vc3EZMuerWYXX
\
Proves nothing other than the fact they wouldn't be crashing a plane into the Pentagon.
the twoof

Winchester, KY

#253607 Feb 24, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly what evidence did he investigate and document? The burden of proof is up to you to refute the government investigation using tangible evidence. Opinions don't count.
because whatever the government says is the twoof, the whole twoof, and nothing but the twoof.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#253608 Feb 24, 2013
the twoof wrote:
<quoted text>
because whatever the government says is the twoof, the whole twoof, and nothing but the twoof.
That's your biased opinion. Were is your tangible evidence proving that anything other than the official version took place?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#253609 Feb 24, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>That's your biased opinion. Were is your tangible evidence proving that anything other than the official version took place?
He had it!

It was sitting on the top shelf of his cupboard, he grabbed it thinking it was crack then he smoked it.

Now he'll have to get some more.
official govie twoof

Winchester, KY

#253610 Feb 24, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
That's your biased opinion. Were is your tangible evidence proving that anything other than the official version took place?
I think I know where you looked to find your tangible evidence for the official govie twoof.
http://www.google.com/imgres...
official govie twoof

Winchester, KY

#253611 Feb 24, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
He had it!
It was sitting on the top shelf of his cupboard, he grabbed it thinking it was crack then he smoked it.
Now he'll have to get some more.
look here for the evidence of official govie twoof
http://www.google.com/imgres...
RogerThat

AOL

#253612 Feb 24, 2013
.

100% CONFIDENCE of Christ's Nearness_______



.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#253613 Feb 24, 2013
official govie twoof wrote:
<quoted text>
I think I know where you looked to find your tangible evidence for the official govie twoof.
http://www.google.com/imgres...
I said evidence. For example evidence of high tech explosive devices used to demolish buildings. Thousands would have been required. Evidence of where the real planes went if not into the targets. Evidence that all government agencies, WTC leaseholders and airlines all worked in a massive cover-up conspiracy. Let's see your stuff.
page one

Winchester, KY

#253614 Feb 24, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
I said evidence. For example evidence of high tech explosive devices used to demolish buildings. Thousands would have been required. Evidence of where the real planes went if not into the targets. Evidence that all government agencies, WTC leaseholders and airlines all worked in a massive cover-up conspiracy. Let's see your stuff.
I have a suggestion for you. Why don't you go back to page one of this thread and start reading. We've presented the evidence ad nauseum. There really is no point in repeating something that's been discussed numerous times on this thread. When will you finally catch on that this debate is over and you are just looking pathetically desperate for trying to keep it alive despite the fact that you guys got your asses kicked a long time ago.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#253615 Feb 24, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly what evidence did he investigate and document? The burden of proof is up to you to refute the government investigation using tangible evidence. Opinions don't count.
Fetzer did have tangible evidence:
1.) The alleged terrorist names do not appear on any passenger manifest. That is not possible to arrange.
2.) Seven have turned up a live in the middle east and have been interviewed by the BBC and the Guardian of the UK.
3.) Their flying background proves they could not have flown a large commercial jet.
4.) Studies have proved the cell phone calls could not have taken place. Cell phones do not work above 2,000 feet and at speeds of over 230 mph.
The list goes on to a total of 20 points.

I am no longer wasting my time with you.
You have denied every fact shown here and you will continue to do so, for whatever reason.
We simply cannot help some people.



Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#253616 Feb 24, 2013
page one wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a suggestion for you. Why don't you go back to page one of this thread and start reading. We've presented the evidence ad nauseum. There really is no point in repeating something that's been discussed numerous times on this thread. When will you finally catch on that this debate is over and you are just looking pathetically desperate for trying to keep it alive despite the fact that you guys got your asses kicked a long time ago.
Not one post presented any tangible evidence, only unsubstantiated, unqualified opinions.

The debate was over before it started. There is no tangible evidence which conflicts with the official version of the events as they unfolded on 9/11.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min mpetershat 654,233
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 9 min Hukt on Fonix 64,219
Queen Cleopatra was clearly Black. White people... (Aug '10) 15 min Johnny 834
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 17 min Truth Teller 106,565
Black people are more evolved then white people? (May '13) 28 min mike byrd 245
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 33 min nanoanomaly 973,881
first gay experience? (Sep '14) 45 min andy 46
More from around the web