• Sections
Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Charlie Sheen
#252075 Jan 24, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
Auto pilot needs a destination beacon to home in on professor. What did he do set his hand held GPS and typed in the word Pentagon?... You took your illiterate pill today I see.
Although nearly abandoned in the United States, NDBs (Beacons) are still used in many countries around the world.

Global Positioning Systems were first invented for the US military and introduced to the public in the early 1990s. This system consists of a series of satellites orbiting the Earth which continuously send out signals telling their orbital location and the time the signal was sent. A GPS receiver can tune into the signals they send out and note the time it took for the signal to travel from the satellite to the receiver for several different satellites at once. Since the speed at which the signals travel is known, it is a simple matter of arithmetic to determine how far from each satellite the receiver is. Triangulation (or, rather, quadrangulation) is than used to determine exactly where the receiver is with respect to the surface of the Earth. In an aircraft, this information is compared with the onboard database to determine how far it is to the next airport, navigational aid (NAVAID), waypoint, or whatever. The concept is simple, but the math is not. GPS systems have turned the world of aviation on its head, allowing everyday pilots to navigate around with levels of accuracy that were unimaginable 20 years ago.
911 was an inside job
#252076 Jan 24, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Although nearly abandoned in the United States, NDBs (Beacons) are still used in many countries around the world.
Global Positioning Systems were first invented for the US military and introduced to the public in the early 1990s. This system consists of a series of satellites orbiting the Earth which continuously send out signals telling their orbital location and the time the signal was sent. A GPS receiver can tune into the signals they send out and note the time it took for the signal to travel from the satellite to the receiver for several different satellites at once. Since the speed at which the signals travel is known, it is a simple matter of arithmetic to determine how far from each satellite the receiver is. Triangulation (or, rather, quadrangulation) is than used to determine exactly where the receiver is with respect to the surface of the Earth. In an aircraft, this information is compared with the onboard database to determine how far it is to the next airport, navigational aid (NAVAID), waypoint, or whatever. The concept is simple, but the math is not. GPS systems have turned the world of aviation on its head, allowing everyday pilots to navigate around with levels of accuracy that were unimaginable 20 years ago.
.... And, more important to the discussion, GPS and augmentations allow automated flight management systems to navigate with levels of accuracy that were unimaginable 20 years ago.
Charlie Sheen
#252077 Jan 24, 2013
911 was an inside job wrote:
<quoted text>
.... And, more important to the discussion, GPS and augmentations allow automated flight management systems to navigate with levels of accuracy that were unimaginable 20 years ago.
And ......????

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#252078 Jan 24, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
Tell us more about these imaginary homing beacons planes need for navigation, Bronie!
<quoted text>
You can't really be that uneducated? But I guess you can.
Maybe you should take up a different forum, like here, where you are more on your intellect level.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/internet-trol...

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#252079 Jan 24, 2013
The Minnesota Air National Guard flies the C-130 Hercules Dim of Wit
<quoted text>
Imagine that. Now you can say you know that huh, mr Dim of Wit #2.
And you probably can fly a kite too right?

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
Charlie Sheen
#252080 Jan 24, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't really be that uneducated?
You claim homing beacons were used and GPS was not WHEN HOMING BEACONS WERE ABANDONED IN THE 1950's and GPS IS THE STANDARD FOR NAVIGATION?

That's what you call EDUCATION MOOBS McBRONIE?
911 was an inside job
#252081 Jan 24, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
And ......????
And we have a much more plausible explanation for the successful targeting of the budget analyst's office in Wedge 1 of the Pentagon (the only part of the Pentagon's facade to have undergone "upgrades") and certain "sensitive" financial institutions on floors of the World Trade Center Towers that, remarkably, had undergone "fire insulation upgrades" prior to 9/11. More plausible, that is than the story of a bunch of fkup, no-talent "pilots" accomplishing feats that are beyond their skill-sets.

And, in any case, the PROVEN pre-planned demolition of the WTC Towers and WTC-7 completely undermines the official narrative, and the probability that the perps would rely on "extremist hijackers" to pull off a successful suicide strike on very specific targets is virtually zero.

Judged:

2

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#252082 Jan 24, 2013

Judged:

2

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#252083 Jan 24, 2013
I wonder how many classes Hani Hanjour went to, in order to operate an autopilot system.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Autopilot_S...
Hmmmmm just press button to engage or to disengage

Judged:

2

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
Charlie Sheen
#252084 Jan 24, 2013
Timesten wrote:
Robot autopilot in the 1930's? So, Bromie, What does that prove about the fact your claim homing beacons are used and GPS is not is totally false?
Charlie Sheen
#252085 Jan 24, 2013
Timesten wrote:
I wonder how many classes Hani Hanjour went to, in order to operate an autopilot system.
Wondering is not evidence Bromie! I bet he was taught that you use GPS to reach your location, not a Homing Beacon.

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#252086 Jan 24, 2013
simple Google search STUPID ..... you like Google searches don't you !?!?!?!?
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
Imagine that. Now you can say you know that huh, mr Dim of Wit #2.
And you probably can fly a kite too right?
Say the Truth
#252087 Jan 24, 2013
Timesten wrote:
helicopters
Hey knucklehead, what about the GPS claim you made last night? Kitties keeping you distracted this morning?
Charlie Sheen
#252088 Jan 24, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
Imagine that. Now you can say you know that huh, mr Dim of Wit #2.
And you probably can fly a kite too right?
WOW, You are right Bromie, You are in full disinfo mode, Good job you My Little Pony Porker!
Timesten wrote:
I found this on one of the pages there
Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation:
DisinformationRule5: Sidetrack opponents with name calling, ridicule
DisinformationRule9: Play Dumb
DisinformationRule17: Change the subject
DisinformationRule20: False evidence
DisinformationRule23: Create bigger distractions
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/RulesOfDisinfor...
Say the Truth
#252089 Jan 24, 2013
911 was an inside job wrote:
<quoted text>
.... And, more important to the discussion, GPS and augmentations allow automated flight management systems to navigate with levels of accuracy that were unimaginable 20 years ago.
You mean like the hijackers may have employed to "find their destination"?

Awesome- Thanks, Twoofer!!
Charlie Sheen
#252090 Jan 24, 2013
Timesten wrote:
Fontaine, Which one of these fans is you?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#252091 Jan 24, 2013
<quoted text>
Except...
The Flight 77 never existed. It was invented after the plane at Shanksville was shot down. This plane was heading for the Pentagon. Thus no plane hit the Pentagon and no plane has been found at Shanksville.
...two smoking guns...
That's very funny, hundreds of witnesses say otherwise. It was seen crashing into the Pentagon by another pilot and people on the ground. There are many evidence pictures from the scene showing various parts from the plane. You are making a fool of yourself.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#252092 Jan 24, 2013
From Denmark, joined Sep 2001,
Can any of the modern passenger jets around land on autopilot - guided by some fancy ILS system or alike?
.
the first autoland was performed by a Trident in about 1965.
.
Actually, they have been capable of doing that since 1974. The L-1011 was the first passenger jet to perform the first "autoland". I think all modern airliners now have the capabiliy to perform autolands now.
.
So now we see that the autopilot feature could have landed a plane in 2001...
.
And here are the components need for that maneuver.
A console.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FMS_B747-co...
Again Hani Hanjour must've studied real hard for this one...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autopilot
.
En route IFR navigation is evolving from the ground based navigational aid (NAVAID) airway system to a sophisticated satellite and computer-based system that can generate courses to suit the operational requirements of almost any flight. Although the promise of the new navigation systems is immense, the present system of navigation serves a valuable function and is expected to remain for a number of years.
http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/aviation/i...
.
And remote unmanned aircraft tecnology existed in 2001.
.
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/03_01/h...
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Virginia9-11Tru...
.
Sunday, 28.10.2001
Safety system: Abductees machines arrive independently
A process developed in the U.S. to make Notlandesystem aircraft hijackings: In an emergency, the crew operates a switch - and the machine automatically controls the nearest airport.
http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/sic...
.
Here we are being told how EgyptAir Flight 990, with many high ranking egyptian army officers on board, was crashed into the Atlantic Ocean on October 1999 using remote. According to Dick Eastman Flight 990 served as a dress rehearsal for 9/11.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#252093 Jan 24, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Fontaine, Which one of these fans is you?
And which one of these is you Sheen.... my guess...all of them...

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#252094 Jan 24, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Moron, You said that that is what a commercial airliner uses to navigate to it's destination. Any proof of that, LMFAO, Retard, how does this work, a plane flying from the us to Paris is shot by a laser from France and .....
I never said all. I am talking of the jets that crashed moron#2. Of course they would have been modified to engage the transition.
Go back to your bridge and ponder on that.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.