Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Does Everybody Hate Hugo?”

Since: Jan 13

Brooklyn, OH

#251772 Jan 17, 2013
Wow. This forum is still going too. And nothing has changed, it seems. So how is everybody doing?
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#251774 Jan 17, 2013
PeterinCleveland wrote:
Wow. This forum is still going too. And nothing has changed, it seems. So how is everybody doing?
Twoofers still batting .000

Happy New Year!
Charlie Sheen

Science Hill, KY

#251775 Jan 17, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah sorry charlie is like that at times. Usually when he is losing face big time and he doesn't like it one bit.
Speaking of losing who were those 20 pilots who could not fly.

That's a funny one eh!
Charlie Sheen

Science Hill, KY

#251776 Jan 17, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
I can post it again and again sorry charlie
you lose again
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ah
.
That's A Good Little charlie Huh eh ! er sorry charlie no really !
Please do! Anything to avoid backing up your claims Eh!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#251777 Jan 17, 2013
The American Genocide wrote:
<quoted text>Who the hell you callin Tommy? Fool.
Maybe you should try harder vulgar-tommy.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#251779 Jan 17, 2013
http://www.alienscientist.com/911/911%20two%2...
.
http://www.alienscientist.com/911/911%20two%2...
.
9/11 Conspiracy Solved: Names, Connections, & Details Exposed!
.

.
Oh the irony LOL
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha h ahah ahahhahaahahahahggghh
.
That's Sure A Good One huh eh !
Charlie Sheen

Science Hill, KY

#251780 Jan 17, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
9/11 Conspiracy Solved: Names, Connections, & Details Exposed!
Does it have the names of the 20 pilots who could not hit the broad side of a barn?

Oh the irony LOL!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#251782 Jan 17, 2013
9/11 Conspiracy Solved: Names, Connections, & Details Exposed!
.

.
http://www.alienscientist.com/911/911%20two%2...
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
.
That's A Good One Huh eh !
Charlie Sheen

Science Hill, KY

#251783 Jan 17, 2013
The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
<quoted text>
Has anyone conducted an exercise or simulation with similar beams and jet fuel that you know of?
LOL, And where would that get you, no one ever claimed jet fuel brought down the towers.
Charlie Sheen

Science Hill, KY

#251784 Jan 17, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
9/11 Conspiracy Solved: Names, Connections, & Details Exposed!
Does it have the names of the 20 fake pilots you claim could not hit the broad side of a barn?

Oh the irony LOL!
one eye

Padre Island Ntl Seashor, TX

#251785 Jan 17, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
Zero Dark Thrity is the new movie from Hurt Locker director Kathryn Bigelow who has enjoyed a rich and varied career to date which will surely be swamped under the weight of opinion lumped on this picture. She is a highly adept film-maker and the aforementioned Hurt Locker might just be the finest example of a war movie since Apocalypse Now and Full Metal Jacket. Zero Dark Thirty is a different beast altogether. It is a fact-based account of the events leading up to the killing of Osama Bin Laden. Its a touchy subject which is largely handled with great care and aplomb by the cast and film-makers.
A facking awesome movie.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#251786 Jan 17, 2013
The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
<quoted text>
Has anyone conducted an exercise or simulation with similar beams and jet fuel that you know of?
Thank you.
Jet fuel:
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
I think the NIST did. They couldn't get it to work right.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha h ha ha ahah ah ah
.
Why It's Just Like Magic Huh eh !

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251787 Jan 17, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Speaking of ignorant, are you ever going to explain how momentum would remain constant when both mass and velocity are increasing?

M=mv

Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots!
The topic of today is disinfo. Isn't that right 20 pilots, 20 pilots, 20 pilots?

To argue with a coward who employs the tactics of name-calling, slander, and deceit to coverup the fact that his entire argument is baseless, is pointless.

As is engaging a person who shows up under false pretenses to simply repeat assertions in a childish manner by saying "it was". Then when pressed it answers "because, so there".

Or addressing the disinfo repeaters of 20 pilots endlessly by spamming the forum to stop it from discussing relevant issues.

These are the proponents of the official lie, they employ the same tactics of NIST and the media to further that lie. They all follow the principle If a lie is repeated enough people will believe it.

Isn't momentum represented in physics by a lower case p, Mr. Wizard?

M=mv or p=mv? But either way, I'll assume you are trying to talk about momentum.

Now p=mv is a physics equation, but doesn't explain the WTC collapse, simply because it is apparent in the photographs of the collapse that mass was laterally ejected, and would be unable to exert downward force on the undamaged lower floors of WTC.

The conservation of energy principle is also shown when the the upper floors disintegrate upon impact with the lower undamaged floors. This upward disintegration will further lesson the downward force and momentum exerted on the lower undamaged floors.

p=mv is simply not the entire story of WTC collapses, and only a scientifically dishonest and morally bankrupt person who spends his days spreading childish insults on the Internet will say that it does.

Heses a 10 minute vid explaining the theories of WTC collapse.

For those not prone to heavy drooling and spamming, that is.

Insults Are Easier

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251788 Jan 17, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
The topic of today is disinfo. Isn't that right 20 pilots, 20 pilots, 20 pilots?

To argue with a coward who employs the tactics of name-calling, slander, and deceit to coverup the fact that his entire argument is baseless, is pointless.

As is engaging a person who shows up under false pretenses to simply repeat assertions in a childish manner by saying "it was". Then when pressed it answers "because, so there".

Or addressing the disinfo repeaters of 20 pilots endlessly by spamming the forum to stop it from discussing relevant issues.

These are the proponents of the official lie, they employ the same tactics of NIST and the media to further that lie. They all follow the principle If a lie is repeated enough people will believe it.

Isn't momentum represented in physics by a lower case p, Mr. Wizard?

M=mv or p=mv? But either way, I'll assume you are trying to talk about momentum.

Now p=mv is a physics equation, but doesn't explain the WTC collapse, simply because it is apparent in the photographs of the collapse that mass was laterally ejected, and would be unable to exert downward force on the undamaged lower floors of WTC.

The conservation of energy principle is also shown when the the upper floors disintegrate upon impact with the lower undamaged floors. This upward disintegration will further lesson the downward force and momentum exerted on the lower undamaged floors.

p=mv is simply not the entire story of WTC collapses, and only a scientifically dishonest and morally bankrupt person who spends his days spreading childish insults on the Internet will say that it does.

Heses a 10 minute vid explaining the theories of WTC collapse.

For those not prone to heavy drooling and spamming, that is.

Insults Are Easier
The 10 minute vid.

http://youtu.be/QxKB9hNvwX0

No drooling spammers!

Insults Are Easier
Charlie Sheen

Science Hill, KY

#251789 Jan 17, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
I think the NIST did. They couldn't get it to work right.
Wrong, Disinfo, the NIST never claimed the towers fell due to jet fuel.

But then truth is not the strong suit of the twooof movement.
Charlie Sheen

Science Hill, KY

#251790 Jan 17, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
The topic of today is disinfo. Isn't that right 20 pilots, 20 pilots, 20 pilots?
Yes, As led by Dr. Zorspaz.
Charlie Sheen

Science Hill, KY

#251791 Jan 17, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
As is engaging a person who shows up under false pretenses to simply repeat assertions in a childish manner by saying "it was". Then when pressed it answers "because, so there".
So far that has been the answer to STEEL PLATING, 20 PILOTS and STATIONARY ELEVATORS!

No that is funny Ehhh!
Charlie Sheen

Science Hill, KY

#251792 Jan 17, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Now p=mv is a physics equation, but doesn't explain the WTC collapse, simply because it is apparent in the photographs of the collapse that mass was laterally ejected, and would be unable to exert downward force on the undamaged lower floors of WTC.
OH God, now it is a CD because it DID NOT FALL INTO IT'S OWN FOOTPRINT!

One photo proves your spam is totally a made up twoofer falsehood!

http://media.photobucket.com/image/recent/ard...
Charlie Sheen

Science Hill, KY

#251793 Jan 17, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Now p=mv is a physics equation, but doesn't explain the WTC collapse, simply because it is apparent in the photographs of the collapse that mass was laterally ejected, and would be unable to exert downward force on the undamaged lower floors of WTC.
1. Ah, Were the 110 stories of concrete floors latterly ejected from the building so they could not exert downward force on the undamaged lower floors of WTC?

(And since you wont answer the above and will avoid debate at all costs)......

2. Do you even think before you post?

3. Where is your KY sock?

4. What crimes did you commit again?

“Does Everybody Hate Hugo?”

Since: Jan 13

Brooklyn, OH

#251796 Jan 17, 2013
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Twoofers still batting .000
Happy New Year!
Well, you have to remember, I'm the one who "sits on the fence"- I think most of the time the "twoofers" display just as much as logic and maturity as the "shills". What's amazing to me is how little the acual content of the posts as changed, despite some different posters. Still the same vicious circle.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 min Bongo 110,275
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 min PadMark 675,592
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 37 min Classic 4,087
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 54 min Retribution 15
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr gabrielwanker 982,212
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr UIDIOTRACEMAKEWOR... 184,752
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 2 hr RiccardoFire 46,194
More from around the web