Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,376 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250829 Jan 1, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
how did WTC 5 catch fire and what was burning that caused such big fires !?!?!?!?!?
<quoted text>
Happy New Year!!!!
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#250830 Jan 1, 2013
Timesten wrote:
Serious fires raged through WTC 5 for hours. Despite the massive structural damage shown by the holes, and fires far more severe than those in WTC 1, 2, and 7, WTC 5 did not collapse. FEMA's report has a number of photographs of Building 5 wreckage, and concludes that fires caused the collapse of portions of this building, without making a convincing case.
Destruction
WTC 5 was demolished 'PULLED' as part of the clean-up of Ground Zero
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search...
READ IT AGAIN, IDIOT:
"The major fire-induced collapse that occurred in WTC 5 involved the portion of the building that had Gerber framing (girder stubs welded to columns, and simply supported central girder spans with shear connections to the ends of the stubs (Figure 2)), but not other areas of the building where girders spanned the full distance between columns. This fact, and observations at the site suggesting that the failure was early in the fire, raised the possibility that this structure had a vulnerability that led to premature failure, perhaps during the heating phase of the fire. "

So to spell it out for idiot twoofers, particular STRUCTURE DESIGNS are vulnerable, so where similar events (e.g., unabated fire) occurred, dissimilar results may be expected, or vice versa.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250831 Jan 1, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
“...and I said,'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.'”
Let’s use some logic. Was Silverstein saying,
“We’ve had such terrible loss of life that it would be wise to blow up my building,”
or was he saying,
“We’ve had such terrible loss of life that it would be wise to withdraw firefighters to prevent further loss of life”?
Be honest,Which statement makes sense, and which is completely absurd?
Next, did Larry Silverstein, a real estate developer, have the world’s largest fire department at his beck and call? Of course not. Larry Silverstein had no say in how firefighting operations in New York City were conducted. He may have liked to think that the FDNY was calling him for a consultation, but that idea is laughable. It was a courtesy call.
“And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."
Who made the decision to pull? They. The fire department. Not “Me,” not “We.” They. This is ridiculously obvious to anyone but a Twoof Twit. Does the FDNY demolish buildings with explosives? No, they pull their people away from buildings that are too dangerous to be near. The “we” in “we watched the building collapse” is Silverstein and his wife. Silverstein was not at the WTC site <quoted text>
The fire fghting operation was referred to as "it".

End of story.

The fact that little losers like Tom (I'm not israelity) Fontaine from Pittsfield Ma still cling to such a weak argument just proves how little they have and how negligable their 11 years of progress has been.
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#250832 Jan 1, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Happy New Year!!!!
HNY, gents!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250833 Jan 1, 2013
Timesten wrote:
Was Building 7 Crushed by the Towers?
Damage to Building 6 shows that the heavy fallout from the North Tower didn't cross Vesey Street.
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/b7/collater...
And bldg 6's core was blown out, that's obvious The center core gone while the rest of the building is standing
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/b7/collater...
No one aside from you losers say it was crushed...just another example of the fallacious logic that makes your ilk a laughing sock truck driver tommy!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250834 Jan 1, 2013
Timesten wrote:
Serious fires raged through WTC 5 for hours. Despite the massive structural damage shown by the holes, and fires far more severe than those in WTC 1, 2, and 7, WTC 5 did not collapse. FEMA's report has a number of photographs of Building 5 wreckage, and concludes that fires caused the collapse of portions of this building, without making a convincing case.
Destruction
WTC 5 was demolished 'PULLED' as part of the clean-up of Ground Zero
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search...
Pictures of wtc 5 show beams with extreme sagging and given that 5 was not straddling the ConEd power station (meaning the entire construction and design was different) this is yet another examples of scientifically illiterate fools pretending they have a point to make.

I know barb, you don't get it...just like fossil fuels and man landing on the moon.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250835 Jan 1, 2013
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
HNY, gents!
Cheers STT!

Hope 2013 is a great one for you and yours:-)

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250836 Jan 1, 2013
Little Blue Alien wrote:
It took me 30 years of my life to figure out sports is a mere distraction in keeping us from figuring out the banksters, career political criminals, and the never ending Israeli designed Middle East genocide.
Homosexuality too.
Oy.
So you failed at sports too eh Fontaine?

Jeez, big surprise there!

Not.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250837 Jan 1, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
.
The forensic investigation and re-creation of the aircraft is usually to find out why the crash occurred. In the hopes of maybe preventing a like scenario in the future.
.
In the case of 9/11 the bwunkers on this forum will tell you this wasn't done because they already knew why the crashes happened. The planes were allegedly flown by bad men into the buildings on purpose. Ergo, mystery solved, let's move on shall we.
.
They didn't even bother to identify any serial numbered parts from the little pieces of wreckage they claim were from these alleged aircraft back to the known records of the planes in question.
.
This is the first time in the history of the investigation of aircraft mishaps in this country that this sort of forensic investigation was not completed.
.
Same thing goes for not looking for evidence of explosives. They simply hand wave away any such evidence, claim there isn't any, and then claim such a forensic explanation is not called for in the most heinous and catastrophic event as the complete destruction of these huge buildings with people in them.
.
In fact they separate the plane crashes from the building falling down in their investigations. And the so-called investigations stopped at the moment the buildings started to fall.
.
All they can come up with is a "probable collapse sequence" and once "collapse initiation" began it was "inevitable".
.
There should certainly be a new independent TRUTHFUL investigation of 9/11. The world is owed an explanation no matter where it leads.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha h ahha ha ha ha
.
That's A Good One Huh eh !
^^Great example of a fool that just.doesn't.get it!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250838 Jan 1, 2013
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
IDIOT:
"The major fire-induced collapse that occurred in WTC 5 involved the portion of the building that had Gerber framing (girder stubs welded to columns, and simply supported central girder spans with shear connections to the ends of the stubs (Figure 2)), but not other areas of the building where girders spanned the full distance between columns. This fact, and observations at the site suggesting that the failure was early in the fire, raised the possibility that this structure had a vulnerability that led to premature failure, perhaps during the heating phase of the fire. "
http://www.structuremag.org/article.aspx...
Oh but the truck driver cited a twoofer forum that cites another twoofer with no science background to support his mindlessly accepted, twoof approved, sheep regurgitated opinion!

You just cited Structure Magazine, a trade publication for engineers and architects in the business of designing tall buildings...

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#250839 Jan 1, 2013
Happy New Year T !!!!
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
HNY, gents!

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#250840 Jan 1, 2013
Happy New Year Pie!!!
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Happy New Year!!!!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250841 Jan 1, 2013
2013...my predictions

1) Twoof will yet again fail to make any impact at all.

2) Twoof will continue to repeat the same old tired, long debunked claims that haven't furthered their cause in the 11 years since 911.

3) Tom (I'm not israelity) Fontaine will hit 10,000 views on his insanely idiotic, chaotic website by clearing cookies and clicking over and over and over and over.

4) More sane people will leave twoof leaving the reins of the [non]movement in the hands of the clincally insane bigots like the ones here at Topix.

5) Repeat step #1.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#250842 Jan 1, 2013
you once said there could not be large fires in WTC 7 because all there was to burn was office material so my question to you is what burned in WTC 5 that, according to you, created large fires worse then WTC 7 !?!!!?!?!?
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what I'd like to know...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =xDaqBecJhr8XX
.
Wiki says it sustained little damage..not true
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_World_Trade...
.
The fires in 5 were worse than the fires in 7
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/docs/w...
.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v411/DoYouE...

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250843 Jan 1, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>Ha Ha ha says the blind shill sheeple. If we get our investigation you and your blind bat gullible buds will be saying "We knew all along 911 was an inside job and we tried to tell you that but you would not listen."

We know you shills all too well... baaaaaaa
http://red-pill.org/are-you-one-of-the-sheepl...
If you get your investigation?

Twoofers can investigate all they want, that's what creates all the lulz!

Btw, is your portion determining whether the plane hung a left or right truck driver?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250844 Jan 1, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
<quoted text>you once said there could not be large fires in WTC 7 because all there was to burn was office material so my question to you is what burned in WTC 5 that, according to you, created large fires worse then WTC 7 !?!!!?!?!?
That's kinda like his claim that steel melted but aluminum didn't.

And like that claim, he won't be able to respond with anything intelligent.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#250845 Jan 1, 2013
...... logic has never been a strong point for Twoof
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
That's kinda like his claim that steel melted but aluminum didn't.
And like that claim, he won't be able to respond with anything intelligent.
Blue Aliens Can Jump

Huntington, MA

#250846 Jan 1, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>So you failed at sports too eh Fontaine?
Jeez, big surprise there!
Not.
If 30 pts per game, in hoop is failing then yes, a big failure.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250848 Jan 1, 2013
Blue Aliens Can Jump wrote:
<quoted text>
If 30 pts per game, in hoop is failing then yes, a big failure.
Well if taking 30 up the hoop in a single night is your idea of success, who am I to argue.

Does wendy know?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#250849 Jan 1, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
...... logic has never been a strong point for Twoof
<quoted text>
Same goes with; thinking, comprehending, understanding and researching.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 10 min Rosa_Winkel 99,727
This ~ or ~ That? (game) (Dec '12) 34 min andet1987 1,837
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 36 min par five 4,082
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 58 min Phantom2010 837,024
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 1 hr The swamiji 7,155
Tamil vs Kannada. Which one is the oldest langu... (Oct '12) 1 hr The swamiji 1,427
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr lightbeamrider 176,756
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr Tony17 589,351
More from around the web