Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,470 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Since: Dec 12

Hurricane, UT

#249667 Dec 21, 2012
Building 7 was not explained by NIST, mostly simply ignored. The whole building dropped at free fall speed into it’s own footprint, and that explains a lot to me. To have all three buildings supposedly weakened by fire in specific spots fall at free fall speed is improbable, indeed impossible beyond any chance.(as did buildings one and two, except for a thirty ton beam that was blown across the street from the towers, and impaled in the walls of a bank, how much energy would it take to throw a 30 ton beam that distance?) Bones from victims were found on the tops of buildings 600 feet away, yet a perfectly preserved un-singed passport belonging to one of “the terrorist’ supposedly made it through the explosion and was found on the street below, and was instantly recognized as belonging to one of the supposed perps!

The mayor knew 7 was coming down and said so, the police knew it was coming down, and there is audio/video proof of those warnings before the fall, it was even announced on TV with it “still” standing in the background that it “had come down” several minutes before it actually come down. It was destroyed by perfectly executed implosions, later in the day.

It is my opinion that building 7 was supposed to be destroyed by making it look like the debris from buildings one and two caused the collapse of bldg 7, the explosives were set to destroy the building as the debris fell on it. But something failed and the “powers that be” simply finished it off.

9-11 was a botched operation, blame was put on Osama before the dust had settled. LDG’s brought down the buildings to further enrich themselves through the military industrial complex with the declaration by Bush, of war on the supposed terrorist organization that the LDG’s chose to blame.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#249668 Dec 21, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
How can anyone possibly talk about the recent mass murder in CT and not mention the fact that the fathers of both the Aurora shooter, and the Sandy Hook shooter were set to testify in the Senate about the LIBOR trillion dollar bank scandal.
.
Were these shootings a message to the fathers of the alleged shooters not to testify against men who control trillions of dollars?
.
Robert Holmes is a "fraud scientist" at FICO. Peter Lanza is the tax director for GE who paid "0" in taxes on 14.2 B in profits last year.
.
This kind of money will certainly buy you a nice false flag style mass murder as a signal to shut up or else, as well as more political focus on gun control.
.
Deception is the most powerful political force on the planet.
.
The sheeple are certainly being deceived these days.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ah
.
That's Certainly Funny huh eh !
"Peter Lanza, was the tax director for General Electric, a corporation that paid -0- taxes on 14.2 billion dollars in profits last year."

That alone should raise red flags all over the place.
https://www.google.com/search...

Since: Dec 12

Hurricane, UT

#249669 Dec 21, 2012
http://www.debunking911.com/paper.htm

This was one of the first websites I saw devoted to 9/11 'de-bunking' propaganda. I love how they act like the towers didn't free fall because it took 10-12 seconds whereas free fall would have been 9 seconds. LOL! Mathematicians and physicists will tell you that it should have taken about 90 seconds for one of the towers to collapse all the way to the ground if it were a natural collapse because of the law of conservation of momentum. The fact is, all of the lower floors' resistance was removed with thermite and explosives, which is why they disintegrated and were pulverized DURING collapse at the speed of gravity. Trying to disprove the fact of free fall collapse by both buildings with a difference of a mere 3 seconds goes to show how absurd this site is in their 'debunking'.

Another thing I need to point out is why there are just as many scientists, physicists, engineers, architects, etc. who support the official story as there are those who challenge and refute it. Dr. Jones' research was gaining a lot of publicity back in 2006 and BYU was beginning to feel the heat about doing something to silence him and so they decided to offer him an early retirement package so that he would no longer be teaching at the school and to effectively distance themselves from his research and conclusions. Why? Easy... money! Had Dr. Jones continued to teach at BYU with all of the publicity he was garnering, the 'government' could have easily punished BYU with any number of financial repercussions, ranging from a revocation of its tax-exempt status to withdrawing or limiting pell grant funding and/or federal loans for students. Dr. Jones has even publicly stated here on this forum that he is aware of some things that went on that contributed to his dismissal and they had to do with $$$. I would surmise that this is the root cause of many others supporting the official story... they don't want the federal government breathing down their neck or any potential ramifications of challenging them. It really is sad and pathetic how money corrupts and controls others... Washington, DC and Wall Street are two prime examples.
Timesten

Pittsfield, MA

#249670 Dec 21, 2012
Bgoood wrote:
http://www.debunking911.com/paper.htm
This was one of the first websites I saw devoted to 9/11 'de-bunking' propaganda. I love how they act like the towers didn't free fall because it took 10-12 seconds whereas free fall would have been 9 seconds.
Agreed when you can't trust those entrusted, who can you trust eh?
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#249671 Dec 21, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
I want a phaser like on Star Trek. Just set it on max and vaporize the little bastard. Blast all those atoms to Kingdom Come.
They already have it..
https://www.google.com/search...
.
https://www.google.com/search...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#249672 Dec 21, 2012
Bgoood wrote:
Building 7 was not explained by NIST, mostly simply ignored. The whole building dropped at free fall speed into it’s own footprint, and that explains a lot to me. To have all three buildings supposedly weakened by fire in specific spots fall at free fall speed is improbable, indeed impossible beyond any chance.(as did buildings one and two, except for a thirty ton beam that was blown across the street from the towers, and impaled in the walls of a bank, how much energy would it take to throw a 30 ton beam that distance?) Bones from victims were found on the tops of buildings 600 feet away, yet a perfectly preserved un-singed passport belonging to one of “the terrorist’ supposedly made it through the explosion and was found on the street below, and was instantly recognized as belonging to one of the supposed perps!
The mayor knew 7 was coming down and said so, the police knew it was coming down, and there is audio/video proof of those warnings before the fall, it was even announced on TV with it “still” standing in the background that it “had come down” several minutes before it actually come down. It was destroyed by perfectly executed implosions, later in the day.
It is my opinion that building 7 was supposed to be destroyed by making it look like the debris from buildings one and two caused the collapse of bldg 7, the explosives were set to destroy the building as the debris fell on it. But something failed and the “powers that be” simply finished it off.
9-11 was a botched operation, blame was put on Osama before the dust had settled. LDG’s brought down the buildings to further enrich themselves through the military industrial complex with the declaration by Bush, of war on the supposed terrorist organization that the LDG’s chose to blame.
Agreed...
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249673 Dec 21, 2012
Timesten wrote:
Donkey Porn!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249674 Dec 21, 2012
Timesten wrote:
They already have mass google searches Moobs?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249675 Dec 21, 2012
Bgoood wrote:
A third paper, regarding new findings in the WTC dust which point to the use of cutter-charges, is going through the peer-review process now.(Submitted in July 2008).
2008?????, I take it it did not pass review.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#249676 Dec 21, 2012
Building 7 was not explained by NIST .... REALLY IDIOT !?!?!?!

http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm...
Bgoood wrote:
Building 7 was not explained by NIST, mostly simply ignored. The whole building dropped at free fall speed into it’s own footprint, and that explains a lot to me. To have all three buildings supposedly weakened by fire in specific spots fall at free fall speed is improbable, indeed impossible beyond any chance.(as did buildings one and two, except for a thirty ton beam that was blown across the street from the towers, and impaled in the walls of a bank, how much energy would it take to throw a 30 ton beam that distance?) Bones from victims were found on the tops of buildings 600 feet away, yet a perfectly preserved un-singed passport belonging to one of “the terrorist’ supposedly made it through the explosion and was found on the street below, and was instantly recognized as belonging to one of the supposed perps!
The mayor knew 7 was coming down and said so, the police knew it was coming down, and there is audio/video proof of those warnings before the fall, it was even announced on TV with it “still” standing in the background that it “had come down” several minutes before it actually come down. It was destroyed by perfectly executed implosions, later in the day.
It is my opinion that building 7 was supposed to be destroyed by making it look like the debris from buildings one and two caused the collapse of bldg 7, the explosives were set to destroy the building as the debris fell on it. But something failed and the “powers that be” simply finished it off.
9-11 was a botched operation, blame was put on Osama before the dust had settled. LDG’s brought down the buildings to further enrich themselves through the military industrial complex with the declaration by Bush, of war on the supposed terrorist organization that the LDG’s chose to blame.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249677 Dec 21, 2012
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
So what. Does that make him a super cop or something. He probably walks a beat while eating donuts...
Not everyone can stay home like you moobs and claim your mental disability check.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#249678 Dec 21, 2012
what does your brother Ed think about your website !?!?!?
Timesten wrote:

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249679 Dec 21, 2012
Timesten wrote:
the last page...
https://www.google.com/search...
.
All of these people are wrong while you few jerks claim to be right..... lmao.... Yeah right.
Nothing that they present washes with the evidence and facts. For example, people all watched the planes being boarded. The same planes departed and were tracked by ATC. Where the hell could they have gone if not into the targets?

You are delusional.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#249680 Dec 21, 2012
Nobody clicks your links Moob Boy !!!
Timesten wrote:
For you troll shills....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =0esUFZcMtdAXX
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249681 Dec 21, 2012
Bgoood wrote:
http://www.debunking911.com/paper.htm
This was one of the first websites I saw devoted to 9/11 'de-bunking' propaganda. I love how they act like the towers didn't free fall because it took 10-12 seconds whereas free fall would have been 9 seconds. LOL! Mathematicians and physicists will tell you that it should have taken about 90 seconds for one of the towers to collapse all the way to the ground if it were a natural collapse because of the law of conservation of momentum.
Show your math!
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#249682 Dec 21, 2012
Bgoood wrote:
Quote; Dr Jones OK -- we begin, with the introduction and a discussion of the collapse of WTC 7. Comments welcomed.(NOTE: NIST has produced their final report on WTC 7, several months AFTER this Fourteen Points paper was published. Although their report was NOT peer-reviewed, I would be glad to comment on it if there is interest. Otherwise, we'll move to point 2 in the peer-reviewed paper.)
INTRODUCTION
On September 11, 2001, the Twin Towers of the World
Trade Center (WTC) were hit by airplanes. Total destruction
of these high-rises at near free-fall speeds ensued within two
hours, and another high-rise which was not hit by a plane
(WTC 7) collapsed about seven hours later at 5:20 p.m.
The US Congress laid out the charge specifically to the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to
“Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed fol-
lowing the initial impacts of the aircraft and why and how
WTC 7 collapsed”[1]. The Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) was acting with a similar motivation in
their earlier study of these tragic collapses [2]. NIST and
FEMA were not charged with finding out how fire was the
specific agent of collapse, yet both evidently took that lim-
ited approach while leaving open a number of unanswered
questions. Our goal here is to set a foundation for scientific
discussion by enumerating those areas where we find agree-
ment with NIST and FEMA. Understanding the mechanisms
that led to the destruction of the World Trade Center will
enable scientists and engineers to provide a safer environ-
ment for people using similar buildings and benefit firefight-
ers who risk their lives trying to save others.
DISCUSSION
1. WTC 7 Collapse Issue
FEMA:“The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how
they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this
time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises con-
tained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only
a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investiga-
tion, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue”[2].
FEMA analyzed the remarkable collapse of WTC build-
ing 7, the 47-story skyscraper that, even though it was not hit
by a plane, collapsed about seven hours after the second
Tower collapse. We certainly agree that FEMA’s best fire-
based hypothesis “has only a low probability of occurrence.”
NIST’s final report on WTC 7 has been long delayed and is
eagerly awaited [3]. Apparently it is difficult to fully explain
the complete and rapid collapse of WTC 7 with a fire-based
hypothesis alone.
Hi, new spammy sockie!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249683 Dec 21, 2012
Bgoood wrote:
Building 7 was not explained by NIST, mostly simply ignored. The whole building dropped at free fall speed into it’s own footprint, and that explains a lot to me.
Not even close to freefall 16 to 18 seconds.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#249684 Dec 21, 2012
NO STUPID, it makes him an officer who doesn't want to show up to the scene of a shooting where multiple people having handguns and he doesn't know who the bad guy is
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
So what. Does that make him a super cop or something. He probably walks a beat while eating donuts...
Seems you idiots cherry pick alot. There are others who say the same thing about this story....61 pages worth of links on peoples views
https://www.google.com/search...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249685 Dec 21, 2012
Bgoood wrote:
and another high-rise which was not hit by a plane
(WTC 7) collapsed about seven hours later at 5:20 p.m.
No, It was just hit by a multi ton chunk of the North tower severing is sprinkler lines el socko!

copenhagen

Tucson, AZ

#249687 Dec 21, 2012
CitizenX wrote:
<quoted text>
So the "official" conspiracy theory is any better? The official conspiracy with its holes doesn't bother you at all?
Wow, you are nuts. Get help!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
"Hey!!!! Do you think I have an ODD-SHAPED HEAD... 4 min WasteWater 27
No one should blaspheme Prophet Mohammad, peace... 4 min MUQ2 655
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 7 min Justise League 854,854
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 8 min MUQ2 40,708
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 12 min WasteWater 596,348
the REAL REASON the state of California lost to... 14 min Doctor REALITY 6
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 15 min razz58 2,632
The Christian Atheist debate 22 min ChristINSANITY is... 1,010
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr Peace_Warrior 612,619
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 2 hr juts fooky 444,338
More from around the web