Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,541 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Fatfck

Padre Island Ntl Seashor, TX

#249141 Dec 14, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
The Eyewitnesses were all conspirators right?
They must be government shills.
ROTFLMAO
Jet Fuel doesn't explode. Ha Ha Ha Ha Hhhhaaaaaa.
Once the fuel ignited and the plane exploded the sourc of fuel is burnt off. There not a strong source of the fire triangle left. Do u understand that?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249142 Dec 14, 2012
Fatfck wrote:
<quoted text>Once the fuel ignited and the plane exploded the sourc of fuel is burnt off. There not a strong source of the fire triangle left. Do u understand that?
NO, Not at all really, But then no one ever claimed jet fuel brought down the building, it just acted as charcoal lighter more or less and set endless poly products like carpet, office furniture and so forth on fire which burns much hotter.

I think the fire triangle is around Bermuda but you would have to ask a twoofer to be sure.
Adam Sandler

Padre Island Ntl Seashor, TX

#249143 Dec 14, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
NO, Not at all really, But then no one ever claimed jet fuel brought down the building, it just acted as charcoal lighter more or less and set endless poly products like carpet, office furniture and so forth on fire which burns much hotter.
I think the fire triangle is around Bermuda but you would have to ask a twoofer to be sure.
So, let get this straight charlie. Fires are what melted the steel beams leading to the catastrophic collapse?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#249144 Dec 14, 2012
09/11/2011

As people across Canada and the United States publicly remembered the tenth anniversary of 9/11 this week, a small group at Ryerson University were examining another angle altogether: the “myth” of 9/11.
.
The four-day Toronto Hearings kicked off Thursday with a trio of experts and academics offering their opinions on why the official narrative of 9/11 as a terrorist attack is flawed.
.
The National Post’s Megan O’Toole looks at the day’s highlights.
.
THE LEGAL ANGLE
.
Though the Toronto Hearings have so far played out more like a conference than a legal hearing, organizers referred to each of the three experts who took to the podium as “witnesses.” No lawyers were there to cross-examine them; instead, a panel of three academics and an Italian judge peppered the speakers with friendly questions.
.
The panel, which will ultimately draft a report on the matter, may address the question of whether another state-sponsored inquiry is needed to help answer all the lingering questions about 9/11.
.
“We know that the official story does not fly,” organizer Graeme MacQueen said.“It’s full of holes.”
.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/09/09/the-t...
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ah haha
.
That's Funny Huh eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#249145 Dec 14, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, When one can not rebut the evidence that's how it works.
So what is funny about Jet Fuel? Watch, another win by default.
You really don't get it do ya Sorry charlie
.
Sorry charlie is twisting it all around like he does.
.
Sorry charlie YOU claim you win by default when YOU can not refute MY evidence.
.
That's how the bwunkers "play" their little game of I know you are but what am I?
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
.
That's As Funny As Dirt huh sorry charlie eh !
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#249146 Dec 14, 2012
Sundog512 wrote:
So when Tigermerpig shows up here complaining about how I am trolling her ugly, fat ass, please take note that after weeks of no contact with the dog-faced baboon, she showed up on my hometown forum using my registered name with this statement:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/welch-wv/TI1K...
She just can't learn....which might explain why she is a conspiracy nut.
;)
Hmmm... now who else routinely impersonates other posters?
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#249147 Dec 14, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
.
“We know that the official story does not fly,” organizer Graeme MacQueen said.“It’s full of holes.”
.
Yeah, like his head.

So what happened to this "report"?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249148 Dec 14, 2012
Adam Sandler wrote:
<quoted text>So, let get this straight charlie. Fires are what melted the steel beams leading to the catastrophic collapse?
Stawman, No one ever claimed the collapse was due to steel melting.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249149 Dec 14, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
09/11/201
“We know that the official story does not fly,” organizer Graeme MacQueen said.“It’s full of holes.”
And those holes would be?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249150 Dec 14, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry charlie YOU claim you win by default when YOU can not refute MY evidence.
You have no evidence, as I said what is so funny about jet fuel, your response on the issue, to ignore the question, I WIN BY DEFAULT!

Now that is funny!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249151 Dec 14, 2012
Fatfck wrote:
<quoted text>Once the fuel ignited and the plane exploded the sourc of fuel is burnt off. There not a strong source of the fire triangle left. Do u understand that?
You forgot about all the other material such as rugs, plastics, computers, desks, luggage, wall coverings, furnature, magnesium, rubber, wiring, filing cabinets full of papper, etc. The fuel doesn't just burn off in a flash. For example, when a plane crashes at an airport, it burns until the foam trucks put out the fire. Once the petrochemicals are ignited, they keep burning as evidenced by all the fire which burned 1,400 cars and trucks at the street level and set other buildings on fire.

You must be kidding me.
Waste

Richmond, KY

#249152 Dec 14, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Friends, relatives, bystanders, security personnel, American Airlines ticket takers to name just a few.
.
Whom exactly? You have failed to provide any names.
.
2. You have failed to provide anything close to proof that Olsen's phone call was faked. Since it was made on her cell phone, I'm quite sure it was verified by telephone records.
.
What you are quite sure about is immaterial bwunker.
Provide some proof other than the 9/11 Ommission Report, the MIST Report, or the Pentgoboom Report. No one believes these bogus reports and they are not evidence.
.
3. Yes flight 77 was tracked, as well as other aircraft in the vicinity. How do you explain how it could have disappeared? Where did it go? It would have had to cross over land at a very low altitude to go out to sea. Someone would have seen it. Besides, the helicopter pilot and others saw it.
.
It landed at Cleveland Hopkins Airport. Parked at a remote location and was quarantined off for a bomb threat inspection.
Do your own research bwunker.
.
4. There was no time to intercept. It flew out of Washington Dulles airport just a short distance away.
.
What flew out of Washington Dulles Airport?(It?)
.
5. The evidence was gathered and documented. There were investigators who also confirmed what they saw.
.
If there were any serial numbered parts, found in wreckage of the aircraft that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon, identified back to the aircraft in question, the FBI will not release that information for reasons of "National Security". YOu and no one else has ever seen it.
Now gee I wonder why they would want to do that? If they were in possession of any such parts, why are they not splashing it all over the media? Same thing goes for all the video cameras confiscated from many locations on the Pentagon and various businesses located around the Pentagon. No matter their technical specifications they could still show what did hit the Pentagon and this is why they were all taken.
.
What about the missile batteries at the Pentagon? Why wasn't whatever it was coming toward the Pentagon shot down?
.
You are calling hundreds of people liars. What is the statistical chance that hundreds can all be colluding is a massive criminal act with no motive?
.
I am also calling YOU a liar.
.
Sorry, you took one small clip and turned it into something other than what actually happened. None of the pieces fit.
.
Especially the Boeing 757 which could not fit into the 65' hole in the Pentagon which was not designed to stop a nuclear bomb like the F4 Phantom jet video.
.
Just like those union assholes in Detroit say, "you're pissing on history"
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
.
Now That's A Funny JOKE HUH EH !
Don't waste your time debating WasteWater. We all know he's a shill and he's probably another porkie sock.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249154 Dec 14, 2012
Waste wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't waste your time debating WasteWater. We all know he's a shill and he's probably another porkie sock.
Ad hominem BS.

You are calling hundreds if not thousands of eye-witnesses liars and shills.

What a Jackass.
newsReports

AOL

#249155 Dec 14, 2012
.

***ISRAEL -- POPE talk RE: MIDEAST PEACE

&fe ature=plcp

.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#249156 Dec 14, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Ad hominem BS.
You are calling hundreds if not thousands of eye-witnesses liars and shills.
What a Jackass.
Don't forget yourself, liar, shill.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ah
.
That's A Good One huh eh !
Dr_Zorderz

Italy

#249157 Dec 14, 2012
Waste wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't waste your time debating WasteWater. We all know he's a shill and he's probably another porkie sock.
Hmmmmm....now who else routinely impersonates other posters?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249158 Dec 14, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't forget yourself, liar, shill.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ah
.
That's A Good One huh eh !
So what is so funny about Jet Fuel, ANOTHER WIN BY DEFAULT! THAT'S A GOOD ONE!!
Porkpie Hat

Richmond, KY

#249160 Dec 14, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Ad hominem BS.
You are calling hundreds if not thousands of eye-witnesses liars and shills.
What a Jackass.
Ad hominem...syntactical signature of Porkie
Did you forget

Henderson, NV

#249161 Dec 14, 2012
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Ad hominem...syntactical signature of Porkie
you were posting as Porkpie Hat

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249162 Dec 14, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
So what is so funny about Jet Fuel, ANOTHER WIN BY DEFAULT! THAT'S A GOOD ONE!!
Looks like it. They can't give a valid argument because such arguments don't exist. Therefore, they resort to name calling. Why are delusional people like that?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min It aint necessari... 878,307
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 4 min RiccardoFire 7,980
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 10 min June VanDerMark 603,224
News Deputy ambushed, fatally shot at gas station ne... 21 min discocrisco 1
gay bottom in gurgaon (May '14) 32 min Ajay 562
Ex-Wife of Dr. Shine, Dee Dee Freeman Moving on... (Apr '12) 35 min Gwendolyn 3
The Christian Atheist debate 1 hr emperorjohn 3,813
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 5 hr Lyndi 177,850
More from around the web