Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,989 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#249146 Dec 14, 2012
Sundog512 wrote:
So when Tigermerpig shows up here complaining about how I am trolling her ugly, fat ass, please take note that after weeks of no contact with the dog-faced baboon, she showed up on my hometown forum using my registered name with this statement:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/welch-wv/TI1K...
She just can't learn....which might explain why she is a conspiracy nut.
;)
Hmmm... now who else routinely impersonates other posters?
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#249147 Dec 14, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
.
“We know that the official story does not fly,” organizer Graeme MacQueen said.“It’s full of holes.”
.
Yeah, like his head.

So what happened to this "report"?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249148 Dec 14, 2012
Adam Sandler wrote:
<quoted text>So, let get this straight charlie. Fires are what melted the steel beams leading to the catastrophic collapse?
Stawman, No one ever claimed the collapse was due to steel melting.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249149 Dec 14, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
09/11/201
“We know that the official story does not fly,” organizer Graeme MacQueen said.“It’s full of holes.”
And those holes would be?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249150 Dec 14, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry charlie YOU claim you win by default when YOU can not refute MY evidence.
You have no evidence, as I said what is so funny about jet fuel, your response on the issue, to ignore the question, I WIN BY DEFAULT!

Now that is funny!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249151 Dec 14, 2012
Fatfck wrote:
<quoted text>Once the fuel ignited and the plane exploded the sourc of fuel is burnt off. There not a strong source of the fire triangle left. Do u understand that?
You forgot about all the other material such as rugs, plastics, computers, desks, luggage, wall coverings, furnature, magnesium, rubber, wiring, filing cabinets full of papper, etc. The fuel doesn't just burn off in a flash. For example, when a plane crashes at an airport, it burns until the foam trucks put out the fire. Once the petrochemicals are ignited, they keep burning as evidenced by all the fire which burned 1,400 cars and trucks at the street level and set other buildings on fire.

You must be kidding me.
Waste

Richmond, KY

#249152 Dec 14, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Friends, relatives, bystanders, security personnel, American Airlines ticket takers to name just a few.
.
Whom exactly? You have failed to provide any names.
.
2. You have failed to provide anything close to proof that Olsen's phone call was faked. Since it was made on her cell phone, I'm quite sure it was verified by telephone records.
.
What you are quite sure about is immaterial bwunker.
Provide some proof other than the 9/11 Ommission Report, the MIST Report, or the Pentgoboom Report. No one believes these bogus reports and they are not evidence.
.
3. Yes flight 77 was tracked, as well as other aircraft in the vicinity. How do you explain how it could have disappeared? Where did it go? It would have had to cross over land at a very low altitude to go out to sea. Someone would have seen it. Besides, the helicopter pilot and others saw it.
.
It landed at Cleveland Hopkins Airport. Parked at a remote location and was quarantined off for a bomb threat inspection.
Do your own research bwunker.
.
4. There was no time to intercept. It flew out of Washington Dulles airport just a short distance away.
.
What flew out of Washington Dulles Airport?(It?)
.
5. The evidence was gathered and documented. There were investigators who also confirmed what they saw.
.
If there were any serial numbered parts, found in wreckage of the aircraft that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon, identified back to the aircraft in question, the FBI will not release that information for reasons of "National Security". YOu and no one else has ever seen it.
Now gee I wonder why they would want to do that? If they were in possession of any such parts, why are they not splashing it all over the media? Same thing goes for all the video cameras confiscated from many locations on the Pentagon and various businesses located around the Pentagon. No matter their technical specifications they could still show what did hit the Pentagon and this is why they were all taken.
.
What about the missile batteries at the Pentagon? Why wasn't whatever it was coming toward the Pentagon shot down?
.
You are calling hundreds of people liars. What is the statistical chance that hundreds can all be colluding is a massive criminal act with no motive?
.
I am also calling YOU a liar.
.
Sorry, you took one small clip and turned it into something other than what actually happened. None of the pieces fit.
.
Especially the Boeing 757 which could not fit into the 65' hole in the Pentagon which was not designed to stop a nuclear bomb like the F4 Phantom jet video.
.
Just like those union assholes in Detroit say, "you're pissing on history"
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
.
Now That's A Funny JOKE HUH EH !
Don't waste your time debating WasteWater. We all know he's a shill and he's probably another porkie sock.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249154 Dec 14, 2012
Waste wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't waste your time debating WasteWater. We all know he's a shill and he's probably another porkie sock.
Ad hominem BS.

You are calling hundreds if not thousands of eye-witnesses liars and shills.

What a Jackass.
newsReports

AOL

#249155 Dec 14, 2012
.

***ISRAEL -- POPE talk RE: MIDEAST PEACE

&fe ature=plcp

.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#249156 Dec 14, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Ad hominem BS.
You are calling hundreds if not thousands of eye-witnesses liars and shills.
What a Jackass.
Don't forget yourself, liar, shill.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ah
.
That's A Good One huh eh !
Dr_Zorderz

Italy

#249157 Dec 14, 2012
Waste wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't waste your time debating WasteWater. We all know he's a shill and he's probably another porkie sock.
Hmmmmm....now who else routinely impersonates other posters?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249158 Dec 14, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't forget yourself, liar, shill.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ah
.
That's A Good One huh eh !
So what is so funny about Jet Fuel, ANOTHER WIN BY DEFAULT! THAT'S A GOOD ONE!!
Porkpie Hat

Richmond, KY

#249160 Dec 14, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Ad hominem BS.
You are calling hundreds if not thousands of eye-witnesses liars and shills.
What a Jackass.
Ad hominem...syntactical signature of Porkie
Did you forget

Henderson, NV

#249161 Dec 14, 2012
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Ad hominem...syntactical signature of Porkie
you were posting as Porkpie Hat

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249162 Dec 14, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
So what is so funny about Jet Fuel, ANOTHER WIN BY DEFAULT! THAT'S A GOOD ONE!!
Looks like it. They can't give a valid argument because such arguments don't exist. Therefore, they resort to name calling. Why are delusional people like that?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249163 Dec 14, 2012
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Ad hominem...syntactical signature of Porkie
Definition:

The person presenting an argument is attacked instead of the argument itself. This takes many forms. For example, the person's character, nationality or religion may be attacked. Alternatively, it may be pointed out that a person stands to gain from a favourable outcome. Or, finally, a person may be attacked by association, or by the company he keeps.
There are three major forms of Attacking the Person:

ad hominem (abusive): instead of attacking an assertion, the argument attacks the person who made the assertion.
ad hominem (circumstantial): instead of attacking an assertion the author points to the relationship between the person making the assertion and the person's circumstances.
ad hominem (tu quoque): this form of attack on the person notes that a person does not practise what he
preaches.

http://onegoodmove.org/fallacy/attack.htm

Put that in your pipe and smoke it Sugar.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249164 Dec 14, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't forget yourself, liar, shill.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ah
.
That's A Good One huh eh !
Another worthless opinion.

ROTFLMAO
Porkpie Hat

Richmond, KY

#249165 Dec 14, 2012
Did you forget wrote:
<quoted text>
you were posting as Porkpie Hat
I do that to get the attention of Porkie and his socks. I know it annoys the shit out of him.
Porkpie Hat

Richmond, KY

#249166 Dec 14, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Definition:
The person presenting an argument is attacked instead of the argument itself. This takes many forms. For example, the person's character, nationality or religion may be attacked. Alternatively, it may be pointed out that a person stands to gain from a favourable outcome. Or, finally, a person may be attacked by association, or by the company he keeps.
There are three major forms of Attacking the Person:
ad hominem (abusive): instead of attacking an assertion, the argument attacks the person who made the assertion.
ad hominem (circumstantial): instead of attacking an assertion the author points to the relationship between the person making the assertion and the person's circumstances.
ad hominem (tu quoque): this form of attack on the person notes that a person does not practise what he
preaches.
http://onegoodmove.org/fallacy/attack.htm
Put that in your pipe and smoke it Sugar.
straight out of the shill manual, eh pork?
Porkpie Hat

Richmond, KY

#249167 Dec 14, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like it. They can't give a valid argument because such arguments don't exist. Therefore, they resort to name calling. Why are delusional people like that?
The arguments were presented before and this debate was over a long time ago and you guys already lost. Now we can't help but be gloating winners which is why we only make fun of you now, and you encourage it by being sore losers.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 24 min Aerobatty 950,642
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 24 min Student 42,254
Gay sex in raigarh (Jun '15) 37 min Botam boy 304
my cousin touches me when i am asleep and i kin... (Mar '14) 41 min mclovins420 29
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 42 min RiccardoFire 615,787
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 42 min Earthling 14,276
There is Everything Wrong with Abortion (Nov '07) 46 min Grunt56 223,082
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 58 min karl44 627,510
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr Lyndi 180,016
More from around the web