Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,500 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#248995 Dec 13, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>.
Thanks for showing that SOME Canadians are for finding the truth and debunking yourself with this website.
.
Sorry charlie, you fell for my deceptive remarks. Now we are getting somewhere!.
Got any more good Canadian FOR TRUTH sites you want to share?
.
I can use any good information you care to provide showing the govie "official" story is fictitious and not to be taken any more seriously than the bible.
.
http://canadawantsthetruth911.blogspot.com/
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ah
.
Funny As Any Canadian Can be huh eh !
And your proven definition for "finding the truth" equates to mindlessly accepting what twoofer websites say then regurgitating it without verification.

Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots!

Btw, have you figured out a way for momentum to remain constant while velocity and mass increase yet?

Hahahahaha!!!!!

Why oh why doesn't anyone take you doltish buffoons seriously!
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#248996 Dec 13, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFAO! Dishonest much in clipping a full interview?
Der Spiegel covered this, too, by viewing the full tape of Stulls interview. After the "no plane" comment, he went on to say this.
"They just found the two turbines because, of course, they're heavier and more massive than everything else. But there was almost nothing left of the actual airplane. You can still find plate-sized parts out there. And Neville from the farm over there found an aluminum part from the airplane's outside shell behind his barn that must've been about 8 by 10 or even 8 by 12 feet."
When Der Spiegel confronts Stull with the English translation of these passages in the book and the film script, the man is speechless: "My statements were taken completely out of context. Of course there was an airplane. It's just that there wasn't much left of it after the explosion. That's what I meant when I said 'no airplane'. I saw parts of the wreckage with my own eyes, even one of the engines. It was lying in the bushes."
Source
AND>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>
http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/c...
Twoofers = intellectually dishonest

-and that applies only to the "intelligent" ones. The rest are too dumb to know any better.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#248997 Dec 13, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
By ReOpen911.info, Edited by World911Truth.org | September 17, 2011
.
Ten years after, how do the French perceive the events of September 11, 2001? With the support of its members and sympathizers, the French association ReOpen911 has commissioned a survey on the subject by an independent organization and have published their results on September 9.
.
To this date, two surveys of this type have been made available in France: one by “TNS Sofres/Logica” for the French newsmagazine “NouvelObs” and another by World Public Opinion which was conducted in France as well as in 16 other countries. These surveys, which date back to September 2008, are already three years old, and the questions asked at the time do not measure the degree of skepticism of the population regarding the official story of the 9/11 Commission and the Bush administration.
.
For this reason, the French association ReOpen911 requested an opinion poll by HEC Junior Consulting.
.
The official junior company of the business school HEC Paris, HEC Junior Consulting was ranked first in its sector by the newsmagazine “Expansion” in 2009. The school has also been a finalist for the CNJI award for excellence every year since 2004. The survey was conducted in June 2011 based on a cross-section sample of the French population [1].
.
This survey is very revealing about the opinion of the French people on the subject of 9/11.
.
58% of the French population express doubts about the official version, compared to only 31% who express no doubts.
.
Only 14% know that three towers collapsed on September 11, 2001.
.
Nearly half of French respondents (49%) believe that US authorities may have let the attacks occur.
.
One third (34%) believe that some US authorities may have been involved in the attacks.
.
49% are favorable to opening an independent inquiry to determine more about the events.
.
Only 28% consider that the media have informed the public about September 11 in the fullest possible manner.
.
http://world911truth.org/france-58-doubt-the-...
.
A big Thank You to Sorry Charlie for this info.
You complete blockhead.
.
Maybe its time for cat food commercials LOL
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ah aha hh
.
That's STILL Very Funny huh eh !
Who cares elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#248998 Dec 13, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>LMFAO! Dishonest much in clipping a full interview?

Der Spiegel covered this, too, by viewing the full tape of Stulls interview. After the "no plane" comment, he went on to say this.

"They just found the two turbines because, of course, they're heavier and more massive than everything else. But there was almost nothing left of the actual airplane. You can still find plate-sized parts out there. And Neville from the farm over there found an aluminum part from the airplane's outside shell behind his barn that must've been about 8 by 10 or even 8 by 12 feet."

When Der Spiegel confronts Stull with the English translation of these passages in the book and the film script, the man is speechless: "My statements were taken completely out of context. Of course there was an airplane. It's just that there wasn't much left of it after the explosion. That's what I meant when I said 'no airplane'. I saw parts of the wreckage with my own eyes, even one of the engines. It was lying in the bushes."
Source

AND>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>

http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/c...
Twoofer dishonesty at its best!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#248999 Dec 13, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Twoofers = intellectually dishonest
-and that applies only to the "intelligent" ones. The rest are too dumb to know any better.
LOL!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#249000 Dec 13, 2012
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
And your proven definition for "finding the truth" equates to mindlessly accepting what twoofer websites say then regurgitating it without verification.
Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots!
Btw, have you figured out a way for momentum to remain constant while velocity and mass increase yet?
Hahahahaha!!!!!
Why oh why doesn't anyone take you doltish buffoons seriously!
If you didn't take us doltish buffoons seriously you wouldn't bother to respond to each and every post of information and evidence presented that refutes the belief you have in the govies's fairy tale of non-existent increasing mass (where's the piledriver?) and bogus constant momentum (it increased) through the line of most resistance of the unheated, undamaged lower 2/3 of the towers.
.
Have you figured out how the mass of the upper 1/3 of the towers increased yet?
.
A million pounds of dust blowing in the wind does not a piledriver make.
.
Oh mu shu you are such a funny little porker piglet!
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
.
That's almost As funny As your special conception of Conservation of Momentum. huh eh !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#249001 Dec 13, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>Twoofers = intellectually dishonest

-and that applies only to the "intelligent" ones. The rest are too dumb to know any better.
Quoted for TRUTH.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249002 Dec 13, 2012
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Twoofer dishonesty at its best!
Yup, Just clip the interview in half to force it to say what you want.

It would be interesting just to go through the strawmen

Such as jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel and it burned off in seconds. Hey, that is a twooffor, no one claimed it was hot enough to melt steel and no one claimed the jet fuel fireball was what caused the structural failure.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#249003 Dec 13, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>If you didn't take us doltish buffoons seriously you wouldn't bother to respond to each and every post of information and evidence presented that refutes the belief you have in the govies's fairy tale of non-existent increasing mass (where's the piledriver?) and bogus constant momentum (it increased) through the line of most resistance of the unheated, undamaged lower 2/3 of the towers.
.
Have you figured out how the mass of the upper 1/3 of the towers increased yet?
.
A million pounds of dust blowing in the wind does not a piledriver make.
.
Oh mu shu you are such a funny little porker piglet!
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
.
That's almost As funny As your special conception of Conservation of Momentum. huh eh !
Easy, I don't take you seriously and pointing out that you're simply a mindless fool is fun.

Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots!

And mass increased as the collapse front progressed, it's quite obvious from watching any video of the collapses.

Btw, have you figured out how momentum stayed constant with velocity and mass increased yet?

Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249004 Dec 13, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
If you didn't take us doltish buffoons seriously you wouldn't bother to respond
Oh no, trust me, it's a source of great amusement not a intellectual exercise in twoofer validity.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#249005 Dec 13, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
govies's fairy tale of non-existent increasing mass
LMFAO! So your claim is as the buildings came down, starting at the initiation of the collapse and ending with the 109 floors hitting the last one, those 109 falling floors were the exact same mass as the top 20 floors.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#249006 Dec 13, 2012
When oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots was knee high to a grassy knoll you throwed a match into a big ol bucket a gas and it didn't light on fire...that means, in his little world, that jet planes can't produce fireballs when they collide with office buildings at high rates of speed.

Only in twooferdumb!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#249007 Dec 13, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>Oh no, trust me, it's a source of great amusement not a intellectual exercise in twoofer validity.
I guess flat earthers must be onto something too since people still argue with them.

Only in twooferdumb!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249008 Dec 13, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
This quote was first used by German television to justify the idea that Flight 93 didn't crash at Shanksville. It was picked up by American Free Press. It remains a fringe idea (most people seem to prefer the “Flight 93 shot down” theory), but is something you’ll encounter occasionally online & at Google.
Is the “Flight 93 didn’t crash there” implication a fair reflection of Stulls view, though? Der Spiegel decided to investigate.
AND!
When Der Spiegel confronts Stull with the English translation of these passages in the book and the film script, the man is speechless: "My statements were taken completely out of context. Of course there was an airplane. It's just that there wasn't much left of it after the explosion. That's what I meant when I said 'no airplane'. I saw parts of the wreckage with my own eyes, even one of the engines. It was lying in the bushes."
Source
This is the point where those who want to hold on to a conspiracy explanation will claim that he's changed his story, been "leaned on", and this is in itself proof that something shady is going on. Fortunately Der Spiegel covered this, too, by viewing the full tape of Stulls interview. After the "no plane" comment, he went on to say this.
"They just found the two turbines because, of course, they're heavier and more massive than everything else. But there was almost nothing left of the actual airplane. You can still find plate-sized parts out there. And Neville from the farm over there found an aluminum part from the airplane's outside shell behind his barn that must've been about 8 by 10 or even 8 by 12 feet."
Source
All the conspiracy theories fall apart when the aircraft evidence comes into play. The fact is the planes went exactly where the preponderance of evidence shows. The motives for all theories are also missing. Finally, the whole idea is such an economic disaster that no-one would participate in it.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249009 Dec 13, 2012
Porkpie Hat wrote:
When oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots was knee high to a grassy knoll you throwed a match into a big ol bucket a gas and it didn't light on fire...that means, in his little world, that jet planes can't produce fireballs when they collide with office buildings at high rates of speed.
Only in twooferdumb!
The updrafts in tall buildings are huge. That factor alone increases the heat of any building fire. The elevator shafts and stairwells are designed to eliminate oxygen feeding the fires. These were severed by the impact. We had open shafts and huge holes in several floors creating ideal conditions for a very hot fire given the amount of plastic in office partitions and floor coverings, all made from petroleum based products and highly flammable given the right conditions.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#249010 Dec 13, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>LMFAO! So your claim is as the buildings came down, starting at the initiation of the collapse and ending with the 109 floors hitting the last one, those 109 falling floors were the exact same mass as the top 20 floors.
I think he's trying to claim the floors turned to dust and disappeared ala his Kentucky sock.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249011 Dec 13, 2012
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Easy, I don't take you seriously and pointing out that you're simply a mindless fool is fun.
Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots!
And mass increased as the collapse front progressed, it's quite obvious from watching any video of the collapses.
Btw, have you figured out how momentum stayed constant with velocity and mass increased yet?
Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots!
Yea, 20- pilots who said they couldn't crash land into a target the size of the Pentagon.

Go figure!!!
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#249012 Dec 13, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
The updrafts in tall buildings are huge. That factor alone increases the heat of any building fire. The elevator shafts and stairwells are designed to eliminate oxygen feeding the fires. These were severed by the impact. We had open shafts and huge holes in several floors creating ideal conditions for a very hot fire given the amount of plastic in office partitions and floor coverings, all made from petroleum based products and highly flammable given the right conditions.
It was like a blast furnace.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#249013 Dec 13, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFAO! So your claim is as the buildings came down, starting at the initiation of the collapse and ending with the 109 floors hitting the last one, those 109 falling floors were the exact same mass as the top 20 floors.
Gee did I say that?
.
Show me.
.
Then blow me.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
.
That's As Funny As "probable collapse sequence" or something like that.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#249014 Dec 13, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
It was like a blast furnace.
I would think so given all the factors.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 min Stilgar Fifrawi 864,447
9/11&bin 4 min REV CAROL 1
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 15 min kent 599,555
Know What You Throwing Away 16 min CarlBenjamin 1
The Christian Atheist debate 41 min HipGnosis 1,984
There is Everything Wrong with Abortion (Nov '07) 56 min Grunt56 221,990
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 1 hr -Stray Dog 6,456
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr Epiphany2 612,903
More from around the web