Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,199 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#248145 Dec 3, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>Of course they were. He refuses to believe all the evidence which refutes his claim.
And when something does refute him he simply plays the game of, "but what about this?".

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#248146 Dec 3, 2012
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Thats just flawed logic.

The hijackers goal wasn't to crash, it was to fly into and destroy. You can't do that when your ailerons are sheered off.

Flying into the center off the Pentagon clearly wasn't the target from their flight path. At that speed, they would have to have a high angle of attack meaning the nose would have to be much lower than the tail, just to maintain a level flight path, the aircraft would want to rise. This is why a high speed near to the ground run in a commercial aircraft is what some say, impossible.

The reason no pilot really can say, is because no pilot has experienced that type of insane maneuver. It's just unlikely and hard to control theoretically in an aircraft that big, especially for a person trying to fly a commercial jet for the first time.

You been indoctrinated all your life to not see the world as it is, but how they want you to perceive it. Thats why this information is hard for you to accept.

The power structure wants easily fooled docile sheep, who can be fleeced over and over again, and thats what the have made. If you think their goal is to have a nation of critical thinkers, well, then enjoy your indoctrination.

Insults Are Easier
Steel plating.

“Bright Waters House ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#248147 Dec 3, 2012
Geeeeez, the twoofers have been getting the Payne Stewart intercept time wrong for 10 years now ..... what does it say when you can't learn and/or correct your mistakes !!!
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!
Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots!
Great "reesurch"!
Didjya just punch that into "twoogle" and mindlessly accept what it said without bothering to figure what time zoned are?
Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!
Priceless!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#248148 Dec 3, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
Geeeeez, the twoofers have been getting the Payne Stewart intercept time wrong for 10 years now ..... what does it say when you can't learn and/or correct your mistakes !!!
<quoted text>
LOL. I know, that crazy time zone line. I don't think they are really getting it wrong after so long, not any wiggle room on this one, I think they are just being dishonest.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#248149 Dec 3, 2012
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats just flawed logic.
Speaking of flawed logic still waiting on these.

A: You claimed it was steel, not me, I make no specific claims about the substance, BACK IT UP, show us a test that it was steel.

B: HOW DID THERMITE, post collapse, remain in intact density to create a thermate reaction instead of becoming massively spread out into dust like the rest of the building?

C: Post collapse how was the thermite stay connected to the ignition system.

D: If there was so much unspent thermite in endless pockets, which would burn off in a few minutes it would take endless thermite pockets to keep igniting every few minutes to keep molten pools of steel alive for months, so what the heck brought down the building if such huge amounts of thermite did not ignite when needed?
Say the Truth

Eatontown, NJ

#248150 Dec 3, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
Geeeeez, the twoofers have been getting the Payne Stewart intercept time wrong for 10 years now ..... what does it say when you can't learn and/or correct your mistakes !!!
<quoted text>
LMAO, they've been getting EVERYTHING wrong for over 10 years!

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#248151 Dec 3, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of flawed logic still waiting on these.
A: You claimed it was steel, not me, I make no specific claims about the substance, BACK IT UP, show us a test that it was steel.
B: HOW DID THERMITE, post collapse, remain in intact density to create a thermate reaction instead of becoming massively spread out into dust like the rest of the building?
C: Post collapse how was the thermite stay connected to the ignition system.
D: If there was so much unspent thermite in endless pockets, which would burn off in a few minutes it would take endless thermite pockets to keep igniting every few minutes to keep molten pools of steel alive for months, so what the heck brought down the building if such huge amounts of thermite did not ignite when needed?
I never claimed molten steel, firefighters did. I didn't find iron microspheres in the dust. I didn't measure high temps from ground zero using a NASA satrelite.

You just post the same question over and over to infer a dishonest point you are trying to make. Thats how you roll, huh?

Gonna spend another full day on topix again? After a full week and full month? Wow, you really have nothing better to do.

Sorry Charlie.

Insults Are Easier
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#248152 Dec 3, 2012
Sorry, you have claimed it was Molten Steel over and over and wondered why it was present weeks and months latter soo ...

Are you admitting there is no proof it was steel or ...

Speaking of flawed logic still waiting on these.

A: You claimed it was steel, not me, I make no specific claims about the substance, BACK IT UP, show us a test that it was steel.

B: HOW DID THERMITE, post collapse, remain in intact density to create a thermate reaction instead of becoming massively spread out into dust like the rest of the building?

C: Post collapse how was the thermite stay connected to the ignition system.

D: If there was so much unspent thermite in endless pockets, which would burn off in a few minutes it would take endless thermite pockets to keep igniting every few minutes to keep molten pools of steel alive for months, so what the heck brought down the building if such huge amounts of thermite did not ignite when needed?
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
I never claimed molten steel, firefighters did. I didn't find iron microspheres in the dust. I didn't measure high temps from ground zero using a NASA satrelite.
You just post the same question over and over to infer a dishonest point you are trying to make. Thats how you roll, huh?
Gonna spend another full day on topix again? After a full week and full month? Wow, you really have nothing better to do.
Sorry Charlie.
Insults Are Easier
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#248153 Dec 3, 2012
Operation Northwoods wrote:
At the time, I checked the airline manifests. No where was their an Arab name.
That was the CNN list of victims, the hint that they were not manifests should have jumped out at you as they were not broken down by individual plane lists which is the point of a manifest.

SO who were those 20 pilots again, was one of them called Remington Steel Plating.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#248154 Dec 3, 2012
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
And when something does refute him he simply plays the game of, "but what about this?".
That's evidence of a disorganized mind. I have one more question for the conspiracy proponents. Assuming the two towers to be targeted by nefarious forces, why bother sending a missile into the Pentagon after accomplishing the initial mission? Wouldn't that be both unnecessary and increase the risk exposure?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#248155 Dec 3, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
That's evidence of a disorganized mind. I have one more question for the conspiracy proponents. Assuming the two towers to be targeted by nefarious forces, why bother sending a missile into the Pentagon after accomplishing the initial mission? Wouldn't that be both unnecessary and increase the risk exposure?
Bingo, And why WTC7, no one ever heard of it, did someone say, we need to bring down 2 110 story buildings with Saudi Hijackers to go to war with Iraq, hold on, the public will never fall for that, lets bring down WTC7, the one no one has heard of, the the masses will be for out plan to invade Iraq.

And it was a false flag to invade Iraq as the twoofers say, would not the NEOCONS FAKE AT LEAST ONE Iraqi highjacker or Iraq government involvement.

HONESTLY, all this detail and inside job planing and they just missed the idea that some sort of (faked) Iraq involvement might help if you want to go to war with Iraq.

Since: Dec 12

Bakersfield, CA

#248156 Dec 3, 2012
9/11 was a direct result of decades of US Imperial policy. To view it as a conspiracy is delusional. As Ward Churchill pointed out so eloquently it was simply "the chickens coming home to roost".
Say the Truth

Eatontown, NJ

#248157 Dec 3, 2012
Danny Manslaughter wrote:
9/11 was a direct result of decades of US Imperial policy. To view it as a conspiracy is delusional. As Ward Churchill pointed out so eloquently it was simply "the chickens coming home to roost".
And yet another CA knuckleheaded sock...

Churchill should be deported to whatever Socialist paradise he thinks trumps the US of A.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#248158 Dec 3, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry, you have claimed it was Molten Steel over and over and wondered why it was present weeks and months latter soo ...

Are you admitting there is no proof it was steel or ...

Speaking of flawed logic still waiting on these.

A: You claimed it was steel, not me, I make no specific claims about the substance, BACK IT UP, show us a test that it was steel.

B: HOW DID THERMITE, post collapse, remain in intact density to create a thermate reaction instead of becoming massively spread out into dust like the rest of the building?

C: Post collapse how was the thermite stay connected to the ignition system.

D: If there was so much unspent thermite in endless pockets, which would burn off in a few minutes it would take endless thermite pockets to keep igniting every few minutes to keep molten pools of steel alive for months, so what the heck brought down the building if such huge amounts of thermite did not ignite when needed?
I have never wondered why it was molten a month later. Red hot, yes, molten no.

Sorry Charlie.

Insults Are Easier

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#248159 Dec 3, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>That's evidence of a disorganized mind. I have one more question for the conspiracy proponents. Assuming the two towers to be targeted by nefarious forces, why bother sending a missile into the Pentagon after accomplishing the initial mission? Wouldn't that be both unnecessary and increase the risk exposure?
What risk? Knowing they can control investigations and witnesses, its just another lie that they are historically proven to be good at.

Insults Are Easier

Since: Dec 12

Bakersfield, CA

#248160 Dec 3, 2012
Saythetruth- I'm actually a California immigrant so it would be incorrect to label me as a "CA knucklehead". I was born and raised in Alaska so a more appropriate, affection term would be "Manly Alaska Avatar"

Sincerely,

Danny Manslaughter

Since: Dec 12

Bakersfield, CA

#248161 Dec 3, 2012
I mean how could you honestly think that 9/11 was nothing other than a retaliation for US foreign policy? If your a 9/11 conspiracy propagator that's one thing (You are simply nuts), but deny the causes of 9/11 is ignorant. Do think that the US was attacked because "They hate our freedom" is ludicrous. If you haven't done the research the blame falls solely on you. It surely was a horrific event of carnage; no one denies that. But to not analyze the causes and root of the problem is very troubling.

It's just amazing the ignorance shown by so many. Just like when Ron Paul tried to hit this point home during the republican debates and was faced with an echo of boos. 9/11 has become a sacred topic in this discussion where you can't even talk about it! How insane is that.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#248162 Dec 3, 2012
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
I have never wondered why it was molten a month later. Red hot, yes, molten no.
Sorry Charlie.
Insults Are Easier
Sure you have but that really does not answer the other questions, you claimed Thermite kept things molten, but I will let you lie and pretend that you said red hot, still four questions to go.

A: You claimed it was steel, not me, I make no specific claims about the substance, BACK IT UP, show us a test that it was steel.

B: HOW DID THERMITE, post collapse, remain in intact density to create a thermate reaction instead of becoming massively spread out into dust like the rest of the building?

C: Post collapse how was the thermite stay connected to the ignition system.

D: If there was so much unspent thermite in endless pockets, which would burn off in a few minutes it would take endless thermite pockets to keep igniting every few minutes to keep red hot or molten pools of steel alive for months, so what the heck brought down the building if such huge amounts of thermite did not ignite when needed?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#248163 Dec 3, 2012
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
What risk? Knowing they can control investigations and witnesses,
Prove witnesses were controlled, of course the investigation was, you don't let all the investigators do what they want, you assign them duties.
Say the Truth

Eatontown, NJ

#248164 Dec 3, 2012
Danny Manslaughter wrote:
Saythetruth- I'm actually a California immigrant so it would be incorrect to label me as a "CA knucklehead". I was born and raised in Alaska so a more appropriate, affection term would be "Manly Alaska Avatar"
Sincerely,
Danny Manslaughter
I stand corrected. So you are another California immigrant knuckleheaded sock. Did you have to come south to find a black woman to hook up with, or was that just a coincidence?

All the best,
Say the Truth

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min AnnieJ 810,258
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 5 min lovewithin 39,634
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 8 min bacon hater 97,905
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 18 min kent 574,310
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 31 min Naked Truth from ... 608,243
This ~ or ~ That? (game) (Dec '12) 42 min Hatti_Hollerand 1,637
what do americans think of mexicans? (Sep '08) 1 hr Luna34 392
Straight guys: Would you ever have intercourse ... (Jul '12) 14 hr viky235 164
Dubai massage Body To Body full service 0559... (Mar '14) Tue Coolsa 205
More from around the web