Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#248212 Dec 3, 2012
Seismic Evidence wrote:
Yet Another Line of Evidence Shows Demolition
André Rousseau is a Doctor of Geophysics and Geology, a former researcher in the French National Center of Scientific Research (CNRS), who has published 50 papers on the relationships between the characteristics of progressive mechanical waves and geology.
Dr. Rousseau is an expert on measurement of acoustic waves.
Rousseau says that the seismic waves measured on September 11th proves that the 3 buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. Specifically, in a new scientific article published by the Journal of 9/11 Studies, Rosseau writes:
The seismic signals propagating from New York on September 11, 2001, recorded at Palisades (34 km) and published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO), have here been subjected to a new critical study concerning their sources. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the nature of the waves, their velocities, frequencies, and magnitudes invalidate the official explanations which imply as sources the percussion of the twin towers by planes and the collapses of the three buildings, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.
***
First of all, we show the contradictions in the official explanation between the seismic data and the timing of the events. Then we point out that it is strange that identical events (percussions of identical towers on the one hand, and collapses of identical towers on the other hand) at the same location would have generated seismic sources of different magnitudes. We demonstrate that only strong explosives could be the cause of such seismic waves, in accordance with the observed low frequencies. According to the nature of the recorded waves (body and surface waves), we can propose a location of each explosive source. According to the presence of shear waves or the presence of Rayleigh waves only, we hypothesize a subterranean … explosion.
***
Another pointless explanation. Why would the government bomb the buildings? The planes flew into the buildings accomplishing the goals. Why WTC7? There would be no point.

Silly.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#248213 Dec 3, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
...... says Mr Lube-O
<quoted text>
Another thing mostly YOU would know about.
.
Smarty pants
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ah
.
That's A Good One huh eh !

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#248214 Dec 3, 2012
who informed you ....... your neighbors dog ?????

don't make me have to tell you what my Christmas bonus was this year LOL
Wall Street wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like things aren't going so well for you and your Wall Street buddies. I have been informed that things are about to get VERY BAD for you guys in the upcoming months. The last bubble has burst and there are no more to create. You better hope you have your house paid off and enough savings to get you through the rest of your life because money will be tight and it will be you in a dark dank hole.
War on Terror

Stanton, KY

#248216 Dec 3, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
YES The bigger agenda was to justify the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan thats why not a SINGLE 9/11 hijacker was Afghani or Iraqi you [email protected] Idiot !!!!!
<quoted text>
good point...so why were those countries invaded? Those hijackers were mostly Saudi Arabian so why wasn't Saudi Arabia invaded if this really was a 'war on terror'?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#248217 Dec 3, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Another pointless explanation. Why would the government bomb the buildings? The planes flew into the buildings accomplishing the goals. Why WTC7? There would be no point.
Silly.
.
So you would have us think that because YOU can not see a point, that means there isn't any!
.
That is the epitome of the most asinine, narcissistic line of thinking imaginable.
.
All this means is that YOU can not see the point of someone else's truly asinine, narcissistic line of thinking.
.
NOT that there isn't one!
.
But what can you expect from asinine narcissistic so-called wanna-be debwunkers of 9/11 conspiracy questions?
.
Praise be the asinine, narcissistic govie fairy tale of deceit. Praise be.
.
Deception is the most powerful political force on the planet.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ah ah aha
.
That's A Good One huh eh !
War on Terror

Stanton, KY

#248218 Dec 3, 2012
the supposed hijackers were Saudi Arabian, therefore let's invade Iraq and Afghanistan...makes perfect sense, eh?
Grand Delusion

Stanton, KY

#248219 Dec 3, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
who informed you ....... your neighbors dog ?????
don't make me have to tell you what my Christmas bonus was this year LOL
<quoted text>
Christmas bonus...now that's a good'un.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#248220 Dec 3, 2012
only to Twoofers
War on Terror wrote:
the supposed hijackers were Saudi Arabian, therefore let's invade Iraq and Afghanistan...makes perfect sense, eh?

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#248221 Dec 3, 2012
why wasn't Saudi Arabia invaded to take control of thier oil?!?!
War on Terror wrote:
<quoted text>
good point...so why were those countries invaded? Those hijackers were mostly Saudi Arabian so why wasn't Saudi Arabia invaded if this really was a 'war on terror'?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#248222 Dec 3, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
.
So you would have us think that because YOU can not see a point, that means there isn't any!
.
That is the epitome of the most asinine, narcissistic line of thinking imaginable.
.
All this means is that YOU can not see the point of someone else's truly asinine, narcissistic line of thinking.
.
NOT that there isn't one!
.
But what can you expect from asinine narcissistic so-called wanna-be debwunkers of 9/11 conspiracy questions?
.
Praise be the asinine, narcissistic govie fairy tale of deceit. Praise be.
.
Deception is the most powerful political force on the planet.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ah ah aha
.
That's A Good One huh eh !
Before I'll consider various opinions on conspiracy, you must answer the following questions in sequence.

1. Did the actual passenger jets hit the targets or crash. If not, where did they go and how did they avoid detection.

2. Is Air Traffic Control correct about the aircraft? If not, prove that Air Traffic Control was faulty.

3. Were there any plotters other than the hijackers. If so, what did they stand to gain?

4. Did people make phone calls from the planes. If not, were did those people go and how were those phone calls faked.

Good luck, most people can't get past step #1.
Saudi

Stanton, KY

#248223 Dec 3, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
why wasn't Saudi Arabia invaded to take control of thier oil?!?!<quoted text>
because they already control it
Page One

Stanton, KY

#248224 Dec 3, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Before I'll consider various opinions on conspiracy, you must answer the following questions in sequence.
1. Did the actual passenger jets hit the targets or crash. If not, where did they go and how did they avoid detection.
2. Is Air Traffic Control correct about the aircraft? If not, prove that Air Traffic Control was faulty.
3. Were there any plotters other than the hijackers. If so, what did they stand to gain?
4. Did people make phone calls from the planes. If not, were did those people go and how were those phone calls faked.
Good luck, most people can't get past step #1.
go back to page one of this thread and start reading, maybe you'll catch up in a few months
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#248225 Dec 3, 2012
False Flag wrote:
<quoted text>
... set up strategic military bases as a prelude to the invasion of Syria and Iran.
LMAO, that's why 12+ years later we're not in either place...
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#248226 Dec 3, 2012
Informed wrote:
<quoted text>
What makes being informed by others more knowledgeable a 'grandiose delusion'? No wonder you are so clueless...no one ever tells you what is really going on in the world, and if you have clueless friends then you are really shitouttaluck.
OK, knucklehead, who "informed" you? And what is so special about your information?
twoof

Stanton, KY

#248227 Dec 3, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
only to Twoofers
<quoted text>
correct, because the official govie faiwytale is the twoof, the whole twoof, and nothing but the twoof.
Say the Twoof

Stanton, KY

#248228 Dec 3, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO, that's why 12+ years later we're not in either place...
who do you think is behind the insurgency in Syria? Once Syria falls, Iran was supposed to be next on the hit list. Unfortunately, Russia and China are backing Iran, that's why it hasn't happened and will not happen.
Wall

Stanton, KY

#248229 Dec 3, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, knucklehead, who "informed" you? And what is so special about your information?
the writing is on the wall for Wall St. The dollar will plummet along with Wall St. and the economy as we have reached the edge of the cliff. Ask Ratdick, he knows but he's still in denial.
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#248230 Dec 3, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
who informed you ....... your neighbors dog ?????
don't make me have to tell you what my Christmas bonus was this year LOL
<quoted text>
Yep, and the dog's name was 'Sam'.

I got a feeling it's not a one year membership in the "Jelly of the Month Club" !!! Mazel tov!!
Syria and Iran

Stanton, KY

#248231 Dec 3, 2012
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-s-secret-l...
Obama’s Secret Letter to Tehran: Is the War against Iran On Hold?“The Road to Tehran Goes through Damascus”
The New York Times announced that the Obama Administration had sent an important letter to the leadership of Iran on January 12, 2012.[1]

On January 15, 2012, the spokesperson of the Iranian Foreign Ministry acknowledged that the letter had been delivered to Tehran by way of three diplomatic channels:

(1) one copy of the letter was handed to the Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations, Mohammed Khazaee, by his U.S. counterpart, Susan Rice, in New York City;

(2) a second copy of the letter was delivered in Tehran by the Swiss Ambassador to Iran, Livia Leu Agosti; and

(3) a third copy went to Iran by way of Jalal Talabani of Iraq.[2]

In the letter, the White House spelled out the position of the United States, while Iranian officials said it was a sign of things as they really are: the U.S. cannot afford to wage a war against Iran.

Within the letter written by President Barak Hussein Obama was a U.S. request for the start of negotiations between Washington and Tehran to end Iranian-U.S. hostilities.

“In the letter, Obama announced readiness for negotiations and the resolution of mutual disagreements,” Ali Motahari, an Iranian parliamentarian, told the Mehr News Agency.[3] According to another Iranian parliamentarian, this time the Deputy Chairperson of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, Hussein Ebrahimi (Ibrahimi), the letter went on to ask for Iranian-U.S. cooperation and negotiations based on the mutual interests of both Tehran and Washington.[4]

Obama’s letter also tried to assure Tehran that the United States would not engage in any hostile action against Iran.[5] In fact, in the same timeframe, the Pentagon cancelled or delayed major joint drills with Israel.[6]

To the Iranians, however, the gestures are meaningless, because the Obama Administration’s actions with Iran have always contradicted its words. Moreover, Iran believes that the U.S. has not attacked, because it knows that the costs of a war with an opponent like Iran are too high and its consequences far too risky.
Syria and Iran

Stanton, KY

#248232 Dec 3, 2012
This, however, does not mean that an Iranian-U.S. showdown has been avoided or will not eventually happen. The currents can go either way, so to speak. Nor does this mean that the Obama Administration is not currently waging a war against the Iranians and their allies. In fact, Washington’s bloc and Iran’s bloc have been fighting a shadow war from the digital arena and television airwaves to the valleys of Afghanistan and the bustling streets of Beirut and Baghdad.

The War Against Iran Started Years Ago

The war in Iran did not start in 2012 or even 2011. Newsweek Magazine even stated the following on a cover title in 2010:“Assassinations, cyberattacks, sabotage – has the war against Tehran already begun?” The actual war may have started in 2006.

Instead of attacking Iran directly, the U.S. has started a covert and proxy war. The covert dimensions of the war are being fought by intelligence assets, cyber attacks, computer viruses, secretive military units, spies, assassins, agent provocateurs, and saboteurs. The kidnapping and assassination of Iranian scientists and military commanders, which started several years ago is a part of this covert war. In this shadow war, Iranian diplomats in Iraq have been abducted and Iranians visiting Georgia, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey have been detained or kidnapped. Syrian officials, various Palestinian figures, and Hezbollah’s Imad Fayez Mughniyeh have also all been assassinated in this shadow war.

The proxy wars started in 2006 when Israel attacked Lebanon with the intention of expanding the war against Syria. The road to Damascus goes through Beirut, while Damascus is on the way to Tehran. After their failure in 2006, realizing that Syria was the lynchpin of the Resistance Bloc, which Iran dominated, the U.S. and its allies spent the next five to six years trying to de-link Syria from Iran.

The U.S. is also fighting Iran and its allies on the diplomatic and economic fronts through the manipulation of international bodies and proxy states. In the 2011 to 2012 context, the crisis in Syria on a geo-political level is a front in the war against Iran. Even the Israeli-U.S. drill Austere Challenge 2012 and the U.S. deployment of troops were primarily aimed at Syria as a means of combating Iran.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 min here 64,053
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 47 min River Tam 973,803
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr Steve III 654,001
I prefer women's satin panties over men's under... 2 hr Clive 27
Moms having sex with their sons (Aug '12) 2 hr Clive 80
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 2 hr Rosa_Winkel 106,508
I want to masturebate with my friend 4 hr Bbflip 1
More from around the web