Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#248155 Dec 3, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
That's evidence of a disorganized mind. I have one more question for the conspiracy proponents. Assuming the two towers to be targeted by nefarious forces, why bother sending a missile into the Pentagon after accomplishing the initial mission? Wouldn't that be both unnecessary and increase the risk exposure?
Bingo, And why WTC7, no one ever heard of it, did someone say, we need to bring down 2 110 story buildings with Saudi Hijackers to go to war with Iraq, hold on, the public will never fall for that, lets bring down WTC7, the one no one has heard of, the the masses will be for out plan to invade Iraq.

And it was a false flag to invade Iraq as the twoofers say, would not the NEOCONS FAKE AT LEAST ONE Iraqi highjacker or Iraq government involvement.

HONESTLY, all this detail and inside job planing and they just missed the idea that some sort of (faked) Iraq involvement might help if you want to go to war with Iraq.

Since: Dec 12

Mcfarland, CA

#248156 Dec 3, 2012
9/11 was a direct result of decades of US Imperial policy. To view it as a conspiracy is delusional. As Ward Churchill pointed out so eloquently it was simply "the chickens coming home to roost".
Say the Truth

Ann Arbor, MI

#248157 Dec 3, 2012
Danny Manslaughter wrote:
9/11 was a direct result of decades of US Imperial policy. To view it as a conspiracy is delusional. As Ward Churchill pointed out so eloquently it was simply "the chickens coming home to roost".
And yet another CA knuckleheaded sock...

Churchill should be deported to whatever Socialist paradise he thinks trumps the US of A.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#248158 Dec 3, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry, you have claimed it was Molten Steel over and over and wondered why it was present weeks and months latter soo ...

Are you admitting there is no proof it was steel or ...

Speaking of flawed logic still waiting on these.

A: You claimed it was steel, not me, I make no specific claims about the substance, BACK IT UP, show us a test that it was steel.

B: HOW DID THERMITE, post collapse, remain in intact density to create a thermate reaction instead of becoming massively spread out into dust like the rest of the building?

C: Post collapse how was the thermite stay connected to the ignition system.

D: If there was so much unspent thermite in endless pockets, which would burn off in a few minutes it would take endless thermite pockets to keep igniting every few minutes to keep molten pools of steel alive for months, so what the heck brought down the building if such huge amounts of thermite did not ignite when needed?
I have never wondered why it was molten a month later. Red hot, yes, molten no.

Sorry Charlie.

Insults Are Easier

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#248159 Dec 3, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>That's evidence of a disorganized mind. I have one more question for the conspiracy proponents. Assuming the two towers to be targeted by nefarious forces, why bother sending a missile into the Pentagon after accomplishing the initial mission? Wouldn't that be both unnecessary and increase the risk exposure?
What risk? Knowing they can control investigations and witnesses, its just another lie that they are historically proven to be good at.

Insults Are Easier

Since: Dec 12

Mcfarland, CA

#248160 Dec 3, 2012
Saythetruth- I'm actually a California immigrant so it would be incorrect to label me as a "CA knucklehead". I was born and raised in Alaska so a more appropriate, affection term would be "Manly Alaska Avatar"

Sincerely,

Danny Manslaughter

Since: Dec 12

Mcfarland, CA

#248161 Dec 3, 2012
I mean how could you honestly think that 9/11 was nothing other than a retaliation for US foreign policy? If your a 9/11 conspiracy propagator that's one thing (You are simply nuts), but deny the causes of 9/11 is ignorant. Do think that the US was attacked because "They hate our freedom" is ludicrous. If you haven't done the research the blame falls solely on you. It surely was a horrific event of carnage; no one denies that. But to not analyze the causes and root of the problem is very troubling.

It's just amazing the ignorance shown by so many. Just like when Ron Paul tried to hit this point home during the republican debates and was faced with an echo of boos. 9/11 has become a sacred topic in this discussion where you can't even talk about it! How insane is that.
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#248162 Dec 3, 2012
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
I have never wondered why it was molten a month later. Red hot, yes, molten no.
Sorry Charlie.
Insults Are Easier
Sure you have but that really does not answer the other questions, you claimed Thermite kept things molten, but I will let you lie and pretend that you said red hot, still four questions to go.

A: You claimed it was steel, not me, I make no specific claims about the substance, BACK IT UP, show us a test that it was steel.

B: HOW DID THERMITE, post collapse, remain in intact density to create a thermate reaction instead of becoming massively spread out into dust like the rest of the building?

C: Post collapse how was the thermite stay connected to the ignition system.

D: If there was so much unspent thermite in endless pockets, which would burn off in a few minutes it would take endless thermite pockets to keep igniting every few minutes to keep red hot or molten pools of steel alive for months, so what the heck brought down the building if such huge amounts of thermite did not ignite when needed?
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#248163 Dec 3, 2012
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
What risk? Knowing they can control investigations and witnesses,
Prove witnesses were controlled, of course the investigation was, you don't let all the investigators do what they want, you assign them duties.
Say the Truth

Ann Arbor, MI

#248164 Dec 3, 2012
Danny Manslaughter wrote:
Saythetruth- I'm actually a California immigrant so it would be incorrect to label me as a "CA knucklehead". I was born and raised in Alaska so a more appropriate, affection term would be "Manly Alaska Avatar"
Sincerely,
Danny Manslaughter
I stand corrected. So you are another California immigrant knuckleheaded sock. Did you have to come south to find a black woman to hook up with, or was that just a coincidence?

All the best,
Say the Truth
Say the Truth

Ann Arbor, MI

#248165 Dec 3, 2012
Danny Manslaughter wrote:
I mean how could you honestly think that 9/11 was nothing other than a retaliation for US foreign policy? If your a 9/11 conspiracy propagator that's one thing (You are simply nuts), but deny the causes of 9/11 is ignorant. Do think that the US was attacked because "They hate our freedom" is ludicrous. If you haven't done the research the blame falls solely on you. It surely was a horrific event of carnage; no one denies that. But to not analyze the causes and root of the problem is very troubling.
It's just amazing the ignorance shown by so many. Just like when Ron Paul tried to hit this point home during the republican debates and was faced with an echo of boos. 9/11 has become a sacred topic in this discussion where you can't even talk about it! How insane is that.
FYI, the phrase "They hate our freedom" is PC code for "They hate anyone who isn't a pure, fundamentialist Muslim- meaning most of us."

Only a pinhead couldn't read between the lines of GWB's speech.

Since: Dec 12

Mcfarland, CA

#248166 Dec 3, 2012
Women chase me- not the other way around. Your racism is repugnant. I welcome you to an intelligent discussion on 9/11 if you are capable of producing any intellect from your bird-like brain.

Sincerely,

Danny Manslaughter

Since: Dec 12

Mcfarland, CA

#248167 Dec 3, 2012
I don't think you have to read between the lines of any W dialogue he's pretty simplistic. 9/11 didn't happen because of religious reasons that's a farce. If that was the case why were the pentagon and world trade centers attacked and not 'grand Christian religious symbols'....

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#248168 Dec 3, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
<quoted text>Geeeeez, the twoofers have been getting the Payne Stewart intercept time wrong for 10 years now ..... what does it say when you can't learn and/or correct your mistakes !!!
Well it says nothing positive but sure makes for some great entertainment!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#248169 Dec 3, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>LOL. I know, that crazy time zone line. I don't think they are really getting it wrong after so long, not any wiggle room on this one, I think they are just being dishonest.
Elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots being dishonest?

*gasp*

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#248170 Dec 3, 2012
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>I never claimed molten steel, firefighters did. I didn't find iron microspheres in the dust. I didn't measure high temps from ground zero using a NASA satrelite.

You just post the same question over and over to infer a dishonest point you are trying to make. Thats how you roll, huh?

Gonna spend another full day on topix again? After a full week and full month? Wow, you really have nothing better to do.

Sorry Charlie.

Insults Are Easier
You've been harping about molten steel daily for ages, now you're trying to weasel your way out of answering pertinent questions because you simply can't answer anything your charlatan masters didn't answer first.

And iron microspheres in a steel building aren't exactly a mystery.

And what would the temperature of a debris pile weeks after an event have to do with your claim of explosives?

You're just painting yourself into another corner you'll eventually have to try lying your way out of.

Steel plating.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#248171 Dec 3, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>That's evidence of a disorganized mind. I have one more question for the conspiracy proponents. Assuming the two towers to be targeted by nefarious forces, why bother sending a missile into the Pentagon after accomplishing the initial mission? Wouldn't that be both unnecessary and increase the risk exposure?
The entire scenario twoof pretends is a given is unnecessary and poses great risk of exposure;-)

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#248172 Dec 3, 2012
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>I have never wondered why it was molten a month later. Red hot, yes, molten no.

Sorry Charlie.

Insults Are Easier
Hahahahahahaha!!

You have no self respect, do you.

Funny, you're reiterating exactly what I said to you days ago when you posted your oft linked video which shows a picture of red hot steel...and you were whining about molten steel.

Good grief you're a pathetic liar!

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#248173 Dec 3, 2012
Okay Charlie Pork, you guys just keep misrepreaenting what people say to prove your dishonest points.

Cartoon sheer/fold theorists who worship all authority.

I always claimed steel melted to cause the collapse as supported by the testimony of fireman immediately after collapse. Then red hot in the weeks that followed.

But misrepresenting is what flawed logic types like yourselves mist do.

You guys love your servitude and ultimately worship your own destruction.

Insults Are Easier
Say the Truth

Ann Arbor, MI

#248174 Dec 3, 2012
Danny Manslaughter wrote:
I don't think you have to read between the lines of any W dialogue he's pretty simplistic. 9/11 didn't happen because of religious reasons that's a farce. If that was the case why were the pentagon and world trade centers attacked and not 'grand Christian religious symbols'....
Then how did you miss the real message? I suggest you give that some 'critical thinking' time. The answer is not difficult. Let me know what you come up with.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 2 min Lyndi 6,512
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 10 min Pres Donald J Tru... 122,616
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 22 min confrinting with ... 681,514
O.J. and Paula...June 11,1994: Malice Aforethou... 40 min Pres Donald J Tru... 9
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr Here For Now 619,432
Why are most white people so arrogant? (Apr '10) 8 hr Daniel 1,024
Why was Orenthal mad enuff to commit murder??! 11 hr Trump Saves Dead ... 10
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 14 hr Gabriel 982,157
More from around the web