Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#247239 Nov 26, 2012
the BBC story is constantly cited as evidence that some of those named as the hijackers are still alive, but the BBC retracted their story and said it was just “confusion over names and identities"

I also wonder if all your paranioa was true why the guys who pulled off 9/11 wouldnt just kll these guys off so they dont spoil the plot ...... they killed 3,000 people whats a few more !?!?!?!?!
Operation Northwoods wrote:
Radekt,
You posted from a newspaper story...
"Interior Minister Prince Nayef told The Associated Press that Saudi leaders were shocked to learn 15 of the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.
"The names that we got confirmed that," Nayef said in an interview. "Their families have been notified of their deaths” "
At least NINE of the alleged hijackers identified by the FBI with names and PHOTOS.... were found alive by the BBC and the Guardian Newspaper in the UK. I believe that it may have been as many as ELEVEN, but the story that I now can locate shows that NINE have been found alive, working good jobs in the Middle East.
I would say that ole Prince NAYER, the Saudi Foreign Minister in 2002, is a lying mothephucker.

_Abraxas_

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#247240 Nov 26, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
You think so? Dust and ash incinerates cars, trucks and buses? Not a chance. Windows broken could be causes by a blast of some kind. I'm talking about all the paint burned off, interiors and all plastic parts melted. I am talking about buildings burning from the ground floor up. What started those fires?
Mostly the tires, some got broken windows from falling debris and the interiors caught fire.

This slide show shows the vehicle fires started after the first collapse.

http://smg.beta.photobucket.com/user/DoYouEve...

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#247241 Nov 26, 2012
hunter wrote:
<quoted text>See your therapist and get him to change your medication!
I've done better.

I've spoken with engineers, fire fighters and pilots, they all agree that twoofs a joke, idiots like you are the punch line.

Good luck with that!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#247242 Nov 26, 2012
hunter wrote:
<quoted text>Do you ever look back on any of your past comments and get embarrassed ?
You should do!
The CRAP you SPEW OUT is so ridiculous,You are really beyond belief.
Only in twooferdumb.

Are you the mayor?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#247243 Nov 26, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>Just ask him to explain the 1,400 vehicles incinerated on the streets of New York that day. Why did all the other buildings catch on fire? The funny thing is none of that has been explained.
First you'd have to show the damage was anomalous.

You know, the phase of actually proving your idiotic claim had merit.

Funny how twoof always avoids that part...oh and the damage is consistant with all car fires and if you can't figure out what caused the fires, you're a bigger fool than the idiot who originally claimed it was pyroclastic flows.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#247244 Nov 26, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>Cars burned by HAARP Death Rays, of course!
And volcanos!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#247245 Nov 26, 2012
low mass effect wrote:
<quoted text>you mean like the low mass effect of dust acting as a piledriver?
Passports that get ejected from a plane, able to withstand a huge fireball that melts steel...now that's a good'n.
http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/files/o...

Sleep it off junkie.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#247246 Nov 26, 2012
_Abraxas_ wrote:
<quoted text>Mostly the tires, some got broken windows from falling debris and the interiors caught fire.

This slide show shows the vehicle fires started after the first collapse.

http://smg.beta.photobucket.com/user/DoYouEve...
Not one picture of a volcano...what gives?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#247247 Nov 26, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
What about the $300 billion in gold stored down below? Where did it go?
Anyone trying to make off with the gold would not be able to run very fast: each ingot weighs 70 pounds.

Photo: Two Brinks trucks were at ground zero yesterday to start hauling away the $200 million in gold and silver that the Bank of Nova Scotia had stored in a vault under the trade center.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/01/nyregion/a-...
Say the Truth

Ann Arbor, MI

#247248 Nov 26, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
Was all this chaos a cover for a big heist? Why did they leave a truck load behind?
yeah, i saw that movie too, the one with Bruce Willis and Sam Jackson, right?

TWOOF = incapable of separating reality from fiction
Say the Truth

Ann Arbor, MI

#247249 Nov 26, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
all your posts are dismissed Jackass.
What kind of moron calls himself "Waste Water"? Maybe the same kind who calls himself "Loser Fool"
hunter

Norwich, UK

#247250 Nov 26, 2012
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
I've done better.
I've spoken with engineers, fire fighters and pilots, they all agree that twoofs a joke, idiots like you are the punch line.
Good luck with that!
Yea of coarse you have spoken to them, NOT!
You may have done,In your imagination!
As I said before,Go see your therapist and get your medication changed.
Personally I don't think there's a lot of hope for you.
hunter

Norwich, UK

#247252 Nov 26, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Twoof is DUMB!
It's a pity you can't live by what your name is,Say the truth!
You have been associating with Porkfart and Rapekit to much.
Why can't you just Say the twoof,
You MORONIC IDIOT!

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#247253 Nov 26, 2012
Does it matter !?!?!?! You are a CLUELESS MORON who just doesn't get it or doesn't want to get it
low mass effect wrote:
<quoted text>
you mean like the low mass effect of dust acting as a piledriver?
Passports that get ejected from a plane, able to withstand a huge fireball that melts steel...now that's a good'n.
hunter

Norwich, UK

#247254 Nov 26, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
the BBC story is constantly cited as evidence that some of those named as the hijackers are still alive, but the BBC retracted their story and said it was just “confusion over names and identities"
I also wonder if all your paranioa was true why the guys who pulled off 9/11 wouldnt just kll these guys off so they dont spoil the plot ...... they killed 3,000 people whats a few more !?!?!?!?!
<quoted text>
No they did not retract their story!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#247255 Nov 26, 2012
hunter wrote:
<quoted text>
It's a pity you can't live by what your name is,Say the truth!
You have been associating with Porkfart and Rapekit to much.
Why can't you just Say the twoof,
You MORONIC IDIOT!
LOL, It's the loon that wanted to debate and end the insults, till debate started and he ran away for a few days.

Have not met such a UK nutter since "Clara Massa", google her.
Say the Truth

San Rafael, CA

#247256 Nov 26, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
Does it matter !?!?!?! You are a CLUELESS MORON who just doesn't get it or doesn't want to get it
<quoted text>
So am I ! And you for that matter.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#247257 Nov 26, 2012
Steve Herrmann BBC 11:33 UK time, Friday, 27 October 2006

A five-year-old story from our archive has been the subject of some recent editorial discussion here. The story, written in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, was about confusion at the time surrounding the names and identities of some of the hijackers. This confusion was widely reported and was also acknowledged by the FBI.

The story has been cited ever since by some as evidence that the 9/11 attacks were part of a US government conspiracy.

We later reported on the list of hijackers, thereby superseding the earlier report. In the intervening years we have also reported in detail on the investigation into the attacks, the 9/11 commission and its report.

We’ve carried the full report, executive summary and main findings and, as part of the recent fifth anniversary coverage, a detailed guide to what’s known about what happened on the day. But conspiracy theories have persisted. The confusion over names and identities we reported back in 2001 may have arisen because these were common Arabic and Islamic names
hunter wrote:
<quoted text>
No they did not retract their story!

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#247258 Nov 26, 2012
..... as are your parents for ever having a worthless piece of shit like you
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
So am I ! And you for that matter.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#247259 Nov 26, 2012
hunter wrote:
<quoted text>
No they did not retract their story!
That's odd, From the BBC, Link provided.

A five-year-old story from our archive has been the subject of some recent editorial discussion here. The story, written in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, was about confusion at the time surrounding the names and identities of some of the hijackers. This confusion was widely reported and was also acknowledged by the FBI.

The story has been cited ever since by some as evidence that the 9/11 attacks were part of a US government conspiracy.

We later reported on the list of hijackers, thereby superseding the earlier report. In the intervening years we have also reported in detail on the investigation into the attacks, the 9/11 commission and its report.

We’ve carried the full report, executive summary and main findings and, as part of the recent fifth anniversary coverage, a detailed guide to what’s known about what happened on the day. But conspiracy theories have persisted. The confusion over names and identities we reported back in 2001 may have arisen because these were common Arabic and Islamic names.

In an effort to make this clearer, we have made one small change to the original story. Under the FBI picture of Waleed al Shehri we have added the words "A man called Waleed Al Shehri..." to make it as clear as possible that there was confusion over the identity. The rest of the story remains as it was in the archive as a record of the situation at the time.

We recently asked the FBI for a statement, and this is, as things stand, the closest thing we have to a definitive view: The FBI is confident that it has positively identified the nineteen hijackers responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Also, the 9/11 investigation was thoroughly reviewed by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States and the House and Senate Joint Inquiry. Neither of these reviews ever raised the issue of doubt about the identity of the nineteen hijackers.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/10...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min Michael 665,471
Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS 8 min Peter Ross 625
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 20 min Seentheotherside 45,847
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 28 min Ricky F 184,769
Liberals say INCEST marriage is okay 45 min guest 5
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 49 min Clearwater 619,143
Electing a president.......with NO POLITICAL EX... 1 hr Doctor REALITY 6
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr Gabriel 977,432
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 1 hr truth 88,379
Secular Humanism VS Christianity 2 hr Lonestar 255
More from around the web