Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#242581 Oct 17, 2012

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#242582 Oct 17, 2012
Slimesten wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm on topic mr juboy. Can you say the same?
And look up the meaning of spam.
Spam is the use of electronic messaging systems to send unsolicited bulk messages, especially advertising,
lastPost
Your deluded garbage is spam, daddy. Earlier today, you promised again you'd start dumping your tripe on a web site, but it's easy to see you're not one to keep your word, lowly slob.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Olds, Canada

#242583 Oct 17, 2012
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>I'm on topic mr juboy. Can you say the same?

And look up the meaning of spam.
Spam is the use of electronic messaging systems to send unsolicited bulk messages, especially advertising,

And here's a few notes on your Israeli kin
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TG7CBME... .
.
Go tell your bosses you are a failure
http://iranianinfo.files.wordpress.com/2012/0...
.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOAG412...
Hmmmm...not long ago a topix mod called your spam well...spamish.

Why?

Because all you do is copy and paste links then troll when people criticize it.

You wouldn't last a day on a truly moderated board vulgar-tommy.

_Abraxas_

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#242584 Oct 17, 2012
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
And why would they call the site Ground Zero
ground ze┬Ěro
Noun:
The point on the earth's surface directly above or below an exploding nuclear bomb.
The 16-acre site of the Twin Towers and other buildings of the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan,
ground zero - definition of ground zero by the Free Online Dictionary ...
The target of a projectile, such as a missile or bomb. 2. The site directly below, directly above, or at the point of detonation of a nuclear weapon.
And you are going by info known publicly. Did you ever think they have intel that is considered Top Secret, concerning Nuclear devices?
And about those seismographs.
"but unfortunately we also conclude that from the distance at which our own detections were made (the nearest station is 34 km away at Palisades, N.Y.) it is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergency situation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been"
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911...
.
Where is this explosion on the graph? Sounds pretty heavy duty to me. It should have registered on the graph as something.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =0YvrKfWkxdwXX
.
and what of WTC 7'S collapse? That was a silent collapse eh?
.
And what of all the explosions heard by many eyewitness and first responders.
https://www.google.com/search...
.
Where are they on the seismographs.
.
Just more holes for the Official Report
http://i1080.photobucket.com/albums/j338/Amer...
.
Compare...
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_lRTwKEuBA3A/RjOi8Ig...
.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/seismi...
The press dubbed the term ground zero ....and
you know definitions are not as rigid as you portray here Timesten.
Ground zero can mean......
"the aiming point," "the epicenter," "the point of origin."
"the center of destruction" "the area of focus"

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Olds, Canada

#242585 Oct 17, 2012
An NFL Fan wrote:
<quoted text>Sure, spam it up, lowly racist.
Well both have played structural engineers so I guess the little cretin is getting a little close to finding a RELEVANT professional.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Olds, Canada

#242586 Oct 17, 2012
And yet another day of twoofer fail comes to a close.

Night, night all...we'll be back to explosives by tomorrow;-)

_Abraxas_

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#242587 Oct 17, 2012
For instance I could say Timesten is Ground Zero
for stupid twoofiness.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#242588 Oct 17, 2012
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, Moobs, I don't think the label on your site " Some modern spray-on building fireproof or fire-resistant coatings look a bit like products used in the 1970's and prior,
but the new materials do not contain asbestos as its use in this application is now prohibited."
Is proof of anything other than what it says. I will at least need a link to a video game and a copy of the restraining order for proof.
This is a blog??
http://visibility911.com/media/wp-content/upl...
from my link
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...

When did they build the WTC 1,2. today???
And jtlyk they had 'spray on' asbestos and other fire materials during the building renovations and upgrades on the WTC.
Typically appearing as a white, fluffy material, spray-on insulation and thermal spray often contained asbestos from the 1930s until the 1970s. Known for its superior ability to insulate from fire and heat while still being lightweight, asbestos fibers were commonly used as spray-applied insulation and thermal spray within buildings to provide fireproofing and structural insulating.

Just keep denying fact. It makes you look more the fool everytime you post

My point was they could have sprayed Sol Gel thermite on those beams when the upgrades were done. And a collapse would have ignited it, seeing they are self propogated

https://www.google.com/search...
.
https://www.google.com/search...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#242589 Oct 17, 2012
_Abraxas_ wrote:
For instance I could say Timesten is Ground Zero
for stupid twoofiness.
I see you graduated idiot school.....again. First grade that is. Well done
http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/How+Idiots+g...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#242590 Oct 17, 2012
Porkpie Hat wrote:
And yet another day of twoofer fail comes to a close.
Night, night all...we'll be back to explosives by tomorrow;-)
Better put your protection on to protect yourself from your own explosions..

http://rlv.zcache.com/pig_fart_oink_i_farted_...

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_TABk_EO5eZU/SxFwYux...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#242591 Oct 17, 2012
For 'on topic' WTC 911 readers...
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#242592 Oct 17, 2012
Slimesten wrote:
For 'on topic' WTC 911 readers...
avemissed/home
Everyone can see your dog and pony show is nothing more than a cover for racism, so why bother to hide it, daddy?

_Abraxas_

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#242593 Oct 17, 2012
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you graduated idiot school.....again. First grade that is. Well done
http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/How+Idiots+g...
Oh yes , I finnished your class last year, now I'm in year two
of Timestens idiot twoofer school.
Funny thing though teach....you haven't taught us anything new.
Do you teach the same idiot stuff every year?

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#242594 Oct 17, 2012
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, provide some evidence to support Musharraf's claim first.
And yes, even if his claim is true, that doesn't automatically mean the "official story is a fairy tale". Although it would mean Britain has some explaining to do.
Perhaps you should forward this to KSM's defense team zealot?
It's nice to see your fantasy world laid open for all to see.

Tell me, Mr Hat, when has Mi6, the CIA, mossad or any other intelligence agency 'explained' anything?

You really think KSM's 'defense' team is going to implicate Mi6 in the 9/11 attacks? Seriously?

Jesus wept Mr Hat, you really are totally insane aren't you.

Musharraf details Mi6 recruiting their operative from university in London and sending him to join Al Qaeda in the Balkans.

Yet (previously) in your fantasy world, there was no intelligence agency involvement in AQ.

Now you've revised this to say that - if this is true - and the operative also directed KSM...'the British have some explaining to do'.

Ho ho.

Of course, any reasonable person would simply acknowledge that western intelligence has a long history of using Jihadists to further their own agendas.

The big suprise would be if 9/11 really was just some pissed off muslims working alone... but, seriously, what sort of fool would believe that?

_Abraxas_

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#242595 Oct 18, 2012
Zealous_Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
It's nice to see your fantasy world laid open for all to see.
Tell me, Mr Hat, when has Mi6, the CIA, mossad or any other intelligence agency 'explained' anything?
You really think KSM's 'defense' team is going to implicate Mi6 in the 9/11 attacks? Seriously?
Jesus wept Mr Hat, you really are totally insane aren't you.
Musharraf details Mi6 recruiting their operative from university in London and sending him to join Al Qaeda in the Balkans.
Yet (previously) in your fantasy world, there was no intelligence agency involvement in AQ.
Now you've revised this to say that - if this is true - and the operative also directed KSM...'the British have some explaining to do'.
Ho ho.
Of course, any reasonable person would simply acknowledge that western intelligence has a long history of using Jihadists to further their own agendas.
The big suprise would be if 9/11 really was just some pissed off muslims working alone... but, seriously, what sort of fool would believe that?
We all know of clandestine efforts on behalf of king and country, but we do not always know where the true loyaties of agents within the sphere of such activities lay. We do know however where such alignment should lay by the virtue of claim of origin.

We also know where these pacts intertwine. So that we know who is a friend does not cut the friend. We also know the nature of the enemy, sometimes those thought to be a friend , turns out to be an enemy.
What we cannot accept or think is that the left hand will tell the right hand to tell the left hand to cut off the right hand.

So basically we know it was another hand in telling.
So this is how we know MI6 is not implicated but in fact
AQ is regardless of what agent is involved in what.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#242596 Oct 18, 2012
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a blog??
http://visibility911.com/media/wp-content/upl...
from my link
So they spray-painted you fake nano termite on it when it was built, THEN RAMMED PLANES IN IN AND NUKED IT?

That really does not make sense, when you take out that crayon, try to stay between the lines.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#242597 Oct 18, 2012
govie shill handler wrote:
<quoted text>
no one is reading these long posts, you are wasting your time...abort mission until further notice. There will be an emergency meeting with the bosses to figure out a new strategy.
I know, It's science, twoofers don't speak it.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#242598 Oct 18, 2012
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>Better put your protection on to protect yourself from your own explosions..

http://rlv.zcache.com/pig_fart_oink_i_farted_...

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_TABk_EO5eZU/SxFwYux...
Vulgar-tommy, you're a truck driver who's spent his entire life avoiding learning. That's extremely obvious, particularly since you refuse to bring your mindlessly accepted drivel to experts who could possibly help you understand why no credibility is assigned to it.

Instead of posting it in places where engineers, material scientists and fire fighters can read it, you choose to languish here preaching to the choir and those of us who don't assimilate to your overtly bullying ways.

No you post on topix, inventing alternate personalities to make it appear as if you have some semblance of support because deep down you know how ridiculous you are.

One day you argue it was explosives, the next thermite and the next still, mini-nukes. All the time with the conviction, that your truck drivers brain can muster, that all are true yet reality says that that's not plausible or probable.

Arguing mutually exclusive theories as if all are supportable with evidence does prove one thing though. It proves the only relevant portion of the theory to you is the conclusion.

Given that, it's extremely obvious that you, as with all twoof cultists, work from the conclusion, fitting your facts to the theory while ignoring anything and everything that proved you wrong.

You're a complete joke Fontaine, a fact that's been noted by many across multiple subjects.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#242599 Oct 18, 2012
The joke is that you bwunkers continue to believe the absolute fairy tale told to you by TPTB. Was it planes crashing into the towers, or thermite, or nukes? Just exactly what was it? Its obvious it wasn't
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
.
Cause TPTB are having a big laugh over that one huh eh !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#242600 Oct 18, 2012
Well stated, In Toms world the conclusion is static, what is loosely called evidence in his world must be altered and forced to reach the his predetermined conclusion.

Oh, And he has moobs.
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Vulgar-tommy, you're a truck driver who's spent his entire life avoiding learning. That's extremely obvious, particularly since you refuse to bring your mindlessly accepted drivel to experts who could possibly help you understand why no credibility is assigned to it.
Instead of posting it in places where engineers, material scientists and fire fighters can read it, you choose to languish here preaching to the choir and those of us who don't assimilate to your overtly bullying ways.
No you post on topix, inventing alternate personalities to make it appear as if you have some semblance of support because deep down you know how ridiculous you are.
One day you argue it was explosives, the next thermite and the next still, mini-nukes. All the time with the conviction, that your truck drivers brain can muster, that all are true yet reality says that that's not plausible or probable.
Arguing mutually exclusive theories as if all are supportable with evidence does prove one thing though. It proves the only relevant portion of the theory to you is the conclusion.
Given that, it's extremely obvious that you, as with all twoof cultists, work from the conclusion, fitting your facts to the theory while ignoring anything and everything that proved you wrong.
You're a complete joke Fontaine, a fact that's been noted by many across multiple subjects.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 1 min It aint necessari... 28,752
Why do white men hate white women who want blac... (May '11) 1 min Johnny 3,644
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 7 min New Age Spiritual... 637,648
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 12 min trifecta1 968,798
sexy girl want to Skype fun Skype: dilinazi20 (Apr '15) 13 min og_exec 38
Gay teens in the New York Connecticut area (Feb '14) 19 min Anonymous 15
Should Black People Forgive White People for Sl... (Jun '07) 19 min Johnny 4,756
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 49 min Holy Commandment... 44,171
More from around the web