#241453 Oct 8, 2012
2005, August 12 - Patricia Ondrovic
The New York Times publishes EMT Patricia Ondrovics WTC Task Force Interview (along with about 500 others) on their website.
These testimonies are scoured by the truth movement and evidence for explosives is discovered. However, a later interview with Ondrovic confirms that supporting testimony for directed energy weapons was redacted from her transcript.
Things to consider: Does the New York Times tell the truth about 9/11? Why on earth would they publish evidence for explosives? Is it designed to steer the truth movement towards the controlled demolition theory? Ondrovics transcript contains over twenty blacked-out lines!
2005, August - Steven Jones / Judy Wood
Jones publishes first version of Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? on Brigham Young Universitys website.
Jones calls his paper a hypothesis, and promotes explosive-demolitions and molten metal. Molten metal was later proven a hoax.
Things to consider: Jones hypothesis mysteriously comes out after Woods proof but somehow Jones gets the attention.
2005, November 14 - Steven Jones / Judy Wood
Jones goes on mainstream media (MSNBC).
Jones promotes explosives demolition by calling it a hypothesis to be tested, and promotes the molten metal hoax.
Things to consider: Dr Wood receives no media coverage for her proof, but Jones goes on corporate mainstream TV with his hypothesis to be tested and molten metal.
#241454 Oct 8, 2012
2006, February 10 - Patricia Ondrovic / Killtown
Killtown interviews Patricia Ondrovic.
Ondrovic confirms she witnessed cars blowing up and that she had mentioned it in her WTC Task Force interview. However, it has been redacted from the New York Times transcript.
Things to consider: Cars blowing up supports Dr Woods DEW theory.
2006, February 28 - Judy Wood / Michael Zebuhr / Steven Jones
Dr Wood and Mr Zebuhr conduct demonstrations on molten aluminum that refute Steven Jones claims.
Michael Zebuhr was a student of Dr Wood at Clemson University and a student member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
2006, March 18/19 - Michael Zebuhr / Steven Jones
Michael Zebuhr is murdered, allegedly by two people during a robbery.
On March 18 he was shot twice in the head and on March 19 he died.
Things to consider: Michael Zebuhrs work interfered with Steven Jones deceptions.
2006, June 7 - Judy Wood
Dr Wood attends 2006 Society for Experimental Mechanics Annual Conference and makes presentation entitled The World Trade Center Towers as Bio-inspired Structures: Characteristics of their Design and Demise.
Things to consider: Despite her presentation proving the governments account of 9/11 false, no media outlet reports it.
#241455 Oct 8, 2012
2006, June 20 - Alex Jones / Steven Jones
Alex Jones Infowars publishes article entitled Scientific Analysis Proves Towers Brought Down By Incendiaries - Steven Jones' analysis on WTC steel about to be released
Infowars receives more traffic than most, if not all, 9/11 sites. They are well known for promoting Steven Jones and opposing DEW and TV-Fakery.
Things to consider: Where are when were Jones findings released? Answer: they werent.
2006, June 25 - Steven Jones
Jones attends the Americans Scholars Symposium(ASS) and discusses evidence for thermite.
This was taped and later aired on C-SPAN, a mainstream source.
Things to consider: Jones continues to be recognized for his hypothesis to be tested.
#241456 Oct 8, 2012
Hey, what ever happened to that pilot/engineer/inventor/philan thropist/walker on water/healer of the sick and blind,but still had time to post on Topix everyday all day, Tomk52, that claimed to be working on this great super secret invention that was going to revolutionize and change the world? Didn't you say you had "invested" in his great company noone had ever heard about? How'd that pan out, Mr. Wall Street executive?
“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”
Since: Jul 11
POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET
#241457 Oct 8, 2012
Does anyone even remotely think if CF/ZPE were workable technologies that could be used right now, the governments that developed them would just give these technologies to the world so we could get off the energy bandwagon we are on now?
The govie didn't just gather up Tesla's technology and sit on it either.
Just ask yourself, "If they could, would they?"
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
That's A Good One huh eh !
#241458 Oct 8, 2012
2006, August 1 - Kevin Barrett / Steven Nass / Steven Jones
The New York Times publishes article detailing Representative Nass attempts to have Barrett fired from the University of Wisconsin-Madison due to his 9/11 related coursework in his class Islam: Religion and Culture.
Things to consider: This sends a signal to all professors and scientists in the world on the dangers of speaking up. Could this have been staged? Barrett is a strong supporter of Steven Jones.
2006, August 23 - Morgan Reynolds / Judy Wood / Steven Jones
Drs Reynolds and Wood publish their paper Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate? A peer-review of Steven E. Jones' 9/11 Research
2006, August 28 - David Ray Griffin
An Associated Press article reveals Griffin to be pro-Global Government.
Global Government is also known as New World Order; something that George Bush Sr called for in a speech to a Joint Session of Congress on September 11, 1990.
Griffin is known for pushing explosives demolition and molten metal, and has been on corporate media numerous times.
Things to consider: What is a pro-New World Order person doing in the truth movement? Why would the corporate media promote Griffin?
#241459 Oct 8, 2012
2006 (late)- 911Blogger.com
911Blogger requires all blogs to be approved before showing up.
The moderators systematically censor directed energy weapons and WTC no-plane theories.
Things to consider: 911Blogger is one of the highest traffic 9/11 sites on the internet.
2006, September 10 - Morgan Reynolds
Dr Reynolds appears on mainstream media (FOX News)
Reynolds pushes TV-Fakery and encourages people to look at the evidence for themselves. Reynolds has never appeared on corporate media since.
Things to consider: If TV-Fakery was really crazy disinfo, why didnt FOX discredit the truth movement by inviting him back?
2006, October - Eric Salter / Steven Jones
JonesJournal of 9/11 Studies site posts Salters anti-TV-Fakery paper
This strawman paper does not refute the TV-Fakery smoking gun proof: It is physically impossible for an aluminum airplane with a plastic nosecone to glide into a steel and concrete building.
Things to consider: 911Blogger regulars were overwhelmed with glee by the release of this paper.
#241460 Oct 8, 2012
2006, October 17 - Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds
Drs Wood and Reynolds publicize first version of The Star Wars Beam Weapons paper.
Wood and Reynolds reveal this paper at an early stage for self preservation.
Things to consider: This paper was attacked from the get-go.
2006, November 20 - Steven Jones / James Fetzer / Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds
Jones includes the following in an email to Dr Fetzer.(Emphasis added.)
"I will also observe that there is a group of 9/11 researchers, including Reynolds, Wood, Haupt and Holmgren, who take the approach of personalized attacks on any other researcher who dares to suggest that real planes hit the Towers. Really - they support the "no-planes-hit-Towers " notion so strongly that they resort to personal attacks on anyone who challenges their pet theory. As I have done."
The current "pet theory" that I have challenged is one now supported by you and (not surprisingly) Wood and Reynolds - the idea that "space beams" or "energy beams" were directed at the Towers to bring them down.
Jones ridicules the DEW / TV-Fakery theories in an attempt to discourage people from taking it seriously. Jones uses the term space beam even though Wood and Reynolds have never said the weapon must be in space.
Things to consider: Jones worked at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
#241461 Oct 8, 2012
2006, November 25 - James Fetzer / Steven Jones / Judy Wood
Dr Fetzer includes the following in an open letter on the Scholars website.(Emphasis added.)
Although [Judy Wood] did not commit herself to that specific hypothesis, she also suggested that directed energy could have come from above, such as from a space-based satellite using a mirror to direct energy. That has led to a veritable propaganda blitz attacking us both for considering "space beam" weaponry!
I had become aware of [Jones] strenuous objections to having "star wars beam weapons" hypotheses mentioned on our home page.(Judys use of "star wars" was a subtle intimation of its probable origins, but Steve has used "space beams" in order to denigrate it!)
Things to consider: Fetzer is on to what Jones is doing.
2006, December 6 - Steven Jones / James Fetzer / Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds
Jones includes the following in an email announcing his resignation from Scholars for 9/11 Truth (Emphasis added):
Of late,[Jim Fetzer] refers often to his association now with Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds. These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.
I join Kevin Ryan and many others in withdrawing from the group so that my name will not be attached to the personalized attacks and ray-beams-from-space stuff on www.st911.org .
We wont spend much time on ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers!
I support this statement made recently by Dr. Frank Legge, Kevin Ryan, Victoria Ashley, and other (previous) members of the Scholars for 9/11 Truth: "...As of this date the web site continues to promote assertions which [are] unsupported by the evidence (ray-beams from space caused the demolitions, mini-nukes were used in the WTC towers, real commercial jets did not hit the WTC towers, etc.)...."
Things to consider: Jones continues ridiculing.
#241462 Oct 8, 2012
2007, February - Greg Jenkins / Steven Jones
JonesJournal of 9/11 Studies site posts Jenkins anti-DEW paper
Things to consider: By the size of this paper, its obvious that Jenkins spent a lot of time on it. Why would he do this? Why is someone with NSA/DEW connections trying to discredit the DEW theory?
2007, March 8 - Morgan Reynolds / Jerry Leaphart
Dr Reynolds files a Request for Correction (RFC) with the government regarding the 9/11 NIST Report (NCSTAR1).
Reynolds RFC reveals evidence of fake airplane crash videos at the WTC, and requests the NIST Report be corrected due to false and misleading statements.
This RFC utilizes the Data Quality Act, a law uncovered by Reynolds attorney, Jerry Leaphart.
Things to consider: An official legal document prepared by a former high level government insider and a mainstream attorney and no media outlet reports it! Why?
2007, March 16 - Judy Wood / Jerry Leaphart
Dr Wood files a Request for Correction (RFC) with the government regarding the 9/11 NIST Report (NCSTAR1).
The NIST website (at present) has a visually distorted version of the RFC.
Dr Wood reveals evidence of Directed Energy Weapons at the WTC and shows NCSTAR 1 to be false, deceptive and misleading.
Wood explains that since NIST did not analyze the Towers destruction, they cannot claim (scientifically, legally, or otherwise) that they collapsed.
The RFC utilizes the Data Quality Act, a law uncovered by Woods attorney, Jerry Leaphart.
Things to consider: An official legal document prepared by a former university mechanical engineering professor and a mainstream attorney no media outlet reports it! Why?
#241463 Oct 8, 2012
2007, March 27 - Steven Jones
Jones team files a press release titled Independent Investigators Release Suppressed Blueprints of Destroyed World Trade Center Tower.
They push explosives demolition,collapse, and molten metal.
Comments: Isnt it strange how this appeared just eleven days after Dr Woods official and legal filing of Request for Correction with NIST?
2007, March 29 - Judy Wood
Dr Wood files Supplement #1 to her Request for Correction to NIST.
2007, April 14 - Steven Jones
Jones and his team file press release titled Scholars and Family Members Submit Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report.
The press release and RFC promote explosives demolition, but make no mention of thermite or molten metal.
Things to consider: Strange how Jones hides evidence of thermite and molten metal that he claims to have. Why didnt Jones send his RFC return receipt requested like Wood and Reynolds have? Jones RFC isnt even dated! Real legal, huh???
2007, April 16 - Judy Wood
Several of Dr Woods instructors were killed at Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
NBC News & Chicago Sun-Times ran reports on the REAL BALLISTICS Monday night before the official story cemented into place Tuesday morning.
Things to consider: Why didnt the police close off the area after the massacre? Perhaps they already knew who the perpetrators were? Dr Woods instructors were killed exactly one month after her RFC was filed.
#241464 Oct 8, 2012
2007, April 20 - Judy Wood
Dr Wood files Supplement #2 to her Request for Correction to NIST.
2007, April 25 - Judy Wood / Jerry Leaphart
Dr Wood, with Mr Leaphart, file Qui Tam case under seal.
Dr Wood sues the private contractors hired by NIST alleging they conspired to hide evidence of directed energy weapons at the WTC. Included in the suit are ARA, SAIC, and Boeing, sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society.
This case is filed under seal and therefore not known to the public.
2007, May 1 - Morgan Reynolds
Dr Reynolds files Supplement to Request for Correction with NIST
2007, May 16 - Judy Wood / Greg Jenkins
Dr Wood posts first version of her paper,Molecular Dissociation: from Dust to Dirt:
Dr Wood got the idea for this paper from the information that Jenkins tried to avoid in the January 2007 ambush interview.
Things to consider: We all thank Jenkins for the information!
#241466 Oct 8, 2012
2007, July 26 - Judy Wood / Andrew Johnson / Ambrose Lane
Dr Wood and Mr Johnson are scheduled to be interviewed on Mr Lanes XM Radio show The Power.
Before interview time, XM cancelled the show and fired Lane.
2007, July 27 - Judy Wood
NIST denies Dr Woods RFC. However, they confirm the statement from the NIST Report that they didnt analyze the collapses.
"As stated in NCSTAR 1, NIST only investigated the factors leading to the initiation of the collapses of the WTC towers, not the collapses themselves."
Dr Wood is the ONLY 9/11 Research Scientist to get NIST to confirm the statement in their own report on not analyzing the collapses.
Things to consider: An official government document prepared by NIST declining Dr Woods Request for Correction, and no media outlet reports it! If the DEW theory had no merit, why didnt the government and media discredit the truth movement by publicizing this?
2007, August 22 - Judy Wood
Dr Wood files Appeal with NIST regarding their RFC response.
NIST posts a low quality black and white version.
Things to consider: Why did NIST convert Dr Woods original document to a low quality version before posting to their website?
#241467 Oct 8, 2012
2007, September 12 - Judy Wood
The US District Court in Southern New York unseals Dr Woods Qui Tam case.
2007, September 28 - Morgan Reynolds
NIST declines Dr Reynolds RFC.
Things to consider: An official government document prepared by NIST declining Dr Reynolds Request for Correction, and no media outlet reports it! If the TV-Fakery/No-Plane theory had no merit, why didnt the government and media discredit the truth movement by publicizing this? NISTs typical response time is 60 days. Why did NIST need 6 and a half months?
2007, September 25 - David Ray Griffin
Griffin makes presentation in Ohio.
He states his belief in Global Government(aka New World Order).
2007, September 29 - James Fetzer / Judy Wood
Dr Fetzer files press release detailing Dr Woods RFC Appeal.
2007, October 4 - Kevin Ryan / Steven Jones / Greg Jenkins
911Blogger posts Ryans blog which promotes Jenkins new anti-DEW theory paper on Jones Journal of 9/11 Studies site:
Things to consider: Is it coincidence than this anti-DEW paper came out just five days after Dr Fetzers pro-DEW theory press release?
#241469 Oct 8, 2012
2007, October 26 - Morgan Reynolds
Dr Reynolds files Appeal with NIST regarding their RFC response.
2008, January 14 2008 - Dr Judy Wood
Appears on Ambrose Lane show with Andrew Johnson to discuss her latest research: Hutchison Effect and 9/11. On 18th Jan, John Hutchison also joins the program:
2008, May 19 - Dr Judy Wood
Dr Wood posts new research linking Hurricane Erin into the events on 9/11. The study references "field effects" in relation to Erin and the Hutchison Effect:
2008, May 29 - Dr Judy Wood and John Hutchison
They give presentations in Portland, OR regarding 9/11, The Hutchison Effect and Field Effects.
#241470 Oct 8, 2012
#241471 Oct 8, 2012
could, would, and did
#241472 Oct 8, 2012
CF/ZPE could be used right now but would NOT be given away for free to the world and I believe they did use this technology on 9/11.
#241473 Oct 8, 2012
If you spell out the whole word "Question" will you turn into a pumpkin?
#241474 Oct 8, 2012
Yes we ARE amazing! We must be like gods!
Add your comments below
|Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07)||3 min||Rosesz||646,683|
|The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15)||7 min||Insults Are Easier||48,857|
|Prove there's a god. (Mar '08)||33 min||Joe Fortuna||971,714|
|opinions needed||1 hr||mannersmom||1|
|Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15)||1 hr||WasteWater||2,072|
|How to solve racism (and sexism) once and for all||1 hr||A human being||1|
|Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07)||2 hr||Just Think||105,632|
Find what you want!
Search Top Stories Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC