Calling all White People
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3494 Apr 26, 2013
yon wrote:
an invasion along the southern borders of basic illiterates, mostly illegal, along with a total corruption of government and mainstream press?
__________

Correct.

Since the United States non-Hispanic White population has gone down. In regards to proportion & percentages.---

Another one of the United States respective "minority" groups will have to be given "Honorary White Status" in this nation.

Asian-Americans are one of the United States PREFERED "minorities". Asian-Americans are WAY PREFERED. OVER African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).

For at least a couple of decades now, Asian-Americans have been known as being the United States "Model Minority".

For at least a couple of decades now, Asian-Americans have had "Honorary White Status" in the United States.

But, Asian-Americans don't have enough numbers throughout the United States. To be a dominant group in this nation.


Hispanics (Afro-Latinos included) are another PREFERED "minority" group in the United States. Hispanics (Afro-Latinos included) are WAY PREFERED. OVER African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).

Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3495 Apr 26, 2013
yon ---- This is what is happening in the United States.---- Hispanics (Afro-Latinos included) are being elevated & advanced. AT THE EXPENSE OF African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).

Here's a link which shows a very, very small aspect of this dynamic at work.---

http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_1_blacks_... .

Hispanics (Afro-Latinos) are viewed as being a racial buffer class. AGAINST African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).

Hispanics (Afro-Latinos included) are being given "Honorary White Status" in the United States.

Hispanics (Afro-Latinos included) don't have the critical, mass numbers throughout the United States yet. But, in years to come, they will.

With this, Hispanics (Afro-Latinos included) will then have the "Honorary Minority Status" & the "Preferential Minority Status" with the United States federal government.

For aid, jobs, government contracts, set asides, housing, health care & education.

Hispanics (Afro-Latinos included) will be totally undercutting, phasing out & displacing African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) in the United States.

Making most African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) a PERMANENT underclass in this nation.

This is just for starts.

It is inevitable. In years to come, these will be the dominant groups in the United States.----

1. Non-Hispanic Whites.

2. Hispanics.

Among the Hispanics, the 2 top, major Hispanic groups will be the Mexicans & the Dominicans.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3496 Apr 26, 2013
RFD wrote:
he will tell them that defence always triumphs offence.
__________

What I typed up about a boxers defense.--- I also typed up a few other factors & variables in regards to the professional boxing ring.

You should try to get some better comprehension.

Maybe due to all of the many, different physical beatdowns which you suffered on the streets.---- Quite possibly, has greatly affected your brain.

Quite possibly, has greatly affected your brain lobe & brains neurotransmitters.

For the worse.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3497 Apr 26, 2013
RFD wrote:
I bet Johnny is about forty years old, an invalid.
__________

Nope.

I'm much younger.

I'm very physically fit. Never been on any form of assistance. Never been on any type of unemployment compensation.

Same with my parents & two older brothers.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3498 Apr 26, 2013
RFD wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree that 62 % percent of Caucasian females are literally brain dead. They are nuttier than a loon.
__________

Oh. Ha, ha.

That a VERY lowly, stupid, simple, slow minded, weak minded & inferior African American (Descendant of a black American slave) person such as yourself.--- Would pass judgment on White women.

When African American women have been in complete & total dysfunction for a few decades.

When the ENTIRE African American (Descendants of black American slaves) "community" has been in complete & total dysfunction for a few decades.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3499 Apr 26, 2013
RFD wrote:
<quoted text>are literally brain dead. They are nuttier than a loon.
__________

This is totally representative of "your people" (African Americans --- Descendants of black American slaves).

Both African American dudes & women.

African American dudes pursue OTHER groups of women.

African American dudes do this because they DON'T like their own race.

African American men & women have A LOT of self hate issues.

Examples of this.----

1. African American dudes & women making appearances on television. Such as on the Oprah Winfrey Show. Or, appearing on American television media news venues like CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC & NBC.

Bashing their opposite gender.

2. African American dudes & women constantly making & posting videos on YouTube.

Bashing their opposite gender.

3. African American women getting skin lightening creams.

4. African American women taking skin lightening drugs.

5. African American women always straightening their hair.

6. African American women always getting hair weaves &/or hair extensions.

Most African American dudes would prefer to date a woman who is of a different race. Even if this woman would be fat, dumpy, uneducated & with low self esteem.

Because even if an African American dude would get a woman such as this, he'd consider it to be a step up for him.

African American dudes consider women who are of other races to be SUPERIOR to African American women. EVEN if these women of other races would be fat, dumpy, uneducated & with low self esteem.

African American dudes still consider these women as ranking higher on the United States social strata ladder. Compared to African American women.

African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) are ALWAYS trying to seek the tolerance, acceptance, validation & endearment from other races.

African Americans are also always & constantly claiming other groups. Such as the ancient Greeks, Romans & Vikings. Even the ancient Germans. Even the ancient Chinese, Olmecs, Mayans, Aztecs & Incas. Even the Native American groups in the United States.

But, ABSOLUTELY NO other group wants to claim African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).

EVERY other group considers most African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) to be a professional, perpetual, lifetime pity case & charity.

EVERY other group considers most African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) to be a bunch of royal, big time pathetic losers & failures at life.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3500 Apr 26, 2013
RFD wrote:
<quoted text>
Europe is doomed because the majority of Caucasians want what is going on there.They accept it.They want Sharia law to rule over cities and towns.
__________

Hey very lowly, stupid, simple, slow minded, weak minded & inferior African American (Descendant of a black American slave) boy.--- Before you type up your posts, please attempt to make sure your brain effectively processes your thoughts.

That when you type up points, that your points will be factually correct.

Europe is in absolutely NO danger at all.

Here's the racial breakdown for a few European nations. Some of the main European nations at this.---

1. For the United Kingdom (UK).--- 92.1% White. 4.0% South Asian. 2.0% Black. 1.2% Mixed. 0.4% Chinese. 0.4% Other.

People in the United Kingdom who classify as "Black" are ONLY 2.0% of the population.

The United Kingdom is in absolutely NO danger.

2. For Italy.--- 92.47% Italian. 1.98% Romanian. 1.07% North African. 0.77% Albanian. 0.28% Chinese. 0.31% Ukrainian. 0.83% Asian (Non-Chinese). 0.54% Latin American. 0.47% Sub-Saharan African. 1.29% Other.

Sub-Saharan Africans are ONLY 0.47% of Italys population.

Italy is in absolutely NO danger.

3. For Germany.---- There are 82 million Germans. 300,000 to 500,000 Afro Germans. 150,000 African nationals.

Germany is in absolutely NO danger.

4. For Sweden.--- 85% Swedes. 5.0% Finns. 0.88% Assyrians. 0.5% Norwegian. 0.5% Danes. 0.5% Croats. 0.5% Albanians. 0.5% Serbs. 0.5% Bosnian. 0.5% Lebanese. 0.5% Turks. 0.5% Iraqis. 0.5% Iranians. 0.497% Roma. 0.1% Estonians. 0.1% Chilean. 0.1% Greek. 0.1% Somalis.

Somalis are ONLY 0.1% of Swedens population.

Sweden is in absolutely NO danger.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3501 Apr 26, 2013
RFD wrote:
<quoted text>
Europe.
__________

The Eastern European nations are even WAY more White.

In the Western European nations, the Whites who control the means of production & who make the policies.---- Are all in favor of having small minority populations. Comprised of a few, different minority groups.

This is why.---- Since these minority groups come from different histories & cultures. Since their goals, objectives & interests are different from each other.---- This prevents the minority groups from having any effective left wing "united minority front".

This also prevents the minority groups from having any effective left wing alliances with left wing White Europeans.

Since the minority groups come from a different history & culture. Since the minority groups have different goals, objectives & interests from the White European working class & working poor.---- This prevents the minority groups from having any effective alliances with the White European working class & working poor.

The society is fractured & fragmented.

This makes it easier for the Whites who control the means of production & who make the policies to rule.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3502 Apr 26, 2013
yon wrote:
Not to mention brain-dead Whites - 62% female
__________

True, most non-Hispanic White women voted Democrat in this last election.

But, this is nothing new.

Most non-Hispanic White women have been voting for candidates of the Democratic Party since 1933.

In this last election, this is why most non-Hispanic White women still continued to vote Democrat.---

1. Back in 2009.---- When the Democrats had numerical majorities in the House & Senate (Democrats still have a slight majority in the Senate).---- They crafted & passed the "Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009".

Our nations president, Democrat Barack Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 into law.

2. Back in 1973.---- When the justices on the United States Supreme Court heard the "Roe v. Wade" case. The justices issuing their decision in the Roe v. Wade case.

Which legalized abortion.

Most non-Hispanic White women are pro reproductive rights. Pro choice.

3. From 1973 till now.---- Abortionists & other feminists have been on the team of the Democratic Party.

4. From 1973 till now.--- Abortionists & other feminists have been a very critical core constituency of the Democratic Party.

So, it is no surprise that most non-Hispanic White women voted Democrat in this last election.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3503 Apr 26, 2013
yon --- In regards to your previous post where you stated that most non-Hispanic White women vote for candidates of the Democratic Party.---

Clearly, this is the case.

But, this nothing new.

From 1933 till now.---- In each & every election in the United States, most non-Hispanic White women have voted Democrat.

It goes back to 1933.--- As a result of the Democrats in the United States House & Senate back then. As a result of our nations president back then, Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR).

As a result of the Democrats "New Deal" legislation. Which started back in 1933.

Starting back in 1933.---- The United States unions came on board the Democratic Party. Due to the Democrats putting forward the New Deal legislation.

From 1933 till now, the United States unions have been on the team of the Democratic Party.

These non-Hispanic White women are union leaders or members. Primarily union members.

Or, these non-Hispanic White women are the wives & girlfriends to these non-Hispanic White male union leaders & members.

These are some of the reasons (I listed the other reasons in my previous response back to you) why these non-Hispanic White women are voting for candidates of the Democratic Party.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3504 Apr 26, 2013
Desmond --- You said "Ali had enough power to stop guys like folley".--- True.

You throwing up the name of Zora Folley as an indicator of Muhammad Alis punching power.--- That is no indicator.

Zora was NEVER one of the top boxers. He didn't have much punching power. Zora had a very questionable chin. He had a very questionable threshold of pain.

Please take some time out & look. At Zoras losses. Here they are.----

1. Zora lost to Johnny Summerlin. By a 6th round technical knockout.

2. Zora lost to Young Jack Johnson. By a 5th round Rtd.


3. Zora lost to Henry Cooper. By a 10 round decision.

4. Zora lost to Sonny Liston. By a 3rd round knockout.

5. Zora lost to Alejandro Lavorante By a 7th round knockout.

6. Zora lost to Doug Jones. By a 7th round knockout.

7. Zora lost to Ernie Terrell. By a 10th round decision.

8. Zora lost to Brian London. By a 10th round decision.

9. Zora lost to Oscar Bonavena. By a 10th round decision.

10. Zora lost to Mac Foster. By a 1st round knockout.

Why even bother mentioning Zora Folley. As a measuring stick of Alis accomplishments.

Zora is a black version of Brian London.

Zora was NOT a top boxer.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3505 Apr 26, 2013
Desmond ---- You said "Ali had enough power to stop guys like williams".---- True.

Regarding Muhammad Alis fight against Cleveland Williams.----

This fight took place back in 1966. Muhammad was only 24 years old.

Cleveland was 33 years old. Cleveland was way more battle worn. Compared to what Ali was.

MOST of all, what happened to Cleveland before this fight.----

Cleveland Williams was being arrested by a few police officers. For drunk driving. Cleveland was shot by one of the officers. With a .357. Cleveland was shot in his abdomen.

Cleveland just barely survived this shooting. He suffered PERMANENT kidney damage. He also suffered a loss of over 10 feet of his small intestine. He also suffered serious nerve damage.

This greatly affected Clevelands left leg above his knee. It caused Clevelands knee to atrophy as a result.

So, in the leadup to Cleveland Williams fight against Muhammad Ali.--- Cleveland was NOTHING. Compared to what he was when he was from 20 to 26 years old.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3506 Apr 26, 2013
Desmond ---- You said "Ali had enough power to stop guys like liston".--- Correct.

But, please evaluate the other factors & variables which are associated with Muhammad Alis fights against Sonny Liston.---

In regards to their first fight.---- Granted, Muhammad won this fight.

This fight took place back in 1964. Muhammad was only 22 years old.

Sonny was at least 34 years old (The 1940 United States census listed Sonny as being born in 1929 or 1930). Sonny was way more battle worn. Compared to what Ali was.

In regards to their second fight.--- Muhammad won this fight.

Soon after the bell rang in the very first round.--- Sonny went down due to Alis alleged "phantom punch".

Sonny was counted out.

But, this fight was a fix.

Sonny said this after the fight.--- "The Muslims were coming up. Who needed that? So, I went down. I wasn't hit".

The second Muhammad Ali / Sonny Liston fight was a fix.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3508 Apr 26, 2013
Desmond ---- You said "Joe Louis, the problems he had with guys like bob pastor".---

Uh, Joe Louis had "problems" with Bob Pastor?

In Joes two fights against Bob.---

In regards to their first fight.--- Joe Louis beat Bob Pastor by a 10 round unanimous decision.

The judges scorecards were 8-2, 6-3-1 & 8-1-1.

Joe won the first fight very convincingly.

In regards to their second fight.--- Joe Louis beat Bob Pastor by an 11th round knockout.

For 10 rounds, Joe was totally dominating over Bob.

Joe Louis DIDN'T struggle at all against Bob Pastor. Not in their first fight.

Not in their second fight.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3509 Apr 26, 2013
Desmond ---- You said "Joe Louis, the problems he had with guys like Billy Conn".----

In Joes two fights against Billy Conn.---

In regards to their first fight.--- Yes, Joe did struggle for several rounds. But, after the 10th round, Billy started getting careless. Joe took advantage of this, knocked Billy out.

In regards to their second fight.--- From the very beginning of the bell ringing to start off the first round.--- Up until Joe delivering the knock out punch.----

Joe Louis was in total domination. OVER Billy Conn.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3510 Apr 26, 2013
Desmond ---- You said "because marciano was no better than say, max baer or tony galento".---- Oh geez.

Rocky had way more punching power. He had WAY better physical conditioning. Rocky had WAY more stamina & endurance. He had a WAY better chin. Rocky had a WAY better threshold of pain.

Than what Max Baer &/or Tony Galento had.

Max Baer & Tony Galento scaled NOWHERES near the heights. Which Rocky Marciano scaled.

You said "He lacked physical gifts in terms of speed, height".--- Granted, Rocky Marciano had less speed than what Muhammad Ali had.

But, the variable of speed is just one factor in the boxing ring.

Yes, Rocky had less height than what Muhammad had.

But, Rocky being shorter than Ali.---- Rocky would use this to his advantage.

To bend at his waist & have his arms up blocking his face. To get low. To come in low. Against Muhammad Ali.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3511 Apr 26, 2013
Desmond --- You said "He lacked physical gifts in terms of reach, chin".----

True, Rocky Marciano didn't have a long arm reach.

But, Rocky used his short arm reach to his ADVANTAGE.

When Rocky would be on the inside against his opponents.

Rocky had a GREAT chin. He had a GREAT threshold of pain.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3512 Apr 26, 2013
Desmond --- You said "Earnie shavers is considered the most powerful puncher of all time".---- Along with Rocky Marciano & George Foreman.

You said "He never won a title".--- True.

This shows, that a boxer being a great puncher.---- Is just one variable in the ring.

The reason why Earnie never won a title.---- Was because Earnies conditioning wasn't good after the 5th round.

Even more so, Earnies chin strength wasn't that good.

Earnies threshold of pain wasn't that good.

These are the reasons why Earnie never won a title.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3513 Apr 26, 2013
Desmond ---- You said "Walcott was 37 years old. The OLDEST MAN EVER TO HOLD THE TITLE".--- Well, up until early November, 1994.

Back in early November, 1994.--- George Foreman eclipsed Jersey Joe Walcotts record.

When George Foreman fought & beat Michael Moorer. By a knockout.

George was 45 years old.

You said "Charles was an over the hill Light HEAVYWT".--- Not at all.

When Ezzard Charles fought against Rocky Marciano.--- Ezzard was ONLY 2 years older than Rocky.

Both Ezzard & Rocky had around the same amount of ring wars.

You said "At 39 years old, Moore was an EVEN MORE over the hill light heavywt".---- True.

But, Archie was an exception in boxing.

This is why.--- Archie fought Rocky back in September, 1955. Archie lost.

From September, 1955 up until mid March, 1963.--- Archie continued to fight. From this time frame, Archies record was 36-3-2.

So, even in the last stage of Archies career.--- He was good.

Archie was an exception.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3515 Apr 26, 2013
Desmond ---- You said "Old man Walcott dropped marciano and was beating him up for THIRTEEN ROUNDS".---- Jersey Joe Walcott was leading on the judges scorecards.

The judges had Jersey Joe up 7-4, 7-5 & 8-4.

But, from rounds 9 till 12, Rocky was coming on strong. Rocky took rounds 9 thru 12.

You said "until marciano landed that lucky shot".--- Uh, it wasn't "luck".

Every power punch which Rocky threw had lethal power. Every power punch which Marciano threw at his opponents face, had it connected squarely.----Would have meant the end of the fight. In victory for Rocky Marciano.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 2 min NotSoDivineMsM 31,859
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min Ringo 987,467
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 26 min hojo 687,466
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 4 hr Here For Now 619,795
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 7 hr ChromiuMan 6,496
Trump: "Get that Son of a B- - - - off the fiel... 7 hr Love Trump 9
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 7 hr SmokinJoe 4,319
More from around the web