Calling all White People
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3213 Mar 27, 2013
Desmond Sandiford wrote:
What saved him from the destructive effects of racism was that he was raised in HAWAII, a state where blacks aren't treated the same as in the mainland.
__________

Nope, Barack being raised in Hawaii was NOT the critical factor.

What SEPARATED Barack from other African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves). In regards to how Obama was received were these factors.---

1. Barack having a White mother. She was Irish-American.

2. Barack living with & being raised by his White grandparents.

3. Obamas father NOT being a descendant of a black American slave. Baracks father was a black Kenyan. From a black Kenyan tribe.

It was especially points #1 & #2.---- As to why Barack was treated DIFFERENTLY.

As to why Obama was viewed as being an acceptable black person.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3214 Mar 27, 2013
Desmond Sandiford wrote:
Obama and others like dr carson are examples of what happens when blacks are given something approaching a level playing field instead of a mountain slope playing field.
__________

You using Barack Obama & Dr. Ben Carson as examples.--- It doesn't hold.

This is why.--- Barack is TOTALLY different. Compared to most African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).

Baracks mother was White. She was Irish-American.

Obama lived with & was raised by his White grandparents.

Baracks father was NOT a descendant of a black American slave.

Obamas father was a black Kenyan. From a black Kenyan ethnic group.

Again, since Baracks father was NOT a descendant of a black American slave.--- This SURE did play a role in Whites view & opinion about him.

So, Baracks "growing up" experience was TOTALLY different. Compared to most African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) growing up experience.

Granted, Dr. Ben Carson is African American (Descendant of a black American slave). Dr. Carson is the VERY, VERY rare exception among African Americans.

Within any respective field, there are exceptions.

In addition, most African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) have become very disillusioned with Dr. Carson. Due to Dr. Ben Carsons Conservative Republican views.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3216 Mar 27, 2013
Desmond --- You said "When banks give loans based on credit worthiness instead of race".--- It is based ON credit worthiness.

It is based upon the person who is seeking the loans.--- His/her ability to pay back the loan.

You said "and hospitals provide care based on need instead of race".--- This ISN'T the case at all.

There are MANY venues for African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) to obtain health care.

African Americans are having health problems due to these factors.---

1. African Americans VERY terrible diets.

2. African Americans being chain smokers.

3. African Americans being major, big time drinkers of beer, alize, moet, purple & gin.

4. African Americans being compulsive users of marijuana, crack cocaine & heroin.

From the mid 1960s till now.---- There have been many programs in implementation for health care for African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).

In addition, from the mid 1960s till now.---- White-Americans have been paying for African Americans way.

It ISN'T a case of African Americans getting any such type of "lower quality" health care.

What do you expect? That health care providers travel to every African American home? To check on African Americans health?

It is up to African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) to get up off of their VERY lazy behinds. To travel to see the doctor.

It isn't up to the doctor to travel to every African American home. To check on African Americans health.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3217 Mar 27, 2013
Desmond --- You said "it is our ability to understand the racist capitalist system".--- Geez, if the United States (US) is such a "racist" &/or "oppressive" nation?

Why then are millions & millions of people of color from the worlds developing nations?--- TRYING to get into this nation each & every year?

If the US is such a "racist" &/or "oppressive" nation?--- Why then do JUST recently arrived immigrants of color ((Mexicans, Salvadorans, Guatemalans, Hondurans, Nicaraguans, Belizeans (Afro-Belizeans included), Panamanians (Afro-Panamanians included), Colombians (Afro-Colombians included), Ecuadorians (Afro-Ecuadorians), Peruvians (Afro-Peruvians included), Cubans (Afro-Cubanos included), Dominicans (Afro-Dominicans included), Jamaicans, Trinidadians (Afro-Trinidadians included), Grenadians, Bajans, Bahamians, Bermudians, Virgin Islanders, Antiguans, Haitians, St. Lucians, St. Barthans, Martiniqueans, Chinese, Cambodians, Japanese, Laotians, Hmongs, Malaysians, Vietnamese, Indonesians, Nigerians, Ghanaians, Senegalese, Ethiopians, Eritreans & Somalis))

pass up most African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves)? Within just a few years after arriving here?

It is because these immigrants of color (All of the respective immigrants of color groups which I listed in my paragraph above) are VERY much different. Compared to African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).

Especially in regards to culture.

Immigrants of color have goals, ambition, drive, desire, commitment, dedication, honor, pride, respect, humility & self gratitude about themselves.

Immigrants of color value & cherish work ethic, family values, morals, decency, education, law & order.

All traits & attributes which most African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) lack.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3218 Mar 27, 2013
Desmond Sandiford wrote:
proves our ability to function independently.
__________

Pff. Come on. African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) are FAR from being "independent".

From the 1960s till now, self destructive behaviors from within have been African Americans BIGGEST obstacles to growth & empowerment. These have been the self destructive behaviors from within.---

1. From the 1960s till now, the over 70% to over 80% illegitimate birth rates. Depending upon the area.

2. From the 1960s till now, the very high rates of African American kids dropping out of high school.

3. From the 1960s till now, the very high rates of deadbeat fathers in the African American "community". Who haven't paid any & who currently aren't paying any child support.

4. From the 1960s till now, the very high rates of single, unwed African American mothers. These African American mothers haven't received any & currently aren't receiving any child support.

5. From the 1960s till now, the very high rates of African Americans who are unemployed & who are not employable. Due to being a high school dropout &/or because of having a criminal record. Usually a very extensive criminal record at this.

Now, the African American "community" has several hundred billion dollars worth of earning & spending power. But, this money goes OUTSIDE of the African American "community". African Americans currently don't support African American owned or run businesses.

African Americans haven't supported African American owned or run businesses since the 1960s.

From the 1960s till now, this is all that it has been in the African American "community".--- Crime against each other, rivalry, jealousy, envy, egos, playa hating, not taking care of & not backing each other up.

So, African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) are FAR from being "independent".
RFD

Oakland, CA

#3219 Mar 27, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
So, African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) are FAR from being "independent".
Blacks nor African-Americans are independent. Far from it.
RFD

Oakland, CA

#3220 Mar 27, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
Oh, come on boy.--- Hey, why lie?
You are the original poster who started off this thread. Throughout the course of this thread, you also blocked out your posting location, you took on other personas.
Throughout the course of this thread, you have been typing up several, different posts with a few different names.
Come on, why lie?
It is totally apparent what your posting & trolling schtick is.
Even going back to July, 2012.--- When the shooting at the Century movie theater in Aurora, Colorado took place.
That one thread which you typed up about the Century movie theater.
Even your other thread which you typed up, titled "Hey White People".
Come on boy, it is totally transparent what your posting & trolling m.o. on Topix is.
Geez man. Are youi on drugs? YOu must be. You keep throwing out all of those insinuations yet you show no links nor do you have any proof.
And even if I did start them, youo seem to be having fun in them. Well, at least in this one.
RFD

Oakland, CA

#3221 Mar 27, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
What you typed up above.-- Yet another VERY stupid, juvenile & childish post. Yet again.
Above, you said "I'm irritable".--- It is more disgust, contempt & disdain.
I'm not politically correct.
I'm especially not politically correct when it comes to people, who are physically grown adults. But, mentally, their mindsets & maturity level are like that of little 3 year old children.
That fits your mentality, mindset & maturity level to a tee.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TS3RGMH...

More just like that one.
Why do you keep saying that you are not politically corerct?
Are you trying to prove something to yourself?
RFD

Oakland, CA

#3222 Mar 27, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
Sure.
Come on, why lie?
No need to be a punk & a coward.
You were a punk & a coward when you typed up this thread, under your other posting & trolling name "The Cleanser".-- Where you pretended that you were White. Where you pretended that you were disillusioned with Whites.
With your statement above.--- You are throwing up another lie.
Via your newest lie.--- You are just reinforcing that you are a punk & a coward.
The more you type up that drivel, the more you showe your true colors. You delusional fool.
RFD

Oakland, CA

#3223 Mar 27, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
In your post above.--- You are pretending to be White.
Your entire post above.--- This is yet another very stupid, juvenile & childish post.
Especially what you said in your last paragraph. Where you said that you had a small business. Where you said that you had students.
Ha, ha.
In your attempt at trolling.--- At least try to make your posts at least 2% "believable".
You foolish goof ball, you make me laugh. You really do.
RFD

Oakland, CA

#3224 Mar 27, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
Uh, I was never "thinking" any such stuff.
Sure you were.
RFD

Oakland, CA

#3225 Mar 27, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
You are totally incorrect. Incorrect, yet again.
In the boxing ring, the dynamics of a boxers defense is different. Compared to a boxers offense.
Again, a matchup between 2 boxers. Where physically, they are roughly of the same height, weight & arm reach.---
The boxer who has the better defensive.--- Will emerge victorious.
Here are many examples of this.---
1. Harry Greb vs. Gene Tunney.---
Harry had a very good offensive attack. But, he was very much lacking in defense.
Gene Tunney had a great defense.
Harry & Gene fought 5 times. Harry only won the first fight. Gene totally dominated Harry in the 4 other fights.
2. Max Baer vs. Joe Louis.----
Max had a very good offensive attack. But, he was very much lacking in defense.
Joe Louis had a very good defense.
When Max Baer fought Joe Louis.--- Joe totally dominated over Max.
3. Henry Armstrong vs. Sugar Ray Robinson.---
Henry had a good offensive attack. But, he was very much lacking in defense.
Sugar Ray Robinson had a very good defense.
When Henry Armstrong fought Sugar Ray Robinson.--- Sugar Ray Robinson totally dominated OVER Henry.
4. Henry Armstrong vs. Fritzie Zivic.----
Henry had a good offensive attack. But, he was very much lacking in defense.
Fritzie didn't have the offensive capabilities such as what Henry Armstrong had.
But, Fritzies defense was way SUPERIOR to Henrys.
When Henry Armstrong fought Fritzie Zivic.--- Fritzie totally dominated OVER Henry.
5. Wilfredo Gomez vs. Salvador Sanchez.---
Wilfredo had a very good offensive attack. But, he was very much lacking in defense.
Salvador had a very good defense.
When Wilfredo Gomez & Salvador Sanchez fought.--- Salvador totally dominated OVER Wilfredo.
6. Roberto Duran vs. Wilfred Benitez.---
Roberto had a good offensive attack. But, he was very much lacking in defense.
Wilfred had a very good defense.
When Roberto Duran fought Wilfred Benitez.--- Wilfred totally dominated over Roberto.
7. Thomas Hearns vs. Marvin Hagler.---
Thomas had a very good offensive attack. But, Thomas was very much lacking in defense.
Marvin also had a very good offensive attack.
But, Marvin had a very good defense. Marvins trainers, Goodie & Pat Petronelli SPECIFICALLY trained Marvin in defense.
When Thomas Hearns & Marvin Hagler fought.--- Marvin SMASHED Thomas.
In boxing, defense is way more CRITICAL than offense.
There you go again.

Just to prove you are full of siht....
]]

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

What is your experience and qualifications to say such things, anyways?
You are a nerd.
You have no idea what you are typing about.
RFD

Oakland, CA

#3226 Mar 27, 2013
How many times have YOU been in the ring?
RFD

Oakland, CA

#3227 Mar 27, 2013
I hate to tell you this, but you are only showing yourself as a typical internet punk.
RFD

Oakland, CA

#3228 Mar 27, 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Ali

Muhammed Ali's offense is what took him to where he was. Now if he was pitted against a real fighter, such as cage fighter, he would be taken down quite early and rendered quite harmless.
RFD

Oakland, CA

#3229 Mar 27, 2013
Now stop being a snot nosed punk.
RFD

Oakland, CA

#3230 Mar 27, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
Oh, in your post above.--- You reverted back to playing & pretending that you are White. Yet again.
You are a fake & a phony. This is why.---
Right off the bat, when you started this thread.--- You played yourself. You perpetrated yourself. You pretended to be something which you are NOT.
When you started off this thread.--- You said that you were White. You typed up points where you tried to come across as if you were disillusioned with Whites.
But, in your exact, same post, you typed up a couple of different points.--- Where you slipped up.
Which gave away your racial identity. Which showed that you AREN'T White.
Which showed that you are African American (Descendant of a black American slave).
I am still waiting for proof to your delusional rants.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3231 Mar 28, 2013
RFD wrote:
<quoted text>
Blacks nor African-Americans are independent. Far from it.
__________

Granted, nations which have a majority black population are not that economically advanced.

But, when foreign born blacks (Afro-Latinos, blacks from the Anglophone, French / Creole speaking Caribbean black nations & from Africa) come to the United States (US).---

They DO pass up most African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves). Within just a few years after arriving in this nation.

This is why.--- Foreign born blacks (Afro-Latinos, blacks from the Anglophone, French / Creole speaking Caribbean black nations & from Africa) are A LOT different. Compared to African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).

Especially in regards to culture.

Foreign born blacks (All of the respective foreign born black groups which I listed in my paragraph above) appreciates the US.

Foreign born blacks have honor, pride, respect, humility & self gratitude about themselves.

Foreign born blacks have drive, desire, ambition, motivation & commitment.

Foreign born blacks value & cherish work ethic, family values, morals, decency, education, law & order.

All traits & attributes which most African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) lack.

Tragically, the US has the lowest & lowliest black life form, in the form of African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3232 Mar 28, 2013
RFD wrote:
<quoted text>And even if I did start them.
__________

Well, via your point above.-- You inadvertantly gave yourself up.

That you started off this thread. Then, you blocked out your posting location, took on other personas.

Right off the bat, you perpetrated & played YOURSELF.

Right from the get go, you PROVED yourself to be something which you are not.

Again, right from the get go, you perpetrated & played YOURSELF.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#3233 Mar 28, 2013
RFD wrote:
I hate to tell you this, but you are only showing yourself as a typical internet punk.
__________

Ha, ha, you calling any other poster a "punk".

Considering your posting & trolling on Topix from late July, 2012 till now.

In regards to your VERY stupid, juvenile & childish threads & posts which you type up.

It is totally laughable for you to throw up the term "punk".--- Considering that in several of your previous posts, you typed up about how you got your behind KICKED many times in Oakland.

Via all the times you got your behind SMASHED in Oakland.--- It seems that your street fighting record is around 0-9. Maybe even worse.

Geez, it sure seems as if you don't know how to fight.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 2 min Sojurner D Truth 26,165
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min hojo 685,742
David Duke: "We're going to take our country ba... 59 min Doctor REALITY 58
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr UMORONRACEMAKEWOR... 985,692
to Maria Chapelle-Nadal: it's time to ROLL, sista' 2 hr Doctor REALITY 1
I hate Haiti (Jan '10) 3 hr Anne Nonymiss 109
"BIGGEST SCAM in WORLD HISTORY...." 3 hr YTube 1st 1
More from around the web