#3088 Feb 8, 2013
pukeskins smell like wet dog
#3089 Feb 8, 2013
pukeskins eat too much
#3090 Feb 8, 2013
white women worship black men
#3091 Feb 8, 2013
The very stupid, simple, single minded, slow minded, weak minded & inferior African American (Descendant of a black American slave) boy is back.
Hey boy, why are you pretending that you are an Australian who is coming from Australia?
Are you ashamed to be African American (Descendant of a black American slave)?
If I was African American (Descendant of a black American slave), I sure would be ashamed.
#3092 Feb 8, 2013
You got the reality of the dynamic reversed. African American (Descendants of black American slaves) dudes & women seek out OTHER groups of people.
African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) do this because they don't like themselves.
African American (Descendants of black American slaves) dudes would prefer to date a woman who is of a different race.
Even if this woman would be fat, dumpy, uneducated & with low self esteem.
Because even if an African American dude would get a woman such as this, he'd consider it to be a step up for him.
African American dudes consider women who are of other races to be SUPERIOR to African American women.
EVEN if these women of other races would be fat, dumpy, uneducated & with low self esteem.
African American dudes still consider these women as ranking higher on Americas social strata ladder. Compared to African American women.
African Americans are also always & constantly claiming other groups. Such as the ancient Greeks, Romans & Vikings. Even the ancient Germans. Even the ancient Chinese, Olmecs, Mayans, Aztecs & Incas. Even the Native American groups in the United States (US).
But, absolutely NO other group wants to claim African Americans.
Every other group considers African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) to be a bunch of royal, big time, pathetic losers & failures at life.
Every other group considers African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) to be a professional, perpetual pity case & charity case.
#3093 Feb 8, 2013
African American (Descendants of black American slaves) men & women don't like themselves.
Examples of this.--- 1. African American women always purchasing skin lightening creams & lotions.
To appear less African American.
2. African American women taking drugs to lighten their skin color.
To appear less African American.
3. African American women always straightening their hair.
To appear less African American.
4. African American women always getting hair weaves &/or extensions.
To appear less African Americans.
5. African American dudes & women making appearances on television.
Such as on the Oprah Winfrey Show. Or, on American television media venues like CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC & NBC.
Bashing the opposite gender of their own race.
6. African American dudes & women making videos. Posting them on YouTube.
Bashing the opposite gender of their own race.
Hyping up the beauty of other races.
Afro-Latinos, blacks from the Anglophone, French / Creole speaking Caribbean black nations & from Africa DON'T do this.
African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) are the one & ONLY group which does this stuff.
#3094 Feb 15, 2013
I would expound upon as to why, but, I still have to respond back to 9 of your previous posts which you addressed to me on this thread.
#3095 Feb 15, 2013
Oh, a politicians ideology IS what guides the politician. Primarily at the state level & federal level. Especially at the federal level.
For instance, what is politics? What does politics comprise of?---
Politics has consisted (It still does) of different ideologies. A politicians ideology is what guides him/her in regards to their crafting of bills for governmental committees. To become law.
Laws affect BILLIONS of people throughout the world.
So, ideology MATTERS. It always has & it always will.
#3096 Feb 15, 2013
it about time, what took you so long ? BWHAHHAHAAHAHHAAHAaaa
#3097 Feb 15, 2013
There are VERY fundamental & substantial differences between the Democratic Party & the Republican Party.
Please just observe.--- The "old guard" of the Democratic Party was very good. The old guard of the Democratic Party was what the Democratic Party was before the mid 1960s.
From 1933 till the mid 1960s, the Democratic Party was truly the best political party in the United States (US). From 1933 till the mid 1960s, the Democratic Party truly spoke for & represented all sectors of American society.--- The working class / lower middle class, working poor & the very poor.
The Democratic Party also spoke for & represented even the upper class, upper middle class & mid middle class.
But, starting back in the mid 1960s, the Democratic Party shifted far left wing. From the mid 1960s till now, the Democratic Party has been the political party of the liberals / leftists, the deadbeats, the incompetents, the irresponsible peole, the criminals, African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves), union people, welfare mothers who abuse the welfare & entitlement society & radical left wing feminists.
In addition, from the mid 1960s till now, the Democratic Party has been the political party of high taxes, waste, pork spending, weak defense & a weak foreign policy.
Back in the 1960s, the "welfare & entitlement society" ("Great Society") of ex. president, left wing Democrat Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) & the Democrats in the House & Senate led to this stuff igniting & skyrocketing.--- Crime, illegitimate birth rates, girls from ages 12-17 having kids, kids dropping out of high school, welfare & entitlement dependency, frivolous lawsuits, laziness, insubordination, deadbeat fathers, households headed by single, unwed mothers & mothers who neglect their kids.
Furthermore, the policies of the Democrats also caused this stuff to ignite.--- High taxes, urban rot & decay, decline of public education (Especially in urban / ghetto communities) & American jobs going overseas.
#3098 Feb 15, 2013
Hi. How's it going?
Hey, did you see my response back to you on that other thread.
True, it did take awhile. It was a case of this thread getting side shelved.
But, I did say that I'd get back to you. Which I'm doing.
#3099 Feb 15, 2013
From the mid 1960s till now, the Republican Party has represented these values.---
Low taxes, self respect, personal freedom, responsibility, discipline, time limits on welfare recipients, letting the economy dictate wages, creating legislation that is pro-business (This is ultimately pro working class), less regulations on businesses, capitalism, laissez faire, free market, long term growth, school choice, very tough law & order policy in regards to dealing with Americas enemies throughout the world.
Primary enemies of the United States (US) are Islamic fundamentalists & left wing movements.
The Republican Party has also represented this.---- Supporting Americas very loyal Allies.--- Primarily Israel, the United Kingdom (UK) & the very GREAT Caribbean & Latin American Right wing Paramilitary organizations.
#3100 Feb 15, 2013
One CANNOT put the blame on the United States (US) federal government for Somalias domestic affairs.
Somalis have been engaged in piracy throughout the Red Sea since the very beginning of Somalia having civilization & culture.
This goes way, way, way back.
Even way, way before Somalia & other respective nations which border on the Red Sea were engaged in the East African slave trade.
So, one CANNOT blame the US federal government for Somalias domestic affairs.
#3103 Feb 15, 2013
UidiotRace --- You said "In 1995, severely indebted low-income countries paid one billion dollars more in debt and interest to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) than they received from it".--- No. The total numerical sum is way way, way LESS.
In addition, this just takes into account & just focuses on the DIRECT monetary assistance which the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has dispersed out.
This totally omits all of these very critical OTHER venues of aid from the IMF. Here they are.---
1. The IMF stabilizing the exchange rates. Especially aimed at many nations of the developing world.
2. The IMF fostering global monetary cooperation. Especially aimed for the nations of the developing world.
3. The IMF securing financial stability. Especially aimed for the nations of the developing world.
4. The IMF facilitating international trade. Especially aimed for the nations of the developing world.
5. The IMF promoting high employment and sustainable economic growth. Especially aimed for the nations of the developing world.
6. The IMF reducing poverty throughout the world. Especially aimed for the nations of the developing world.
7. The IMF making financial resources available to member countries. So that these respective member nations are able to meet their balance of payments needs.
This is especially aimed for the nations of the developing world.
An example.--- From 1960 till now, black, Sub-Saharan African nations have received at LEAST 300 billion dollars worth of DIRECT financial assistance.
This doesn't even take into account the 7 areas which I listed in my post here.
So, taking into account the 7 venues which I listed.--- All total, black, Sub-Saharan African nations have received TRILLIONS of dollars worth of aid from the IMF.
#3104 Feb 15, 2013
UidiotRace ---- You said "Uses of Haiti. This resistance is due to many factors, not the least of which is the discomfort born of facing ugly realities about the role of our government in the Third World".--- Well, the United States (US), Israel & the United Kingdom (UK) have many Allies & interests in Haiti.
The US, Israel & the UK have many, many Allies & interests throughout the world.
Which MUST be protected.
The REALITY of the US, Israel & the UK conducting their respective foreign policies, at times, it doesn't consist of niceties.
The reality of the US, Israel & the UK dealing with rivals throughout the world, this entails neutralizations.
#3105 Feb 15, 2013
Not at all. FAR from it.
The United States (US) & European nations are way, way FAR ahead of China economically.
For the "West", the US, Israel & the United Kingdom (UK) are the leaders of the West.
An example.--- A comparison of JUST the US.--- With China.---
Clearly, from 1992 till now, China has experienced economic growth. But, Chinas economic growth is very SUPERFICIAL.
The ONLY reason why China has more money than say, a European nation such as Estonia, is because China has over 1.4 billion people.
This is why China lags FAR behind the US.--- Less than 25% of Chinas population is comprised of a middle class. Furthermore, Chinas middle class is according to the standards of Chinas left wing, communist dictatorship. NOT according to the economic standards of the US federal government. NOT according to the economic standards of any respective European nations central governments.
Other examples.--- Which shows how China lags FAR behind the US.--- The average China person in China is paid, way, way less. Than what EVEN a Jamaican citizen who lives in Jamaica is paid.
Chinas Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is not even six trillion.
Chinas GDP isn't even half of what Americas is.
Chinas per capital GDP is very low, on average.
In addition, there are OVER 300 million Chinese citizens in China who live on LESS than one dollar per day.
So, China still lags FAR behind the US.
Putting together the US, the European nations & Israel on the one side. Compared to China on the other side.--- There is absolutely NO comparison.
The alliance of the US, the European nations & Israel on the one side.--- Are far, far AHEAD of China.
#3106 Feb 15, 2013
UIdiotRace --- You said "The United States has given frequent and enthusiastic support to the overthrow of democracy in favor of "investor friendly" regimes".--- The respective regimes being investor friendly isn't the main factor.
The critical factor, is the ideology of the regimes. As in, if the regimes are sympathetic to the United States (US) federal government.
Or, if the regimes are sympathetic to the Israeli &/or British governments.
You said "The World Bank, IMF, and private banks have consistently lavished huge sums on terror regimes, following their displacement of democratic governments".--- True. So what.
I say "so what", is because that is the DEAL with the World Bank, IMF & private banks conducting international relations.
What matters ISN'T if the regimes are "democratic". What matters is if the regimes are Allies to the United States (US), Israel & the United Kingdom (UK).
#3107 Feb 15, 2013
UIdiotRace --- You said "The IMF is essentially a covert arm of the U.S. Treasury, yet beyond congressional oversight because it is formally an international organization".--- Correct. So what.
You said "Its voting rules ensure that it is dominated by the United States and its allies".---True.
This is the deal.--- The United States (US) federal government & the many foreign governments which are Allied to the US federal government.
Primarily the European nations. I specifically mention the European nations, is because they also have more votes with the IMF.-- These nations are putting up MORE money with the IMFs trust.
So, THIS is why the US federal government & Allies of the US have more votes in the IMF.
#3108 Feb 15, 2013
UIdiotRace ---- You said "India and China have fewer votes in the IMF, for example, than the Netherlands".--- You are absolutely correct about this.
Your statement here.--- This is yet another example, as to why China lags FAR behind the United States (US).
Why China especially lags FAR behind the alliance of the US, Israel & the European nations.
An example.--- Several years ago.--- When several, black African nations were to conclude trade deals with the US, Israel & the United Kingdom (UK).--- the US federal government, Israeli government & the British government DELIBERATELY set very high interest rates.
So, the black African nations of Ghana, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Kenya, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zimbabwe & Zambia concluded some trade deals with China.
But, despite this, the US federal government, Israeli government & British government still maintain majority share in the black African nations of Ghana, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Kenya, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zimbabwe & Zambia.
One such venue is via the Vulture Funds. The Vulture Funds are just one avenue of how the US federal government, Israeli government & British governments have majority share in black African nations. Even in black African nations where there is a Chinese presence.
#3109 Feb 15, 2013
Well, the United States (US) federal government HAS to undertake relations with many, many respective foreign governments.
When the US federal government conducts foreign relations, intermediaries are utilized.
So, it is only logically, that the US federal government & American corporations would work hand in hand with the World Bank & the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Add your comments below
|Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS||1 min||Seentheotherside||464|
|American Soldiers - Duty, Honor, Country (Jun '11)||5 min||Voyeur||39,216|
|Secular Humanism VS Christianity||20 min||Truthiness||24|
|The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15)||44 min||Scaritual||87,943|
|Renzenberger : STEALING MILLIONS from their dri... (Feb '15)||1 hr||rocko||44|
|Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07)||1 hr||onemale||284,496|
|Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07)||1 hr||Gods r Delusions ...||665,168|
|Prove there's a god. (Mar '08)||2 hr||karl44||977,199|
|The Future of Politics in America||21 hr||Insults Are Easier||176|
Find what you want!
Search Top Stories Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC