Comments
32,681 - 32,700 of 37,629 Comments Last updated Friday Aug 22
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41628 Sep 25, 2013
Naturally I am Wired wrote:
Australian mooooooslim, another unwanted tresspasser.
Notice how they all talk about c*ck, d*cks etc
gi look at yourselve and your president muslim lover
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41629 Sep 25, 2013
Naturally Wired wrote:
Australian mooooooslim, another unwanted tresspasser.
Notice how they all talk about c*ck, d*cks etc
ooo carn't we say it ,how's a good little boy , tell your sister I will be in her tonight after your mummy

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#41630 Sep 25, 2013
1 ILLITERATE BRIT wrote:
<quoted text>gi look at yourselve and your president muslim lover
He has a prime minister not a president, idiot. <¦-o

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#41631 Sep 25, 2013
1 ILLITERATE MOSLEM wrote:
<quoted text>ooo carn't we say it ,how's a good little boy , tell your sister I will be in her tonight after your mummy
We don't have mummies in North America, ignorant Egyptian. <¦-o
Patriot

Longmont, CO

#41632 Sep 25, 2013
Patriot

Longmont, CO

#41633 Sep 25, 2013
cont...

"All ‘laws’ which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison

"No one is bound to obey an un-Constitutional ‘law’ and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d. Sec 256 http://constitution.org/uslaw/16amjur2nd.htm

"An un-Constitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County

"Where Rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be NO rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."
Miranda v Arizona, U.S. Supreme Court, 384 US 436, 491 (1966).

"The claim and exercise of a Constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime."
Miller v U.S. 230 F 486, at 489

"No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it."
Miller v U.S., U.S. Supreme Court,[319 U.S. 105 (1943).

"If a state converts a liberty into a privilege the citizen can engage in the Right with impunity."
Shuttlesworth v Birmingham, U.S. Supreme Court.[394 U.S. 147 (1969).]

"Constitutional Rights cannot be denied simply because of hostility to their assertions and exercise; vindication of conceded Constitutional Rights cannot be made dependent upon any theory that it is less expensive to deny them than to afford them."
Watson v. Memphis, 181 N.C. 574, 107 S.E. 222, at 224 (1921)

"The maintenance of the Right to bear arms is a most essential one to every free people and should not be whittled down by technical constructions." Tiche v Osborne, 131 A. 60

"The provision in the Constitution granting the Right to all persons to bear arms is a limitation upon the power of the legislature to enact any law to the contrary. The exercise of a Right guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be made subject to the will of the sheriff."
People v Zedillo,{219 Mich. 635, 189 N.W. 927, at 928 (1922)

"When any court violates the clean and unambiguous language of the Constitution, a fraud is perpetrated and NO ONE is bound to obey it." State v Sutton,[Source: 63 Minn 167, 65 NW 262, 30 LRA 630]

"There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional Rights." Snerer v Cullen 481 F. 946

"We find it intolerable that one Constitutional Right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another." Simmons v U.S.,[390 US 389 (1968)]

And to Our military -

The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 809[890].ART.90 (20), makes it clear that military personnel need to obey the "lawful command of his superior officer," 891.ART.91 (2), the "lawful order of a warrant officer", 892.ART.92 (1) the "lawful general order", 892.ART.92 (2) "lawful order". In each case, military personnel have an obligation and a duty to only obey Lawful orders and indeed have an obligation to disobey Unlawful orders, including orders by a president that do not comply with the UCMJ. The moral and legal obligation is to the U.S. Constitution and not to those who would issue unlawful orders, especially if those orders are in direct violation of the Constitution and the UCMJ.

President’s Oath of Office:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

---

PENALTY FOR TREASON
&#12288;
DEATH , if convicted of Treason.

18 USC, Part 1, Chapter 115, Sec.2381

And UCMJ Sec. 906, Art. 106

- AND -

http://www.commieblaster.com/ineligible/index...

http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/07/08/forens...

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2011/07/oba...
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41634 Sep 25, 2013
USA_ number 1 dick head wrote:
<quoted text>We don't have mummies in North America, ignorant Egyptian. <¦-o
no you just got dick heads YOU
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41635 Sep 25, 2013
USA_1 wrote:
<quoted text>He has a prime minister not a president, idiot. <¦-o
so tell me the diffrence moron candan shit for brains, see you go the empire way, PRIME MINISTER LOL
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41636 Sep 25, 2013
canada_1 wrote:
<quoted text>We don't have mummies in North America, ignorant Egyptian. <¦-o
what's it like to be under our qween. and still in the commonwealth lol . your are slave boy,
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41637 Sep 25, 2013
ON WENSDAY 27TH FEB 2008, george bush snr ,the 41st president of the u s a sent a legal team to the INTERNATIONAL COURT of justice in the hague [netherlands] to REQEST IMMUNITY from the multiple charges against him for WAR CRIMES, is is whay no one went to americas aid with syira ,can you blame them NOTHING BUT LIERS
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41638 Sep 25, 2013
and that why

Since: Sep 13

Hanoi, Vietnam

#41639 Sep 25, 2013
Wow, nice stories!
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41640 Sep 25, 2013
WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE U.S.A ,The first 4 impeachments articles charge the PRESIDENT with ILLEGALLY creating a case for war with iraq,INCLUDING charges of propaganda campaign falsey representing IRAQ as responsible for the 9/11,and falsey representing iraq as an IMMINET danger to the U.S.A face up to it america lied all the way
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41641 Sep 25, 2013
[QUOTE who=" canada /USA_1 lier"]<quoted text>We don't have mummies in North America, ignorant Egyptian. <¦-o[/QUOTE]see what I mean you come from u. s. a then you come from canada ....... lies all lies THAT AMERICA FOR YOU

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#41642 Sep 25, 2013
1 big illiterate douchebag Moslem wrote:
<quoted text>what's it like to be under our qween. and still in the commonwealth lol . your are slave boy,
When the terminology 'shit for brains' was coined, they had you in mind illiterate fool. <¦-o

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#41643 Sep 25, 2013
Shit for brains 1 wrote:
and that why
Huh?!?! Your must be retarded like the NFL fan says you are, pig. <¦-o

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#41644 Sep 25, 2013
CAMEL JOCKEY-1 wrote:
<quoted text>so tell me the diffrence moron candan shit for brains, see you go the empire way, PRIME MINISTER LOL
Again, just what are you trying to say, linguistically challenged Moslem? <¦-o

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#41645 Sep 25, 2013
MOSLEM-1 wrote:
WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE U.S.A ,The first 4 impeachments articles charge the PRESIDENT with ILLEGALLY creating a case for war with iraq,INCLUDING charges of propaganda campaign falsey representing IRAQ as responsible for the 9/11,and falsey representing iraq as an IMMINET danger to the U.S.A face up to it america lied all the way
It was all based on United Nations resolutions, Moslem fool. <¦-o

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#41646 Sep 25, 2013
Patriot wrote:
cont...
"All ‘laws’ which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison
"No one is bound to obey an un-Constitutional ‘law’ and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d. Sec 256 http://constitution.org/uslaw/16amjur2nd.htm
"An un-Constitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County
"Where Rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be NO rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."
Miranda v Arizona, U.S. Supreme Court, 384 US 436, 491 (1966).
"The claim and exercise of a Constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime."
Miller v U.S. 230 F 486, at 489
"No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it."
Miller v U.S., U.S. Supreme Court,[319 U.S. 105 (1943).
"If a state converts a liberty into a privilege the citizen can engage in the Right with impunity."
Shuttlesworth v Birmingham, U.S. Supreme Court.[394 U.S. 147 (1969).]
"Constitutional Rights cannot be denied simply because of hostility to their assertions and exercise; vindication of conceded Constitutional Rights cannot be made dependent upon any theory that it is less expensive to deny them than to afford them."
Watson v. Memphis, 181 N.C. 574, 107 S.E. 222, at 224 (1921)
"The maintenance of the Right to bear arms is a most essential one to every free people and should not be whittled down by technical constructions." Tiche v Osborne, 131 A. 60
"The provision in the Constitution granting the Right to all persons to bear arms is a limitation upon the power of the legislature to enact any law to the contrary. The exercise of a Right guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be made subject to the will of the sheriff."
People v Zedillo,{219 Mich. 635, 189 N.W. 927, at 928 (1922)
"When any court violates the clean and unambiguous language of the Constitution, a fraud is perpetrated and NO ONE is bound to obey it." State v Sutton,[Source: 63 Minn 167, 65 NW 262, 30 LRA 630]
"There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional Rights." Snerer v Cullen 481 F. 946
"We find it intolerable that one Constitutional Right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another." Simmons v U.S.,[390 US 389 (1968)]
And to Our military -
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 809[890].ART.90 (20), makes it clear that military personnel need to obey the "lawful command of his superior officer," 891.ART.91 (2), the "lawful order of a warrant officer", 892.ART.92 (1) the "lawful general order", 892.ART.92 (2) "lawful order". In each case, military personnel have an obligation and a duty to only obey Lawful orders and indeed have an obligation to disobey Unlawful orders, including orders by a president that do not comply with the UCMJ. The moral and legal obligation is to the U.S. Constitution and not to those who would issue unlawful orders, especially if those orders are in direct violation of the Constitution and the UCMJ.
President’s Oath of Office:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
---
PENALTY FOR TREASON
&#12288;
DEATH , if convicted of Treason.
18 USC, Part 1, Chapter 115, Sec.2381
And UCMJ Sec. 906, Art. 106
- AND -
http://www.commieblaster.com/ineligible/index...
http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/07/08/forens...
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2011/07/oba...
Good post!

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#41647 Sep 25, 2013
MOSLEM-1 wrote:
<quoted text>see what I mean you come from u. s. a then you come from canada ....... lies all lies THAT AMERICA FOR YOU
Again, one more unintelligible post, illiterate fool. <¦-o

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gleep 4 min andet1987 63
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 5 min Buck Crick 732,986
Last Post Wins !!! [ game time :) ] (Jan '11) 6 min andet1987 2,407
4 word game (use same Letter) (Mar '13) 9 min andet1987 1,004
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 10 min guest 538,951
Relatives Of Burglers Become Outraged 14 min Bobby Eweing 1
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 14 min KiMare 94,671
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 23 min Dr_Zorderz 257,997
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 44 min Peace_Warrior 599,908
Sims 4 Key Generator (Oct '13) 2 hr Figaro 105
•••
Enter and win $5000

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••