American Soldiers - Duty, Honor, Country

“Seriously guys...”

Since: May 12

Regina

#41618 Sep 25, 2013
Some lame assed shitpump wrote:
well you americans now say he smuggeld the over the boarder well that another ploy for you americans to go in
Oh, and by the way shit for brains, I'm not American. Then again, with your abject stupidity, I'm not surprised you need to be told the same thing over and over.

“Seriously guys...”

Since: May 12

Regina

#41619 Sep 25, 2013
usa number 1 prick wrote:
<quoted text>dickhead we look after you.and what benifit well you should know, people respect us more than americans inthe middle east, we did control it for some time and still have that respect from them,americans just fuck everything up ,why coz you so gun ho , yea that will win you wars /like nam/korea you americans beged us to come with you .you shoud read what maggie thacher said ,what g bush said look it up nob face
I'm not American. Just like you're not British. The difference is, I'm not pretending to be American, while you pretend to be British.
It must really suck to be you. An inferior specimen so desperately wishing to be something better than he is.
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41621 Sep 25, 2013
Whisgean Zoda wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not American. Just like you're not British. The difference is, I'm not pretending to be American, while you pretend to be British.
It must really suck to be you. An inferior specimen so desperately wishing to be something better than he is.
lol I'm not bothering with you cock head
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41623 Sep 25, 2013
[QUOTE who is clueless me="Whisgean Zoda"]<quoted text>
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA What a f*cking moron. You weren't even a twinkle in your donkey daddy's eye when that shit went down. America gave Saddam chem weapons capability and the Brits showed him how to set it up. It's that simple.
This is funny though, "we sold him the technology for something ealse".
Who's this "we" you're talking about. The technology was American. You're saying the Brits sold American tech to Iraq? And what exectly was that "something ealse" they supposedly sold American tech for?
Sorry dumbass, your assfacts don't match up with history or reality. I'd suggest you talk to your doctor about a prescription for Thorazine. Either that or get a real education.[/QUOTE]clueless
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41624 Sep 25, 2013
Whisgean Zoda wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA What a f*cking moron. You weren't even a twinkle in your donkey daddy's eye when that shit went down. America gave Saddam chem weapons capability and the Brits showed him how to set it up. It's that simple.
This is funny though, "we sold him the technology for something ealse".
Who's this "we" you're talking about. The technology was American. You're saying the Brits sold American tech to Iraq? And what exectly was that "something ealse" they supposedly sold American tech for?
Sorry dumbass, your assfacts don't match up with history or reality. I'd suggest you talk to your doctor about a prescription for Thorazine. Either that or get a real education.
wee sold him the tech point blank read a little more brain washed nethf dentst
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41625 Sep 25, 2013
Whisgean Zoda wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah yes, the last resort of the mentally incompetent. Resort to ad hominem attacks instead of trying to refute any points that are made.
That's what stupid people like you do all right. It's a sign the conversation has gone WAY over your tiny, little pin head.
at lest I havn't go a little dick
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41626 Sep 25, 2013
An NFL Fan wrote:
<quoted text>
You're retarded, aren't you? Were you going to have me arrested for pointing out that you're mentally incompetent, illiterate slug?
yea you need help aswell. loft entslinp

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#41627 Sep 25, 2013
Australian mooooooslim, another unwanted tresspasser.

Notice how they all talk about c*ck, d*cks etc
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41628 Sep 25, 2013
Naturally I am Wired wrote:
Australian mooooooslim, another unwanted tresspasser.
Notice how they all talk about c*ck, d*cks etc
gi look at yourselve and your president muslim lover
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41629 Sep 25, 2013
Naturally Wired wrote:
Australian mooooooslim, another unwanted tresspasser.
Notice how they all talk about c*ck, d*cks etc
ooo carn't we say it ,how's a good little boy , tell your sister I will be in her tonight after your mummy

USA_1

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#41630 Sep 25, 2013
1 ILLITERATE BRIT wrote:
<quoted text>gi look at yourselve and your president muslim lover
He has a prime minister not a president, idiot. <¦-o

USA_1

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#41631 Sep 25, 2013
1 ILLITERATE MOSLEM wrote:
<quoted text>ooo carn't we say it ,how's a good little boy , tell your sister I will be in her tonight after your mummy
We don't have mummies in North America, ignorant Egyptian. <¦-o
Patriot

Brighton, CO

#41632 Sep 25, 2013
Patriot

Brighton, CO

#41633 Sep 25, 2013
cont...

"All ‘laws’ which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison

"No one is bound to obey an un-Constitutional ‘law’ and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d. Sec 256 http://constitution.org/uslaw/16amjur2nd.htm

"An un-Constitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County

"Where Rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be NO rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."
Miranda v Arizona, U.S. Supreme Court, 384 US 436, 491 (1966).

"The claim and exercise of a Constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime."
Miller v U.S. 230 F 486, at 489

"No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it."
Miller v U.S., U.S. Supreme Court,[319 U.S. 105 (1943).

"If a state converts a liberty into a privilege the citizen can engage in the Right with impunity."
Shuttlesworth v Birmingham, U.S. Supreme Court.[394 U.S. 147 (1969).]

"Constitutional Rights cannot be denied simply because of hostility to their assertions and exercise; vindication of conceded Constitutional Rights cannot be made dependent upon any theory that it is less expensive to deny them than to afford them."
Watson v. Memphis, 181 N.C. 574, 107 S.E. 222, at 224 (1921)

"The maintenance of the Right to bear arms is a most essential one to every free people and should not be whittled down by technical constructions." Tiche v Osborne, 131 A. 60

"The provision in the Constitution granting the Right to all persons to bear arms is a limitation upon the power of the legislature to enact any law to the contrary. The exercise of a Right guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be made subject to the will of the sheriff."
People v Zedillo,{219 Mich. 635, 189 N.W. 927, at 928 (1922)

"When any court violates the clean and unambiguous language of the Constitution, a fraud is perpetrated and NO ONE is bound to obey it." State v Sutton,[Source: 63 Minn 167, 65 NW 262, 30 LRA 630]

"There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional Rights." Snerer v Cullen 481 F. 946

"We find it intolerable that one Constitutional Right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another." Simmons v U.S.,[390 US 389 (1968)]

And to Our military -

The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 809[890].ART.90 (20), makes it clear that military personnel need to obey the "lawful command of his superior officer," 891.ART.91 (2), the "lawful order of a warrant officer", 892.ART.92 (1) the "lawful general order", 892.ART.92 (2) "lawful order". In each case, military personnel have an obligation and a duty to only obey Lawful orders and indeed have an obligation to disobey Unlawful orders, including orders by a president that do not comply with the UCMJ. The moral and legal obligation is to the U.S. Constitution and not to those who would issue unlawful orders, especially if those orders are in direct violation of the Constitution and the UCMJ.

President’s Oath of Office:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

---

PENALTY FOR TREASON
&#12288;
DEATH , if convicted of Treason.

18 USC, Part 1, Chapter 115, Sec.2381

And UCMJ Sec. 906, Art. 106

- AND -

http://www.commieblaster.com/ineligible/index...

http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/07/08/forens...

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2011/07/oba...
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41634 Sep 25, 2013
USA_ number 1 dick head wrote:
<quoted text>We don't have mummies in North America, ignorant Egyptian. <¦-o
no you just got dick heads YOU
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41635 Sep 25, 2013
USA_1 wrote:
<quoted text>He has a prime minister not a president, idiot. <¦-o
so tell me the diffrence moron candan shit for brains, see you go the empire way, PRIME MINISTER LOL
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41636 Sep 25, 2013
canada_1 wrote:
<quoted text>We don't have mummies in North America, ignorant Egyptian. <¦-o
what's it like to be under our qween. and still in the commonwealth lol . your are slave boy,
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41637 Sep 25, 2013
ON WENSDAY 27TH FEB 2008, george bush snr ,the 41st president of the u s a sent a legal team to the INTERNATIONAL COURT of justice in the hague [netherlands] to REQEST IMMUNITY from the multiple charges against him for WAR CRIMES, is is whay no one went to americas aid with syira ,can you blame them NOTHING BUT LIERS
BRITAIN-1

Perth, Australia

#41638 Sep 25, 2013
and that why

Since: Sep 13

Hanoi, Vietnam

#41639 Sep 25, 2013
Wow, nice stories!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 min Bongo 48,128
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 14 min VIKING 971,586
White women leaving their white families in dro... (Aug '09) 41 min Johnny 328
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr Phooey 646,369
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 1 hr Puppet master 105,553
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr Just Wondering 618,557
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr Yellow Star 182,623
More from around the web