American Soldiers - Duty, Honor, Country
courteous europhobe

Plymouth, NH

#39999 Aug 25, 2013
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
US Scramble for Africa, Katharine Ainger,
Africa is vastly rich in natural resources but the continent has paid a terrible price for this wealth. In the past decade horrendous wars in Angola, Sierra Leone, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan and Liberia have been fuelled by fighting for control over diamonds, timber, gold, minerals and oil.
Wha!?!?!?

couldn't be!!! The Sudan is loaded with Chinese"peace" keepers~and chinese weapons as well.

Doc H

I bet there is gold in the computer your using right now.
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDP EACE

United States

#40000 Aug 25, 2013
courteous europhobe wrote:
<quoted text>And how much "American" oil and business did you use today, Doc Hypocrite?
Did you receive your
"on order" car yet?
Look Miss war monger, not a Doc hyprocrite! U biggest Ms War monger who protect evil.

U.S. State Department, 1945
"
Middle East oil is a stupendous source of strategic power, and one of the greatest material prizes in world history."

==
author/source
Henry Kissinger, cited in
The Hostage Nation, The Guardian (London) Hans von Sponek and Denis Haliday, Nov 29, 2001

Addicted to War, p27

Oil is much too important a commodity to be left in the hands of the Arabs
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDP EACE

United States

#40002 Aug 25, 2013
courteous europhobe wrote:
<quoted text>Wha!?!?!?
couldn't be!!! The Sudan is loaded with Chinese"peace" keepers~and chinese weapons as well.
Doc H
I bet there is gold in the computer your using right now.
Not a doc Hypocrite, you worst one you Miss War monger Hypocrite! US want Sadan for its raw resources ! Instead of use War to plunder other nations raw resources , our US should have use diplomacy and trade to acquire it. As to China use Diplomacy and build other nations infrastructure is winning and our US is losing because use of war and Hard Power ... As to China not going to give up its rare Strategic metal for Computer manufacturing to the bully US militaristic Imperailist agendas.
courteous europhobe

Plymouth, NH

#40003 Aug 25, 2013
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>Look Miss war monger, not a Doc hyprocrite! U biggest Ms War monger who protect evil.
U.S. State Department, 1945
"
Middle East oil is a stupendous source of strategic power, and one of the greatest material prizes in world history."
==
author/source
Henry Kissinger, cited in
The Hostage Nation, The Guardian (London) Hans von Sponek and Denis Haliday, Nov 29, 2001
Addicted to War, p27
Oil is much too important a commodity to be left in the hands of the Arabs
1941?

2001

?????

Doc H

how about something a little more current

OXFORD, United Kingdom--A U.S. shale boom could slash 25% off the revenue African producers get from oil, Nigeria's oil minister said at a conference Friday.

The remarks are the sharpest warning so far by oil producers as they grapple with the decline of U.S. imports.

"Shale oil has been identified as one of the most serious threats for African producers," Diezani Alison-Madueke said, calling the new production a cause for great concern. "[It] could lead to pressure on oil prices and a global oil glut."

As a result, "African oil producers could lose 25%" of their oil revenue, she said.

Angola recently said China could compensate for a decline in U.S. imports, but Ms. Alison-Madueke said "China too is exploring shale" and warned of a "possible decline in China" imports, too.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788...
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDP EACE

United States

#40004 Aug 25, 2013
Michael Parenti
"
The record of US international violence just in the last decade is greater than anything that any socialist nation has ever perpetrated in its entire history. US forces or proxy mercenary forces wreaked massive death and destruction upon Iraq, Mozambique, Angola, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, East Timor, Libya, and other countries. In the span of a few months, President Clinton bombed four countries: Sudan, Afghanistan, Iraq repeatedly, and Yugoslavia massively. At the same time, the US national security state was involved in proxy wars in Angola, Mexico (Chiapas), Colombia, East Timor, and various other places. And US forces occupied Macedonia, Bosnia, Kosovo, and Afghanistan, and were deployed across the globe at some 300 major overseas bases- all in the name of peace, democracy, national security, counter-terrorism, and humanitarianism.
courteous europhobe

Plymouth, NH

#40005 Aug 25, 2013
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>Not a doc Hypocrite, you worst one you Miss War monger Hypocrite! US want Sadan for its raw resources ! Instead of use War to plunder other nations raw resources , our US should have use diplomacy and trade to acquire it. As to China use Diplomacy and build other nations infrastructure is winning and our US is losing because use of war and Hard Power ... As to China not going to give up its rare Strategic metal for Computer manufacturing to the bully US militaristic Imperailist agendas.
China has won what, with all it's diplomacy?

29 April 2013 Last updated at 06:58 ET Share this pageEmail Print Share this page

ShareFacebookTwitter.Darfur conflict: Sudan's bloody stalemateBy James Copnall

Sudan analyst

This Darfur boy was wounded when his brother set off some unexploded ordnance near their home
Continue reading the main story
Deadly DarfurDarfuris waiting for peace
Darfur: World's favourite war?
Q&A: Darfur conflict
Who are Sudan's Darfur rebels?

A decade after the disastrous war in Darfur began, there is no end to sight to the fighting.

The intensity of the conflict in Sudan's western region has diminished since its early years, but most of Darfur is still extremely dangerous.

More than 1.4 million displaced people still rely on food handouts in camps throughout Darfur, and many others have fled the country.

The multi-layered conflict has also done colossal damage to Sudan's image: The US and many Western activists have accused the government of genocide.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-223366...

Wake up Doc H.

The Facts: China’s Arms Sales to Sudan

In the run up to the Olympics, China is engaging in a major public relations campaign to downplay its arms sales to Sudan, to belittle the extent of its influence with Khartoum, and to claim credit for playing a positive role in bringing security to Darfur. But the facts of China’s military support for the government of Sudan tell a different story.

Sudan’s military expenditures have risen dramatically since 1997, the year of its first oil exports.

Much of the money for this shopping spree for weapons came from profits made from oil exports to China. And much of the money has gone directly back to China, for purchases of small arms and other military equipment by Sudan.

http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/our-work/crim...
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDP EACE

United States

#40006 Aug 25, 2013
American author and professor emeritus of the University of California, San Diego. He served in the Korean War, was a consultant for the CIA from 1967 to 1973, and chaired the Center for Chinese Studies at the University of California, Berkeley from 1967 to 1972. He was also president and co-founder with Steven Clemons of the Japan Policy Research Institute (now based at the University of San Francisco), an organization promoting public education about Japan and Asia.

"Today, the military is an entirely mercenary force, made up of volunteers paid salaries by the Pentagon. Although the military still tries to invoke the public's support for a force made up of fellow citizens, this force is increasingly separated from civilian interests and devoted to military ones.
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDP EACE

United States

#40007 Aug 25, 2013
courteous europhobe wrote:
<quoted text>
1941?
2001
?????
Doc H
how about something a little more current
OXFORD, United Kingdom--A U.S. shale boom could slash 25% off the revenue African producers get from oil, Nigeria's oil minister said at a conference Friday.
The remarks are the sharpest warning so far by oil producers as they grapple with the decline of U.S. imports.
"Shale oil has been identified as one of the most serious threats for African producers," Diezani Alison-Madueke said, calling the new production a cause for great concern. "[It] could lead to pressure on oil prices and a global oil glut."
As a result, "African oil producers could lose 25%" of their oil revenue, she said.
Angola recently said China could compensate for a decline in U.S. imports, but Ms. Alison-Madueke said "China too is exploring shale" and warned of a "possible decline in China" imports, too.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788...
Shale extraction is expensive operatonwhen over certain price it is not feasible to extract.

And , the African people want USA-AFRICOM- US neo-imperialist militarism out of Africa. China is winning the Africa heart, and US is losing , you figure it out ...
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDP EACE

United States

#40008 Aug 25, 2013
courteous europhobe wrote:
<quoted text>China has won what, with all it's diplomacy?
29 April 2013 Last updated at 06:58 ET Share this pageEmail Print Share this page
ShareFacebookTwitter.Darfur conflict: Sudan's bloody stalemateBy James Copnall
Sudan analyst
This Darfur boy was wounded when his brother set off some unexploded ordnance near their home
Continue reading the main story
Deadly DarfurDarfuris waiting for peace
Darfur: World's favourite war?
Q&A: Darfur conflict
Who are Sudan's Darfur rebels?
A decade after the disastrous war in Darfur began, there is no end to sight to the fighting.
The intensity of the conflict in Sudan's western region has diminished since its early years, but most of Darfur is still extremely dangerous.
More than 1.4 million displaced people still rely on food handouts in camps throughout Darfur, and many others have fled the country.
The multi-layered conflict has also done colossal damage to Sudan's image: The US and many Western activists have accused the government of genocide.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-223366...
Wake up Doc H.
The Facts: China’s Arms Sales to Sudan
In the run up to the Olympics, China is engaging in a major public relations campaign to downplay its arms sales to Sudan, to belittle the extent of its influence with Khartoum, and to claim credit for playing a positive role in bringing security to Darfur. But the facts of China’s military support for the government of Sudan tell a different story.
Sudan’s military expenditures have risen dramatically since 1997, the year of its first oil exports.
Much of the money for this shopping spree for weapons came from profits made from oil exports to China. And much of the money has gone directly back to China, for purchases of small arms and other military equipment by Sudan.
http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/our-work/crim...
china win Africa because diplomacy and BUILDING OTHER nations Infrastructure and US lost because US militaristic neo-imperailism in Africa
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDP EACE

United States

#40009 Aug 25, 2013
courteous europhobe wrote:
<quoted text>
1941?
2001
? ueke said, calling the new production a cause for great concern. "[It] could lead to pressure on oil prices and a global oil glut."
As a result, "African oil producers could lose 25%" of their oil revenue, she said.
Angola recently said China could compensate for a decline in U.S. imports, but Ms. Alison-Madueke said "China too is exploring shale" and warned of a "possible decline in China" imports, too.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788...
DUH! u HAVE BRAIN OF grunting Jockhead MS war monger

US still In the Middle East, Africa
courteous europhobe

Plymouth, NH

#40010 Aug 25, 2013
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>china win Africa because diplomacy and BUILDING OTHER nations Infrastructure and US lost because US militaristic neo-imperailism in Africa
LOL trading oil for weapons= building infrastructure??

Show me the building in the Sudan Doc H.

Investing in Tragedy makes the case that through its money, arms and politics, China has helped to sustain the violence in the war torn region of Darfur, Sudan. After more than five years of conflict that has left at least 200,000 people dead and more than 2.5 million people homeless, China continues to strengthen its relationship with the government of Sudan despite the government’s record of mass atrocities in Darfur.

http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/our-work/crim...
courteous europhobe

Plymouth, NH

#40011 Aug 25, 2013
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>DUH! u HAVE BRAIN OF grunting Jockhead MS war monger
US still In the Middle East, Africa
your point?

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#40012 Aug 25, 2013
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>china win Africa because diplomacy and BUILDING OTHER nations Infrastructure and US lost because US militaristic neo-imperailism in Africa
No.

The Chinese make no demands about human rights and other issues. They make no attachments to their aid, investments etc..which many African states welcome.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#40013 Aug 25, 2013
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry , not a Chocolate pirate but the world biggest US bully, a sly warring pirate is US militaristic neo-imperialist , the US naval force that spanning 7 seas loots raw resources like oil..., US manifest Destiny... BWHAHAHAHAHAAHHa
Congrats on getting into the Guiness World Records book for having the largest turd ever measured. The amazing thing is that it came out of your mouth.

You blowhard idgit.
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDP EACE

United States

#40014 Aug 25, 2013
courteous europhobe wrote:
<quoted text>LOL trading oil for weapons= building infrastructure??
Show me the building in the Sudan Doc H.
Investing in Tragedy makes the case that through its money, arms and politics, China has helped to sustain the violence in the war torn region of Darfur, Sudan. After more than five years of conflict that has left at least 200,000 people dead and more than 2.5 million people homeless, China continues to strengthen its relationship with the government of Sudan despite the government’s record of mass atrocities in Darfur.
http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/our-work/crim...
Actually US is world biggest sell Arms/weapons and provide arms rebels...

China is Building Africa Infrastructure , and trade , DI...the African China Accept as new Partner
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDP EACE

United States

#40015 Aug 25, 2013
courteous europhobe wrote:
<quoted text>your point?
US is losing to China and the world mistrust US neo-imperailism ! You ignorant grunting MS pinhead!
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDP EACE

United States

#40016 Aug 25, 2013
Naturally Wired wrote:
<quoted text>
Congrats on getting into the Guiness World Records book for having the largest turd ever measured. The amazing thing is that it came out of your mouth.
You blowhard idgit.
I see American Crew of Bullies war mongers is back to bully the Americans and world masses for differing about Illicit US wars! Yes i know about biggest turd are US war mongers/war-for-profiteers/War -amrs-weapon Manufacturers/war investors/Us mercenaries... BWHAHHAHAHAhaa
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDP EACE

United States

#40017 Aug 25, 2013
Naturally Wired wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
The Chinese make no demands about human rights and other issues. They make no attachments to their aid, investments etc..which many African states welcome.
US is also Human rights Abusers way worst then Chinaand world because US all over the world causing wars, dissensions...

Richard Durbin, U.S. Senator
k
" the United States needs to promote the development of democracy and human rights, not militaries that view their own citizens as the enemy
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDP EACE

United States

#40018 Aug 25, 2013
Amnesty International for World Human Rights

"United States of America - Rights for All,"

The U.S.A. has supplied arms, security equipment and training to governments and armed groups that have committed torture, political killings and other human rights abuses in countries around the world.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#40019 Aug 25, 2013
uIDIOTMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>US is also Human rights Abusers way worst then Chinaand world because US all over the world causing wars, dissensions...
Richard Durbin, U.S. Senator
k
" the United States needs to promote the development of democracy and human rights, not militaries that view their own citizens as the enemy
See, you're a blowhard idgit, you didn't even read my comment right.
Western nations often bring up human rights etc in African states along with investment etc...The Chinese don't give a heck about human rights issues in the African states they invest in and those African states and leaders are more welcoming recently to Chinese investment.

That's fact and not long ago came out of the mouth of an official from Tanzania. I'll take his word over your idiocy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 3 min FUmonitors 88,693
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr Big Al 703,884
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr bronzeagelegends 996,589
"Doctor REALITY" is FOS 2 hr chick fill a 12
WARNING To GOP Republicans 3 hr Bernie fan 1
There is Everything Wrong with Abortion (Nov '07) 3 hr Big Al 223,085
New girl reminds me too much of ex gf 3 hr Jimbo 2