“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 12

Tanner Flats

#33076 Apr 4, 2013
DUNG wrote:
"evil sheeple"
LOTS OF TOPIX HIRELINGS ARE ON VACATION AND IT'S THE SMART ONE'S HERE NOW.
<quoted text>
We have to exclude you from that list, pig face.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#33077 Apr 4, 2013
The latest National Defense Authorization Act now repeals the following section of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice:
Article 925 Section 125 SODOMY

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.

(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct

Together with the repeal of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, military men and women can now openly engage in bestiality and sodomy of each other without fear of being courts-martial ed.

One of the reasons for this is so our military can overlook the homosexual practices of Islamic recruits and others of Muslim persuasion (NATO) the military needs to use eventually to deal with the American population's penchant for acquiring guns. Our own "boys" would not fire upon their homie American brothers but homo Islamic Muslim NATO forces WILL !
.

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 12

Tanner Flats

#33079 Apr 4, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The latest National Defense Authorization Act now repeals the following section of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice:
Article 925 Section 125 SODOMY
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.
(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct
Together with the repeal of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, military men and women can now openly engage in bestiality and sodomy of each other without fear of being courts-martial ed.
One of the reasons for this is so our military can overlook the homosexual practices of Islamic recruits and others of Muslim persuasion (NATO) the military needs to use eventually to deal with the American population's penchant for acquiring guns. Our own "boys" would not fire upon their homie American brothers but homo Islamic Muslim NATO forces WILL !
.
Preaching to the choir, brother!

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#33082 Apr 4, 2013
Force Majeure wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I'm much flattered that you realize you'd need such a large knife to do the job but you'd need a macheté just to get through the pubic hairs on the way to the actual genitals. As often as you've stopped by for a drink I shouldn't really need to tell you that.
Ewww!

Honestly, a good old fashion kitchen knife will do fine...the serrated kind:)

“Seriously guys...”

Since: May 12

Regina

#33085 Apr 5, 2013
cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, you are clearly the clueless one, Bomber Command didn't want the US to daylight bomb because they tried it and the price was to high for the RAF. The RAF only staged daylight raids in 1939/40 and discontinued.(Except for the odd specialty raid)
"Bomber" Harris stated that the US was crazy for insisting on daytime raids....
Know your own history before trying pick apart mine.
The RAF suffered a higher loss ratio from night missions than day missions, approximately double the rate actually. In fact, despite Bomber Command flying 70,000 FEWER sories than the USAAF's heavies, they lost 2000 more bombers than the USAAF. This rather disproves your initial off-handed remark that the RAF bombed at night because they were too scared to fly during the day.
Also keep in mind that until 1942, Bomber Command was equipped primarily with Whitleys, Wellingtons and Hampden/Herefords. They had a small bomb capacity and few guns for defense. Not exactly the type of kites to use in strategic bombing and certainly next to no chance of survival against a Bf-109. They only had a handful of Halifaxes and even fewer Lancs.
The USAAF thought they could bomb accurately in daylight because of the Norden bombsight, and in the near perfect conditions of the American southwest, I have no doubt they could bomb with a decent measure of precision. However the skies above Europe were often cloudy making accuracy difficult. In fact in 1944 the USAAF was only dropping 7% of its bomb loads within 1000ft of their targets.
Also don't forget that the USAAF gave up long range bombing missions in 1943 after two disastrous raids over Schweinfurt. They didn't go back over Germany until 1944 when the P-51 became available for escort.
US insistence they could operate during the day was part Norden bombsight and part hubris, thinking their "Flying Fortresses" could fend off German fighters by flying in a combat box.
Their unwillingness to give up day missions is probably more a case of Americans never wanting to admit they were wrong about anything, ESPECIALLY when it came to the Brits.
Once the RAF got their Lancs and Halifaxes in useful numbers, they could have easily gone back to day missions. However, since the US decided to maintain their day bombing role, it seemed like a good idea at the time to go with round the clock bombing. The USAAF would go in during the day and pound their target and the RAF would show up at night to make sure life was truly miserable for the Germans.

At the end of it all though, Bomber Command and the USAAF heavies lost about the same number of crews.

I guess I took offense when you suggested Bomber Command was too scared to fly day missions. After all, they not only had to deal with fighters and flak like they did in the day time, they also had to deal with searchlights that would blind the crews if/when they caught a bomber, and they also had to deal with a much, MUCH greater chance of mid-air collision flying in formation, at night, with no navigation lights. On top of THAT, they had no landmarks to navigate by so it was a combination of dead reckoning and star fixes that would get them to their target and home. Yeah, I know they had Gee and Oboe and H2X but they were also unreliable. If that's your idea of what scared people do, then the USAAF must have been some majorly serious pussies. Obviously they weren't but I hope you understand what I meant.

“Seriously guys...”

Since: May 12

Regina

#33086 Apr 5, 2013
cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually I have read Winston Churchill, Lord Mounbatten, Hitler and Speer, Eisenhower, Montgomery, and anything I can get my hands on for 30 yrs.
I'm actually quite knowledgeable on the subject of WW2 specifically and I welcome any HONEST debate on the subject.
Very cool. I have an entire wall in my study dedicated to books on the subject and have been studying the subject for about 5 years longer. Not that that extra 5 years automatically makes me more knowledgable mind you lol.
I got hooked on the subject when I was 9 from watching the TV series World at War.

“Seriously guys...”

Since: May 12

Regina

#33087 Apr 5, 2013
cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah? Then what happened?
6 months later, Nov. 11 1918, Germany surrendered...Go figure.
Yeah, it's kind'a like your buddy and some other guy beating the shit out of each other in a bar fight for 15 minutes while you stand and watch. Then after both are winded and running out of stamina, you walk up, kick the crap out of the dude your buddy is fighting and then take all the credit for winning the fight. Go figure.

“Seriously guys...”

Since: May 12

Regina

#33088 Apr 5, 2013
cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
You are right, Dieppe was only a raid, IN FORCE, to determine the feasibility of an invasion of the Continent.
Really.
Maybe you should look into the archives at Sandhurst and the Royal War College...I have.
When did you last look? In 2012, 70 years after the raid, more information was declassified. There was never any intent to determine the feasibility of a Continental invasion.
If you have already read "A Man Called Intrepid", it hints at what Dieppe was really about. Sir William Stephenson was the senior representative of British intelligence for the entire western hemisphere during World War II. In the book he states the reason for the raid was to capture a top secret piece of German radar equipment. In reality, according to documents declassified in 2012, the object of the raid was to capture a brand new version of the German naval enigma machine that had 4 wheels for encryption instead of the 3 wheeled model the Brits already had.
One of the men behind the planning of the raid was none other than Sir Ian Fleming.
There were actually 2 aspects to the raid. The first was the land element, which was to try and capture the enigma machine. The second element was an attack on the harbour from the sea, doing as much damage as possible before scuttling a ship to block the entrance.
One of the men in charge and on the scene of this raid was a Victoria Cross recipient, whose name escapes me at the moment but IIRC his call sign was Red Ranger. You don't throw a recipient of the highest medal for valour in the Commonwealth armies into a pointless, useless exercise in futility.

The entire "to determine the feasibility of an invasion of the Continent" line of bull was the "official" version of events.
Remember, Churchill once said, "In times of war the truth is so precious she must always be jealously watched over by a body guard of lies". Sometimes those lies last for decades until things become declassified.
Personally, as a WW2 hobby-historian, I think these next three years will be rather interesting as more and more information becomes declassified.

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 12

Tanner Flats

#33090 Apr 5, 2013
Horse Manure wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that what y'all use in Nebraska, do ya' Pork Fat?
That's not Porkpie Hat, obtuse one and PC is not from Nebraska either, old deranged fool. <¦-o

“the summer home in Cape Cod”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#33092 Apr 5, 2013
You should really ManScape
Force Majeure wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I'm much flattered that you realize you'd need such a large knife to do the job but you'd need a macheté just to get through the pubic hairs on the way to the actual genitals. As often as you've stopped by for a drink I shouldn't really need to tell you that.

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 12

Tanner Flats

#33093 Apr 5, 2013
Horse Manure wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I'm much flattered that you realize you'd need such a large knife to do the job but you'd need a macheté just to get through the pubic hairs on the way to the actual genitals. As often as you've stopped by for a drink I shouldn't really need to tell you that.
Don't be, the concept for employing the Bowie knife, wasn't for mitigating large genetalia; rather it was for inflicting as much collateral damage in the process as possible. You'd be left with a real gash, old creep.

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 12

Tanner Flats

#33094 Apr 5, 2013
Horse Manure wrote:
<quoted text>
As often as you've stopped by for a drink I shouldn't really need to tell you that.
More fantasies from a deranged old pervert. <¦-o

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#33095 Apr 5, 2013
Strength and Honor wrote:
<quoted text>
Excellent post, RS, as usual.
Ditto!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#33096 Apr 5, 2013
Strength and Honor wrote:
I like to see a man proud of the place in which he lives. I like to see a man live so that his place will be proud of him.~Abraham Lincoln
Nice!

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 12

Tanner Flats

#33097 Apr 5, 2013
DUNGS wrote:
"evil sheeple"
LOTS OF TOPIX HIRELINGS ARE ON VACATION AND IT'S THE SMART ONE'S HERE NOW.
<quoted text>
Hey DUNGS, how does it feel to know that your time on Earth is coming to an end soon? The American soldiers will be merciful to you and kill you quickly, to save you from your misery, little boot lickers.
<¦-o

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#33098 Apr 5, 2013
Strength and Honor wrote:
<quoted text>
And hats off to you for acknowledging their contribution MLS. I hope you'll like our new thread as we post some more tributes, etc.
Ditto!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#33099 Apr 5, 2013
Force Majeure wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I'm much flattered that you realize you'd need such a large knife to do the job but you'd need a macheté just to get through the pubic hairs on the way to the actual genitals. As often as you've stopped by for a drink I shouldn't really need to tell you that.
Say what??
courteous europhobe

Bangor, ME

#33100 Apr 5, 2013
american morons wrote:
<quoted text>thats it com on.///// have a look at some of the gettos in america ......fool
i

have, and as far as ghettos
go

usa s' are the best!!

u kno
courteous europhobe

Bangor, ME

#33101 Apr 5, 2013
Chaumette wrote:
<quoted text>
Say what??
excuse him,
phil in

Bangor, ME

#33102 Apr 5, 2013
DENG wrote:
"evil sheeple"
LOTS OF TOPIX HIRELINGS ARE ON VACATION AND IT'S THE SMART ONE'S HERE NOW.
<quoted text>
yaz

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Heartfelt Farewell by Thousands of Devotees 19 min Himanshr 1
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 28 min Pegasus 265,196
21 Dead Babies Found on Riverbank in China (Mar '10) 39 min TehO 662
Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says (Jun '07) 40 min MUQ2 37,821
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 44 min pusherman_ 559,652
Who would like Darwins Theory of Evolution take... (Dec '10) 1 hr ChristineM 48,263
Hey guys..we are hiring boy for threesome sex.. 1 hr myveryownjulia 2
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 hr Kaitlin the Wolf ... 775,696
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 hr ctsseo 605,054
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 8 hr Chris Clearwater 175,684
More from around the web