Prove there's a god.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#777051 Sep 5, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't get that from Hitler's Table Talk.
And you lied about David Barton.
Haha. Yeah, right. Barton is the biggest wingnut hack in the bunch. You have further eroded any credibility.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#777052 Sep 5, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
<quoted text>
M'kay pumpkin.
Thank you for your concession speech.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#777053 Sep 5, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think so. A 500% increase would make something 5 times larger. The number of atheists in America grew 4% from '05 to '13, according to Gallup - from 1% to 5%.
If there was 101 atheists in 2005 and that number increased to 4% by 2013, then there would be 105, not 505.
The maths! Keep posting stupid. You wear it well, squash.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#777054 Sep 5, 2014
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>I had the same feeling--he woke up in a very cranky mood.

Maybe it's Satan's influence?
That or the jesus character left him.

I've not seen this side of him before, now I know how he got the rep.
Huh

Fort Worth, TX

#777055 Sep 5, 2014
ROCCO wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah, just excising the above from your reply is sufficient for purposes of being able to technically call a fetus a parasite.
The relationship is obligatory to the parasite, but not the host - hence, miscarriages and abortions.
A sperm is an invading organism.
Some fetuses have been known to be harmful to its host.
The remainder are entirely self-explanatory.
Parasite:
Biology:
An organism that grows, feeds, and is sheltered on or in a different organism while contributing nothing to the survival of its host.
Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/parasite#ixzz3CT...
Does a fetus not grow, and feed, and derive shelter from a different organism while contributing nothing to the survival of its host?
A fetus fits the definition of "parasite".
Hey! Every sperm is sacred, even the raping ones. Why aren't you protesting the sock holocaust?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#777056 Sep 5, 2014
sweets2360 wrote:
<quoted text>You didn't even look at it, for shame, same as Back Crick. I am out, yall aren't worthy.
Pearls to swine. Or something.
ROCCO

Indio, CA

#777057 Sep 5, 2014
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
The Redneck attempts to reinvent himself on a regular basis.
But he is unable to change his spots--his early Christian indoctrination pickled his brain.
He's convinced himself that he's nothing without his religion, and indications are that he isn't any better with it.

He can't outrun his spots.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#777058 Sep 5, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
<quoted text>No. That's exactly what Luci said.
"Since its inception."

Is the part you left out, you also left out context. I see how it is with you, can't have an honest debate or discussion so you start lying for the jesus character.

Now call me a liar for pointing it out.

http://i.imgur.com/AxU9dZk.jpg
ROCCO

Indio, CA

#777059 Sep 5, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
<quoted text>
It's mine. I have no employer, not in a long while. Not that it's any of your business... Stay out of people's personal affairs.
Perhaps you should start by not making your personal affairs people's business as you just did. Without your participation, how can anyone involve themselves in them?

But your comment raises the question - were you lying then, or are you lying now?

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#777060 Sep 5, 2014
Huh wrote:
If Christianity weren't trying to exert its evil influence everywhere in our society, there would be no reason to discuss it. When Islam gains its foothold, and it will, just by sheer numbers, that will be the next fight. It really is that simple.


What "evil influence" of Christianity? Elaborate.
ROCCO

Indio, CA

#777061 Sep 5, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, it was in the post to which you responded, the part you ignored and did not respond to.
That's a very tiresome game, man. I try to spell out to you what I'm trying to convey and you cherry-pick a single portion of it and respond only to that. It's irritating. It makes trying to explain something to you an utter waste of time. Why do you do that?
Gadzooks, what kind of hypocrite are you?

Read your post back to yourself as if it were someone's post to you - and you will then get a sense of what it's like trying to deal with you.

Why do you do that?

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#777062 Sep 5, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
All scientists are faith-based thinkers.
Some are just so conceited they can't admit it.
Nobody cannot do science unless he is a faith-based thinker, and incorporates his faith intimately within the scientific work.
Every scientific discovery is by a theist, or someone imitating a theist.
If you are going to go hyperbolic, I-man, I'm locked and loaded.
You're an idiot with this.
Sorry you there is no faith involved with empirical or evidence that is quantifiable.
Only the faith that after 1000 times of the same result, the 1001st will not change.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#777063 Sep 5, 2014
ROCCO wrote:
<quoted text>Marital problems are a bitch.
True.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#777064 Sep 5, 2014
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Then I blame not rendering to Caesar what is Caesar's and putting god quotes on money.
Putting God on our money doesn't technically specify the Christian God. Why does it bother you so much?
ROCCO

Indio, CA

#777065 Sep 5, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
<quoted text>
Your belief?
Yep.
ROCCO

Indio, CA

#777066 Sep 5, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
Calling it forthright implies that you think IANS is being honest in his guesses. Why do you think he's honest about it?
<quoted text>
I didn't imply either way. Answer my question.
Yours was a tacit implication.

I've answered sufficiently.
Anon

Lakewood, OH

#777067 Sep 5, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
<quoted text>
Because people can never change, right?
I've never seen a wholesale change in anyone. Maybe a 10% behavior modification, if that. All the losers and fuckups I've known have remained losers and fuckups no matter what type of self-improvement they've tried. Life is harsh...

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#777068 Sep 5, 2014
Huh wrote:
To your cheap ass peril.
It isn't about being cheap or even frugal, it's about watching all the other kids in America zoned out on computers for 20 hours a day turning into mindless zombies. There's no need for a teenager to have access to shit like Facebook, twitter, YouTube or definitely porn. So, no computer.

That fixes any problems that could arise.
ROCCO

Indio, CA

#777069 Sep 5, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
<quoted text>
Because people can never change, right?
Some can.
Some can't.

Some don't.
Some won't.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#777070 Sep 5, 2014
Huh wrote:
For the billionth time, as written. Really, why do you keep up this continual lunacy.
It is not written in the Bible that God is "murderous, unforgiving control freak and capriciously benevolent bully". That's an assertion by a Topix Atheist!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 5 min Aura Mytha 36,726
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 17 min Seentheotherside 688,651
Does anyone else hate being around white women? 1 hr hmmmm 25
Main causes of bullying 1 hr Wise above all 3
How did black people get here ( economically) 3 hr Johnny 70
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 4 hr Wisdom of Ages 6,545
Dental Visits Are Never Fun 4 hr may i suggest 6
More from around the web