Prove there's a god.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#770288 Aug 17, 2014
joylesssatanbot8118 wrote:
Goodnight!

And to the liars, happy lying!
None of this happy nonsense from you, practice how to lie effectively first.
Huh

Arlington, TX

#770289 Aug 17, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
<quoted text>
Joy didn't lie, dude. Her post,#769390, has magically disappeared from Topix.
Go figure.
Here is how the casual observer knows you are full of nonsense. You have never once defended a wonderful, non-Chhristian person on Topix. You have attacked your imaginary. Are enemies ideologically without acknowledging that a true Christian would accept alternative viewpoints and never, ever fear them. This is why. You have elevated your asshattery to a Bruggencate level of fraudulence. It's your failure. Own it like the last couple that bought the LG washer and dryer combo from your ..
Huh

Arlington, TX

#770290 Aug 17, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
<quoted text>
Censorship seems to be a favorite game of the Militant Atheists. That's probably why the FFRF fights on with such dogged determination, silencing every Christian they can.
We must fight back.
Haha. You broke every irony meter in existence when you reverted to being a dick. I would write "well-played", but, it was the only denouement.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#770291 Aug 17, 2014
Susie D wrote:
<quoted text>Prove there is not a God!
We don't have to....no one on earth has been able to call Him/Her/It up for any reason or in any way, shape, or form.

Total blank.

I don't think Him/Her/It is around anymore....so, no God.

Prove me wrong.....
Huh

Arlington, TX

#770292 Aug 17, 2014
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
She's Ferguson, CA WalMart hot!
Huh

Arlington, TX

#770293 Aug 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
I knew a guy who called the Amish "Omelettes".
You knew many guys, Biblically. Well, that was written in Cell Block C.
Huh

Arlington, TX

#770294 Aug 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
I knew a guy who called the Amish "Omelettes".
And you guys love eating omlettes. Those pink, hairy eggs, stuffed in your chins. Mmmmmm, good cracker.
Huh

Arlington, TX

#770296 Aug 17, 2014
Susie D wrote:
<quoted text> Deal
.. Debate is on....
However, let me make this short and sweet. You are going to bring up the Crusades and Christian wars from the Middle ages, I’m going to bring up how these war were really about land ownership AND the removal of Jesus and less about Christians pushing their faith.. Then you’re going to bring up other “holly wars” and how so many people died and I’m going to retaliate and bring up the not so distant past rather than wars nearly 1,000 years ago and bring in communist and people like Pol Pot who killed MILLIONS for the removal of God, and then you are going to bring in Hitler, then the debate will go from whether or not he was a Christian or atheist and BOTH of us will have strong arguments and even direct quotes which will get us nowhere. I’ll also talk about Vietnam and China and how they kill believers to this day and your whole argument will be based on 500 years or longer while mine is within a 100 years and less… So let’s hit it ;) I have had this argument with you and EVERY other person who is angry with God who use the term atheist!! You cannot win!!
Yeah. Nobody died. Do you really think that property rights justify genocide? You might be a-Palin. Here's your sign.

God damn. Every day. Christians prove the crazy.
Huh

Arlington, TX

#770297 Aug 17, 2014
Joyful8118 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again. He changed the words and the post doesn't exist now, because liars had it removed through the report abuse function.
Welfare. It is anti-Biblical. Jesus promised if you work hard He would provide. You would never have to rely on Caesar. Why does Jesus hate you?

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#770298 Aug 17, 2014
curiouslu wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't assume, I look.
Let it play out, like you said.
I don't mind being wrong, if I am but I know who I'd bet on.
8118 makes it exceedingly difficult to be impartial... I'll give her that.
Huh

Arlington, TX

#770299 Aug 17, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
Atheism is the belief that there are no gods.
Atheists believe there are no gods.
<quoted text>
My post was about atheISM, not atheIST.
Pay attention.
Why? You promised you wouldn't be a d*ck. You reneged.

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#770300 Aug 17, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
If either one of you misread that, that's not my fault.
No, but you are at fault for calling him a liar without sufficient justification.
I don't know how you could've misread "for that I apologize"....
I didn't read that at all. I misread this:

"Yes I did. I apologize for that."

I could explain why I misread it, but the point is that I did. It's possible to misread things or to miss them. It's certainly worth considering before calling someone a liar.
Huh

Arlington, TX

#770301 Aug 17, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
<quoted text>
IANS said God is leaving America.
So IANS believe God is real?
How ridiculous are you that you can't understand concepts vs. reality?

Oops, never mind, you're a lying Christian. Oops, sorry for being redundant.
Huh

Arlington, TX

#770302 Aug 17, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
<quoted text>
Your posts are making less sense than usual.
What's up?
She's responding to you and trying to counter your nonsense and trump it. Why are you more confused than your normal state?

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#770303 Aug 17, 2014
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
Why? You promised you wouldn't be a d*ck. You reneged.
Wallowing in buckshidt all day has that effect on garF.

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#770304 Aug 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
There is a "you" in existence.
I exist.
"you" may be erroneously described as a taco.
"you" may? Is that what's happening? Are you making a claim?
You would still exist.
Is this "you" or me?

I exist.
By your logic, if described as a taco, you would not exist.
Tacos exist. They are logically possible.

Are you claiming that I am a taco? I'm not.

If you are defining "you" as a taco, then "you" is a taco.
Fallacy of excluded middle.
What about it?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#770305 Aug 17, 2014
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>Wallowing in buckshidt all day has that effect on garF.
Yeah, I'd tell him to stop hanging out with that shady buckaduck character but you know how kids are.

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#770306 Aug 17, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
If John is erroneously defined as a married bachelor, John may or may not exist.
Nothing defined as a married bachelor exists.
The definition does not determine the matter.
In this case, the definition tells us exactly what we're talking about.
John may be a bachelor, married, existent, or non-existent.
John may also be defined as a married bachelor, but if that is your definition for John, then John cannot exist.

Define John differently and things change for John.

That's why it's important to remember that the definition tells us exactly what we are talking about when we only have a claim to work with.
Step up to second grade.
I'm fine teaching Kindergarten.

See you tomorrow.
Huh

Arlington, TX

#770307 Aug 17, 2014
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
Wallowing in buckshidt all day has that effect on garF.
They are two socks on one adipose-addled ankle that needs Lasix more than the third horse in the second race.

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#770308 Aug 17, 2014
Stilgar Fifrawi wrote:
By his logic, if "Tide with Beach" is defined as a taco, "Tide with Beach" cannot exist.
Wait, is that logic?
Incorrect.

Tacos can exist.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 31 min River Tam 88,356
Fischbach army depot-NATO site 67 (Mar '07) 37 min Larry W-Ours 489
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr candlesmell 703,781
why Donald Trump is president (Oct '17) 3 hr Joe Fortuna 37
Division Of Cold Dead Hands 5 hr Happy 1
Sexual Desires: My wife pooping in my mouth (Aug '13) 5 hr poodawg 66
Trump is Gods anointed!!! 7 hr doG mnaDed lyoH r... 1