Prove there's a god.
Scrooge

Scottsdale, AZ

#728882 May 13, 2014
pusherman_ wrote:
Scrooge post a good song from your Archives..
Here's another one of my persona faves featuring Nick Simper from Mark I.

Scrooge

Scottsdale, AZ

#728883 May 13, 2014
Ghost Writer 2 You wrote:
All historical matters are subject to revision as more relevant source material becomes available.
Obviously the term Christian revisionist history is beyond your limited intellectual capacity to understand. Christian revisionist history is the deliberate rewriting of history to promote Christian dogma, you f*cking moron!

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#728886 May 13, 2014
Ghost Writer 2 You wrote:
<quoted text>
You have stated something very important and I thank you for the observation. Jeffrey Dahmer had no conscience. He even went so far as to say so in interviews:
"I don't even know if I have the capacity for normal emotions or not because I haven't cried for a long time. You just stifle them for so long that maybe you lose them, partially at least. I don't know."
and
"Yes, I do have remorse, but I'm not even sure myself whether it is as profound as it should be. I've always wondered myself why I don't feel more remorse."
and
"I still have guilt. I will probably never get rid of that, but yes, I'm free of the compulsion and the driving need to do it… I don't think I'm capable of creating anything. I think the only thing I'm capable of is destroying … I'm sick and tired of being destructive. What worth is life if you can't be helpful to someone?"
and finally
"Something stronger than my conscious will made it happen. I think some higher power got good and fed-up with my activity and decided to put an end to it. I don't really think there were any coincidences. The way it ended and whether the close calls were warning to me or what, I don't know. If they were, I sure didn't heed them… If I hadn't been caught or lost my job, I'd still be doing it, I'm quite sure of that. I went on doing it and doing it and doing it, in spite of my anxiety and the lack of lasting satisfaction… How arrogant and stupid of me to think that I could do something like this and just go about my life normally as if nothing ever happened. They say you reap what you sow, well, it's true, you do, eventually … I've always wondered, from the time that I committed that first horrid mistake, sin, with Hicks, whether this was sort of predestined and there was no way I could have changed it. I wonder just how much predestination controls a person's life and just how much control they have over themselves."
These all indicate that he willfully suppressed his conscience, and that in part he knew what he was doing was wrong. This conforms to the truth declared in the following passage:
18 For God’s wrath is revealed from heaven against all godlessness and unrighteousness of people who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth, 19 since what can be known about God is evident among them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For His invisible attributes, that is, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen since the creation of the world, being understood through what He has made. As a result, people are without excuse.
This speaks of the concept that we all have a conscience and it is through our conscience that we can come to know and recognize God, and when we do wrong, we suppress our conscience so we can keep doing wrong. This is what Dahmer was saying he did until God stopped him.
Jeff was trying his best to mimic the actions of your deity. Your deity exhibits the same characteristics as he...he learned from the best.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#728887 May 13, 2014
Ghost Writer 2 You wrote:
<quoted text>
Ben's philosophy and worldview is much like that of Friedrich Nietzsche. He dismisses the supernatural, places Jesus in a Greek esoteric philosophical framework, and dismisses Paul as a fraud in the same way Nietzsche did.
He's another one who is beyond reasoning with.
Scrooge is just another troll out to piss on everyone's parade.
Thank You Foghorn Leghorn.
Whatever would we do without the instructive guidance and opinions of such a great celebrity as this ladies and gentlemen?

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xph19c_1951-...
Scrooge

Scottsdale, AZ

#728888 May 13, 2014
Ghost Writer 2 You wrote:
Christian history is researched and written the exact same way any other history is.
Thanks for proving that you're an exceptionally severe case of mental retardation via Christian indoctrination. You'll never have the intellectual capacity to understand that Christian revisionist history isn't history and Christian pseudoscience isn't science, punk.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#728889 May 13, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Irregardless isn't a word, dude.
This is great fun isn't it? Now we will learn the difference between your/you're...hypocrite.... LOL!

Since: Dec 12

Yes, I'm an Atheist.

#728890 May 13, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>RiversideRedneck wrote:
Why do the peaceful Muslims put up with shit from the terrorist Muslims like the Taliban?

Divinity Surgeon wrote:
I'm sorry dude, I'm kinda starting to think of you as my slow mait, but I will not pander to your propaganda puppetry programming.

Indeed....
Why do you expect me to speak for Muslims in a question form response to my pointing out that you think bombing a school full of kids is acceptable?

You represent christianity well. Answer me with another question then try to deflect. A christian's actions is never their own fault or responsibility, right?

I'm still not going to speak for them, Muslims and christians have little difference to me, other than numbers. I just wish that in you trying to kill each other, you'd leave innocent children out of it.

"People should be hung in a public place."

"Bomb schools full of children."

"Murdering innocent children is a necessity."

- Ar ar, the "good christian".

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#728891 May 13, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree.
I was refuting what Tide had written, implying that Dahmer's Christian upbringing turned him into the psychopath killer that he was.
He wrote:
"Like everyone else, he was shaped by the circumstances of his life."
Divinity Surgeon kept the ball rolling....
"He was raised in a Christian household"
Where was your deity when all this was happening?
NON EXISTENT IS WHERE.........omnipotently non existent.

Since: Dec 12

Yes, I'm an Atheist.

#728892 May 13, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>Irregardless isn't a word, dude.
Merriam Webster and Oxford disagree with your stupidass.

So does a cnet writer, who says it well:

"In a post I wrote a couple of weeks ago about overpriced Halo USB drives, I used the word "irregardless." And as these TalkBack posts show , it wasn't a very popular decision.

For example, one BoopieJones (awesome screen name notwithstanding) challenged the very existence of the word. Another reader, JustDenny, was noticeably shaken by the use of the word, e-shouting "oh no!!!" before noting that the word is a double-negative.

In response, I would like to say that "irregardless" is a word. It is, at least according to Merriam-Webster and Scrabble.

But I'm not going to stop there. No. I would also like to contend that "irregardless" is the baddest-ass word of all time. This is for several reasons, which I will now explain.

It's the only word where attaching the "ir-" prefix to the root word has the exact same meaning as the root word: Throwing an "ir-" in front of normal, less bad-ass words that begin with "R" changes the meaning to the opposite of the word. Irrefutable. Irreverent. Irrelevant. Irresponsible. Not "irregardless." It doesn't care what the rules of grammar are. It means exactly the same thing as "regardless," and that's the way it likes it.
Against all odds, against all logic, and (ir)regardless of everyone hating it, it has achieved official word status: How can you not pull for the underdog in this case? "Irregardless" went up against the rules of grammar, stick-by-the-book lexicographers, and the fact that it's a completely redundant word. Didn't matter. Whatever didn't kill it made it stronger. It's the hardest-working word in the dictionary, and it should have earned your respect by now.
Even though it's a word, Merriam-Webster says you shouldn't use it: Can you name another word in the dictionary that the dictionary says you shouldn't use? Even really bad swear words don't have a dictionary-imposed boycott. That just makes me want to use it more.
It simultaneously makes sense and doesn't make sense: You can think of the word in one of two ways:(1) it should mean the opposite of "regardless," or something along the lines of "keeping the facts in regard," or (2) it could mean "regardless of the fact that something is regardless." The latter of the two is like double-super regardless, and it's the meaning I prefer. "Irregardless" really, really doesn't care what the facts are or what you think. It should only be used in extreme circumstances, such as when a course of action is ridiculously counterintuitive. "Irregardless of the fact that you are very thirsty, you should eat this pile of salt." Stuff like that.
It practices what it preaches: Irregardless of the rules of grammar, "irregardless" is a word. It's self-reflexive. It's the exception that proves the rule. It talks the talk and walks the walk. Is there another word like that? No, because "irregardless" is bad-ass. It is a text-based Chuck Norris, roundhouse-kicking everything else in the dictionary into submission.
If you think about it long enough, it will blow your mind: It's the Mobius Strip of words, but it's also packed with Eminem's aggressively apathetic attitude. It's completely unique, completely confusing, and it couldn't give a rat's ass about any of that. It just is what it is. If you don't like it, don't use it."

http://www.cnet.com/au/news/off-topic-in-defe...

The above, in addition to BT, are more credible than you. The word has been around since the 19th century.

Irregardless of your opinion, you don't get to change words, their meanings or existence status any more than you get to change history that you don't like.

Since: Dec 12

Yes, I'm an Atheist.

#728893 May 13, 2014
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>I would ask why peaceful, tolerant Christians put up with hostile, intolerant Christians.

It never ceases to amaze me how blind rr is to his own hypocrisy.
Same. Notice that post is him deflecting from my pointing out that he thinks bombing schools full of children is acceptable.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#728894 May 13, 2014
Scrooge wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's another one of my persona faves featuring Nick Simper from Mark I.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =gm3yWH7vx1kXX
Great music, my Dad used to listen to them guys back In the mid 70's I guess it was..

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#728895 May 13, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep quoting psychobabble from supposed psychiatrists that have "evaluated" him.
Why don't you take Dahmer's words at face value?
Skip to 2:00, Jeffrey himself explains that while he was committing his crimes, he felt accountable for nothing and had to answer for nothing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =IjW7bezdddEXX&sns=em
(Sounds like an atheist to me…)
why didn't you take Hitler's words at face value? Sounds like a cathaholic ta me crister..

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#728896 May 13, 2014
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank You Foghorn Leghorn.
Whatever would we do without the instructive guidance and opinions of such a great celebrity as this ladies and gentlemen?
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xph19c_1951-...
Great cartoon, one of my favorites..I didn't know they had banned certain ones tho. I knew about certain Popeye's getting banned but not the chicken.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#728897 May 13, 2014
Ghost Writer 2 You wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen oh clueless one-
All historical matters are subject to revision as more relevant source material becomes available. The negative connotation you use is based on your own ignorance of historiography.
I'm willing to bet that you'll accept Tacitus on anything to do with Julius Caesar or Josephus on the engineering of the all weather harbor at Caesarea. They're our best sources for these subjects.
But you go bat-shit crazy if it's even remotely suggested that either one of them mentioned Christ. You'll claim it's either forgery or revisionist history simply because it mentions something that ***you*** wish didn't exist.
And your wishing that it didn't exist fits the charge of "revisionist history."
Come intern with me for a week. You'll leave here much better educated.
Aaahahahahah!
Scrubbing truckstop toilets isn't "interning" silly....and all that stuff they make ya paint over in the stalls after ya commit it ta memory ain't "gospel". LOL!
Yer sich a riot mugwamp!

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#728898 May 13, 2014
Ghost Writer 2 You wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not?
Defend your assertion.
This is a trial of your deity for all the murders he is purported to have committed in the black book isn't it.....
WOW! Maybe we can get to trying the church for it's atrocities now---you know--the REAL ones.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#728899 May 13, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No. It would've been very different if I sent it to a woman, that's why I sent that "tolerance test" to a man, an atheist man.
The Topix Atheist! failed.
One man sending pictures of his penis to another man should have been completely "acceptable" to the Topix Atheist!.....
Right, since they're all gay.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#728901 May 13, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Dahmer quoted to Bible when killing his victims?
Provide evidence for that assertion.
Yer wasting yer time expecting that loon to provide any evidence.

Since: Dec 12

Yes, I'm an Atheist.

#728902 May 13, 2014
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>"Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them." - John 6:56
Thank you Teddy. Good point which leads me to my next point, ar ar seems to think Jeffrey Dahmer did what he did only because of mental illness (now), that christianity had nothing to do with it.

Like it had nothing to do with Hitler.

So, what would be the effect of just the words in the bible, on a borderline psychotic sociopath with Aspergers?

Say, without throwing in adult christian influence.

A little tiny thing about Aspergers - those diagnosed with it, take things literally.

GW wrote a good post, quoting Jeffrey's words, full of christian based speech. Just thought I'd throw in that observation.

Since: Dec 12

Yes, I'm an Atheist.

#728903 May 13, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>Hmmm....

You just claimed that you know the Bible as well as Dahmer did.

Interesting…
You see a claim from Teddy in a bible passage? Whoa, how discerning.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#728905 May 13, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a new respect for you.
Well said…
If you're going to be that way then why don't you just petition the pres to nuke the whole dang area? That'll show 'em who's boss.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 9 min Burke Devlin 6,559
High Cost of Photography ? 23 min cyndiwojahn 1
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 41 min Great Day of Arma... 40,900
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 44 min USA Born 600,162
News Man wins DeLorean time machine at Hanover Casino 46 min BLOODY__FATALITY 2
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 50 min Great Day of Arma... 612,924
News GOP hopefuls take on illegal immigration in deb... 59 min discocrisco 1
The Christian Atheist debate 1 hr Truthiness 2,068
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr justdoit2it 272,433
Sleeping with mother (Oct '13) Sun andy 45
More from around the web