Prove there's a god.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#687099 Jan 19, 2014
destroy atheism wrote:
<quoted text>
But you agree you were living a life of an atheist (not necessarily an atheist) as you committed your crime , causing you to serve time? You certainly weren't behaving as a Bible believing, God obeying Christian. You would have to agree with that , right?
is your behaviour that of a bible believing god obeying christian?

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#687100 Jan 19, 2014
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope. No, no, no, no, no. We already pay too damn many taxes.
HOMEGROWN!!! That way, you *know* where it comes from, you *know* what's in it, you *know* its potency,and you *know* there are no other "third parties" involved.
Homegrown; there are no substitutes.
We make our own beer. We used to make our own whiskey and wine, but now a friend shares his award winning wine with us and we share our beer. Ah, free people in a free society.

That is until a bunch of criminal authoritarian socialists want to come in and tell us we can't do it.

"" Libertarianism is not libertinism or hedonism. It is not a claim that “people can do anything they want to, and nobody else can say anything.” Rather, libertarianism proposes a society of liberty under law, in which individuals are free to pursue their own lives so long as they respect the equal rights of others. The rule of law means that individuals are governed by generally applicable and spontaneously developed legal rules, not by arbitrary commands; and that those rules should protect the freedom of individuals to pursue happiness in their own ways, not aim at any particular result or outcome.""

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/k...

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#687101 Jan 19, 2014
Logo wrote:
<quoted text>
So your saying we are all formed from STARDUST?!?!?!?!?! Are you people crazy? Just because we are made from the same elements as stars have,does not mean we were made from the "Big Bang"
Genesis 1:1
In the beginning Gad created the heavens and the earth.
SIMPLE AS THAT!!!!!
Gad huh!

Genesis 6:4 RSV ("The Nephilim were on the earth in those days") and Gen. 7:21 ("And all flesh died that moved upon the earth....) say there were Nephilim BEFORE the Flood and all life died in the Flood; yet Genesis 13:33 RSV ("And there we saw the Nephilim") says there were Nephilim AFTER the Flood.

Genesis 8:22 ("While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease")
versus
Genesis 41:56 ("And the famine was over all the face of the earth and Joseph opened all the storehouses")

Genesis 9:21 (Noah "drank of the wine, and was drunken")
versus
Genesis 6:9 ("Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations").

Genesis 10:5, "By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their land; every one after his tongue ....,"
versus
Genesis 11:1 ("And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech") and Genesis 11:6 ("And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they all have one language").

According to Genesis 14:12 ("And they took Lot, Abram's brother's son") Lot is Abraham's nephew; yet, Genesis 14:16 ("And Abraham brought back all the goods, and also brought his brother Lot....") says he is his brother.

Lot said to a crowd in Genesis 19:8, "Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes...," even though 2 Peter 2:8 says Lot was a righteous man.

Genesis 22:1 ("And it came to pass after these things that God did tempt Abraham....")
versus
James 1:13 ("For God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man")

God said to Abraham in Genesis 22:2, "Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac...." when he had another son, Ishmael, according to Genesis 16:16 ("And Abram was fourscore and six years old, when Hagar bare Ishmael to Abram"), and Gal. 4:22 ("For it is written, that Abraham had two sons .... 11)

Genesis 25:1 ("Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah")
versus
I Chron. 1:32 ("Now the sons of Keturah, Abraham's concubine")

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#687102 Jan 19, 2014
destroy atheism wrote:
<quoted text>
Your definition is wrong. Atheism is the obsession of God while brainwashing oneself that God doesn't exist. It is characterized by mental deterioration, anger, and outbursts of hate and rage.
Followed by outward acts of violence, disparagement , libelous and slanderous comments.
If you are the "fruit" of Christ-insanity there is good reason not to want to have anything to do with it.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#687103 Jan 19, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I said nothing of belief.
I said we all call God, God.
Even you do.
"jesusgod you're stupid"
Imagine that.
When I say God, I am not referring to the christian deity(s)

you are lying
Scrooge

Phoenix, AZ

#687104 Jan 19, 2014
Le_le wrote:
God is w you..
No, he's not.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#687106 Jan 19, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, look at that.
karl has finally admitted that he believes God doesn't exist instead of asserting that God doesn't exist.
Good job, karl. We'll make a regular guy out of you yet.
the god of the chrsitain bible does not exist.

I welcome the evidence that (any) god exists, for I have never seen any.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#687107 Jan 19, 2014
henry wrote:
<quoted text>
You better spent time with science.
Was?

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#687108 Jan 19, 2014
henry wrote:
<quoted text>
You better spent time with science.
Jesus war Homosexuell, sind Sie anderer Meinung?
Scrooge

Phoenix, AZ

#687109 Jan 19, 2014
destroy atheism wrote:
The entire universe was created by God. Get over it, you angry moron.
Man has created many gods and many religions worshiping them. Religious brainwashing is responsible for you being an "angry moron" and a revolting pile of shit that not even a mother could love.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#687110 Jan 19, 2014
Logo wrote:
UNDERSTAND!!!!!!!!!! EVERYBODY SHUT UP ABOUT NOT BELIEVING IN JESUS!!!!!!!!!! THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD AND IT IS GOD HIMSELF!!!!!!!!!! DONE HERE! F*** YOU ALL! GOOD BYE!!!!!!!!!!
Don't come back until you get your "!" key fixed it seems to be sticking.
Scrooge

Phoenix, AZ

#687111 Jan 19, 2014
Logo wrote:
...and it's what God pre-destined us to be like.
No, religiously retarded and revolting redneck, you weren't chosen to be a colossal azzhole. You've willingly decided to waste your life as a colossal azzhole with nothing of value to contribute to society. F*ck you, too!

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#687112 Jan 19, 2014
irecknso wrote:
<quoted text> I'm not sayn there has to be god, nope, you believe what you want, i do, it has no bearing on the way i live! he11, them parties yuns have out in the woods sound pretty [email protected] good for real, lol..how could life come from nothin? don't say from mixing this with that blah, blah, cause if that was the case, they would be creating it now, which i'm sure some scientist are tryn to do, what is it that's missing that they can't figure out? what?
as long as there is something you do not understand, your god will have a reason to exist.

long shall your god live in your mind

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#687113 Jan 19, 2014
Logo wrote:
<quoted text>
Just straight and simple, you're stupid
And people who believe the following aren't?

Dennis wrote this in 1983

A professor of the Bible and Greek and chairman of the department of Biblical education at Cedarville Bible College, attempted to resolve some of the problems related to the Virgin Birth. He alleged, for example: "Joseph and Mary were legally married or betrothed" (Matt. 1:18). She was called "his wife" twice (Matt. 1:20,24). He was called "her husband" (Matt. 1:19)(The Virgin Birth, by Robert Gromacki, p. 76). Obviously, Gromacki doesn't like the idea of believing his alleged Saviour was illegitimate. Of course, what he has done is opt for the Biblical version that suits his needs, a common ploy of apologists. The KJV of Matthew 1:18 says they were "espoused", which Gromacki equates with "being married," while the Modern Language (ML), the LB, the NWT, and the NI versions clearly say "engaged." There are no valid grounds for equating espoused with being married. Even the RSV and the NASB versions say they were betrothed, i.e. engaged. Gromacki uses the word "married." Although Matthew 1:20, 24 in the KJV strongly imply Mary is Josepj's wife, the ML, the LB, the NAS, and the NI versions show she is not his wife. And while the KJV of Matt. 1:19 says Joseph is Mary's husband, the ML and the LB versions versions refer to Joseph as her fiance. As stated earlier, the version people use depends on what they want to prove. Every Christian is putting his/her money on a Biblical version favored by one group of scholars and taking his/her chances. You could be an expert in Greek and Hebrew and still find scholars who would firmly disagree with your translation of many verses.
In trying to explain why Mary referred to Joseph as Jesus' father, Gromacki says, "In public, Mary had to refer to Jesus as Joseph's son in order not to arouse any suspicion about His origin." (Ibid. p. 75). this explanation is pure speculation, since Gromacki couldn't possibly know Mary's motives, and is also alleging the "Blessed Mother" lied. We are to believe the mother of God deliberately told a falsehood.

In a Life Magazine article Robert Coughlan said: "On the other hand, both Gospel writers (Matthew and Luke) give genealogies showing that Jesus was a descendant of King David through the male line-that is, the line of Joseph--an incongruity increased still more by the fact that the genealogies differ." (Life, Dec. 25, 1964, by Robert Coughlan, p. 90). Apologist Gromacki's response to this was: "If both genealogies did record Joseph's physical lineage, then Coughlan was indeed correct; however, no reputable evangelical embraces that position. Coughlan's rejection of the accuracy of the two genealogies was based upon his subjective equation of the two. He nowhere proved that they both belonged to Joseph." (The Virgin Birth, by Gromacki, p.151). Coughlan doesn't need to "prove it." All one needs to do is read the genealogies in Matt.1 and Luke 3 to see they pertain to Joseph. It's stated quite clearly. The burden of proof lies on the shoulders of Gromacki. He needs to prove the genealogy in Luke 3 pertains to Mary, which isn't possible unless some unwarranted assumptions are made. Her name never appears once in the entire third chapter of Luke. It's rather difficult to believe a geneaology pertains to someone who isn't even mentioned. Another apologist said: "The reason that Mary is not mentioned in Luke 3 is because she has already been designated the mother of Jesus in several instances." (Answers to Tough Questions, by McDowell and Steward, p. 60). Why would this be of significance? The point at issue is not whether Mary is the mother of Jesus, but whether the genealogy in Luke 3 pertains to Mary.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#687114 Jan 19, 2014
Logo wrote:
<quoted text>
Those are gods created by other people. THE God is the creator of all. And to sum this all up with one word,PRE-DESTINATION.
One of the most prominent figures in modern church history, John Calvin, is strongly associated with a belief that is repugnant to most of Christendom, i.e., predestination. Most biblicists believe that God knows what will occur prior to the event but leaves man free to make the choice. In other words, men are free to choose what God already knows will happen. Calvin, on the other hand, stressed biblical pronouncements to the contrary. God doesn't just know ahead of time; he determines it; he fixes it; he plans it; it's his idea. In reality, Calvin viewed free will as myth. In so doing he highlighted one of the most serious, most prominent contradictions in biblical theology--free will versus determinism. His opponents rightly observed that the abolishment of free will destroys moral responsibility. But unfortunately for them literally scores of verses substantiate his position. An exhaustive list in descending order of strength would include the following:

(1) "According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world,.... Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ himself, according to the good pleasure of his will" (Eph. 1:4-5),
(2) "And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God to them who are the called according to his purpose. For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son,.... Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called...." (Rom. 8:28-30),
(3) "And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord; and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed" (Acts 13:48),
(4) "But we are bound to give thanks always to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth" (2 Thess. 2:13),
(5) "In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his (not our) own will" (Eph. 1:11),
(6) "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them" (Eph. 2:10),
(7) "Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you" (John 15:16),
(8) "For God has not destined us for wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Thess. 5:9 RSV),
(9) "A man's heart deviseth his way: but the Lord directeth his steps" (Prov. 16:9),
(10) "He will carry out what he has planned for me, and of many such matters He is mindful" (Job 23:14 Mod. Lang),
(11) "Only, let every one lead the life which the Lord has assigned to him, and in which God has called him" (1 Cor. 7:17 RSV),
(12) "...your eyes saw my unformed body. All the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be" (Psalm 139:16 NIV),
(13) "Man's goings are of the Lord; how can a man then understand his own way?" (Prov. 20:24),

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#687115 Jan 19, 2014
irecknso wrote:
<quoted text> I'm not, hence the question mark, but i assume you came here after leaving the church? that would've ment that u were vulnerable. to just leave the church and turn stone cold, which i love, don't just happen w/out some influence. everybodys got questions they want answered but no one can answer them but ourselves, i do mean of the nature of questions here, you must've believed n a god once? i used to go to church n my younger days but it was the virgins i was after and not the word, the words that were spoke by "the jesus" are very meaningful, but 1 has to find the meaning for themself, not the opinions of people on a forum or confined between some walls listening to some hypocrite! peace to you! i mean no offense!
I do take offense

I take offense at your preaching

I take offense at your ridiculous beliefs

I take offense at your lack of education

mostly, I take offense at your attitude

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#687116 Jan 19, 2014
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
RR doesn't even understand the English word "God". Yet he KNOWS he is right.
ROFLMAO
Warming pews will do that to you.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#687117 Jan 19, 2014
Le_le wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi andet!
Maybe - word associatio (in early08) was the first thread w met on?? I'm
not sure.
I read your description of your miracle. It's up to you if your heart believes that
to be a sign
God is w you.. You know He is..
That's all the proof you need.
If you believe w your heart--- then it's true..
Sending you my friendship- and my best.
When you go to church to warm pews do you use a butt plug?

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#687118 Jan 19, 2014
-RUSH- wrote:
<quoted text>
You will be missed.
Like herpes is missed.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#687119 Jan 19, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you know that "Cap'n" Crunch isn't a Captain?
He's a Commander, based on his stripes.
"Commander Crunch"
My whole childhood unraveled.
http://m.today.com/food/capn-crunch-answers-m ...

And the Jolly Green Giant isn't a giant. There he is holding a pea in his hands and it is the size of a basket ball. If he was a giant the pea would be about the size of a grain of sand.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 3 min Dr Banonator 64,954
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr marge 654,532
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr Peace_Warrior 618,750
women watching men naked on webcam (Mar '12) 1 hr Ableviking 60
Israel End is Near (Feb '15) 1 hr MUQ2 515
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr MUQ2 281,965
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 2 hr RiccardoFire 45,313
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 5 hr bad bob 183,224
More from around the web