Prove there's a god.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#680163 Dec 24, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
God has proof of God.
He's shown me that He exists.
That's proof enough for me.
If you really believed there was a God RR, you would become a disciple of Jesus and give up everything you have. But you won't because you do not really believe there is a god and that it wrote the Bible. You are not a real Christian.

"...none of you can be my disciple unless he gives up everything he has" Luke 14:33

All I am doing is following the Bible RR to prove you do not believe a word of it.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#680164 Dec 24, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
I am not a liar, you said six and I said half a dozen and now you claim there is a difference between what we are saying.
I never said six when you said half a dozen.

Liar.

Prove me wrong.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#680165 Dec 24, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
You are NOT a Christian
Yes I am.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#680166 Dec 24, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
According to you, they might as well.
What makes you think we have hands?
RR knows he has a hand because he loves to show Jesus his middle finger.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#680167 Dec 24, 2013
karl44 wrote:
many cultists insist that their deity acts in reality upon request, such actions can be measured, when they are, they have been found false or unfounded.
How can God's actions be measured?

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#680168 Dec 24, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Negative.
I said nothing of the sort.
Here we go again, arguing what RR didn't say....
the list of what your did say is short.

you did say that your god "whispers in your ear"

you did say that you smack your babies

and strike "your woman"

(where I grew up, you would get a beating for that)

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#680169 Dec 24, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Good ole science and it's awesome weapons.
Gotta dig it!
to do real evil, hate is required

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#680170 Dec 24, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>lol
There's this one jerk on here, calls himself chimney, who's been promoting a universal moral code, says we can't all be happy until we all agree that the same things make us happy...
What a hoot. You can guess where that argument went.
why, that is so vile;

that:

It could become religion

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#680171 Dec 24, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>When did I say that they were sick and need treatment? Cognitive dissonance is not a sickness, it is something every human experiences.
When did I say I wanted to silence them?
I have no idea what point you think you're making with your reference to dogs.
Why would I criticize science because it corrects its mistakes? I acknowledge that it does make mistakes, but it is by far the best way we have come up with for learning about the world. If you know of a better system for increasing our knowledge, share it, you'll go down in history as a genius. I realize that we don't have all the answers, but why should I write off the best system we have for gaining knowledge simply because it has gotten some things wrong?
Do you think it makes more sense to count on religion? Has it increased our knowledge about the world in any meaningful way? Did we land on the moon by praying hard?
And do I really need to list some of the bad ideas that religion has given us, or are you just being a pedant? YECS themselves are demonstrative of one of the worst things religion has given us - a virulent strain of anti-intellectualism and a widespread distrust of science that both extend beyond the loopy confines of the YEC movement.
deserves a repeat

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#680172 Dec 24, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Ya, sure Rev. Sure. All you do is twist Scripture to something it's not. Like how you try to pass of that Jesus said he wants his enemies brought before him and killed.
You're a deceptive liar.
Nothing more.
What did I twist? I quote the Bible as the words appear on the page. It is you who twist the words into what you want them to mean. But the words say what they say and if you don't like it it is not my problem it is your problem.

Prove that Jesus is not saying Luke 19:27. Go ahead, where is your proof?

JESUS: Luke 19:27, "But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them, bring them here and kill them in front of me."

Prove Jesus didn't say this.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#680173 Dec 24, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Open your Bible. Notice those last twelve verses in Mark are italicized, smaller print or bracketed.
Care to venture why?
I know why RR. Some Eusibus wanted an escape route and changed the text. But you are stuck with it whether it is italicized, in smaller print or in brackets.

You are stuck with it, it is in the Bible and that is all there is to it.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#680174 Dec 24, 2013
Jesus tells you to hate your wife and kids and the Bible says to beat your children with a rod.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh boy.
It's your problem not mine. I never claimed to believe the Bible, you did.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#680175 Dec 24, 2013
karl44 wrote:
the list of what your did say is short.
Okay.... English is tough for you, I know.
you did say that your god "whispers in your ear"
I never said that.
you did say that you smack your babies
I never said that, either.
and strike "your woman"
You're exaggerating.
(where I grew up, you would get a beating for that)
Lying is just second nature to you.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#680176 Dec 24, 2013
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
to do real evil, hate is required
Good is required for hate to exist.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#680177 Dec 24, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
What did I twist? I quote the Bible as the words appear on the page. It is you who twist the words into what you want them to mean. But the words say what they say and if you don't like it it is not my problem it is your problem.
Prove that Jesus is not saying Luke 19:27. Go ahead, where is your proof?
JESUS: Luke 19:27, "But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them, bring them here and kill them in front of me."
Prove Jesus didn't say this.
Jesus did not say that in the context you're trying to make.

You're a deceitful lying prick and you know it.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#680178 Dec 24, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
I know why RR. Some Eusibus wanted an escape route and changed the text. But you are stuck with it whether it is italicized, in smaller print or in brackets.
You are stuck with it, it is in the Bible and that is all there is to it.
Wrong.

Try again. you claim to be a Biblical expert. C'mon...

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#680179 Dec 24, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe.
You think DNA exists because you believe it exists.

Got it.

Why do you believe DNA exists?
You?
I'm not the one that keeps bringing up DNA.

You are.

Why?

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#680180 Dec 24, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure there is.
Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
To what proof do you refer?

Where is it located?

What you refer to is in your head... and it isn't proof.

What's funny is this...

You don't require proof to believe DNA exists... but when it comes to your god, you claim to have proof.

You have more faith in the existence of DNA than you do for that of your god.

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#680181 Dec 24, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
So?
There is no proof that your god exists.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#680182 Dec 24, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Luck does not exist.
We've already been over intuition and dreams (and hands for that matter) probably 20 times, and I am not wasting my time with it again. Even with myself and around 10 other people explaining this to you, you continue to dredge up the same tired old nonsense. The gist of it is, however, that, excluding the various "hard" ways we can prove dreams and intuition (brain scans, sleep studies, etc), the fact that billions of people can attest to the existence of dreams is enough to prove that dreams exist. You will try to say that the same goes for god, but the difference is, people use their experience of dreams to "prove" that dreams exist, as opposed to using dreams to "prove" that the dream sandman exists. Your personal experience of god proves that you personally feel that god exists, not that any outside agent is causing your feelings.
Chance...luck...coincidence... it's all the same to me...

" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coincidence" ;

...some is luck is more coincidence, some less...

Have you heard my "lucky" bird poop story yet?

xD

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 10 min Aerobatty 118,658
News Trump calls special counsel Russia probe 'great... 28 min C Kersey 3
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 32 min -KENTUCKY- 678,649
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 1 hr UidiotRaceUMAKEWO... 2,207
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 4 hr UidiotRaceUMAKEWO... 184,825
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 4 hr worthless crap 46,208
The Catholic and Moslem debate 4 hr worthless crap 3
More from around the web