Prove there's a god.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#672435 Nov 10, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You "want to see" no evidence of God.
You "want to see" no reason to believe.
No, I don't. I would find evidence of god perfectly agreeable. There just isn't any. All you can appeal to is that "I must find him myself," and as profound as that may sound to you, it's the same thing a follower of zeus or thor might encourage me with. So it's meaningless.

Religious people are under the impression that you guys are offering a hard sell - you're not at all. "Believe in this, get eternal bliss!"

Really?

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#672436 Nov 10, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
Hey, Clueless?*YOU* are the one who said we're better off today. I merely asked how, and pointed out a few FACTS that contradict your opinion.
<quoted text>
Yeah, you're right; in spite of what Santayana said, we should all just forget the past.
<quoted text>
If Fox were the blatant liars you accuse them of being, they would have been sued into oblivion ten years ago.
Fox news is more reliable than most internet sites, as near as I can tell. It's easy to find Fox and yell at them if they get something wrong; not so with internet rumor-mongers. And when they are wrong, they admit it and correct themselves.
I mean, do you think Topix is a good source of information?
You just don't like Fox because you're a liberal leftist, while they openly admit to being conservative.
One of several things I *don't* like about Fox is their religious advertising.
So, what's stopping you *this* time from providing that name?
<quoted text>
No I didn't.
I said it does a better job than most internet sites.
There's a difference.
<quoted text>
Stepping away from the bong would be a good start.
<quoted text>
Bullshit!! You said you knew of a blatant GOP propagandist who worked at Fox as a reporter---prove it by GIVING THE DAMN NAME.
Oh, I forgot; you can't provide WHAT YOU DON'T HAVE.
Checkmate.
I'm done with you.
No, it was framed as "internet vs. fox news," not "a few sites vs fox news." You're lying again.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#672437 Nov 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
A lot of them are looking for rewards that may not be there, but that does not negate the possibility you will wake up from this life and need to find something else to do in an even bigger jungle.
Yes, you are afraid of just such a possibility. With good cause.
You have not hit a point in life where you aren't exactly looking forward to waking up the next day, but you do?
Why would I be scared of waking up in the afterlife? That's not scary at all. I mean.. I guess if it helps you feel better to imagine that you're taking the "scary path," more power to you, but that's just nonsensical.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#672438 Nov 10, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
Why not just give me the name?
Did you *forget* the name of this blatant GOP "propagandist?" Wow; I'da thunk a name like that would have stuck in your memory.
You don't *want* to give that name, because *you don't have it.*
You lied.
You're still lying.
SHOW US THE NAME.
<quoted text>
Are you telling me to google the name of the Fox reporter that you claimed is a blatant GOP propagandist?
Are you kidding me? "Timn17's name of the blatant GOP propagandist at Fox," is that what you're telling me to google?
You mentioned a specific person at Fox; why can't you provide his name??
<quoted text>
It would be easier for you to simply provide the name of that "blatant GOP propagandist."
Go.
<quoted text>
It would be easier if you just gave his name.
<quoted text>
GIVE US THE GODDAMN NAME.
<quoted text>
Translation: "I'll never admit I lied. I'm a left-wing liberal socialist, and I hate Fox."
No, I will get the post numbers, and as soon as I do that's all I will respond to you with until you shut up. This isn't about proving I can google, it's about proving you're a liar. An obnoxious one at that.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#672439 Nov 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
Funny thing. Someone said something earlier about you only live eternally in the minds of others.
JC is still going on after 2000 years. Even in the minds of those that deny his existence.
That's the eternal strength of imaginary hero's, you just cant kill Peter Pan, Beowulf or Jebus.
They have truth justice and the American way. Except for the dreaded arch enemies... Hook , Grendal's mother and the Anti Christ.
The dreaded flies in the ointment, the proverbial monkey wrenches the messed up my day villeins that sneak up and like Mordred stab the Arther in the sneaky spot.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#672440 Nov 10, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
It was very strange, I'll admit. The only way I can describe it to something we both know is goosebumps at first. Ever had goosebumps on your scalp? It was something like that, except instead of the entire scalp, it was only a quarter-sized area on the top of my head, and it lasted for a few minutes straight. I then felt a warm rush of energy (or something) run down my body, similar to the feeling of a warm liquid going down your throat. It eased my entire body and I felt an instant comfort, an instant feeling of ease and a loss of pain.
In a strange kinda way, He kinda sounded like me, but different. I can't explain it. But I do remember that the voice came from outside of my head, into my ears. Just as much as the clicks of the keyboard are entering my ears right now.
What did Karma look like?
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Sounds like you have have an underlying brain condition.
I felt the same way the first time I got a shower, instead of a bath.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#672441 Nov 10, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>Only because it's being shoved in our faces every day.
Sidenote: 3.5 million insurance policies cancelled, thanks to Obamacare. Thank you, Mr. President. You s.o.b.
Here is where I compiled some of my "name a name" responses. Original text:

"And here are the links and post numbers:
page number 31586, post #665592. page #31551, post#664887.
So, will you admit that you were lying? And even further, will you admit that this entire "name a name" tack was nothing more than a dishonest tactic to distract from the main point I was making? I said that the network as a whole functions as a propaganda service, not that every single person involved does nothing but spread propaganda - my main point being that calling propaganda "opinion" does not magically make it not propaganda. Stacking your whole network with lunatic far right talking heads and heading it with a former GOP propagandist is quite suspicious, and you condemn msnbc for these same things, but you have no problem with fox."

Found on page 31587.

From now on, if you whine about "naming a name," I will refer you to this post. I do not care to argue about fox news anymore, it's clear you are beyond help. I only want it to be clear how dishonest you are. This is from over 2 weeks ago! And the posts it references are even older! You have been doing this for over 2 weeks, what in the world is wrong with you?

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#672443 Nov 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
Funny thing. Someone said something earlier about you only live eternally in the minds of others.
JC is still going on after 2000 years. Even in the minds of those that deny his existence.
So are a lot of people you troglodyte.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#672444 Nov 10, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>Only because it's being shoved in our faces every day.
Sidenote: 3.5 million insurance policies cancelled, thanks to Obamacare. Thank you, Mr. President. You s.o.b.
Dude, it's THANKSOBAMA. Do it with feeling next time.

“LOL Really?”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#672445 Nov 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
From my experience you could say I have very strong suspicions of such.
You could say I have very strong suspicions of your experience.
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

#672446 Nov 10, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
I don't know who your Goddess is.
I don't care who your Goddess is.
I don't get into pointless debates about things I don't believe in.
Cuz I'm not atheist.,
What's your excuse?
Atheists are witches.
Wicca?
Dumb.
Typhoon in Taiwan.
It is not a game.

Kaitlin the Wolf Witch

“An Ye Harm None, Do As Ye Will”

Since: May 10

I Am A Religion-Free Zone

#672447 Nov 10, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>No, it was framed as "internet vs. fox news," not "a few sites vs fox news." You're lying again.
You deliberately misquoted what I said in order to score a phony point. You lied. That's what you do. You can't even provide the name of this supposed GOP propagaindist posting as a journalist.

The internet is a medium; Fox News is a media corporation.

Fox News is part of the internet, too.

Give me the name. What's stopping you?

Or admit you are a liar.

Kaitlin the Wolf Witch

“An Ye Harm None, Do As Ye Will”

Since: May 10

I Am A Religion-Free Zone

#672448 Nov 10, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
Why not just give me the name?
Did you *forget* the name of this blatant GOP "propagandist?" Wow; I'da thunk a name like that would have stuck in your memory.
You don't *want* to give that name, because *you don't have it.*
You lied.
You're still lying.
SHOW US THE NAME.
<quoted text>
Are you telling me to google the name of the Fox reporter that you claimed is a blatant GOP propagandist?
Are you kidding me? "Timn17's name of the blatant GOP propagandist at Fox," is that what you're telling me to google?
You mentioned a specific person at Fox; why can't you provide his name??
<quoted text>
It would be easier for you to simply provide the name of that "blatant GOP propagandist."
Go.
<quoted text>
It would be easier if you just gave his name.
<quoted text>
GIVE US THE GODDAMN NAME.
<quoted text>
Translation: "I'll never admit I lied. I'm a left-wing liberal socialist, and I hate Fox."
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text> No,
Why?
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text> I will get the post numbers, and as soon as I do that's all I will respond to you with until you shut up.
No.

I want the name. What's stopping you? Giving me the name right here and now is easier that looking for posts that don't exist. But that's what you do; nameless propagandists, posts that don't exist ...
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>This isn't about proving I can google, it's about proving you're a liar. An obnoxious one at that.
I don't care about your google abilities; I have proven that you are the liar. You refuse to give the name because YOU DON'T HAVE IT.

Just admit it, and I'll stop.

Kaitlin the Wolf Witch

“An Ye Harm None, Do As Ye Will”

Since: May 10

I Am A Religion-Free Zone

#672449 Nov 10, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Here is where I compiled some of my "name a name" responses. Original text:
"And here are the links and post numbers:
page number 31586, post #665592. page #31551, post#664887.
So, will you admit that you were lying? And even further, will you admit that this entire "name a name" tack was nothing more than a dishonest tactic to distract from the main point I was making?
The main point is that I asked for a specific name; you refuse to give it.
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text> I said that the network as a whole functions as a propaganda service, not that every single person involved does nothing but spread propaganda -
You said there was a "blatant GOP propagandist" working as a journalist for Fox. I asked for a name; you refused to give it.
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text> my main point being that calling propaganda "opinion" does not magically make it not propaganda.
I don't see the name of any propagandist here; you said there was a blatant GOP propagandist, and you are going through one hell of an effort to do everything *but* give the name.
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text> Stacking your whole network with lunatic far right talking heads and heading it with a former GOP propagandist is quite suspicious, and you condemn msnbc for these same things, but you have no problem with fox."
Found on page 31587.
From now on, if you whine about "naming a name," I will refer you to this post.
The name, please. It isn't George Soros, is it?
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text> I do not care to argue about fox news anymore, it's clear you are beyond help.
You're fulla shit.
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text> I only want it to be clear how dishonest you are.
Is that the name of the reporter?
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>This is from over 2 weeks ago! And the posts it references are even older! You have been doing this for over 2 weeks, what in the world is wrong with you?
Trying to get an honest answer out of you.

What's this got to do with anything? I asked for the name of that propagandist; it isn't here.

That's an awful lot of effort to avoid giving the name of that "reporter."

Kaitlin the Wolf Witch

“An Ye Harm None, Do As Ye Will”

Since: May 10

I Am A Religion-Free Zone

#672450 Nov 10, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Dude, it's THANKSOBAMA. Do it with feeling next time.
Dude, suck butter from my ass.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#672451 Nov 10, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No I did not.
I said that neither a dream not God can be proven, even though they are both real.
your god is as real as your dream

easy to agree upon

Kaitlin the Wolf Witch

“An Ye Harm None, Do As Ye Will”

Since: May 10

I Am A Religion-Free Zone

#672452 Nov 10, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Here is where I compiled some of my "name a name" responses. Original text:
"And here are the links and post numbers:
page number 31586, post #665592. page #31551, post#664887.
So, will you admit that you were lying? And even further, will you admit that this entire "name a name" tack was nothing more than a dishonest tactic to distract from the main point I was making? I said that the network as a whole functions as a propaganda service, not that every single person involved does nothing but spread propaganda - my main point being that calling propaganda "opinion" does not magically make it not propaganda. Stacking your whole network with lunatic far right talking heads and heading it with a former GOP propagandist is quite suspicious, and you condemn msnbc for these same things, but you have no problem with fox."
Found on page 31587.
From now on, if you whine about "naming a name," I will refer you to this post. I do not care to argue about fox news anymore, it's clear you are beyond help. I only want it to be clear how dishonest you are. This is from over 2 weeks ago! And the posts it references are even older! You have been doing this for over 2 weeks, what in the world is wrong with you?
This is like claiming that George Soros writes all the news copy for, and controls everything disseminated by, MS-NBC, CNN, NPR and Pacifica.

Either way, you and your source are both bullshit.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#672453 Nov 10, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF?
What would the "preacher" preach about?
Why not wait for the next PTA or Town Hall meeting or something?
Maybe December 25th, they'll celebrate the Non-Denominational Winter Holiday......
oh atheists are better at everything than you religitards.

They are going to show y'all how to have a moral church.

pay attention.

Kaitlin the Wolf Witch

“An Ye Harm None, Do As Ye Will”

Since: May 10

I Am A Religion-Free Zone

#672454 Nov 10, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>..... Stacking your whole network with lunatic far right talking heads ....
Name one.

Just one.

Geraldo Rivera? Bob Beckel? Juan Williams? Marla Liasson, of NPR? Alan Colmes? John Stossel? Sally Kohn? Leslie Marshall?

Or do you mean Chris Wallace, the son of CBS "60 Minutes" Mike Wallace?
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>and heading it with a former GOP propagandist is quite suspicious, and you condemn msnbc for these same things, but you have no problem with fox."
As I've pointed out REPEATEDLY, Fox admits to its conservatism. Roger Ailes made it that way, in response to the other three networks that are blatantly liberal, while they *claim* to be "objective."

You just hate that, don't you? The Left is allowed to call themselves "objective" while spewing liberal garbage, but when Fox actually admits to their conservatism, you scream "PROPAGANDISTS!!!"

Thanks for showing your hypocrisy.

Since: May 07

Muncie, IN

#672456 Nov 10, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
Name one.
Just one.
Geraldo Rivera? Bob Beckel? Juan Williams? Marla Liasson, of NPR? Alan Colmes? John Stossel? Sally Kohn? Leslie Marshall?
Or do you mean Chris Wallace, the son of CBS "60 Minutes" Mike Wallace?
Leave it to Kaitlin to forget that Sean Hannity is conservative or that he has a show on Fox News.
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
As I've pointed out REPEATEDLY, Fox admits to its conservatism. Roger Ailes made it that way, in response to the other three networks that are blatantly liberal, while they *claim* to be "objective."
You just hate that, don't you? The Left is allowed to call themselves "objective" while spewing liberal garbage, but when Fox actually admits to their conservatism, you scream "PROPAGANDISTS!!!"
Thanks for showing your hypocrisy.
Being conservative doesn't make one a propagandist. Spreading propaganda, on the other hand, does.
For instance, what you did here. You use the word "liberal" for propaganda purposes only, ignoring what the word actually means; in the past you have referred to gun regulation advocates as "liberals" despite regulations being the opposite of liberal. You, in turn, have made yourself a propagandist. A wooden one.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 1 hr Tellthetruth 37,310
The American Dream is DEAD DEAD DEAD. 1 hr Johnny 18
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 1 hr Tony 6,554
Bring the jobs back to the USA! 2 hr Johnny 24
Why doesn't God STOP the world's MADNESS and in... 3 hr Doctor REALITY 10
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 hr oneear69 688,931
You are of your father.....the devil 4 hr Doctor REALITY 3
More from around the web