Prove there's a god.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#670360 Nov 2, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
...
but alcohol and drugs are not prerequisites.
You haven't seen Clark. Drugs ARE a prerequisite for any woman doing him.

“It's Time. . .”

Since: Jun 13

New Holland

#670361 Nov 2, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
This is why those who insist on the God Theory are so dangerous and morally bankrupt; they can commit any crime and believe they answer to a higher power who forgives them.
They hate admitting Hitler is in heaven as we type but Hitler was a real and a true Christian trying to do what Jesus failed to do 2,000 years ago, and Hitler said he accepted Jesus and that is all that is necessary to have eternal life in Heaven according to the God Theorists.
I HOPE NOT!

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#670362 Nov 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Hold on a sec.
All the available evidence we have today suggests that life cannot create itself spontaneously.
Why do you ignore the evidence and go off of your beliefs?
You never answered my responses to the above post.

1. > What evidence?

Last night (night before last by the time you read this)... you posted this...
Because it can't be proven by science in no way means it doesn't exist.
Same goes for God.
Then there's this...
All the available evidence we have today suggests that life cannot create itself spontaneously.
All the available evidence we have today suggests there is no god.

See how that doesn't really work?

If you have evidence that life can't create itself spontaneously (or didn't way back when), then I have evidence your god doesn't exist.

We both, IMO, have evidence... not strong evidence... still evidence, though... with which to *infer* our respective stances.

Proof... neither of us have it.

Our evidence, if we can call it that, is only suggestive.

Proof would be conclusive.

2. > "What Beliefs?"
Why do you ignore the evidence and go off of your beliefs?
Am I? Aren't you?

I can ask the same of you.

I should get the same answer(s) I'd give you.

Instead, you get a free pass, for some reason, from having to provide proof.

Why?

“It's Time. . .”

Since: Jun 13

New Holland

#670363 Nov 2, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>The militarization of our police force has resulted in large part because of the war on drugs.
Also, you're a lunatic if you support the war on drugs.
Well, it is unwinnable. Hasn't the last 50 years shown that?!

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#670364 Nov 2, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
you and me have SO much faith in common that it's a shame you're too stubborn to concede anything to me....
i totally believe that there's life in the cosmos and that they're known as angels and the spirits of those who've departed from their bodies on earth:-)
<quoted text>
Don't accuse me of doing what *you* do, christian. You are the one who denies everything that doesn't kiss ass to your worthless god.
<quoted text>
Our existence proves you wrong, dickhead.
We are not special, we are not protected by your jeebusgod.
Shove your fundamentalist sites back up your ass, along with that condom.
http://gizmodo.com/5875481/the-possibility-of...
<quoted text>
Then why are *you* not dead?
One hundred billion planets in our galaxy alone, dimwit. That's just *our galaxy.*
*You* state that it is impossible for any of them to have any kind of life; prove it.
"NASA" is not a fundamentalist site,'tard; "gizmodo", OTOH, is about as legit a science fact source as Sesame Street is and just your speed. Too bad you're too stupid to know you should be embarrassed about your lame ass comments.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#670365 Nov 2, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>
No he wasn't. Your buybull is a pile of lies.
Take your crap somewhere else.
You don't own Topix, scumbag.

“LOL Really?”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#670366 Nov 2, 2013
Ravin wrote:
God as told in Bible or Quran is contrary to common sense and therefore cannot exist. But a Creator must exist because this Universe appears real and there must be some force which brought the system ruling it. That FORCE IS GOD. This might be similar to Vedanta theory of Hindus. It is another matter that they have multiple Gods, but all Hindus do not believe in same theory.
Nor do all Christians.

That seems to be a flaw in religions. Y'all need to conference and come up with 1 true false god and stick with it.

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Redondo Beach, CA

#670367 Nov 2, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>You haven't seen Clark. Drugs ARE a prerequisite for any woman doing him.
You've seen Clark?

Up close and personal?

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#670368 Nov 2, 2013
Working for the Lord wrote:
<quoted text> One church that comes from the bible is the only church that God approves of and that's the Church of Christ. What get's me is when someone says that the CoC came about during the restoration movement in the 1800's. This isn't true as there's CoC's in the 14 and 1500's in England that were active, so that blows the ideal that the CoC came out of the Restoration Movement in the 1800's. The CoC came to be when the Apostle Peter was preaching in the year 33AD on the day of Pentecost that 3,000 souls were added to the CoC that day when the people that were listening to Peter were saved. Acts 2 37-38, Mark 16;16. The church that Jesus said he would build in Matthew 16;18 is the church that was opened in the year 33AD. there's only one church that is the true church on this planet and that is the Church of Christ and for a very good reason, that's because the church worships according to the bible, no other church does. Tell me if you don't feel the church spoken of in the bible that Jesus said he would build isn't the CoC , then what church do you think it is?
Incoherency is a helluva' thing.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#670369 Nov 2, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
You never answered my responses to the above post.
1. > What evidence?
Last night (night before last by the time you read this)... you posted this...
<quoted text>
Then there's this...
<quoted text>
All the available evidence we have today suggests there is no god.
See how that doesn't really work?
If you have evidence that life can't create itself spontaneously (or didn't way back when), then I have evidence your god doesn't exist.
We both, IMO, have evidence... not strong evidence... still evidence, though... with which to *infer* our respective stances.
Proof... neither of us have it.
Our evidence, if we can call it that, is only suggestive.
Proof would be conclusive.
2. > "What Beliefs?"
<quoted text>
Am I? Aren't you?
I can ask the same of you.
I should get the same answer(s) I'd give you.
Instead, you get a free pass, for some reason, from having to provide proof.
Why?
RR has 200 proof, it comes in a mason jar.

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Redondo Beach, CA

#670370 Nov 2, 2013
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
Nor do all Christians.
That seems to be a flaw in religions. Y'all need to conference and come up with 1 true false god and stick with it.
Would you say I'm part owner of Topix?

And for sure I'm not a scumbag, right?

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#670371 Nov 2, 2013
Anon wrote:
<quoted text>
Weird, wasn't it? I'm not completely sure, but I may have just found religion...
Yes, it certainly was.

I'm fairly sure I didn't find a description of how EM works.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#670372 Nov 2, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>
I almost forgot: there's no such thing as an "ex-Marine." Ask Al Garcia.
Husband #2 is an ex-marine and he never uses profanity, ever. Cussing doesn't make a man tough and a purple heart does not make him a soldier for eternity, just an unlucky guy who took a wrong turn.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#670373 Nov 2, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>.....I know an ex-marine who never uses profanity. He's a very polite killer.<end quote>
Nano, I have proven you wrong time, and time again. Every time you open your mouth or put fingers to keys, I shoot you down and prove you wrong. I will continue to do so, because you are a hateful little drag queen, until you finally concede, hang your head in shame, and leave this thread, never to be seen again.
You are a fake, a phony, and an impotent troll.
You are an idiot. Try and prove my ex never cusses. Moron.

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#670374 Nov 2, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Oh.
Sorry about that - they just annoy me.
Actually, I think my S key is on the fritz. Sometimes ya gotta mash it pretty good.

"Atheistssssssssss"

Spellchecker fixed it.

"Atheists"

>I< fugged it up again!

"Atheist"

<face/palm>

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#670375 Nov 2, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> RR has 200 proof, it comes in a mason jar.
There is evidence that could be true.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#670376 Nov 2, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I think my S key is on the fritz. Sometimes ya gotta mash it pretty good.
"Atheistssssssssss"
Spellchecker fixed it.
"Atheists"
>I< fugged it up again!
"Atheist"
<face/palm>
Laffin.

See, Spellcheck would have red-lined that. And up with this, I will not put.
christINSANITY is EVIL

Wheatley, Canada

#670377 Nov 2, 2013
Ravin wrote:
God as told in Bible or Quran is contrary to common sense and therefore cannot exist. But a Creator must exist because this Universe appears real and there must be some force which brought the system ruling it. That FORCE IS GOD. This might be similar to Vedanta theory of Hindus. It is another matter that they have multiple Gods, but all Hindus do not believe in same theory.
belief and facts are two different things,..

http://youtu.be/nZiROWO6iVs

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Redondo Beach, CA

#670378 Nov 2, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Laffin.
See, Spellcheck would have red-lined that. And up with this, I will not put.
OK then, Winston.

He was mocking the rule against split infinitives, and said,

"That is something up with which I will not put."

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#670379 Nov 2, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Laffin.
See, Spellcheck would have red-lined that. And up with this, I will not put.
My composing is via a word proc. It could be setup to red-line instead of auto-correct.

Doesn't really affect me.

The problem isn't on that side of the keyboard.

<slaps computer anyway>

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 16 min Huff post is a joke 286,594
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr Seentheotherside 687,339
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 1 hr Wizard Droppings 31,215
-----*ANTICHRIST on world stage----- 2 hr NewsGlobal 1
strangers f*ck wife in adult theater (Jul '15) 2 hr BandT 16
My "thorn in the flesh" God won't fix....this s... 3 hr Poo Bears 7
Are Quadroons and Griffes Considered Mulatto? (Aug '10) 5 hr Johnny 47
More from around the web