Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#665585 Oct 19, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
EVANS the zoologist copy righted the discovery of some facts regarding spiders 1995, haha I wrote deviancy instead of Da Vinci
my bad man.
And because this man supposedly copyrighted some facts regarding the spider (I'm quite sure you can't do that), that means no one had ever heard of spiders before 1995. Therefore, god.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#665586 Oct 19, 2013
Mujahid wrote:
<quoted text>
Bro. Hazem,
Obviously "Just Think" does not like to be engaged in any intellectual discussion with you. However, there are many educated Chritian scientists who did the research and were so amazed on all the scientific revelations made in the Noble Quran.
Read "Quran Bible and Science" by a French scientist.
Nothing more noble than detailed descriptions of torture.

Since: Oct 13

Location hidden

#665587 Oct 19, 2013
and here is another subject for those who didn't take the previous 2 facts seriously.

THE IDENTITY IN THE FINGERPRINT

Everyone, including identical twins, has a unique fingerprint. In other words, people's identities are coded at their fingertips. This coding system may also be compared to the barcode system that is used today.

While it is stated in the Qur'an that it is easy for Allah to bring man back to life after death, peoples' fingerprints are particularly emphasized:

"Yes.[We are] Able [even] to proportion his fingertips " (Qur'an, 75:4)

The emphasis on fingerprints has a very special meaning. This is because shapes and details on everyone's fingerprint are unique to each individual. Every person who is alive or who has ever lived in this world has a set of unique fingerprints. Furthermore, even identical twins having the very same DNA sequence have their own set of fingerprints.105

Fingerprints attain their final shape before birth and remain the same for a lifetime unless a permanent scar appears. That is why fingerprints are accepted as a very important proof of identity, exclusive to their owner. The science of fingerprints has been used as a non-erring identity determination method.

However, what is important is that this feature of fingerprints was only discovered in the late 19th century. Before then, people regarded fingerprints as ordinary curves without any specific importance or meaning. However in the Qur'an, Allah points to the fingertips, which did not attract anyone's attention at that time, and calls our attention to their importance. This importance has only been fully understood in our day.

and for those who will claim that fingerprints where known 1600 years ago , please check this article before annoying me http://onin.com/fp/fphistory.html

enjoy

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#665588 Oct 19, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
EVANS the zoologist copy righted the discovery of some facts regarding spiders 1995, haha I wrote deviancy instead of Da Vinci
my bad man.
I don't think you can copyright a discovery.(c)

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#665589 Oct 19, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
what you don't know is that the Holy Quran doesn't only contain scientific miracles, it contains different kind miracles such as language, teachings ,historical facts and humans laws , the miracle of the Holy Quran 1400 years ago was not based on the scientific facts, it mainly focused on some language issues because the People of Quraysh (Mohammed's tribe) were well known for poetry and Arabic
fluency , I cannot reveal this kind of miracles because apparently nobody speaks Arabic in here, but these scientific facts were only known and noticed mostly by non-Muslims after the continual improvement of science and man knowledge, other wise it wouldn't be fair to those who came after Mohammed to believe in his prophecy nor in God, imagine I told you that my grandfather walked on fire, you wouldn't care or would never believe me, So I have been trying to show you some of these scientific facts which was proven recently and I only get back from some mockery and non sense comments.
That's because you haven't listed any scientific facts found in the quran that have only been proven recently. You have listed vague verses about spiders and torture and then interpreted them in an extremely dishonest way, to the point straight up making stuff up to make the verse "fit" the science.
Doctor REALITY

North Little Rock, AR

#665590 Oct 19, 2013
You're going to HELL, bowy.

Since: Sep 08

Fowler, CO

#665591 Oct 19, 2013
christINSANITY is EVIL wrote:
<quoted text>
some spiders are cute..and some very deadly
http://youtu.be/sqgOeVhpW94


This is funny.

We had these big brown housekeepers when I was growing up. They got like 3 or 4 inches across, and were fast, and they did jump.

My mother thought it was great fun picking them up by one leg and chasing us kids with them when we would freak out finding one in the house, and that was very often.

The shower was a favorite place for them to hang out. When you are a small kiddie and step into the shower, then pull the curtain closed only to discover one of these huge maneating spiders that was hiding in the folds, between you and getting back out, well, you just develop a extreme distaste for them. Particularly when you had a dark shower curtain that blocked the light from over the sink making it dim in the shower. Over the years I learned to keep a watchful eye while taking my shower before bailing out and getting something to kill the beast with.

They have woken me up crawling across my chest a couple of times.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#665592 Oct 19, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>
You claimed I opposed Obama's policies because I'm a Fox conservative and because he was black.
<quoted text>
I'm tired of yours.
<quoted text>
No you haven't.
<quoted text>
Wikipedia is unreliable, as it is subject to editing by its users.
<quoted text>
And *still* you refuse to supply ONE NAME!!**JUST ONE!!**
<quoted text>
Why won't you name on of these "propagandist" reporters? Why not?
WHY NOT??
Because you're a liar. You're a fundamentalist liberal, lying for his cause; no different from a funamentalist christian lying for his.
Opposite sides of the same damn coin.
I'm no longer interested in pursuing this line of discussion.
Wow dude. You're either blinded by partisan fury, or you're a straight up liar. I never said you opposed obama because he was black. Tell me the post number.

I have said several times that the whole "name a reporter" game you're playing is dishonest, and that I do not think that the regular reporters on fox are primarily propagandists. Their commentators are, and they do not get a pass because they call their propaganda "opinion." I did name a name - gretchen carlson - because I happened to be watching a video of her discussing "what would regan do" regarding the shutdown. And you ignored it twice. Again, this line of questioning is pointless. It's a deflection.

I referred you to the wiki sources, because I do not feel like listing all of them myself. I also mentioned specific things (like the "daily memos" and the former employee testimony on the matter), which you ignored. We also agreed that msnbc having a cast of primarily liberal commentators and a president who is a former clinton manager makes them biased. We then agreed that these things are true about fox, but you can't seem to take that final step.

Now I'm a liar? What have I lied about? Have I lied like you did when you claimed I called you a racist? I'm a fundamentalist even though I have repeatedly criticized obama even during the course of this conversation? Do you even have the ability to understand that someone can see the "obama is hitler" nonsense for what it is and not be a "fundamentalist liberal?" Seriously, you're devolving into a bad parody of an angry bill o'reilly. "LIBERAL!! EVIL SOCIALIST LIBERAL! FOX IS THE BEST!" Lol.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#665593 Oct 19, 2013
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
You might want to reread your the posts your "bro" wrote. its not just me. Everyone on here is ripping him a new one.
Trust me, "intellectual" isn't the first word that describes your buddy...
ahahah

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#665594 Oct 19, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes.
I stand by that.
<quoted text>
I never said any such thing, but don't let that stop you from making any more false accusations about me, liberal.
<quoted text>
Because the way "liberal" is popularly used today is not accurate. The true liberal movement got hijacked by the fundamentalist liberals.
Juan Williams, for example. As I've already told you (and you won't even address it), he was a commentator for NPR and for Pacifica. After 9-11, he expressed, through his Free Speech First Amendment rights on NPR radio, his discomforture at riding in the same airplane with people of obvious Arabic descent.
Those grand supporters of First Amendment Free Speech FIRED HIM for making such a "racist" statement over their airwaves.
"Their" airwaves.
I was always under the impression that the airwaves belonged to the public...as NPR and Pacifica always remind us.
Anyway, I also told you that he is now a Fox News consultant, where he is still speaking out on hils liberal views; and you said he was a Fox "token." Liberal, that is.
<quoted text>
You are deliberately being obtuse.
Williams was a liberal reporter working for NPR/Pacifica at the time he made his remarks. NPR/Pacifica prides itself on its support of free speech...except sometimes, apparently.
<quoted text>
Thanks for proving Fox News and many conservatives right once again; you liberals are hateful little racists.
I wonder why you clipped the rest of my post.

If NPR truly has an anything goes policy, even to the point that their people could go on other shows and make racist comments, then fine, he shouldn't have been fired. I strongly doubt that is the case however. I fail to see how this is relevant.

What's relevant is that you brought him up as an example of a "liberal point of view" on fox, and I, while reading through some transcripts, found pretty strong indications that he is nothing more than a foil. Which you clipped out. Again, I wonder why.

First of all, I'm not a "liberal." Second of all, I'm not a "hateful little racist." What about my post was racist? And again, why are you getting so angry? You need to chill out bill o reilly.

Since: Oct 13

Location hidden

#665595 Oct 19, 2013
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah...its pretty obvious that Hazem hasn't the vaguest idea what he's talking about...
I didnt not say people didnt know anything about spiders, I meant they didn't know a lot of details about spiders nor how they live

Since: Oct 13

Location hidden

#665597 Oct 19, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>So.. a passage about brutally and endlessly torturing people is proof for your god. I couldn't make this stuff up if I tried.
Also, roasting someone and then replacing their skin would not allow them to feel pain again, you lunatic.
yes but anyone who read the Quran, knows that the disbeliever would stay in hell forever tasting punishment, you may find it in other verses, Its not questionable that the skin will be renewed for nothing

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#665598 Oct 19, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm a fast reader. In the 60's I could spend a half hour reading the local, state, national, and world news, and a few editorials and columns in the Miami Herald. I could start when ordering breakfast and still be reading at the end. In the 80's I would be all done about the time they served me in Denny's. Now, I could spend more time looking at the ads. They took up more space by that time. Now I can get on the net and see a few headlines on the same subject across a variety of sites and be finished in 5 minutes.
Twice the population, a fraction of the news.
You have editors that decide what you will read. As an editor of the LA Times said many years ago, their job was to decide what you should read.
I grew up watching Huntley/Brinkley, Cronkite, and Howard K Smith. They were the gods enlightening you to what was happening in the world. It was often shaded by their expressions and delivery. One half hour of what was happening all over the world. Some stories given more time than others.
This is nothing new. Since writing and oratory began there were decisions on what you should hear and how you were to react to it as interpreted by those bringing the news to you. It is the nature of the beast.
You know only what you hear about. This shapes your thinking. The younger you are and the more influenced you are by who you read or listen to. The TV networks of the 50's and 60's were more liberal than conservative. You have a whole generation programmed to think a certain way about things.
Cable and the internet is a return to the older days of differing opinions. You have a choice of what sounds more true to you now than of the last 50 years. You can get in even more depth of an event than you could in that time.
You try to be balanced and discerning, but what I am telling you is your scales were calibrated by special interests a long time ago.
If you want truths in life about people look around your physical environment and interactions with them, and then make your own judgements. Staring at the tube, screen, or page just makes a funnel for others to pour their own brew into your skull.
I had to delete some of your post for response.
Yes, our perceptions are to an extent influenced by the outside world, whether intentionally or not. The trick is to learn the many ways that your brain can deceive you while also learning about the many ways that people can BS you, so that you can catch it when you see it. Still, you can't catch everything all the time.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#665599 Oct 19, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
again you and your buddy are still ignoring the fact that most spiders houses have Spiritual weakness among the house itself because it is deprived of all love and kindness, which are the pillars of any happy home. The female, in some types of spiders, kills the male as soon as the fertilization takes place. Being larger in size and more violent, the female kills the male and eats its body. In some cases, the female eats its youngsters mercilessly. In some types, the female dies after fertilizing its eggs, which are usually fostered in a silk bag. When the eggs hatch, spiderlings come out to find themselves in a very crowded place inside the eggs bag. The siblings then start to fight for food, space or both. The brother kills its brother and sister, and the sister kills its sister and brother, until the fight ends with a few spiderlings remaining. These spiderlings shed their skin and tear the eggs bag to come out one after the other with unhappy memories.
You are a lazy researcher and apparently you are not willing to take anything seriously.
An insult from you is the highest compliment, my friend.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#665600 Oct 19, 2013
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah...its pretty obvious that Hazem hasn't the vaguest idea what he's talking about...
Yeah. I've decided he must be a poe.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#665601 Oct 19, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
yes I am sure it wasn't known at that time that Skin is responsible to hold most of the nerves endings, it was proved recently that there are nerves and accurate endings to deliver pain and different touches to the Brain, we now know these facts simply because we were raised in different time and place.
So, again, did the book say that the skin would be replaced because it has the most nerve endings, or are you adding that yourself?

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#665603 Oct 19, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =0bDJmc4I1OIXX
This is funny.
We had these big brown housekeepers when I was growing up. They got like 3 or 4 inches across, and were fast, and they did jump.
My mother thought it was great fun picking them up by one leg and chasing us kids with them when we would freak out finding one in the house, and that was very often.
The shower was a favorite place for them to hang out. When you are a small kiddie and step into the shower, then pull the curtain closed only to discover one of these huge maneating spiders that was hiding in the folds, between you and getting back out, well, you just develop a extreme distaste for them. Particularly when you had a dark shower curtain that blocked the light from over the sink making it dim in the shower. Over the years I learned to keep a watchful eye while taking my shower before bailing out and getting something to kill the beast with.
They have woken me up crawling across my chest a couple of times.
My garage would be burned down if that one got away.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#665604 Oct 19, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
yes but anyone who read the Quran, knows that the disbeliever would stay in hell forever tasting punishment, you may find it in other verses, Its not questionable that the skin will be renewed for nothing
O....K? Man, you are kooky.

Since: Oct 13

Location hidden

#665605 Oct 19, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>So, again, did the book say that the skin would be replaced because it has the most nerve endings, or are you adding that yourself?
no it didnt say that skin has the most nerve endings, but the punishment or warnings could be told in so many ways without mentioning the skin, the verse could simply say the disbeliever will keep burning, I don't know if you really miss the point every time or just having fun twisting words and facts.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#665606 Oct 19, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
no it didnt say that skin has the most nerve endings, but the punishment or warnings could be told in so many ways without mentioning the skin, the verse could simply say the disbeliever will keep burning, I don't know if you really miss the point every time or just having fun twisting words and facts.
Do you know of or read the work of Adnan Oktar also known as Harun Yahya and one of his books ĎAtlas of Creationí???

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 min USA Born 586,528
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 16 min Commander Bunny 270,851
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 26 min WildWeirdWillie 176,591
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 27 min RiccardoFire 40,219
ye olde village pub (Jun '07) 28 min okimar 53,346
Courtroom victim??? 2 hr Protester 2
is it wrong i like to wear womens underwear (Nov '12) 2 hr Cool guy 298 239
Why Iím no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 2 hr waaasssuuup 443,004
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 hr Remnant of 144000 611,973
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 3 hr Theswamiji 6,453
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 11 hr Tony17 99,363
More from around the web