Prove there's a god.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#654809 Aug 22, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF?!
Al - just so you know; she's only using you to make me jealous....
The reason you can't prove there is a God is because there isn't one.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#654810 Aug 22, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/22/ opinion/blecker-death-penalty/ index.html?hpt=hp_c4
A skilled sharpshooter knows if he fired a blank or the real thing.
The reason you can't prove there is a God is because there isn't one.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#654811 Aug 22, 2013
RiversideHick wrote:
O_o
The reason you can't prove there is a God is because there isn't one.

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#654812 Aug 22, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
The reason you can't prove there is a God is because there isn't one.
The reason you can't prove your sanity is because there is none in you.
The Truth is Known

Phoenix, AZ

#654815 Aug 22, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
pseudo-anthropologists who embrace evolution to the exclusion and bigotry of Creationism
The Truth is Known...

Evolution is scientific fact. Creationism isn't science. You're one of the most ignorant and bigoted rednecks to ever post in this forum and should be totally ashamed of yourself for making a complete ass of yourself on an international forum, boy.

Are you a retarded Christian?

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#654816 Aug 22, 2013
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/transge...

Proof of social insanity that runs rampant today.

Google that name. Every article will refer to that individual as "her".

"In 2010, Newburn, who was born Daymond but began to cross-dress when she was 22,

http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news...

"Domonique" was born Daymond, and with a dick. Daymond's death certificate will be recorded with "Domonique" as a male.

Redefining to suit one's desired image is not considered reality, but give them time, and they will redefine reality. Which of course will then redefine "science" which will then have to redefine its "objective" nature.

Tell me the mass media, and the weak minds led by it, have not wandered off into la la land.

Get your phreak on. Time to party. You have arrived at the Promised Land.

Thankfully I was already headed for the door.
The Truth is Known

Phoenix, AZ

#654817 Aug 22, 2013
Troth Whitewater wrote:
God gave the law to Moses
The Truth is Known...

Congratulations! You're completely brainwashed and mentally retarded as a consequence. God and Moses are both mythical characters from a plagiarized work of fiction.

The Moses-Dionysus Connection:

http://stellarhousepublishing.com/moses-diony...

"We cannot be sure that Moses ever lived because there are no traces of his earthly existence outside of tradition."

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#654818 Aug 22, 2013
http://www.riograndesun.com/articles/2013/08/...

This is a product of modern American social development and sensitivity.

Noticed he talked freely until he was read his rights.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#654819 Aug 22, 2013
Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep. Late Devonian Period. Google "Tiktaalik".
IMHO, the most important fossil find ever.
You probably do not know this, but some fish come on land to lay eggs. During the Devonian extinction (after the Permian/Triassic and K-T extinctions, probably the biggest extinction event in earth's history), all macro organisms lived in the ocean. However, during a mass extinction, the food chain gets overturned, because the vase food source (i.e vegetation or plankton) gets wiped out. This means that herbivores would die and rhe carbivores feeding on them, die as well.
When mass extinctions hit, we see larger specialist organisms go extinct (like T-Rex, Triceratops, Mozasaurs, archosaurs, etc) while generalists survive - like the rodent type mammals after the K-T extinction, Coelophysis, birds, etc.
Why? Because specialists have got bo other options. T-Rex hunted big prey, like Ankylosaurs, Ceratopsians and Hadrosaurs. After they died, T-Rex could not sustain itself with insects and little rat-like mammals. Hence, it went extinct. Generalists, however, have the ability to radically alter behaviour. Hunters could turn into scavengers and new food sources can be exploited.
During the Devonian Extinction event, this is also the case. Google "Dunkleostus", a predatory fish that lived during this time. As big as a city liner, this monster sat at the top of th food chain. However, when resources dwindled, Dunkleostus was too much a specialist to adapt, hence it died out. Smaller creatures, like Tiktaalik was able to sustain themselves while the pickings were slim. By giving birth on land, Tiktaalik probably had an evolutionary advantage, in the sense its young was less at risk that those of other fish. However, while on land, Tiktaalik (or its ancestors, rather), probably saw much richer pickings on land. A niche was there to be exploited, and evolution produced the results.
Oh that is so cool!

How can I grow a tail?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#654820 Aug 22, 2013
Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
You mock her for not being able to produce nature defying phenomena, i.e magic, but you chastise us for mocking you because your god cannot donthe same?
Double standard, RR
God.

Internet witch.

Not the same thing.

woods959

Since: Jul 12

Cambridge, UK

#654821 Aug 22, 2013
there is no god, there is no life after death - people, get a grip!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#654822 Aug 22, 2013
Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
Really RR. I type out a well written response, and then you type garbage like this ^ back to me?
Love is felt, but shown to others in *gestures*. Some gestures are grandiose. Some are small. Some are real sacrifices, some are simple conveniences.
These gestures are quite persuasive evidence, and is even used in the highest courts. You may think it a poor example, but it is most likely that under intense scrutiny, you can discern a loving from a non-loving relationship. In fact, in many cases, you can even discern a loving relationship from something that is dressed to look like a loving relationship.
Buying someone something, sending a text, or giving a hug is not necessarily evidence of a loving relationship, but *constant* affirmations does imply it.
Before resorting to your obtuse garbage, answer me this: Do you think your wife loves you? And how do you know it?


I didn't think it was garbage, I thought it was a good rebuttal or response. If you didn't see it that way that I apologize, I have respect for you man, you're one of the few here that have actually taught me something, specifically stuff about dinosaurs. And I really listen, or read, when you talk about dinosaurs that I think dinosaurs are superduper cool.

Yes, I think my wife loves me. And it's not because of anything she buys for me or anything she does for me. I think she loves me just by how she looks at me and how she touches me, always so gentle and always so kind.

I know love exists, obviously. But I'm saying is that love is not quantifiable and can therefore not be "shown".

All we can do is try to detect love's actions or feelings, all the little nuances that we think what love should be. But everybody's opinion of love is different, and everybody's experience with love is different.

I've seen it so many times here that atheists complain that peoples view of God is different and that makes means God isn't real, because we all see him differently. But I guess with that logic we all see love differently therefore it must be fake also...

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#654823 Aug 22, 2013
Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you love your kids? How do they know that?
I buy them stuff.

:p

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#654824 Aug 22, 2013
I see I didn't miss Alan's spamming...

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#654825 Aug 22, 2013
RiversideHick wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that in some wiccan magazine or something?
Missed another Lit course, eh?

It's in the original novel, you prat. Bram Stoker, 1897.

Stoker was Irish, BTW.

Is there anything you DO know about?

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#654826 Aug 22, 2013
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
He demands we all have his preposterous and disgusting religion. Blach!
If he wants to call me the antichrist, I'll accept that deification.
Nobody "demands" that you have the same ideology as them. Nobody cares what you believe or don't believe. They simply find your pompous, know-it-all attitude repulsive.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#654827 Aug 22, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
The reason you can't prove there is a God is because there isn't one.
God is not discoverable or demonstrable by purely scientific means, unfortunately for the scientifically minded. But that really proves nothing. It simply means that the wrong instruments are being used for the job.- J.B. Phillips

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#654828 Aug 22, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Missed another Lit course, eh?
It's in the original novel, you prat. Bram Stoker, 1897.
Stoker was Irish, BTW.
Is there anything you DO know about?
Crayons.

I got crayons.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#654829 Aug 22, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Missed another Lit course, eh?
It's in the original novel, you prat. Bram Stoker, 1897.
Stoker was Irish, BTW.
Is there anything you DO know about?
But seriously, how would I know some obscure line in some book I've never read?

What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason, how infinite in faculty! In form and moving how express and admirable! In action how like an angel, in apprehension how like a god!

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#654830 Aug 22, 2013
RiversideHick wrote:
<quoted text>
But seriously, how would I know some obscure line in some book I've never read?
What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason, how infinite in faculty! In form and moving how express and admirable! In action how like an angel, in apprehension how like a god!
Hamlet, yes, gottit.

Inappropriate to the topic, though.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 1 min Aura Mytha 99,534
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 2 min WildWeirdWillie 184,235
No Walls! Don't fence Me In! 8 min bad bob 12
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 14 min Rosesz 670,145
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 1 hr Tony 6,134
____*Historic POPE - ISRAEL Meeting MARCH 2017____ 2 hr YTubeNews 1
Lido Theater, Dallas (Mar '12) 2 hr Allan 6224 455
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 13 hr AussieBobby 286,431
the new gay skype 22 hr codyh 2
More from around the web