Prove there's a god.
jondo

Blairsville, GA

#645629 Jul 27, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>ROFL.
No. Just makes you stupid.
No. YOUR STUPID!!!! Why don't you prove to me there is no GOD!!! What? just as I thought you can't. so like earlier YOUR STUPID.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#645630 Jul 27, 2013
JESUS VERSES NANOANOMOLY

JESUS VERSION: Luke 14:26, "If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters yes, even his own life he cannot be my disciple."

NANOANOMOLY VERSION: Luke 14:26, "To the people in my presence if you love your family, at all, you will not take up following me because there would be great sorrow for all involved. I tell those of you in my presence that it would be danger and pain ahead, and a man that was even the tiniest bit happy with his family, should remain with them."

ALAN: Now we all have a choice we can believe Jesus or we can believe nanoanomply. Or "C" none of the above.

Am I the only one who has a problem with Christians rewriting the text to make Jesus say what they want him to say?

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#645631 Jul 27, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>
Your brain is a magical place.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You should see my.....
... Bible.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#645632 Jul 27, 2013
PS. nanoanomoly, please explain why I should believe a word that comes out of your mouth when what comes out of your mouth is no different from what comes out your ass.

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#645633 Jul 27, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
Unless it's an irrefutable truth, it should not be in any science book presented as an irrefutable truth.
Capiche?
But it's okay for bibles?

You still don't get it.

When science is proven wrong... science advances.

That's why science works.

...and...

Why religion doesn't.

Science > Stands on its own merit.
Religion > Falters on its own merit.

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#645634 Jul 27, 2013
Fugg it.

Here's the whole list.

---

~SCIENCE VS RELIGION~

Science > Truth as authority.
Religion > Authority as truth.

Science > Evidence precedes conclusion.
Religion > Conclusion precedes evidence.

Science > Relies on the empirical.
Religion > Relies on lack of the empirical.

Science > Accepts burden of proof.
Religion > Rejects burden of proof.

Science > Resolves contradictions.
Religion > Ignores contradictions.

Science > Strives to disprove itself.
Religion > Are you kidding!?!

Science > Requires and fosters cognitive skills.
Religion > Requires and fosters cognitive dissonance.

Science > Are there better ways?
Religion > Our way is the only way!

Science > Here's a reason to believe this... here's a reason to not.
Religion > Believe this or else!

Science > Let's get it together.
Religion > Let's tear them apart.

Science > Show them how.
Religion > Tell them why.

Science > Why don't you agree?
Religion > Why do you hate God?

Science > Provides tools.
Religion > Perverts the tools.

Science > Pays for itself.
Religion > Relies on handouts.

Science > Please keep asking questions.
Religion > Please stop asking questions.

Science > Provides basic to advanced models of reality.
Religion > Buries them in bullshit.

Science > Here's my opinion. What's yours?
Religion > Here's your opinion.

Science > Built upon previous understanding.
Religion > Built upon previous ignorance.

Science > Becomes more unified with time.
Religion > Becomes less unified with time.

Science > Fact driven.
Religion > Fear driven.

Science > I can't understand everything... I'm OK with that.
Religion > I can't understand anything... I'm scared.

Science > Requires no universal antagonist.
Religion > Requires existence of evil to promote itself.

Science > Makes kids wonder.
Religion > Makes kids afraid.

Science > Makes adults wonder.
Religion > Makes adults act like kids.

Science > Mistakes are made. Let's fix them.
Religion > Mistakes are made. Let's cover them up.

Science > Let's see if we can figure this out.
Religion > Let's keep them from figuring it out.

Science > You don't like us because we're smart.
Religion > We don't like you because you're smart.

Science > We're not that smart. We're pretty dumb. We can fix that.
Religion > We're really smart. Just ask us... we'll tell you.

Science > Life is grand. Let's make it better.
Religion > Life sucks. Let's pray.

Science > Lead to the invention of iron chariots.
Religion > The God of Abraham is powerless against iron chariots (Bibles say so).

Science > Rock solid.
Religion > Refer to previous.

Science > Rocks!
Religion > Encourages death by rocks.

Science > Demonstrative.
Religion > Demonizing.

Science > Stands on its own merit.
Religion > Falters on its own merit.

Science > One science doesn't seek to destroy another.
Religion > One religion seeks to destroy all others.

Science > Provides answers... invites more questions.
Religion > Provides placebos... shuns more questions.

Science > Educate people about sex.
Religion > Tell them they'll burn in Hell.

Science > Fun and exciting.
Religion > Boring and depressing.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#645635 Jul 27, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>EVERY TIME you find a so called problem, it's been explained to you. EVERY TIME you ignore and move on to your next McKinsey point. How many times do we need to answer all your questions about the Bible? WHY don't you spend more time researching instead of being the fool?
Prov. 19:9 RSV "A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who utters lies will perish"

Go ahead, keep repeating your lies, honest people know that you have answered nothing. But who cares, presenting the problem is enough for me, I already know you do not have any answers.

And you can't answer this either:

Who was Moses' father in law?

Moses' father-in-law was Reuel in Ex. 2:18 & 2:21),
Jethro in Ex. 4:18 ("now Moses kept the flock of Jethro his father-in-law"),
Raguel in Num. 10:29 ("...the son of Raguel, the Midianite, Moses' father in law"), and
Hobab in Judges 4:11 ("Now Heber the Kenite, which was of the children of Hobab the father-in-law of Moses")

I guess even God doesn't know.

If ever there was proof the Bible is multiple guess this is it.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#645636 Jul 27, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>All the so called errors are in your brain washed mind. Pull your head out of the dead man's ass and have a debate, stop skipping around, stay on one point then answer back, why are you such a coward like McKinsey?
You keep providing me an opportunity to prove that you do not deal with the Bible's endless errors but instead only attack those who point out the errors; attack the messenger when you can't deal with the message.

Try and deal with this:

Ex. 15:3 ("The Lord is a man of war")
versus
Rom. 15:33 ("Now the God of peace be with you all"),
1 Cor. 14:33 ("For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace") and
2 Cor. 13:11 ("...and the God of peace and love shall be with you")

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#645637 Jul 27, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>No. Damn your ADHD.John 6:53. Jesus said to them, "Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.You contended that that verse means Christians are cannibals.Do you still make that claim?
I asked you if anyone has ever seen God and you changed the subject about eating Jesus. I ask again, has anyone ever seen God:

ohn 1:18 "No man hath seen God at any time;..."
Exodus 33:20, And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live.
John 6:46 "Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is ofGod, he hath seen the Father."
1 John 4:12 "No man hath seen God at any time. If we love one another, God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us."

Versus

Gen. 32:30 "And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved."
Exod. 33:11 "And the LORD spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend."
Num. 14:14 "...that thou LORD art seen face to face,..."
Job 42:5 "I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth thee."
Deut. 34:10 "And there arose not a prophet since in Israel like unto Moses, whom the LORD knew face to face,..."
Deut. 5:4 "The LORD talked with you face to face...."

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#645638 Jul 27, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Child's play...
That verse does not mean that the earth does not move, or that the earth's surface does not move.
It means that the planet has been given a firm support, similar to a building, and will not collapse or crumble under anyone's power.
But I'm sure you already knew that...
Next!
Since you and all the other pew warmers are filled with the same Holy Spirit we should expect you all to come up with the same explanation as to why God tells us the earth does not move. Each of you have added words to the text and each of you have given a different explanation incompatible with the others.

Do you have any idea how silly you make yourselves look?

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#645639 Jul 27, 2013
jondo wrote:
<quoted text> No. YOUR STUPID!!!! Why don't you prove to me there is no GOD!!! What? just as I thought you can't. so like earlier YOUR STUPID.
Oh, dear. Subliterate, too.

You should have written "you're". It's a whole different word.

And I don't need to prove the non-existence of any deity - I comfortably await proof of your assertion that there is at least one.

In the meantime, I see no reason for one.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#645640 Jul 27, 2013
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
They're upset that you know as much about the Bible as they do, but have a rational interpretation of it.
Have you ever looked in to anything that he writes or are you just liking him because you're both atheist?

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#645641 Jul 27, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then you should talk to Hukt about it.
I agree that you can't blame science for war.(Which is why I didn't say that.....)
Hukt here.

You did say that, near enough.

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOCO8TE...

Bye.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#645642 Jul 27, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
But it's okay for bibles?
You still don't get it.
When science is proven wrong... science advances.
That's why science works.
...and...
Why religion doesn't.
Science > Stands on its own merit.
Religion > Falters on its own merit.
RR's had this pointed out to him repeatedly.

He seems to be tone-deaf and color-blind in that range.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#645643 Jul 27, 2013
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
The category "religious people" includes the category "certain religious people." Mind you, being more specific almost always improves the quality of information, so "certain" would be a better qualifier.
Yes, it would've. But he didn't want to say it like that. It would imply that *certain* religious people help science...

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#645644 Jul 27, 2013
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Who really like to buy sex from men in bathroom stalls.
You white people are so strange!
Shiiiiit.........

You should see me dance.
:p

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#645645 Jul 27, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
The crucial question is: Where do the words of the nobleman end. At what verse does he stop speaking. It is extremely important whether or not the last thing he says is verse 24, 26, or 27 because if Jesus is speaking for himself in verse 27 then he is one of the most intolerant and ruthless figures to have ever emerged from the pages of literature. On the other hand, if these two verses are merely a summation of the situation by the nobleman, the Christian dilemma is lessened dramatically.
Is Jesus saying verse 27 or is he merely relating the words of a nobleman in a parable? That's the issue.
Oh, now it's an "issue"? Earlier you were posting your BS as if it was a fact.

Make up your mind, dude.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#645646 Jul 27, 2013
UIDIOTRACE MAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>Evil , even those our elite class in power step on you lowly whites, see you as subservient animals! i see u still slurping your masters boot, and once you used and they throw you in the trash heap like tin toy soldiers. BWHHAHHAHAHAA
Lol

"lowly whites"

You're not a racist, are you?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#645647 Jul 27, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
False analogies are about all he's got.
Then again, if RR wants to compare his god to an emotion, I don't really have a problem with that.
"It's nothing but a feeling" is what he inadvertently winds up saying.
Funny.
I never compared God to an emotion.

I said that proving that He exists is just as difficult as proving an emotion.

If you doubt me, prove that you love anything.

Go.

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#645648 Jul 27, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>"Men dying on the battlefield? You can thank science for that."
I didn't even need to go back and find the quote, I remembered it off the top of my head because of how mind numbingly stupid it was.
Dohhh!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 5 min Clearwater 37,133
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 59 min Steve III 44,260
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr guest 640,989
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr Steve III 618,277
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 2 hr jasiEL 104,546
Play "end of the word" part 2 2 hr jasiEL 1,695
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr onemale 280,845
More from around the web