OJ was lynched by the media, I didn't think he was guilty from the evidence. Neither did the jury.<quoted text>I am aware of that. Am I not allowed to disagree with their idiotic assessment? When people talk about OJ, do you tell them he's definitely innocent because a jury said he was?
Did you know that something like 4 of the jurors said they went into the trial *knowing* he was innocent?
He had plenty of money to have had the job done by someone else.