Prove there's a god.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#635357 Jul 2, 2013
Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay.
Think of Angelina Jolie and all the things you would like to do to her....
Now, picture Brad Pitt doing them.
... QED :)
Ah. Elegant.

Since: Mar 13

Anaheim, California

#635358 Jul 2, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>That.. wasn't a grammar mistake. What?
Lol whatever you call it. It was a mistake. And i corrected myself.:P

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#635359 Jul 2, 2013
Ilovewhitemen20 wrote:
<quoted text>
No it wasn't implying THAT post was mine, idiot. I posted things from both MY blog and Theosophist blogs on here. So therefore your assumptions are inaccuracte.
Are YOU unhappy about something? You remind me of some miserable pimply faced nerdy teen fag who got picked on in high school. Whatever the f uck you're going through, it isnt my fault. FInd a shrink to b itch at.:)
I've brought up many good Theosophical and philosophical topics to discuss from both my own blog and other's blogs, you did nothing but "refute" them with your b itching and so-called "insults". Where ever my posts came from, your dumb a ss failed to refute them. You just BAAAAAAAW when your foot gets put in your mouth. LIke alot of atheists do.
"I'm right and superior to you, because I dont believe in magical fairies, even though I have no proof they dont exist, yet I still believe they dont exist. Though I believe they dont, dont go calling my atheism a religion ARRRRG"---a confused atheist.:P
Take a few deep breaths, dude.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#635360 Jul 2, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Do I need to link you to self reports of people describing jealousy? Do I need to link to descriptions of what exactly goes on in the brain and the body when experiencing it? Examples of people behaving jealousy?
Or will you accept that these things do exist, and that they prove that there exists an emotion we call jealousy?
That's your demonstration?

hmmm...

Would it help you if I:

Do I need to link you to self reports of people describing God? Do I need to link to descriptions of what exactly goes on in the brain and the body when experiencing Him?
Or will you accept that He does exist, and that they prove that there exists an deity we call God?

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#635361 Jul 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Well shit, man...
&*$&^(*(&%($#)))_* $
Now I kinda wanna get in the middle and see what happens...
You... would like to be... in the middle?

“First it steals your mind..”

Since: Jun 11

..and then it steals your soul

#635362 Jul 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Well shit, man...
&*$&^(*(&%($#)))_* $
Now I kinda wanna get in the middle and see what happens...
O.O

Get in the middle? Err, hehehehe. I uhm, didn't know you liked parties like that?

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#635363 Jul 2, 2013
True Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
I highly doubt she thought about that when she said it.
But you raised a good point. Just how skeptical is too skeptical? Is there such a thing?
I believe so. To be skeptical to the very end, means that one would never believe anything anyone says, unless he has proven it himself. Is that multivitamin good for you? Is that new mouthwash really better than the old one? Sometimes, we'll just never know, but we use it.
Will that woman really make you happy? If you were a fanatical skeptic, you'll just never get married.
And to say "Oh it's a belief, thus its probably dumb", would be a misuse of the characteristic of being skeptical. That's more of an emotional skepticism.
These "skeptics" on here are too passionate in their non-beliefs to be "skeptics".

Skepticism is doubt, not actively denying.

Since: Mar 13

Anaheim, California

#635364 Jul 2, 2013
True Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
I highly doubt she thought about that when she said it.
But you raised a good point. Just how skeptical is too skeptical? Is there such a thing?
I believe so. To be skeptical to the very end, means that one would never believe anything anyone says, unless he has proven it himself. Is that multivitamin good for you? Is that new mouthwash really better than the old one? Sometimes, we'll just never know, but we use it.
Will that woman really make you happy? If you were a fanatical skeptic, you'll just never get married.
And to say "Oh it's a belief, thus its probably dumb", would be a misuse of the characteristic of being skeptical. That's more of an emotional skepticism.
Yep you're right there's different types of skepticism. I meant that atheists are blind skeptics. Almost everything they talk about is "backed up" by speculation.

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#635365 Jul 2, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>No, RR, for the love of all that is holy, please stop... I am going to break my computer screen if I have to read you say this again. Please, please stop. Qualia cannot be scientifically qualified. I really think this is why you're confused. You have the concept of qualia tied up inextricably to the concept of emotion. They are very closely related, but not the same thing. The personal experience of an emotion cannot be qualified, but the fact that emotion itself exists can and is already proven.
Define emotion. You seem to present it as a thing of itself and not as a derivative of an action. If you are a materialist insofar as humans go, then emotion is just a product of action/reaction on the physical level, like a fart.

“First it steals your mind..”

Since: Jun 11

..and then it steals your soul

#635366 Jul 2, 2013
Ilovewhitemen20 wrote:
<quoted text>
You never respected mine, so why should I respect yours?:)
I have shown you far more respect than you have shown me, so don't come whining about how you feel disrespected

Since: Mar 13

Anaheim, California

#635367 Jul 2, 2013
Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sure True Truth and Al are going to have a sleepless night tonight, me having disrespected the practice of theism.
Really? You are down to stulid arguments like these?
The only reason you grow weary, is because you have been humiliated.
I havent been humiliated. Atheist are a joke already themselves, so...:) I've grown weary is because I'm tired of talking to a numbskull. I have so for the past 5 hours.

And no I'm not expecting them to loose sleep. I'm just simply pointing out you're fake.:)

Yes do assume why I brought up the fact you said that so you can go on one of your rants again.:/

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#635368 Jul 2, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
These "skeptics" on here are too passionate in their non-beliefs to be "skeptics".
Skepticism is doubt, not actively denying.
Who actively denies the existence of a god?

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#635369 Jul 2, 2013
Ilovewhitemen20 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh my goodness gracious...you missed my point AGAIN.
Let me dumb it down for you: How can you get angry with Christians for blindly believing in something, when atheists blindly believe in alot of things too?
Like what?

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#635370 Jul 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
That's your demonstration?
hmmm...
Would it help you if I:
Do I need to link you to self reports of people describing God? Do I need to link to descriptions of what exactly goes on in the brain and the body when experiencing Him?
Or will you accept that He does exist, and that they prove that there exists an deity we call God?
Again... god belief proves god belief. Jealousy proves jealousy. God belief does not prove god. Jealousy does not prove the jealousy demon. Please, for the sake of my computer screen, do not repeat this. Gonna make me hulk out on my computer just so that I can feel like I destroyed something your words have touched.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#635371 Jul 2, 2013
Ilovewhitemen20 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are right though. They seem to loose their degenerate minds over cuss words. Like little kids; "omg she sad a bad word!"
"She cussed so therefore she's wrong!" "Oh dear!" :O
Oh give me a break.......
F uck off.

Since: Mar 13

Anaheim, California

#635372 Jul 2, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
These "skeptics" on here are too passionate in their non-beliefs to be "skeptics".
Skepticism is doubt, not actively denying.
I second this!!

They wont get it though.:/

“First it steals your mind..”

Since: Jun 11

..and then it steals your soul

#635373 Jul 2, 2013
Ilovewhitemen20 wrote:
<quoted text>
I never tried to school anyone on what science is or should be. The reason why this dumb quarrel started is because YOU people misinterpreted what I said about the mind being quantum. It was more of a philosophical statement, anyway. And then you and the rest of your ilk jumped on me and implied i was stupid, and I went off. I may look sweet and innocent on the outside, but I dont like to take bull from nobody. When I said quantum mind I was also referring to something I studied online about "quantum consciousness", hypothesis proposes that classical mechanics cannot explain consciousness, while quantum mechanical phenomena, such as quantum entanglement and superposition, may play an important part in the brain's function, and could form the basis of an explanation of consciousness.
Speaking of physics. I'd like to see you prove "God" doesnt exist with physics.
Go.:P
Dearie, your memory seems to be as lacking as your judgement. I did not jump on you with the Quantum comments.

What I did, is tell you that the Holocaust was no hoax. Since then, you have replied with nothing but insult.

Disprove a deity with physics? Not possible. The most that we can say, is that we have found no evidence of of any kind that supports and omniscient, omnipotent creator.

Since: Mar 13

Anaheim, California

#635374 Jul 2, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Like what?
Like, most of all, blindly believe there's no "God"?:P

Since: Mar 13

Anaheim, California

#635375 Jul 2, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
F uck off.
Make me f uck off.:)

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#635376 Jul 2, 2013
Ilovewhitemen20 wrote:
<quoted text>
I didnt know you were Secular Humanist.
But my question still applies: then why dont you respect people's right to believe what they want? To try to force your obvious atheist beliefs on others is as oppressive as what any Nazi or Muslim did/does with their beliefs. Humanism is nothing but a euphemism to let you get away with forcing what YOU think is best for others on other people. That's not humane at all.
You're no different. And still a hypocrite.
Nice try.
Couple of quick questions.

Are you for or against gay marriage?

And are you for or against access to legal abortion?

Contraception?

Morning after pill?

Your answers will help me determine if you, as a christian, are or are not forcing your religious beliefs on others.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min Anthony MN 678,991
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 4 min UMORONRACEMAKEWOR... 119,069
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 7 min trump not racist 2,526
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 10 min Tony 6,265
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 2 hr curtjester1 46,211
Why does everyone claim that they are native am... (May '09) 3 hr Anonymous 28
Illegal to hoard or store extra food under USA ... (Jun '08) 4 hr Wanderer 27
More from around the web