Prove there's a god.
Myth Buster

Scottsdale, AZ

#635083 Jul 1, 2013
Freebird USA wrote:
I listen to rational people every day.
Unfortunately, you lack the intellectual capacity to recognize rational people, which is why you'll waste away your worthless life as a retarded and revolting redneck with absolutely no socially redeemable qualities.
waaaz up

London, KY

#635084 Jul 1, 2013
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
This religiously retarded redneck is clearly mentally retarded lacking the intellectual capacity to understand that science is fact based with evidence to support proven and verified theories. Please cease replying to this severely retarded redneck other than to advise him to seek professional help.
I mean you cannot state that science is an authority of truth simpy because it uses the scientific method. It's like saying "I therefore conclude that science produces truth because it uses the scientific method."

By what authority?

How will you prove using the scientific method does produce truth? Because it's "scientific"? Because science said so? Again, the question "By what authority does science have by proclaiming to be the truth than religion"?

The statement "The results of the scientific method should be followed" is unscientific because it is a value statement that does not get its authority from anywhere but itself.

"We should use the scientific method." Why should we? "It proves itself." How does it prove itself? "It uses the scientific method."

"The scientific method is true because it works and because it is axiomatic (self-evident)."

Sounds a lot like faith to me. Who decides what is axiomatic? does the scientific method decide it? That makes it circular if it does. If not, then it is not scientific itself.

Now what was your argument, retart??
Myth Buster

Scottsdale, AZ

#635085 Jul 1, 2013
whack job waaaz up wrote:
You are the delusional one, who has been scientificly brainwashed
A religiously retarded redneck this mentally retarded really should be institutionalized immediately. There's absolutely brainwashing involved in studying scientific hypotheses and theories.

Scientific hypotheses are educated guesses based on observation. Scientific theories are proven hypotheses which have been verified by multiple teams of independent researchers.

There's no point attempting to reason with a godbot so completely brainwashed to be mentally retarded.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#635086 Jul 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Moving the goalposts again, timn...
tsk tsk tsk
I really don't think you understand the overall discussion nor what "moving the goalposts" means. I was trying to show you via example what you're doing wrong.

I say jealousy exists because jealous behavior (among other things) exists.

You say god exists because god belief exists.

I say jealousy demon exists because jealousy exists.

Do you still not understand?

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#635087 Jul 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
It's absolutely relevant.
To a person that's never experienced jealousy, it doesn't exist. You can describe it to them all you want but you can't to them that it exists even thought it does.
Get it?
No.
waaaz up

London, KY

#635088 Jul 1, 2013
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
being compared to a religious person
now, there;
is a low blow
You actually think you are above or better then one who does not agree with you?

Gets lonely on that soap box i bet?

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#635089 Jul 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I'm not. I'm trying to show you that certain things can & do exist without scientific proof.
There is plenty of scientific proof for the existence of emotions and jealousy specifically.

None for god. Plenty for god belief.

None for the jealousy demon. Plenty for jealousy.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#635090 Jul 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You brainwashed athibots will believe anything, won't you?
From your link:
"Through the process of descent with modification, the common ancestor of life on Earth gave rise to the fantastic diversity"
What is this mysterious common ancestor and how did it come to be?
You don't know.
Nobody does.
You believe it, though.
Imagine that.
You have banana dna in your body RR. Banana. Why would a loving god do that?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#635091 Jul 1, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>I really don't think you understand the overall discussion nor what "moving the goalposts" means. I was trying to show you via example what you're doing wrong.
I say jealousy exists because jealous behavior (among other things) exists.
You say god exists because god belief exists.
I say jealousy demon exists because jealousy exists.
Do you still not understand?
I understand your analogy, you're not understanding mine. You refuse to. It might crack that fragile belief system of yours.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#635092 Jul 1, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>No.
Of course not.

That whole fragile belief thing of yours.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#635093 Jul 1, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>There is plenty of scientific proof for the existence of emotions and jealousy specifically.
None for god. Plenty for god belief.
None for the jealousy demon. Plenty for jealousy.
Emotions are outside the realm of science. If you can't quantify or prove something, but are somehow experiencing it anyway, it falls right into the realm of the subjective.

Your feeling of jealousy is undoubtedly different than mine, no?

In turn, my experiences with God are different than yours - you claimed to have had none.

*just like* trying to convince a child(or anyone that's never experienced it) what jealousy is all about, how it manifests, how it feels & how to try to control it.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#635094 Jul 1, 2013
timn17 wrote:
You have banana dna in your body RR. Banana. Why would a loving god do that?
Potato, too.

Why did He do that?

*shrugs*

Why not?

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#635095 Jul 1, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, so you are not trained in BS, you just have a natural talent for it.
Brain death occurs because the body support system fails, right?
Tell us how evolution could possibly develop such a shutdown mechanism. How did this adaptation of a relatively orderly shutdown of molecular transfers of energy occur past the point of no return? And then get passed down in the genes?
How did eyes evolve? How did brains evolve? Arms? Legs? Toes!

God!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#635096 Jul 1, 2013
Myth Buster wrote:
There's absolutely brainwashing involved in studying scientific hypotheses and theories.
You're right about that!

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#635097 Jul 1, 2013
Ilovewhitemen20 wrote:
<quoted text>
You just validated my point smart a ss.
How do you know one doesn't exist since you have no evidence of that?
You're basically telling me you're a skeptical fool. Like all atheists are.
Trolololololol.

I recommend a moratorium on responses to this particular troll. Adds nothing to the discussion, and isn't even funny like some of our more distinguished trolls.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#635098 Jul 1, 2013
Ilovewhitemen20 wrote:
WE live on a planet constantly in motion, and except for the occasional natural catastrophe, it is usually a very slow, orderly motion.
The Earth is billions of years old and still in the making—glacial cycles come and go, continents move, mountains form and crumble. Yet Life persists.
Modern Science has, for decades, tried to sell us every soulless theory they could, from the ‘big bang,’ to the chemical origin of life, and a gravity-driven universe.
Our current dogmatic science ought to fear approaching the problem of life’s origins. Their hypothetical models always postulate random events, and chance mutations, in a hostile universe — a cosmos without conscience, consciousness or spiritual life.
All new theories lead up blind alleys. How Earth formed, how life arose. All we are offered is endless speculation, and the stunningly unscientific approach that, instead of welcoming new ideas, refuses to follow where the evidence leads.
It's incredibly easy to tell when you're plagiarizing. Wonder why that is?
waaaz up

London, KY

#635099 Jul 1, 2013
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
A religiously retarded redneck this mentally retarded really should be institutionalized immediately.
There's absolutely brainwashing involved in studying scientific hypotheses and theories.
I couldn't i AGREE more!
Scientific hypotheses are educated guesses based on observation. Scientific theories are proven hypotheses which have been verified by multiple teams of independent researchers.
All that info is filterd through, human interpretation. I would have to do all the experiments to come to that conclusion. Other than that, I take it on faith that all of the scientists who did the experiments and reviewed them and tested them are not lying to me. That is my point.

You cannot use the "scientific method" as a reason to make science as an authority of truth, simply because the only way to prove science as the truth is to use the "scientific method"! The logic is circular.
There's no point attempting to reason with a godbot so completely brainwashed to be mentally retarded.
There's no point in attempting to reason with a robot who admitts brainwashing exist in his method of rational thinking and logic.

Your lack of the abilty to think for your self, shines through.

As your new advasary, i would recommend getting a new catch phrase (retart),, and please stop talking to those on the sidelines when you post.. Your desperate attempt to seek support for your stupidity,,, well, it's just stupid..

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#635100 Jul 1, 2013
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
Unfortunately, you lack the intellectual capacity to recognize rational people, which is why you'll waste away your worthless life as a retarded and revolting redneck with absolutely no socially redeemable qualities.
What a predictable bore.
waaaz up

London, KY

#635101 Jul 1, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>There is plenty of scientific proof for the existence of emotions and jealousy specifically.
None for god. Plenty for god belief.
None for the jealousy demon. Plenty for jealousy.
Tell me, how can science study or provide evidence of a supernatural being?

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#635102 Jul 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Potato, too.
Why did He do that?
*shrugs*
Why not?
Parts is parts.

It all came out of the same firmaments and dust. Some parts can be utilized in several designs. It's all in how you assemble the final product.

Timmy has peanut butter between his ears.

Ugh! But that don't smell like peanut butter. Just looked like it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min Steve III 646,427
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 13 min It aint necessari... 48,229
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 15 min Brian_G 445,706
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 35 min Yellow Star 182,632
Would a Somali girl marry a non-Somali man in L... (Dec '13) 1 hr LMH1983 96
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr RiccardoFire 44,650
Moving companies provide a Shifting solution th... (Sep '15) 1 hr PaykasaKartBozdurma 7
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 3 hr Neville Thompson 281,234
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 7 hr Annaleigh 105,560
More from around the web