Comments
600,121 - 600,140 of 730,541 Comments Last updated 5 min ago
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632205
Jun 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Bald Eagle wrote:
<quoted text> Who's Paula Dean? My cousin said she's a fatlady!!
She is a cook on the food network.
She used the "N" word (Short for Nigeria).
She made an apology on TV.
She wants black waiters dressed in white at
her sons wedding.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632206
Jun 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KittenKoder wrote:

There is no evidence that anything in nature is designed other than what the animals build. That's the logic, you are assuming it's designed.
Argument from ignorance fallacy.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632207
Jun 22, 2013
 
_Oscar Wilde_ wrote:
<quoted text>So, which fossil and genetic evidence would YOU be referring to. I mean, since your evolution theory is not juvenile, then please specify the fossil and genetic evidence. Gosh, MB, just tell us what the first fossil and genetic evidence was. Don't even bother with the transitional, go straight to the beginning.

You will never be part of a fossil record,
but you will be part of the fundie broken record.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632208
Jun 22, 2013
 
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
That's how chemistry works, with the correct chemicals present, they will react in the same way in different environments. No chance needed, no probability to invoke, no "designer" needed. Just the right chemicals and environment. That is how we know that in cool enough temperatures, oxygen and hydrogen will mix into H2O and HO, if those two molecules are present, this will always happen, there isn't a "chance" that they will bind like that, they just bind like that.
They have to be presented to each other first, and the mood has to be just right, and no guilt feelings afterwards.

Plus you have to have enough of them to last long enough to learn how to replicate themselves. That is a VERY LARGE requirement. You aren't talking a little pool of ooze where a quickie got life to going.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632209
Jun 22, 2013
 
LineDazzle wrote:
<quoted text>
I said I don't believe it's right for adults to act on their desires, as it would be sexual abuse(Though you said if it wasn't illegal you would sleep with teenage boys, why?), but the desires themselves are perfectly alright.
A teenage girl is still developed enough overall physically, and mentally for the matter(of course not maturity wise, no where near it, lol, just mentally developed enough to be lusted after by adults, IMO). Hovever, a girl below 13 is not.
Tell you what, walk into the nearest police station and inform them that you have sexual desires for underage girls and you think that it is perfectly ok. Be sure to tell them you'll never act on these desires.

Let us know how this works out for you, dumbass.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632210
Jun 22, 2013
 
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You're on the wagon, you say?
Very seldom get off it.

How about you?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632211
Jun 22, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Argument from ignorance fallacy.
Then provide the evidence.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632212
Jun 22, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
They have to be presented to each other first, and the mood has to be just right, and no guilt feelings afterwards.
Plus you have to have enough of them to last long enough to learn how to replicate themselves. That is a VERY LARGE requirement. You aren't talking a little pool of ooze where a quickie got life to going.
Your kind are the ones saying "a little pool of ooze."

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632213
Jun 22, 2013
 
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Your kind are the ones saying "a little pool of ooze."
Explain how those chemicals got dispersed and placed in the right places.

Start with the earth accreting and how those chemical came to be. Geological processes or whatever to produce and distribute in such a fortunate way. And how the change of seasons and orbital precession kept the thermal, radiation, and other environmental conditions within the proper range for this process to happen and be maintained.

No maybes or couldas. Those are beliefs, not facts.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632214
Jun 22, 2013
 
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Then provide the evidence.
The mass of the proton. Exactly perfect to provide both its own stability and that of the entire universe.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632215
Jun 22, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Explain how those chemicals got dispersed and placed in the right places.
Start with the earth accreting and how those chemical came to be. Geological processes or whatever to produce and distribute in such a fortunate way. And how the change of seasons and orbital precession kept the thermal, radiation, and other environmental conditions within the proper range for this process to happen and be maintained.
No maybes or couldas. Those are beliefs, not facts.

Not beliefs Dave, they are hypothesis based on the evidence.
All you have is a fairy tale.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632216
Jun 22, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Explain how those chemicals got dispersed and placed in the right places.
Start with the earth accreting and how those chemical came to be. Geological processes or whatever to produce and distribute in such a fortunate way. And how the change of seasons and orbital precession kept the thermal, radiation, and other environmental conditions within the proper range for this process to happen and be maintained.
No maybes or couldas. Those are beliefs, not facts.
The same way the planet itself formed, from the same sources.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632217
Jun 22, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
The mass of the proton. Exactly perfect to provide both its own stability and that of the entire universe.
Yeah, um, nope. Even if it was the only way a proton could be, that's not evidence of a god. I asked for evidence of a god, not another blind assertion.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632219
Jun 22, 2013
 
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Not beliefs Dave, they are hypothesis based on the evidence.
All you have is a fairy tale.
"A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis

It's a belief.

Let us know the results of your tests.

Remember, no hands.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632220
Jun 22, 2013
 
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
The same way the planet itself formed, from the same sources.
Some more good ol' Topix atheist version of goddidit.

Very impressive.

Tell us how amino acids are produced in stars. Or the other building blocks.

Or how they formed here on this planet.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632222
Jun 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, um, nope. Even if it was the only way a proton could be, that's not evidence of a god. I asked for evidence of a god, not another blind assertion.
You did not ask for evidence of a god, you asked for design in nature.

I provided that. Quit trying to move the goalposts.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632223
Jun 22, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Very seldom get off it.
How about you?
I usually have a cocktail, before dinner. Scotch on the rocks, or a Rob Roy.

Then a glass of wine, with dinner.

When I go out, my usual pre-dinner drink is a vodka martini, up, dry, with olives.

If lunching at a restaurant, I'll order a glass of rose, or sauvignon blanc, once in a while a beer (IPA).

When I am in another country, I may well adjust to the local custom (in Peru, for example, a pisco sour).

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632224
Jun 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Sharkey wrote:
Five years and counting.
Still no resolution, no god proved or disproved.
What HAS been proven, however, is our stubborn ability to argue ourselves into self-extinction.
All over a question that can never be answered.
And the argument STILL goes on.
The better question is:
DOES IT MATTER WHETHER THERE IS A GOD OR NOT?
DOES IT REALLY MATTER?
Does it matter so much to us that we are willing to kill our own entire species off for it?
If it does matter that much, why are we on such a mass murder-suicide mission - over gossip and bullsh!t?
How sad that our dogmas matter more to us than our future on this planet.
I weep for the homosapian species, with our unique ability to self-extinct over an issue created in our own minds.
Sad.
Hey, uh.... Sparky?

We ain't killing each other, we're just debating.

Chill out.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632225
Jun 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I usually have a cocktail, before dinner. Scotch on the rocks, or a Rob Roy.
Then a glass of wine, with dinner.
When I go out, my usual pre-dinner drink is a vodka martini, up, dry, with olives.
If lunching at a restaurant, I'll order a glass of rose, or sauvignon blanc, once in a while a beer (IPA).
When I am in another country, I may well adjust to the local custom (in Peru, for example, a pisco sour).
That's an interesting mix of booze.

I like beer, rum, tequila, whiskey & vodka. That's about it. But I'm a simpleton, remember? I have no use for your gay mixed drinks.

:o

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#632226
Jun 22, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
"A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis
It's a belief.
Let us know the results of your tests.
Remember, no hands.

It has been tested , and yielded positive results.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
lesbian sexting 10 min fucker5559076 7
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 12 min Anthony MN 537,286
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 13 min USA-1 117,866
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 38 min bad bob 172,991
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 50 min GodFreeByChoice 5,344
Last Word + 2 56 min Tender Mercies 423
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr BenAdam 599,569
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr Charlie Sheen 259,373

Search the Top Stories Forum:
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••