Prove there's a god.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631808 Jun 21, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Into a living body.
In order to make it a non-living body.
HA!

I predicted that...

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631809 Jun 21, 2013
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, you're completely brainwashed mind is incapable of grasping any irrefutable fact in contradiction to your Christian indoctrination, which is why you should be institutionalized immediately.
The undeniable truth is you're a stark raving mad insane lunatic making a complete ass of yourself on an international forum with your willful ignorance of science and inability to differentiate science from Christian pseudoscience bullshit.
ALL OF THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FULLY SUPPORTS ENTIRELY NATURAL ORIGINS FOR THE UNIVERSE AND LIFE ON EARTH WITHOUT ANY NEED FOR SUPERNATURAL INVOLVEMENT. THERE HAS NEVER EVER BEEN A SINGLE SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION IN SUPPORT OF DESIGN OR A DESIGNER.
Yes, but you didn't answer my question, not even close.

You're anger is visable from way over here.

Calm down, try again.

Is it rational to believe in something (there is no God) without ANY evidence at all and still call yourself rational?

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631810 Jun 21, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't worry, little boy. I don't want to take your cool toys away.
I just want some sensible regulation.
Maybe an IQ test. Because a lot of gun owners I know wouldn't make it into double digits.
Hey, I'm all for regulation. Check out thegun laws here in Cali. They are the strictest in the nation.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631811 Jun 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
OOPS.
No, lol I can see into the future...
It was supposed to be 2010, not 2101.
But it completely refutes your nonsense that most gunshots to people are fatal.
Where did I say most gun shots are fatal?

If I did, then I was wrong.

However, that does not refute the fact that the INTENTION of the shooters of those hit by non-fatal bullets didn't INTEND to KILL their victims.

At any rate, do you think it's just fine and dandy to shoot to wound and all the more if that wound results in permanent paralysis?

Ever hear of James Brady, RR?

Do you honestly think that John Hinkley did not intend to KILL him?

Do you honestly think that Mark Chapman made a "boo-boo" and only meant to INJURE John Lennon?

That more people are wounded by guns than killed by guns does not negate what the intent of the shooters is.

And I'm TIRED of this already!

And I've told you that a few time already!

So why do you keep posting to me to keep me in this topic of discussion when discussing it with you is FUTILE?

So don't think I'm ignoring you but any future posts of yours on this topic WILL go ignored by me.

E-N-O-U-G-H.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631812 Jun 21, 2013
OCB wrote:

A GUN can be used to kill; therefore it's design is to kill.
WRONG.
There, I fixed it for ya.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631813 Jun 21, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Sigh....Yes, RR- scientific theories ARE proven.
It's amazing how you obviously will never grasp the use of the word "theory" in the scientific community versus the use of the word "theory" by laymen.
Amazing as that is, it's sadder still.
Name one scientific theory that has been proven.

Go.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631814 Jun 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, but you didn't answer my question, not even close.
You're anger is visable from way over here.
Calm down, try again.
Is it rational to believe in something (there is no God) without ANY evidence at all and still call yourself rational?
Did I miss your response to my post to you in which I asked you:

Is it rational to believe in something (there is no Santa Claus) without ANY evidence at all and still call yourself rational?

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631815 Jun 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
***waits for one of your fellow atheists to coment on your need for violence***
***and waits...***
***and waits...***
***and waits...***
***and waits...***
***and waits...***
MythBuster simply stated what he thought bats were for- won't even mention it was an obvious joke.

However, it was YOU who brought up bats being used as weapons to begin with.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631818 Jun 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Name one scientific theory that has been proven.
Go.
Gravity.

Done.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631819 Jun 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Name one scientific theory that has been proven.
Go.
Again- because you don't even know what a scientific theory is:

"A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing.

If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step—known as a theory—in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon."

http://www.livescience.com/21491-what-is-a-sc...

“Listen to the sounds”

Since: Feb 09

of your own extinction......

#631820 Jun 21, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> This sounds much like the fine tuning argument, that the physical laws seem arranged so that life could happen.
It would seem to you in this niche that the universe was fine tuned because you are alive and it seems the universe was designed for you to live in.
But reality shows us it is not the case, the niche life dwells in is very small, and if the universe was designed for life, why did it take 13.7 billion years for us to evolve into it?
It more likely seems and appears life adapted to the conditions it could survive in. Also we are arrogant in assuming life has to be like us, when it maybe possible life elsewhere could be completely different requiring completely different conditions.
The fact that there are physical laws is not surprising, it would not have to come as a design. It is understood as forces moved away from a ground state they would balance and try to trickle back down to it's ground state. That would cause and ordered state to happen. Gravity would be evidence of the universe trying to return to it's ground state. Quantum mechanics predicts infinite universes all with different physical laws and different ground states.
I did not say that the universe was made with us in mind. The universe is fascinating and brilliant without life. Life is just a cherry on the top. It would be even more fascinating to find multiverses, with different systems of law. That would be a tremendous lesson on how we have underestimated God once again.

The thing is, you talk as if its all so simple, but its not simple. It's simple when you uncover the answer. In fact, it's not only simple, it is at times seemingly obvious, but that's when you observed and got the answer.

And in any case, much of what you claim is a "could have" and "maybe", probably from Krauss's book, "A Universe from Nothing", which is filled with re-definitions and conjecture. And this is what happens when one tarnishes science with agendas. Krauss had in his mind that there is no god, and so pursued a specific answer of how to create a universe from nothing. And what did he end up with? Having to re-define nothing and propose numerous "could be"s and then wrap it up with a bow as allegedly a scientific explanation on how the universe began. It is a propaganda book fit only for a bookshop, not an academic library as science.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631822 Jun 21, 2013
LineDazzle wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Why do you disagree that Riverside Redneck is effeminate?
2. Effeminate people are freaks of nature, admitting he is effeminate will put the evil Riverside Redneck to shame, and help make him feel more self conscious, and cause him to commit suicide out of emotional damage from knowing how worthless he is and him being smashed on topix!
3. Why does it matter what it means to you? Riverside Redneck cares what others think of him, so whether or not you care what you think of him, he does!
If ANYONE fits the definition of a freak of nature, it is YOU, you freak.

(And Nano).

Anyway, take up your obsession with RR with RR himself.

Not really interested in your mindless drivel and palaver.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631823 Jun 21, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>
1. I don't agree with you that RR is effeminate.
2. Even if I did agree with you and even if he was, so the F*CK what- what's it to YOU?
3. What you want and/or what you want me to admit to means less to me than NOTHING.
It's about 8PM where you are- just have another drink or as many as it takes until you pass out.
Nightie night!
Ya, really. What's it to him.

I know I'm a guy, but I'm a lot too old for his tastes....

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631825 Jun 21, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Where did I say most gun shots are fatal?
If I did, then I was wrong.
However, that does not refute the fact that the INTENTION of the shooters of those hit by non-fatal bullets didn't INTEND to KILL their victims.
At any rate, do you think it's just fine and dandy to shoot to wound and all the more if that wound results in permanent paralysis?
Ever hear of James Brady, RR?
Do you honestly think that John Hinkley did not intend to KILL him?
Do you honestly think that Mark Chapman made a "boo-boo" and only meant to INJURE John Lennon?
That more people are wounded by guns than killed by guns does not negate what the intent of the shooters is.
And I'm TIRED of this already!
And I've told you that a few time already!
So why do you keep posting to me to keep me in this topic of discussion when discussing it with you is FUTILE?
So don't think I'm ignoring you but any future posts of yours on this topic WILL go ignored by me.
E-N-O-U-G-H.
So is THIS your last post about guns?

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#631826 Jun 21, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Gravity.
Done.
Wrong, dearie.

Why you have dark matter, dark energy, and no grand unified theory.

The numbers don't crunch.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631828 Jun 21, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Did I miss your response to my post to you in which I asked you:
Is it rational to believe in something (there is no Santa Claus) without ANY evidence at all and still call yourself rational?
Not something as irrational as Santa, no.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631829 Jun 21, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>MythBuster simply stated what he thought bats were for- won't even mention it was an obvious joke.
However, it was YOU who brought up bats being used as weapons to begin with.
Right, right, right....

But when I make a gun joke, it's "Christian violence this" and "Christian violence that".

But when an atheist makes a violent joke, it's eerily ignored.

Hypocrites.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631830 Jun 21, 2013
LineDazzle wrote:
But you also said you currently right now are a construction worker.
No, I didn't.
What are you Building?
Currently, I'm remodeling my bathroom - almost done, finishing up crown molding in our office, fixed a drywall crack in my bedroom wall - gettin ready for paint, just installed all new windows and a sliding glass door, poured a small slab of conrete on the sid of the house and prepping for another one, installed sprinklers in the backyard, fixed the carpet shampooer...

Oh, and I've taken three shits today.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631831 Jun 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Ya, really. What's it to him.
I know I'm a guy, but I'm a lot too old for his tastes....
LineLOONY is certifiable.

Just the kind of person who is just an ordinary citizen who is able to hide their mental illness from the public at large but who may very well be a walking time bomb.

Get my drift, RR?

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631832 Jun 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Not something as irrational as Santa, no.
And who are you to say that a belief in a god or specifically, a belief in the bible god isn't irrational??

Frankly, I don't find a belief in Santa to be any more irrational than a belief in the god of the bible.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What is the most forbidden sex you have had ? (Nov '16) 1 min UMORONRACEMAKEWOR... 9
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 2 min River Tam 26,075
Why it's time for Donald Trump to RESIGN...in d... 24 min UMORONRACEMAKEWOR... 27
David Duke: "We're going to take our country ba... 37 min UMORONRACEMAKEWOR... 50
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr RCCprophesied Har... 685,696
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 3 hr Jake999 6,447
Liberal Democrats Murdered Jesus 5 hr big oil 3
More from around the web