Prove there's a god.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631569 Jun 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I no need your liberal advise, counselor.
The word is "advice".

And how "cute" your "I no need" is, RR- not.

“Seventh son”

Since: Dec 10

Will Prevail

#631570 Jun 21, 2013
True Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
What makes you put nature above God? If God exists, then God would have created nature. The laws of nature would've come from God, not God having to follow the laws of nature.
Nothing we have observed in nature is beyond the physical laws that govern it. If god created nature then either he excluded himself
from entering it, or does not enter it. Either way there is no god in our reality.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631571 Jun 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Simple.
Demonstrate proof that I don't believe in Jesus, as you claim.
Why should anyone else demonstrate the proof that you so LIBERALLY provide here yourself?

You might believe in Jesus but you sure don't follow the teachings of the Jesus you believe in on this thread and so there is no reason to think you do so in "real" life.

Add to that how you so try to twist the words of your Jesus in order to get away with your bad behavior.

A little kid who believes in SANTA CLAUS knows how to behave in order to be in Santa's good graces; you do not demonstrate that YOU know how to behave in order to be in your Jesus' good graces.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631572 Jun 21, 2013
Post #631569- "good" to know there is at least one illiterate moron here who doesn't know the difference between the words "advise" and "advice" since that person disagreed with me.

Pathetic.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#631573 Jun 21, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing we have observed in nature is beyond the physical laws that govern it. If god created nature then either he excluded himself
from entering it, or does not enter it. Either way there is no god in our reality.
Cl, cl, cl, cl

That’s a one handed applause while I type this with the other hand

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631574 Jun 21, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
At school reading was a nightmare until about age 14, by which time it was too late to appreciate old dialects, I had enough difficulty with the one everyone wrote.
I know there are quite a few Shakespeare quotes in everyday language, I simply don’t (I have no reason to) use them. But don’t get me wrong, although I would personally not buy the tickets I’ll sit and watch a Shakespeare play no problem, been down to Stratford to see the RSC a couple of times.
Recently watched the RSC/BBC Hamlet production, was very good, but when I tried reading it (something I usually do to get a proper perspective of the film) I found it hard going.
Oh yeah- reading Shakespeare can indeed be difficult, but I've always found it interesting to "translate" the more difficult passages into modern day English.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631575 Jun 21, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
The history of the gun explains precisely what a gun is designed for.
Ignore history at your peril, all you get I appellation of being ignorant.
However lets look as some dictionary definitions shall we:-
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/gun
1 - A weapon consisting of a metal tube from which a projectile is fired at high velocity into a relatively flat trajectory.
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/engl...
1- a weapon incorporating a metal tube from which bullets, shells, or other missiles are propelled by explosive force, typically making a characteristic loud, sharp noise.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gun
a : a piece of ordnance usually with high muzzle velocity and comparatively flat trajectory
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gun
1. a weapon consisting of a metal tube, with mechanical attachments, from which projectiles are shot by the force of an explosive; a piece of ordnance.
http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary...
1 a weapon that shoots bullets, for example a pistol or a rifle. You load a gun with ammunition and pull the trigger to use it
http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/e... ?
1 a. a weapon with a metallic tube or barrel from which a missile is discharged, usually by force of an explosion. It may be portable or mounted. In a military context the term applies specifically to a flat-trajectory artillery piece
NOTE THE WORD WEAPON in all but one dictionary definition and in the one that did not use the word weapon it used the word ORDNANCE
So now we look at the meaning of the word weapon
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/weapon
1 any instrument or device for use in attack or defense in combat, fighting, or war, as a sword, rifle, or cannon.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wea...
1: something (as a club, knife, or gun) used to injure, defeat, or destroy
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/engl...
a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage:
OK, Point made
But keep on wriggling if it makes you more comfortable
Neither, then what?, put you money where your mouth is and supply specific model numbers.
Your rules? What? Lies in the name of god, obfuscation, deception? Are you completely off your rocker? Tell me if I am following your rules then why the fook are you hurting so much and so desperate to get rid of me?
You want to post on topic to topix TOCs, that is part of the contract you signed up to when you registered your avatar. You don’t like topix TOCs then you choice is simple, butt out and go and play with yourself somewhere more convivila to your4 mindset, North Korea comes to mind.
Anyone who won't admit as to what the purpose of guns is has no business owning them.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#631576 Jun 21, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>The word is "advice".
And how "cute" your "I no need" is, RR- not.
Is RR dyslexic too? wow I never would have guess the way he rants on and on about my spelling and grammatical errors.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#631577 Jun 21, 2013
True Truth wrote:
<quoted text>What makes you put God on one side, and nature on the other?
Nature is testable.

And real.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#631578 Jun 21, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Is RR dyslexic too? wow I never would have guess the way he rants on and on about my spelling and grammatical errors.
No- I don't think he's dyslexic- just poorly educated is all. And that's a LOT.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631579 Jun 21, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Then where are the following requirements for a theory:
1. Evidence suggesting it.
2. Tests confirming the evidence is not fraudulent.
3. Demonstrable methods, mechanisms, and beneficial formulas.
4. Beneficial understanding of how the universe works.
1. There IS evidence suggesting ID.

2. There is no test for the Big Bang, but you agree with it.

3. There is no demonstrable evidence that life began spontaneously, but you believe it did.

4. Beneficial (or non-beneficial) understanding of the universe is not needed to conduct a theory.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631580 Jun 21, 2013
saidI wrote:
RiversideRedneck Wrote:
<quoted text>
"The tree of life on Earth, is one of stunning diversity: 9,000 species of birds, 350,000 kinds of beetles, 28,000 types of fish; 2,000,000 living species and counting. And we are just one of them."
Yup. And it all happened by chance, luck & pure coincidence.
Question:(I don't expect an answer)
How did all that life happen to come to be?
You have been answered on here about the above, many times by many people.
I have notice how your English has improved, since I first started reading you. You may not believe anything the Atheist say but they have improved your vocabulary.
Bullshit.

No on has answered this question:

How did all that life happen to come to be?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#631581 Jun 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
1. There IS evidence suggesting ID.
....
Where? So far all you have done is posted rubbish about evolution. You have presented no evidence for creationism.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631582 Jun 21, 2013
ChristineM wrote:

The history of the gun explains precisely what a gun is designed for.
Ignore history at your peril, all you get I appellation of being ignorant.
However lets look as some dictionary definitions shall we:-
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/gun
1 - A weapon consisting of a metal tube from which a projectile is fired at high velocity into a relatively flat trajectory.
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/engl...
1- a weapon incorporating a metal tube from which bullets, shells, or other missiles are propelled by explosive force, typically making a characteristic loud, sharp noise.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gun
a : a piece of ordnance usually with high muzzle velocity and comparatively flat trajectory
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gun
1. a weapon consisting of a metal tube, with mechanical attachments, from which projectiles are shot by the force of an explosive; a piece of ordnance.
http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary...
1 a weapon that shoots bullets, for example a pistol or a rifle. You load a gun with ammunition and pull the trigger to use it
http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/e... ?
1 a. a weapon with a metallic tube or barrel from which a missile is discharged, usually by force of an explosion. It may be portable or mounted. In a military context the term applies specifically to a flat-trajectory artillery piece
Yup. Notice that NOT ONE of those definitions is "to kill".

You've been wrong all along.

Thank you :)

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631583 Jun 21, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Chaos is supreme.
The fall of raindrops is chaotic, the drip of a tap, the formation of leaves, patterns of natural camouflage, weather, air movement are all chaotic. You live surrounded by chaos. Chaos theory is used to calculate aircraft aerodynamics, bank interest rates and governmental strategy. The orbit of path of planets, solar systems and galaxies is defined by chaos theory and although predictable for thousands of years (provided no chaotic intervention) are in fact born of chaos and operate in a chaotic manner.
The problem here is your deliberate misunderstanding of the meaning of chaos.
No, it's you that misunderstands.

Chaos is complete disorder and confusion.

Rain drops, formation of leaves, weather, etc are not chaotic in any way. They are predictable and measurable.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631584 Jun 21, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Cosmological joke
One day the universe just disappeared, all the atoms gone
No matter.
Science is not so precise, it is unknown what was before the universe. The fact that godbots claim that you can’t have something from nothing is in fact not a scientific principal that makes any sense in that time period.
The laws that govern this universe (including the laws of causality) did not exist or even start to resolve until at least 10^-34th of a second after this universe came into existence. It is not even known whether time existed prior to that point.
That is not to say nothing or everything existed, that is saying that science and hence everyone else alive on this ball of rock does not know.
However there are at least 27 theories doing the rounds as to what, if anything existed before this universe. In scientific circles there is no theory that makes any claim for a god doing it
HA HA HA!!!!

"The laws that govern this universe did not exist or even start to resolve until at least 10^-34th of a second after this universe came into existence"

Pfft.....

Provide evidence for that humongous guess.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631585 Jun 21, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Why should anyone else demonstrate the proof that you so LIBERALLY provide here yourself?
You might believe in Jesus but you sure don't follow the teachings of the Jesus you believe in on this thread and so there is no reason to think you do so in "real" life.
Add to that how you so try to twist the words of your Jesus in order to get away with your bad behavior.
A little kid who believes in SANTA CLAUS knows how to behave in order to be in Santa's good graces; you do not demonstrate that YOU know how to behave in order to be in your Jesus' good graces.
So.....

You can't answer, either?

Got it.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631586 Jun 21, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Anyone who won't admit as to what the purpose of guns is has no business owning them.
Not one of those definitions described a gun's design is "to kill".

You're both wrong.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#631587 Jun 21, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Where? So far all you have done is posted rubbish about evolution. You have presented no evidence for creationism.
You said evidence "suggesting" it.

There's plenty.

"The laws of the universe are complex because they are highly unlikely. Cosmologists have calculated the odds of a life-friendly universe appearing by chance are less than one part in 1010^123. That’s ten raised to a power of 10 with 123 zeros after it!"

http://www.discovery.org/a/9761

(You won't read it)

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#631588 Jun 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Yup. Notice that NOT ONE of those definitions is "to kill".
You've been wrong all along.
Thank you :)
WEAPON

W – E – A – P – O - N

Why have you IGNORED the definition or weapon?

Is it because you under the assumption that a weapon is designed for making life all fluffy and pink and godlike?

Or is it because it shows you to be a sad, belligerent, incredulous and narrow minded moron?

But of course, in the same way that not one of those definitions says they are designed for shooting pesky tin cans and cardboard boxes – right?

You do not have the mental stability to be left in charge of a loaded weapon

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 3 min MUQ2 44,670
Jesus and Muhammad were FRAUDS 4 min your god is a fraud 9
ye olde village pub (Jun '07) 5 min Ann Bonney 53,816
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 7 min It aint necessari... 48,448
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 17 min Rosesz 646,517
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr MUQ2 281,246
Prepare To Meet Thy God 2 hr The Truth Hurts 2
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 8 hr Toby 105,572
More from around the web