Ahh, what I posted was a link to a ladyboy named nano. A person who enjoys what he/she has made of themselves to the extent of spending a considerable amount of money to achieve their goal.<quoted text>
That porn Christine posted was not a woman, it was aside with implants and long hair.
Why aren't you bitching about the subjugation of men in the porn industry?
Why? Because you're a one-sided loon.
What intrigued me was the fact they he/she was called nano and I asked the question which the nano no mates we all know and loath for some reason has refused to answer
True that it is not natural, people are not (usually) born to develop such physicality, but consider this, guns are not natural, never seen a gun tree and christianity is not natural.
You could extend the point and say the same of the recording of all pornography because cameras are not natural, however sex and sexuality in whatever form the consenting adult wishes is natural.
Just because you dont like this particular aspect of not natural, because you dont like gays or lesbians or ladyboys of either gender does not mean a dammed thing.
Please tell us if you appreciate such implants in a woman or would you dismiss her with not a woman, it was aside with implants?