Prove there's a god.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#630571 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I will say you have issued more coherent statements than that last paragraph. On occasion.
There is a variable resistor feeding pin 34 on your emotion generator that could use a tad tweaking. Try turning the screw all the way in.
Oh sorry you are too stupid to comprehend. Lets try and explain it simply, you made a stupid davesworld sexist comment, I pointed out the irelevance of your stupidity. There does that help of should I break it down into words of fewer syllables?

If that’s how davesworld engineers fix things then I am so happy that I don’t live in davesworkd.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#630572 Jun 17, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh sorry you are too stupid to comprehend. Lets try and explain it simply, you made a stupid davesworld sexist comment, I pointed out the irelevance of your stupidity. There does that help of should I break it down into words of fewer syllables?
If that’s how davesworld engineers fix things then I am so happy that I don’t live in davesworkd.
Huh?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#630573 Jun 17, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahh right so it’s not enough for you when I cite cases where guns are used for the purpose they were designed so how about
http://www.pbs.org/opb/historydetectives/tech...
or
http://inventors.about.com/od/militaryhistory...
or
http://www.gunsandammo.info/guns/early-firear...
These are for the most part pro gun sites that catalogue the history of the design of guns, note that they indicate guns were designed originally and primarily as a weapon of war, i.e. for killing the opposition as quickly as possibe.
Guns were designed to kill, they were not designed for you to shoot cans off a wall and joke about threatening people.
Guns are still primarily designed as a weapon of war and enforcement, not for you to shoot cans of walls and joke about threatening people.
If you are so concerned that a gun is not designed to kill people then try paint balling or use an air gun for your macho and egotestical shooting der fook out of dose pesky tin cans.
You are also free to waste your time with more strawman BS, we are discussing guns, not knives or poison or strawberry panna cotta but guns. But if you want to go into the history of knives then feel free, I am quite willing to go right back to the Cro-Magnon use of flint knives as tools.
First of all, pbs.org & about.com are not "pro guns sites".

Second, "1364: First recorded use of a firearm - shooter lit wicks by hand that ingnited gunpowder that was loaded into the gun barrel."

That says nothing about it being designed to kill, as you suggest, but that it's designed to launch a projectile at high velocity on an intended trajectory, as I suggest.

"Guns save lives"
http://www.gunsandammo.info/blog/guns-save-li...

Get a clue, Christine. Just because you fear guns doesn't mean you get to redefine them to fit your fear.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#630574 Jun 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, pbs.org & about.com are not "pro guns sites".
Second, "1364: First recorded use of a firearm - shooter lit wicks by hand that ingnited gunpowder that was loaded into the gun barrel."
That says nothing about it being designed to kill, as you suggest, but that it's designed to launch a projectile at high velocity on an intended trajectory, as I suggest.
"Guns save lives"
http://www.gunsandammo.info/blog/guns-save-li...
Get a clue, Christine. Just because you fear guns doesn't mean you get to redefine them to fit your fear.
Her "scientific method" is what turned gunpowder from a plaything to guns that kill. Not one bit of religion involved.

Judged:

16

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#630575 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh?
Catcher here.

I don't know where Huh may be.

I'll try to find her for you.

I'm here to help.

Judged:

16

16

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#630576 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh?
Exactly, well done

Judged:

16

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#630577 Jun 17, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Catcher here.
I don't know where Huh may be.
I'll try to find her for you.
I'm here to help.
Thank you, you may be good for something.

Here, take this stick and and thrash around in those bushes over there. If you hear a snarl, it may be her. Don't move another inch.

Judged:

16

15

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#630578 Jun 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, pbs.org & about.com are not "pro guns sites".
Second, "1364: First recorded use of a firearm - shooter lit wicks by hand that ingnited gunpowder that was loaded into the gun barrel."
That says nothing about it being designed to kill, as you suggest, but that it's designed to launch a projectile at high velocity on an intended trajectory, as I suggest.
"Guns save lives"
http://www.gunsandammo.info/blog/guns-save-li...
Get a clue, Christine. Just because you fear guns doesn't mean you get to redefine them to fit your fear.
They are not? Wow, actually not gun sites but that does not make them anti gun. However whichever way you bend it, it does nothing for your argument. Designed as weapons…

Yes and? Gunpowder, barrel, aim, bang your dead… What is so difficult to understand? Just because that trajectory ended at a person during a war makes it all go away, right?

Why are you so ignorant, what is to fear? As has been EXPLAINED to you several times, I live in the UK, I am not scared of some egotestical godbot with a gun fetish who lives 6000 miles away.

Launching a projectile at high speed towards a person invariably KILLS them, this appears to be another concept you have no grasp of, no doubt why you are immature enough to go threatening people with your gun.

You seem unable to comment on paint balling and airguns to satisfy your gun lust, I really wonder what that is?

Judged:

16

16

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#630579 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Her "scientific method" is what turned gunpowder from a plaything to guns that kill. Not one bit of religion involved.
And? WTF are you rambling about? The disgussion is whether guns were designed to kill or not, The discussion was not davesworld godbots delusions

Judged:

16

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#630581 Jun 17, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
And? WTF are you rambling about? The disgussion is whether guns were designed to kill or not, The discussion was not davesworld godbots delusions
You bring religion into all your rants.

Guns were designed to kill by the science of humans.

Judged:

15

15

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#630582 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Her "scientific method" is what turned gunpowder from a plaything to guns that kill. Not one bit of religion involved.
Yup. Science made guns, not religion.

Judged:

15

15

8

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#630583 Jun 17, 2013
ChristineM wrote:

They are not? Wow, actually not gun sites but that does not make them anti gun. However whichever way you bend it, it does nothing for your argument. Designed as weapons…
I never said they were anti-gun sites, did I?

YOU claimed to post from 'pro gun sites', which about.com & pbs.com are not.
Yes and? Gunpowder, barrel, aim, bang your dead… What is so difficult to understand?


Bang, who's dead?

Why are you do obsessed with killing and violence? Just shoot your gun at a cardboard target and watch it die.
Just because that trajectory ended at a person during a war makes it all go away, right?
No, that just means a person used a tool to kill another person, not that the tool is designed for killing.

You think the Wright brothers designed the plane to kill?

No?

But planes kill, you'd say.
Why are you so ignorant, what is to fear? As has been EXPLAINED to you several times, I live in the UK, I am not scared of some egotestical godbot with a gun fetish who lives 6000 miles away.
I'm not implying that you're scared of me, I didn't say that.

I said you're scared of guns(which could be 60 meters away from you...)
Launching a projectile at high speed towards a person invariably KILLS them,
Really? "invariably KILLS them"?!

LMAO! You've never heard of a gunshot wound that didn't end in death?

You're obsessed with death.
this appears to be another concept you have no grasp of,
Ya because its a bullshit lie.

You're claiming that every person that gets shot with a gun dies, when in fact there are MANY more people that get shot that don't die.
no doubt why you are immature enough to go threatening people with your gun.
You seem unable to comment on paint balling and airguns to satisfy your gun lust, I really wonder what that is?
Because I don't care to, but since you're so curious, I've owned several paintball guns and have gone on many a paintball gun range to play. You should try it, it's super fun.

Judged:

14

14

7

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#630584 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
You bring religion into all your rants.
Guns were designed to kill by the science of humans.
Sorry it was YOU who brought in religion, because you are incapable of rational conversation perhaps means that you should butt out of real life and simply stay in the realm of davesworld make believe.

Thank you, exactly what I have told RR for the last week so now all you have to do is try explaining that wonderfully insightful statement to severely hard of thinking RR

Judged:

14

13

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#630585 Jun 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said they were anti-gun sites, did I?
YOU claimed to post from 'pro gun sites', which about.com & pbs.com are not.
<quoted text>
Bang, who's dead?
Why are you do obsessed with killing and violence? Just shoot your gun at a cardboard target and watch it die.
<quoted text>
No, that just means a person used a tool to kill another person, not that the tool is designed for killing.
You think the Wright brothers designed the plane to kill?
No?
But planes kill, you'd say.
<quoted text>
I'm not implying that you're scared of me, I didn't say that.
I said you're scared of guns(which could be 60 meters away from you...)
<quoted text>
Really? "invariably KILLS them"?!
LMAO! You've never heard of a gunshot wound that didn't end in death?
You're obsessed with death.
<quoted text>
Ya because its a bullshit lie.
You're claiming that every person that gets shot with a gun dies, when in fact there are MANY more people that get shot that don't die.
<quoted text>
Because I don't care to, but since you're so curious, I've owned several paintball guns and have gone on many a paintball gun range to play. You should try it, it's super fun.
No you said they were not pro gun sites. However guns and ammo is, and the other two are neutral, i.e. not anti gun sites

Honey it was not me who threatened anyone with a gun, THAT WAS YOU

What do you think would happen if your child was sitting peacefully contemplating the world behind your cardboard target?

WAR, designed for WAR, the WAR of KILLING the opposition. Why is this concept so difficult for you to grasp? Is it because you like you gun and are not willing to admit to it’s history because that would give you a reason not to like your gun?

Why do you keep bringing up strawmen arguments? This is a symptom of the fact that you have nothing. Planes were designed to fly, washing machines were designed to wash, guns were designed to kill.

Of course we have already had the discussion of your empty threats but that of course does not stop you making stupid and ignorant statements about my feelings. But the thing is, the BIG thing is that they are not 60 metres away from me and therefore I could not give a toss. It does not really matter that you are scared of guns because any nut job you meet in the street may be armed

That by dear little stupid prat is why I said invariably, try looking up the word before you go into gloating meltdown

Nope, why would you suggest I am claiming that, Of course not everyone who is shot dies? But enough do to make the manufacture of guns worthwhile

is it because you are floundering and have to make up BS, you really are pathetic

We know you don’t care as evidenced by you immature attitude to guns, I have tried it, several times. You see your screwed /distorted opinion based on guesswork is just that. screwed and distorted opinion

Judged:

14

13

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#630586 Jun 17, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
No you said they were not pro gun sites. However guns and ammo is, and the other two are neutral, i.e. not anti gun sites
Honey it was not me who threatened anyone with a gun, THAT WAS YOU
What do you think would happen if your child was sitting peacefully contemplating the world behind your cardboard target?
WAR, designed for WAR, the WAR of KILLING the opposition. Why is this concept so difficult for you to grasp? Is it because you like you gun and are not willing to admit to it’s history because that would give you a reason not to like your gun?
Why do you keep bringing up strawmen arguments? This is a symptom of the fact that you have nothing. Planes were designed to fly, washing machines were designed to wash, guns were designed to kill.
Of course we have already had the discussion of your empty threats but that of course does not stop you making stupid and ignorant statements about my feelings. But the thing is, the BIG thing is that they are not 60 metres away from me and therefore I could not give a toss. It does not really matter that you are scared of guns because any nut job you meet in the street may be armed
That by dear little stupid prat is why I said invariably, try looking up the word before you go into gloating meltdown
Nope, why would you suggest I am claiming that, Of course not everyone who is shot dies? But enough do to make the manufacture of guns worthwhile
is it because you are floundering and have to make up BS, you really are pathetic
We know you don’t care as evidenced by you immature attitude to guns, I have tried it, several times. You see your screwed /distorted opinion based on guesswork is just that. screwed and distorted opinion
Gee, I think the real reason guns were invented was to protect people from those with emotions and passions like you have.

Judged:

14

14

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#630587 Jun 17, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
No you said they were not pro gun sites. However guns and ammo is, and the other two are neutral, i.e. not anti gun sites
Honey it was not me who threatened anyone with a gun, THAT WAS YOU
What do you think would happen if your child was sitting peacefully contemplating the world behind your cardboard target?
WAR, designed for WAR, the WAR of KILLING the opposition. Why is this concept so difficult for you to grasp? Is it because you like you gun and are not willing to admit to it’s history because that would give you a reason not to like your gun?
Why do you keep bringing up strawmen arguments? This is a symptom of the fact that you have nothing. Planes were designed to fly, washing machines were designed to wash, guns were designed to kill.
Of course we have already had the discussion of your empty threats but that of course does not stop you making stupid and ignorant statements about my feelings. But the thing is, the BIG thing is that they are not 60 metres away from me and therefore I could not give a toss. It does not really matter that you are scared of guns because any nut job you meet in the street may be armed
That by dear little stupid prat is why I said invariably, try looking up the word before you go into gloating meltdown
Nope, why would you suggest I am claiming that, Of course not everyone who is shot dies? But enough do to make the manufacture of guns worthwhile
is it because you are floundering and have to make up BS, you really are pathetic
We know you don’t care as evidenced by you immature attitude to guns, I have tried it, several times. You see your screwed /distorted opinion based on guesswork is just that. screwed and distorted opinion
A site that isn't pro-gun doesn't automatically become anti-gun. First you claimed to have linked to pro-gun sites, now you're claiming they are neutral...

Why the hell would my kid dot behind the cardboard target I'm shoring at?! You're obsessed with death.

Oooohhhhh..... So you've moved the goalposts yet again. First you say that guns are designed to kill, NOW you're saying they are designed for war and killing. Make up your damn mind.

I don't need to look up invariably, I know what it means; every occasion, every case, always. You're claiming that when a person gets shot, they invariably(ALWAYS) die. You're 100% wrong.

A gun is designed to launch a projectile at high velocity on an intended trajectory. Period.

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#630589 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee, I think the real reason guns were invented was to protect people from those with emotions and passions like you have.
Dreaming in davesworld again.

Or are you threatening me, RR has tried that tack and failed, just as you fail. Pathetically

Judged:

14

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#630590 Jun 17, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Dreaming in davesworld again.
Or are you threatening me, RR has tried that tack and failed, just as you fail. Pathetically
Liar. I never threatened you.

You're just a humorless shit.

Judged:

14

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#630592 Jun 17, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Dreaming in davesworld again.
Or are you threatening me, RR has tried that tack and failed, just as you fail. Pathetically
Sigh...

My love, you are missing one particular understanding or perspective in your personalized application of your beloved E=mc2.

From your perspective of this transfer of that energy you see yourself as a strong woman no one is going to fool or walk on again, and you summon up all your intellectual capability to achieve that goal of setting them straight. Because of this focus of your tremendous energies you therefore miss the perspectives of others. Those that are the focus of your energy beams see you as a fire breathing dragon, while those on the side looking on see you as a raving lunatic.

But I am sure you are sweet and affectionate to those that agree with you totally.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#630593 Jun 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
A site that isn't pro-gun doesn't automatically become anti-gun. First you claimed to have linked to pro-gun sites, now you're claiming they are neutral...
Why the hell would my kid dot behind the cardboard target I'm shoring at?! You're obsessed with death.
Oooohhhhh..... So you've moved the goalposts yet again. First you say that guns are designed to kill, NOW you're saying they are designed for war and killing. Make up your damn mind.
I don't need to look up invariably, I know what it means; every occasion, every case, always. You're claiming that when a person gets shot, they invariably(ALWAYS) die. You're 100% wrong.
A gun is designed to launch a projectile at high velocity on an intended trajectory. Period.
Nope I claimed to have linked to “for the most part pro gun sites” so stop your pathetic lying.

Nope, I am making a logical conclusion based on the ability of children to get into places they are not supposed to get. Don’t pretend it does not happen just because you like your gun, try googling “child shot by accident”.

No matter how you attempt to obfuscate (look it up), I have said that war was the driving force for gun invention, for the most part guns were designed to kill in war. I have repeatedly mentioned who the majority of guns were designed for, i.e. the military and police. So are you saying that guns designed for the military are designed to shoot at cardboard targets? Or is it that you have nothing to argue with?

Ahh nope I was using invariably to mean, regularly, customarily as shown in my thesaurus but I see you are absolutely correct. I apologise for the confusion caused by my choice of word.

No period involved, if that trajectory ends in a human target as it’s designed for then it can kill

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 6 min WasteWater 272,064
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 9 min WasteWater 6,116
The Christian Atheist debate 11 min Lbj 782
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 13 min WasteWater 5,817
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 21 min WasteWater 595,968
dirty gay skype 27 min hrny46 1
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 33 min RiccardoFire 40,689
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 41 min RiccardoFire 100,732
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 57 min Legendary Karma 444,172
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 hr Qu_innocence 612,600
More from around the web