Prove there's a god.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#630602 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Not a one of them gets delivered online unless they are digital files. All others are ordered, and then all the cars, trucks, maybe bicycles, and airplanes are set into motion.
Here is the difference between going to the store and having it delivered. The store is a warehouse that takes a lot less transportation to get it from the factory to the end user. Ordering online adds layers to the system.
Okay, so the only time you ever read anything literal is when you want to try to be funny. Yeah, fail on your part.

You order them online, they get delivered via FedEx, UPS, or USPS (in the US).

There, specific enough for your miniscule mind?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#630603 Jun 17, 2013
ChristineM wrote:

Nope I claimed to have linked to “for the most part pro gun sites” so stop your pathetic lying.
Well since about.com and pbs.org are neither pro-gun, anti-gun or neutral-gun sites it seem as though YOU are the one lying.
Nope, I am making a logical conclusion based on the ability of children to get into places they are not supposed to get. Don’t pretend it does not happen just because you like your gun, try googling “child shot by accident”.
That's a stretch. See of you can find a child that was killed by a gun because they got behind the cardboard target while someone else was shooting.

Good luck!
No matter how you attempt to obfuscate (look it up), I have said that war was the driving force for gun invention, for the most part guns were designed to kill in war. I have repeatedly mentioned who the majority of guns were designed for, i.e. the military and police. So are you saying that guns designed for the military are designed to shoot at cardboard targets? Or is it that you have nothing to argue with?
No. I'm saying the same thing I've said all along, that guns are designed to launch a projectile at high velocity on an intended trajectory.
Ahh nope I was using invariably to mean, regularly, customarily as shown in my thesaurus but I see you are absolutely correct. I apologise for the confusion caused by my choice of word.
Then it's you that needs to "look it up".

Invariably:
adj.
Not changing or subject to change; constant.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/dict.aspx...

So no, a person that gets shot does NOT invariably die.
No period involved, if that trajectory ends in a human target as it’s designed for then it can kill
Sure it can, but do can a spoon.

So then by your version of logic, whatever can be used to kill is designed to kill...

Ugh

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#630604 Jun 17, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, so the only time you ever read anything literal is when you want to try to be funny. Yeah, fail on your part.
You order them online, they get delivered via FedEx, UPS, or USPS (in the US).
There, specific enough for your miniscule mind?
Track your packages and see how many hops they make. Those are made by planes, semis, and various delivery vehicles. They are also usually sorted and routed by automation, which can require quite a bit of energy expenditure.

That is a great system for manufacturers and distributors of many products. Keeps their inventory, and thus taxes, down, and lessens risks of overproduction, and thus selling at a lot less profit margin. However, all products go the same route in general, thus your per item cost will be higher than the bulk rates you get through something like a WalMart distribution system.

Those delivery services follow schedules, product or no product. Store distributors do it on an as needed basis to maintain stock, and the total cost, and wear and tear on roads, and fuel consumption will be less overall.

The biggest difference is who drives to pick it up. You drive to the store when you need it, and you can pick up several other items on the same trip. Those services have a vehicle on the road on a route you may be on that day or not.

That lipstick you ordered online costs more to deliver than at Walmart. Any price difference is the savings from the aforementioned reduced inventory, and middleman costs. Those online companies drop ship items oftentimes from the manufacturer or first level distributor.

You live in a city where the population and thus distribution via services like that can be more economical and less traffic generating. Suburbs and rural are a different ball game.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#630605 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
The failure is in you to understand them.
Every single human being is born with the need and desire to bond with other life, be it human or pet.
Energy transfer. That is what happens when a switch is thrown.
Even dim bulbs extinguish when there is nothing to fire them up.
So you would say the same about priests, nuns and monks, right?

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#630606 Jun 17, 2013
Oooh!!

10 judgits negative for me, and 10 positive for KK.

Interesting. We have 10 all of the exact same mind. or we have one with lots of multiple accounts.

Interesting.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#630607 Jun 17, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes you have and you have even apologised for it you lying toad, you have also claimed it was a joke
Just because it was a couple of weeks ago does not make it go away.
Sorry if my humour does not run to getting off when you claim you put people in your sights and then complain that your sights were out of alignment. Nope not even remotely funny as has been indicated by the majority of posters who have commented on your sad attempt at christian humour.
You are just a violent christian
I didn't claim it was a joke, I explained that it was a joke.

A joke to which you didn't take as bring funny, but insulting. That's why I apologized.

I did not apologize for threatening you because I did not threaten you.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#630608 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
Oooh!!
10 judgits negative for me, and 10 positive for KK.
Interesting. We have 10 all of the exact same mind. or we have one with lots of multiple accounts.
Interesting.
Or else and the most likely scenario is that it's a Topix glitch.

Multiple accounts used from the same computer won't result in one person being able to judge a post more than once if the multiple accounts are linked to a single ISP address.

It's happened before- many judgits for just one post. I wouldn't read too much into it if I were you.

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#630609 Jun 17, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Or else and the most likely scenario is that it's a Topix glitch.
Multiple accounts used from the same computer won't result in one person being able to judge a post more than once if the multiple accounts are linked to a single ISP address.
It's happened before- many judgits for just one post. I wouldn't read too much into it if I were you.
I'm not so sure about that. I believe they work off cookies, which are a per account basis. You can post as several different accounts from one, or two, computers. Add in virtualization and you can get some interesting posts.

But perhaps you know that.

You were saying that is just the janitor behind that curtain?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#630610 Jun 17, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Or else and the most likely scenario is that it's a Topix glitch.
Multiple accounts used from the same computer won't result in one person being able to judge a post more than once if the multiple accounts are linked to a single ISP address.
It's happened before- many judgits for just one post. I wouldn't read too much into it if I were you.
I don't even bother with those stupid things. I think people like to feel like they're part of something, like "liking" something on YouTube or the book face.

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#630611 Jun 17, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>So you would say the same about priests, nuns and monks, right?
I believe they are classified as humans by science.

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#630612 Jun 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't even bother with those stupid things. I think people like to feel like they're part of something, like "liking" something on YouTube or the book face.
Kinda cute. You can watch the numbers grow as we post. Someone must be very busy switching screens.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#630613 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe they are classified as humans by science.
Such sophomoric attempts at wit and sarcasm, Dave.

Actually, my question to you: So you would say the same about priests, nuns and monks, right?

That question was actually in response to the following exchange:

KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, I don't believe in marriage ... or dating for that matter.

You responded with your post #630468:

"Then you will wither away. Conservation of mass and energy.

Your thought processes will deteriorate due to lack of input and the accompanying processing of it. Your central processor loses purpose.

An injured beast crawling into a hole to die."

So to repeat my question, then you would say the same about priests, nuns and monks, right?

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#630614 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not so sure about that. I believe they work off cookies, which are a per account basis. You can post as several different accounts from one, or two, computers. Add in virtualization and you can get some interesting posts.
But perhaps you know that.
You were saying that is just the janitor behind that curtain?
WhatEVER, Dave.

If you wanna think that someone is sitting with 10 computers in front of them going from machine to machine to judge posts as many times as possible, enjoy such a fruitless waste of energy and what is such silly speculation.

And no....Topix works off ISP addresses anyway.
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

#630615 Jun 17, 2013
There is no cancer.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#630616 Jun 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't even bother with those stupid things. I think people like to feel like they're part of something, like "liking" something on YouTube or the book face.
You're right and I'm with you on this one......

And at least on Facebook, if you like a post, your name appears in the list.

To anonymously judge posts when no one really knows for an absolute fact who is doing the judging is a waste of time.

However, I DO notice that MANY posts are judged NOT based on WHAT is posted but instead based on WHO is doing the posting.

Whatever- it's like high school and is just plain silly.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#630617 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Kinda cute. You can watch the numbers grow as we post. Someone must be very busy switching screens.
Right. This is how you allow your imagination to take flights of fancy in addition to the other ways you do- by imagining someone sitting with TEN computers all lined up or else frantically running from one machine to another to judge posts.

Possible? No doubt. Probable? Highly doubtful.

Judged:

16

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#630618 Jun 17, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Kinda cute. You can watch the numbers grow as we post. Someone must be very busy switching screens.
I'm on an iPhone, I can't even see them.

Judged:

16

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#630619 Jun 17, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>You're right and I'm with you on this one......
And at least on Facebook, if you like a post, your name appears in the list.
To anonymously judge posts when no one really knows for an absolute fact who is doing the judging is a waste of time.
However, I DO notice that MANY posts are judged NOT based on WHAT is posted but instead based on WHO is doing the posting.
Whatever- it's like high school and is just plain silly.
Totally. I agree.

Judged:

16

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#630620 Jun 17, 2013
Forum wrote:
There is no cancer.
There is no spoon.

Judged:

15

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#630621 Jun 17, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Such sophomoric attempts at wit and sarcasm, Dave.
Actually, my question to you: So you would say the same about priests, nuns and monks, right?
That question was actually in response to the following exchange:
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, I don't believe in marriage ... or dating for that matter.
You responded with your post #630468:
"Then you will wither away. Conservation of mass and energy.
Your thought processes will deteriorate due to lack of input and the accompanying processing of it. Your central processor loses purpose.
An injured beast crawling into a hole to die."
So to repeat my question, then you would say the same about priests, nuns and monks, right?
I'm sorry, but you will have to be a bit more coherent and specific about the question you are asking than you think you are.

Judged:

20

20

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Reason to cringe: Female voters react to Trump 2 min MIDutch 314
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 min Pad 659,050
Donald Chump: "Not paying federal taxes makes m... 19 min eddy4294 6
Ladies...Fantasies (May '09) 22 min jane 2
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 24 min Toby 71,235
ladies is there such thing as too big? (Jun '13) 38 min jane 4
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 45 min RiccardoFire 45,632
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr Blink 283,057
Should Black People Forgive White People for Sl... (Jun '07) 4 hr gundee123 5,104
More from around the web