Prove there's a god.

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#627359 May 29, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for being so kind.
(There went another ten seconds...)
Plus the ten seconds you spent to read his post and perhaps re-read it as well but no matter-

RR, you are on Topix at LEAST 5 hours a day every single day.

OWN it. It's a FACT about you.

Go.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Huh

Arlington, TX

#627360 May 29, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
That IS your claim....
Yes, but you've proven my positive claim, hypocrite.
Huh

Arlington, TX

#627361 May 29, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Here goes 5 seconds...
That's what your wife said, which is why her new slogan is, "What can Brown do for me?"

Someone is driving into her Lincoln Tunnel while you steal time on Topix.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#627362 May 29, 2013
scambuster wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not? Why couldn't it take homo sapiens tens of thousands of years to invent writing? Picture drawing is a lot simpler than writing, and it's what children do before they're intellectually developed enough to start writing.
If it took them all that time to invent writing then what can we say about homo sapiens. OK let us assume it took them say 50 Thousand years to paint pictures and another say 45 thou to come to writing things down. I think we can safely assume homo sapiens were underachievers at best. If they had the ability to paint such graphic pictures along with the use of paint which would last 30 thousand years then why could they not write anything down? Nothing worth writing down for 95 thousand years? Not an earthquake or volcanic eruption to report to later generations? It is just as easy to speculate they were not around as long as the moderns would have us believe. Keep in mind there is zero ancient precedent for any of modern assumptions.

Judged:

11

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Mar 11

Melbourne, Australia

#627363 May 29, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> None of that proves anything. They even admit they had no written history. What did the aboriginals evolve from? What happened to them? Do the aboriginals have any tradition of evolving from ape like creatures which went extinct? Are they fully human? Sub human? You have not proved anything and will not prove anything with nothing more than speculation and a story and a bunch of facts mixed with modern myth.
At least you admit there is a "bunch of facts", regarding Aboriginals of Australia!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#627364 May 29, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>I guess lightbeam never heard that a picture speaks 1,000 words....
Actually i have.

http://www.amightywind.com/abortionf/abortion...

No crime here? Legal abortion and its fruits.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#627365 May 29, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually i have.
http://www.amightywind.com/abortionf/abortion...
No crime here? Legal abortion and its fruits.
Wow. Talk about a non sequitur.

1. We were talking about the origin of mankind and about proof of that prior to the written word.

2. Not interested in your doctored-up pics of abortion.

3. Not on this thread to discuss abortion.

4. There are at least two threads- and no doubt many more on Topix- about abortion.

5. You want to discuss abortion? Go to one of those threads.

In the MEANTIME, the detail, designs and images depicted on cave wall drawings were what were used to communicate prior to the invention of the written word.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#627366 May 29, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually i have.
http://www.amightywind.com/abortionf/abortion...
No crime here? Legal abortion and its fruits.
BTW, you committed the "crime" of TOTALLY changing what we were discussing because you are "guilty" of not being able to refute that humankind is MUCH older than you have deluded yourself into thinking it is and that is also true of human history and the absence of the written word prior to 5,000 years ago is IRRELEVANT.

And so is this post of yours to the ACTUAL topic at hand.

And in your quest to turn the entire world into Christians and godbots, so are YOU- IRRELEVANT.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#627367 May 29, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> If it took them all that time to invent writing then what can we say about homo sapiens. OK let us assume it took them say 50 Thousand years to paint pictures and another say 45 thou to come to writing things down. I think we can safely assume homo sapiens were underachievers at best. If they had the ability to paint such graphic pictures along with the use of paint which would last 30 thousand years then why could they not write anything down? Nothing worth writing down for 95 thousand years? Not an earthquake or volcanic eruption to report to later generations? It is just as easy to speculate they were not around as long as the moderns would have us believe. Keep in mind there is zero ancient precedent for any of modern assumptions.
Small changes in knowledge stack upon each other and have effects on logarithmic or polynomial orders of magnitude rather than on a linear scale. Underachievers or not, we are still seeing the same level of knowledge increase (logarithmic/polynomial) due to increased efficiency in communication.

In laymans terms, our ways of communicating started out slow, but once it took off, it REALLY took off.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Mar 11

Melbourne, Australia

#627368 May 29, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> If it took them all that time to invent writing then what can we say about homo sapiens. OK let us assume it took them say 50 Thousand years to paint pictures and another say 45 thou to come to writing things down. I think we can safely assume homo sapiens were underachievers at best. If they had the ability to paint such graphic pictures along with the use of paint which would last 30 thousand years then why could they not write anything down? Nothing worth writing down for 95 thousand years? Not an earthquake or volcanic eruption to report to later generations? It is just as easy to speculate they were not around as long as the moderns would have us believe. Keep in mind there is zero ancient precedent for any of modern assumptions.
You write as if you aren't a Homo sapiens.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#627369 May 29, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> If it took them all that time to invent writing then what can we say about homo sapiens. OK let us assume it took them say 50 Thousand years to paint pictures and another say 45 thou to come to writing things down. I think we can safely assume homo sapiens were underachievers at best. If they had the ability to paint such graphic pictures along with the use of paint which would last 30 thousand years then why could they not write anything down? Nothing worth writing down for 95 thousand years? Not an earthquake or volcanic eruption to report to later generations? It is just as easy to speculate they were not around as long as the moderns would have us believe. Keep in mind there is zero ancient precedent for any of modern assumptions.
Saidl brought up an excellent point- what do you think humans are?

We are HOMO SAPIENS!!

Underachievers?

Something not yet having been invented doesn't translate into people being underachievers.

Each era in history invents what is needed for that time in history.

In other words, necessity is the mother of invention.

Now back to educating you on what humans are:

"All people today are classified as Homo sapiens. Our species of humans first began to evolve nearly 200,000 years ago in association with technologies not unlike those of the early Neandertals. It is now clear that early Homo sapiens, or modern humans, did not come after the Neandertals but were their contemporaries. However, it is likely that both modern humans and Neandertals descended from Homo heidelbergensis."

http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo2/mod_homo_4.ht...

OCB

“What a GLORIOUS day!!!”

Since: Apr 12

Orlando but NYC born & raised

#627370 May 29, 2013
saidI wrote:
<quoted text>
You write as if you aren't a Homo sapiens.
I don't think lightbeam was aware that humans are homo sapiens.

I have to say that lightbeam seems to be hiding their light under a bushel- assuming the bulb is even working.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 11

London, UK

#627371 May 29, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> If it took them all that time to invent writing then what can we say about homo sapiens. OK let us assume it took them say 50 Thousand years to paint pictures and another say 45 thou to come to writing things down. I think we can safely assume homo sapiens were underachievers at best. If they had the ability to paint such graphic pictures along with the use of paint which would last 30 thousand years then why could they not write anything down? Nothing worth writing down for 95 thousand years? Not an earthquake or volcanic eruption to report to later generations? It is just as easy to speculate they were not around as long as the moderns would have us believe. Keep in mind there is zero ancient precedent for any of modern assumptions.
"homo sapiens were underachievers at best"

Funniest line EVER ON THIS THREAD from a pseudo intellectual, word-game playing fundie.

Semper Fi.

LMFAO

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Mar 11

Melbourne, Australia

#627372 May 29, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>I don't think lightbeam was aware that humans are homo sapiens.
I have to say that lightbeam seems to be hiding their light under a bushel- assuming the bulb is even working.
I'm amazed. The bulb has blown!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 13

Reseda, CA

#627373 May 29, 2013
Prove there isn't. Lol.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Bartholomew Oglethorpe

Haslet, TX

#627374 May 29, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> If it took them all that time to invent writing then what can we say about homo sapiens. OK let us assume it took them say 50 Thousand years to paint pictures and another say 45 thou to come to writing things down. I think we can safely assume homo sapiens were underachievers at best. If they had the ability to paint such graphic pictures along with the use of paint which would last 30 thousand years then why could they not write anything down? Nothing worth writing down for 95 thousand years? Not an earthquake or volcanic eruption to report to later generations? It is just as easy to speculate they were not around as long as the moderns would have us believe. Keep in mind there is zero ancient precedent for any of modern assumptions.
Meh. Your Semetic hippie didn't write anything down, either. I guess it wasn't very important.

Your ignorance is appalling.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#627375 May 29, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>Typical 24-7 BS.
"24/7"?!

This post of yours is two hours old.

Imagine that.
Bartholomew Oglethorpe

Haslet, TX

#627376 May 29, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually i have.
http://www.amightywind.com/abortionf/abortion...
No crime here? Legal abortion and its fruits.
Aw, now I'm hungry for lunch. Athiests love eating babies.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#627377 May 29, 2013
OCB wrote:
<quoted text>Right- for a post of only 4 words which took no time to think about nor did you have to spend any time making your thoughts coherent.
STOP already.
Go.
Stop and go?

Hurry up and wait.
Bartholomew Oglethorpe

Haslet, TX

#627378 May 29, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> If it took them all that time to invent writing then what can we say about homo sapiens. OK let us assume it took them say 50 Thousand years to paint pictures and another say 45 thou to come to writing things down. I think we can safely assume homo sapiens were underachievers at best. If they had the ability to paint such graphic pictures along with the use of paint which would last 30 thousand years then why could they not write anything down? Nothing worth writing down for 95 thousand years? Not an earthquake or volcanic eruption to report to later generations? It is just as easy to speculate they were not around as long as the moderns would have us believe. Keep in mind there is zero ancient precedent for any of modern assumptions.
An underachiever is an idiot who is still a godbot in 2013. An underachiever is one who enjoys the fruits of science while denigrating it. An underachiever is one who confirmation biases himself with the writings of known scam artists like convicted felon and guest if the state Ken Hovind, Ken Ham, and Matt Slick.

You ignorance of history is astounding.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 1 min Buck Crick 124,265
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 32 min Michael 682,145
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 37 min Pres Donald J Tru... 8,191
Being alone stinks so bad...that even God........ 1 hr Doctor REALITY 1
Gay Sex in Houston (Apr '15) 1 hr John j 18
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr onemale 286,505
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 hr lil whispers 619,479
More from around the web