Comments
594,841 - 594,860 of 732,995 Comments Last updated 5 min ago
Sharkey

Vallejo, CA

#626634 May 26, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I don't think that's their *issue*. I think it's more about "instant gratification". Men don't like waiting to "get to know" each other for sex and with homosexual *connections* the sex is immediate and many times, anonymous.
WRONG, as usual, NoBrains.

Gays and lesbians carry on loving relationships for years, while most hetero men want to just "hit'er and quit'er".
Sharkey

Vallejo, CA

#626635 May 26, 2013
End of Times wrote:
<quoted text>What the mentally confused Susan is saying is that her god is satan and he takes on the form of whatever she wishes. Why do you think some religions worship rats? Perhaps Susan's father looked like her mother and thus her confusion.
Thanks for the evidence that your mommy didn't love you.

The way you act, I wouldn't blame her.

Your mommy wishes she aborted you.

But perhaps she hated you so much that she let you come into this world to suffer from being a gay homophobe, and enjoys the torture you live with yourself every day, because killing you before you could be unleashed into this world would have been just the easy way out.

This is good - a case like you can be studied and analyzed, and treatments can be determined.
Sharkey

Vallejo, CA

#626636 May 26, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Believe it or not, men can also find women willing to have immediate sex. One does not become gay so that they can get off quicker.
True!- that was a stupid premise she had.
Sharkey

Vallejo, CA

#626637 May 26, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh...
Never thought of that.
Good point.
But now that you mentioned it, they'll probably start naming others...
So your god is a PERSON, then? A HUMAN?

Y'all keep talking about god as if "god" is a human male.

Does god have a penis?
Sharkey

Vallejo, CA

#626638 May 26, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Well at least you believe God is real.
That's a start...
....a start to your putting words in people's mouths, added to the lying and violence against babies.

WHEN did he ever say that he believed that god was real, and where are the photos of this god if it is so "real"?

If god was real he WOULD be able to put a photo in everyone's hand of himself, instantly, like NOWNOWNOWNOW.
Sharkey

Vallejo, CA

#626639 May 26, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
WOW,, that is flipping ridiculous as it gets!!! Unbelievable..
Aww, shut the hell up with all this phony-@ss "concern".

You only want them born just so you can get them to be cannon fodder in your war against the world that will lead to the self-extinction of the whole human race.

You are SICKO PRICKS wanting innocent babies to be caught up in this STUPID FIGHT OVER A BULLSH!T STORY. You want them born just to be killed - or be killers - for this "god".

Take all that fake "caring" and SHOVE IT BACK up your @SS!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#626640 May 26, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I don't think that's their *issue*. I think it's more about "instant gratification". Men don't like waiting to "get to know" each other for sex and with homosexual *connections* the sex is immediate and many times, anonymous.
And they want legal marriage. Go figure.
Sharkey

Vallejo, CA

#626641 May 26, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are sick and twisted person.
No, YOU are the sick and twisted one for believing in a story that is causing the human race to make itself extinct.

You are participating in the biggest mass murder-suicide in the history of the solar system...OVER BULLSH!T!

YOU ARE THE ONE THAT'S F*CKED IN THE HEAD, ARMAGEDDON-INSTIGATOR.
Sharkey

Vallejo, CA

#626642 May 26, 2013
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> And they want legal marriage. Go figure.
So do the hetoros that do it, and they're the ones you see getting married 3, 4, 5 times, as if marriage is a toy.

Heteros don't even respect marriage, so why all the phony outrage now?

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#626643 May 26, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Well at least you believe God is real.
That's a start...
What are you talking about? Why do you always do this childish nonsense? Do I tell you what your positions are?

“THE LORD IS MY SHEPHERD;”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#626644 May 26, 2013
Sharkey wrote:
<quoted text>No, YOU are the sick and twisted one for believing in a story that is causing the human race to make itself extinct.
You are participating in the biggest mass murder-suicide in the history of the solar system...OVER BULLSH!T!
YOU ARE THE ONE THAT'S F*CKED IN THE HEAD, ARMAGEDDON-INSTIGATOR.
If you dont like the US, and its obvious you dont.

I can only suggest to you, that you board a plan, or boat and go to a country thats more suitable for a wack job as yourself. Pack your nutty bars and go to greenland for pete's sake.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#626645 May 26, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
They ***LEARN*** how to manipulate you.
Have you hugged your kids lately?
6 month old babies do not learn how to manipulate anyone. Any "manipulation" on the part of your baby was simply you misunderstanding the situation and reading too far into it. As I said before, I would probably say that theory of mind is necessary for "true" manipulation - you can only use your behaviors to elicit certain responses from others if you understand that they have a mind (and all that a mind entails).

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#626646 May 26, 2013
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>6 month old babies do not learn how to manipulate anyone. Any "manipulation" on the part of your baby was simply you misunderstanding the situation and reading too far into it. As I said before, I would probably say that theory of mind is necessary for "true" manipulation - you can only use your behaviors to elicit certain responses from others if you understand that they have a mind (and all that a mind entails).

Oh I don't know timn17, mothers start training daughters very very early in manipulating men. hahahah

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#626647 May 26, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
You can call it cowering away, but the reason i stoped posting/debating with you, is for the simple fact you ASSUME MUCH and are dishonest, and it's pointless and boreing.
SHOW me one "post" that says EXACTLY word for word, that " Palsm23 said we could benefit from public execution"????
I will be waiting.
Here you are.
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
To stone someone it would have to be done in public, and this was part of the instructions. Since stoning was public, and carried out right away after the trial, it worked as a great """deterrent """".
Which is something i think this country needs today,( not stoning ) so dont get bent out of shape timmy, a swift and justice punishment/execution, instead of housing criminals for life...
Explain to me how this is not an endorsement of public execution. You say that the effectiveness of stoning as a deterrent was in the fact that it was carried out right after the trial, and that it was public. You then go on to state that this is "something [you] think this country needs today,( not stoning...) swift and justice (sic) punishment/execution, instead of housing criminals for life."

So, right after you endorse a swift and public execution as an effective deterrent, you claim that this is "something this country needs today;" and you do not rule out a public nor a swift execution, you only exclude stoning as a method of execution.

If you weren't suggesting that a swift, public execution was "something this country needs," then what you were claiming? You had just finished a rambling, unsupported anecdote about the difference between "execution israel" (low crime), and "non execution israel" (high crime); then you assert that israel achieved a low level of crime via public, swift stoning. You then say that this is something we need today, minus the stoning.

If you again deny that this is what you said, I'm going to be convinced that your mind is simply too far gone. I'm starting to believe that you are actually capable of convincing yourself of something that is blatantly untrue, which actually is not too surprising considering your religious beliefs and your anti science nuttery.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#626648 May 26, 2013
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>I actually had written a book, Sharkey and in the bible it is called the "flying roll", Zechariah 5. It was a five year diary but was not complete. It was missing the first years and the later years. It said things like, "noticias de manana" and "I set the toilets on fire". It was also probably encoded because at least 30% of the words were misspelled, even simple words, and I'm actually a very good speller. But we won't know til the resurrection, because it went up in smoke.
You are awesome. Amazing.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#626649 May 26, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I don't think that's their *issue*. I think it's more about "instant gratification". Men don't like waiting to "get to know" each other for sex and with homosexual *connections* the sex is immediate and many times, anonymous.
You would know, sir.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#626650 May 26, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is an interesting link.
http://prolifephysicians.org/lifebegins.htm
When Does Human Life Begin?
There is a tremendous consensus in the scientific community about when life begins. This is hardly controversial. If the claim were made that life was discovered on another planet, for example, there are well-defined criteria to which we could refer to conclusively determine whether the claim was accurate. How do scientists distinguish between life and non-life?
A scientific textbook called "Basics of Biology" gives five characteristics of living things; these five criteria are found in all modern elementary scientific textbooks:
1. Living things are highly organized.
2. All living things have an ability to acquire materials and energy.
3. All living things have an ability to respond to their environment.
4. All living things have an ability to reproduce.
5. All living things have an ability to adapt.
According to this elementary definition of life, life begins at fertilization, when a sperm unites with an oocyte. From this moment, the being is highly organized, has the ability to acquire materials and energy, has the ability to respond to his or her environment, has the ability to adapt, and has the ability to reproduce (the cells divide, then divide again, etc., and barring pathology and pending reproductive maturity has the potential to reproduce other members of the species). Non-living things do not do these things. Even before the mother is aware that she is pregnant, a distinct, unique life has begun his or her existence inside her.
Furthermore, that life is unquestionably human. A human being is a member of the species homo sapiens. Human beings are products of conception, which is when a human male sperm unites with a human female oocyte (egg). When humans procreate, they don't make non-humans like slugs, monkeys, cactuses, bacteria, or any such thing. Emperically-verifiable proof is as close as your nearest abortion clinic: send a sample of an aborted fetus to a laboratory and have them test the DNA to see if its human or not. Genetically, a new human being comes into existence from the earliest moment of conception.
"I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly, I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy." Hippocrates, 400 B.C., Greece
It is necessary to distinguish between life and sentience in this situation. The rights and preferences of the living, sentient mother take precedence over the living fetus.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#626651 May 26, 2013
It is necessary to distinguish between life and sentience in this situation. The rights and preferences of the living, sentient mother take precedence over the living, and *not sentient* fetus.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#626652 May 26, 2013
psalms 23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Excactly!!
They are scripture for these types of people, specific scripture that describes them to a T.
Scriptures that exist so that believers can explain to themselves why some people just won't believe the same things they do.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#626653 May 26, 2013
Sharkey wrote:
<quoted text>True!- that was a stupid premise she had.
Sure was.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
3 Word Game (Feb '12) 2 min repeat offender 4,154
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 min seriously the ori... 538,967
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 5 min lil whispers 599,918
4 word game (use same Letter) (Mar '13) 6 min Hannah V 1,007
Last Word + 2 7 min andet1987 510
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 12 min andet1987 4,337
What Your Church Won't Tell You by Dave and Gar... (Apr '10) 12 min Holy Pure Dr Shrink 33,001
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr Dr_Zorderz 257,997
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 2 hr Patrick 226,341
Sims 4 Key Generator (Oct '13) 3 hr Figaro 105
•••
Enter and win $5000

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••